Florida Statute 68.095 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Chapter 68
MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 68.095

68.095 Legislative intent.—It is the intent of the Legislature to establish an administrative framework whereby public funds may be used in an effective and efficient manner to enhance the availability of civil legal assistance to the poor in this state. The Legislature finds that the lack of adequate and equitable legal services available to the indigent population, particularly the children and elderly of this state, unnecessarily burdens existing social and human services programs. It is the purpose of this act to promote the availability of civil legal assistance to the poor and improve access to justice by establishing a streamlined method to utilize available state funds in furtherance of this goal.

History.—s. 2, ch. 2002-288.

F.S. 68.095 on Google Scholar

F.S. 68.095 on Casetext

Amendments to 68.095

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 68.095

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 68.095.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 68.095

Total Results: 4

Morrison v. Homewise Preferred Insurance Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-02-10

Citation: 209 So. 3d 682, 2017 WL 543427, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 1648

Snippet: 2d 1262, 1265 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990) (citing §§ 631.68, 95.11(5)(d), Fla. Stat. (1983)). If a first-party

Florida Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Jones

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2003-05-06

Citation: 847 So. 2d 1020, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 6538

Snippet: and immunity to FIGA. See §§ 631.57, 631.66, 631.68, 95.11(5)(d), Fla. Stat. (1995). FIGA’s immunity statute

Addison v. Benedict

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1969-07-03

Citation: 225 So. 2d 335, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5409

Snippet: PIERCE, Judge. This is an appeal by the plaintiffs below, Hazel Addison and Henry Futch, from a final judgment rendered by the Lee County Circuit Court in favor of the defendant Elena Duke Benedict, and the other defendants who claim as successors in interest of Harold M. Bixby, deceased, (hereinafter referred as the Bixbys), in a suit to quiet title. Addison and Futch filed their amended complaint in which they alleged that they are the owners of: The North 150 feet of the South one-half of Gov’t

Hamilton v. Hamilton

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1968-07-16

Citation: 212 So. 2d 881, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5375

Snippet: PER CURIAM. This is an interlocutory appeal by the former wife of the appellee from an order reducing support for the minor child of the parties. The original allowance was made in the final decree of divorce pursuant to a written separation and property settlement agreement awarding the wife $500.00 per month permanent support and alimony, with the further provision that, in the event she should remarry, the $500.00 per month allowance would be paid to her for the support and education of their