Syfert Injury Law Firm

Zoltan Barati v. State of Florida, Motorola, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-02-22

Citation: 198 So. 3d 69

Snippet: pursuant to the Florida False Claims Act, section 68.081' et seq., Florida Statutes The

State of Florida v. Zoltan Barati and Motorola, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-10-06

Citation: 150 So. 3d 810

Snippet: pursuant to the Florida False Claims Act, section 68.081 et seq., Florida Statutes. Bara-ti alleged that

Stevens v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-11-20

Citation: 127 So. 3d 668, 2013 WL 6097312, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 18520

Snippet: , and Ch. 2002-218, § 37, Laws of Fla., with § 68.081, Fla. Stat. (2011), and Ch. 94-316, § 1, Laws of

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 2011-06-16

Snippet: municipality. The Florida False Claims Act, sections 68.081-68.09, Florida Statutes, authorizes civil actions

DHL Express (USA), Inc. v. State ex rel. Grupp

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-03-10

Citation: 60 So. 3d 426, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 3206

Snippet: question under the Florida False Claims Act, sections 68.081 through 68.09, Florida Statutes. They contend DHL

Myers v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-01-29

Citation: 866 So. 2d 103, 2004 WL 221274

Snippet: BARFIELD and POLSTON, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] Sections 68.081-68.09, Fla. Stat. (2002). [2] Specifically, section

Cade v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1995-06-02

Citation: 658 So. 2d 550, 1995 WL 326107

Snippet: impressive to a jury, Ake v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68, 81 n. 7, 105 S.Ct. 1087, 1095 n. 7, 84 L.Ed.2d 53

Boynton v. Burglass

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1991-12-24

Citation: 590 So. 2d 446, 1991 WL 188025

Snippet: future dangerousness." Ake v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68, 81, 105 S.Ct. 1087, 1095, 84 L.Ed.2d *450 53, 64-65

Burton v. Burton

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1968-10-15

Citation: 214 So. 2d 648

Snippet: PER CURIAM. The appellant sought to have the lower court modify a final decree of divorce under which he was to pay $20 per week alimony. He claimed that the alimony payments should be cancelled. The lower court entered a post-decretal order denying the requested relief. A review of the record and briefs indicates that the appellant failed to show a substantial change of circumstances or show that his financial ability had changed sufficiently to warrant the cancellation of alimony entirely. Appellant’s

Beaty v. Beaty

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1968-09-06

Citation: 213 So. 2d 765, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 6218

Snippet: Appeal dismissed.

Pembroke Pembroke v. Peninsular Terminal Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1933-01-16

Citation: 146 So. 249, 108 Fla. 46

Snippet: Everglades Sugar Land Co. v. Bryan, 81 Fla. 75, 87 So.2d 68, 81; Hardee v. Horton, 90 Fla. 452, 108 So.2d 189.