Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 61.705 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 61.705 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 61.705

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
Chapter 61
DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE; SUPPORT; TIME-SHARING
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 61.705
61.705 Remedies for noncompliance.—In addition to other remedies authorized by general law, if a court finds that a party to a proceeding acts in bad faith or intentionally fails to comply with this part or a court order issued under this part, the court may assess any remedies under this chapter against the party, and order other appropriate relief under general law.
History.—s. 1, ch. 2018-69.

F.S. 61.705 on Google Scholar

F.S. 61.705 on Casetext

Amendments to 61.705


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 61.705
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 61.705.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 61.705

Total Results: 3

Sonya Witt-Bahls v. Dennis Bahls

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-04-20

Citation: 193 So. 3d 35, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 6000

Snippet: forms of marital assets, or both.” Id, § 61.705(6)(a)l.b. The enhanced value of stock from

Sonya Witt-Bahls v. Dennis Bahls

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-02-03

Snippet: other forms of marital assets, or both.” Id. § 61.705(6)(a)1.b. The enhanced value of stock from

Martin v. Clum

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1962-06-05

Citation: 142 So. 2d 149, 1962 Fla. App. LEXIS 3322

Snippet: HORTON, Judge. Appellant-plaintiff seeks review of a final order dismissing with prejudice his second amended complaint in a negligence action. *150Plaintiff, a guest passenger, was injured when an automobile owned by defendant Clum and driven by defendant Fahrenkopf collided with the rear end of a vehicle stopped at an intersection stop light. He brought this action seeking to recover damages. Plaintiff’s second amended complaint was dismissed on the ground it failed to state a cause of action