Florida Statute 61.530 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Chapter 61
DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE; SUPPORT; TIME-SHARING

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 61.530

61.530 Simultaneous proceedings.—If a proceeding for enforcement under ss. 61.524-61.540 is commenced in a court of this state and the court determines that a proceeding to modify the determination is pending in a court of another state having jurisdiction to modify the determination under ss. 61.514-61.523, the enforcing court shall immediately communicate with the modifying court. The proceeding for enforcement continues unless the enforcing court, after consultation with the modifying court, stays or dismisses the proceeding.

History.—s. 5, ch. 2002-65.

F.S. 61.530 on Google Scholar

F.S. 61.530 on Casetext

Amendments to 61.530

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 61.530

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 61.530.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 61.530

Total Results: 5

London v. London

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2009-10-16

Citation: 32 So. 3d 107, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15614, 2009 WL 3320189

Snippet: of section 61.530." Staats v. McKinnon, 924 So.2d 82, 84 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006). Section 61.530 provides that

Staats v. McKinnon

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-02-27

Citation: 924 So. 2d 82, 2006 WL 452824

Snippet: enforcement provisions of the act, sections 61.519 and 61.530, Florida Statutes, in concluding that it retained

Giventer v. Giventer

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2003-12-31

Citation: 863 So. 2d 438, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 19740, 2003 WL 23095388

Snippet: you first.”) The clear requirement of section 61.530 is that the enforcing court (Florida) “shall immediately

Monday v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2001-09-06

Citation: 792 So. 2d 1278, 2001 WL 1013594

Snippet: consistent statements); State v. Pollitt, 205 Conn. 61, 530 A.2d 155 (1987)(holding that a prior consistent

Clark v. Gray

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1962-07-17

Citation: 143 So. 2d 504, 1962 Fla. App. LEXIS 3052

Snippet: PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See: Crosby v. Stubblebine, Fla.App.1962, 142 So.2d 358. PEARSON, TILLMAN, C. J., dissents.