Cases from cite.case.law:

PRO- ART DENTAL LAB, INC. v. V- STRATEGIC GROUP, LLC,, 986 So. 2d 1244 (Fla. 2008)

. . . defective because it did not specifically describe the property at issue as required under section 66.031 . . . and failed to comply with the mandatory requirements for ejectment provided in sections 66.021 and 66.031 . . .

COHEN, v. G. GINSBERG, N., 715 So. 2d 1113 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . See § 66.031, Fla. Stat. (1997). Cohen timely appealed the judgment. . . .

BROWN, v. DAVIS, B. U. S., 493 So. 2d 523 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . , Davis may perfect a claim for betterment in the ejectment action under the provisions of sections 66.031 . . .

TOOMBS, v. GIL, 353 So. 2d 934 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . Section 66.031, Florida Statutes (1975); Lungren v. Brownlie, 22 Fla. 491 (1884); Gibbs v. . . .