The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Chapter 68
MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 68.10

68.10 Eligible activities.—Funds received or allocated pursuant to this act may be used to secure the legal rights of eligible clients relating to family law, juvenile law, entitlements to federal government benefits, protection from domestic violence, elder and child abuse, and immigration by providing legal assistance and education regarding legal rights and duties under the law.

History.—s. 7, ch. 2002-288.

F.S. 68.10 on Google Scholar

F.S. 68.10 on Casetext

Amendments to 68.10

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 68.10

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 68.10.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

HOCHSTETLER As a v. UNITED STATES,, 126 Fed. Cl. 64 (Fed. Cl. 2016)

. . . Northern Pacific”), acquired a segment of the rail corridor in Cass County, North Dakota between milepost 68.10 . . .

ALABAMA LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS, v. ALABAMA, v., 989 F. Supp. 2d 1227 (M.D. Ala. 2013)

. . . that the final plan increased the black voting-age population in her district from 61.55 percent to 68.10 . . .

UNITED STATES v. TRANSOCEAN DEEPWATER DRILLING INC., 936 F. Supp. 2d 818 (S.D. Tex. 2013)

. . . Transocean cites the following rules: § 68.10 Applicability. . . . See 40 C.F.R. § 68.10(a) (“Applicability. . . . See 40 C.F.R. § 68.10. . . . See id., § 68.10(f). . . . See 40 C.F.R. § 68.10. . . .

UNITED STATES v. HIBBS,, 905 F. Supp. 2d 862 (C.D. Ill. 2012)

. . . evidence log indicates that the officers found several items of evidence including a bag containing 68.10 . . . evidence log indicates that the officers found several items of evidence including a bag containing 68.10 . . .

BROWN, v. THALER,, 455 F. App'x 401 (5th Cir. 2011)

. . . P. 68.10. . . . .

MILESTONE, v. CITY OF MONROE, WISCONSIN,, 665 F.3d 774 (7th Cir. 2011)

. . . . § 68.10(l)(a). . . .

BIG LOTS STORES, INC. v. JAREDCO, INC. d. b. a. Co., 182 F. Supp. 2d 644 (S.D. Ohio 2002)

. . . affidavit that Goldman representative Mark Stevens told her that she owed $193.10 for her original $68.10 . . .

NEWFOUND MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, GENERAL PARTNER OF NEWFOUND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, v. A. SEWER,, 34 F. Supp. 2d 305 (D.V.I. 1999)

. . . had invited Sewer “at one point to come in and discuss boundary lines_” Hearings on Motions, Tr. 68.8-68.10 . . .

PERKINS, v. U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS,, 138 F.3d 336 (8th Cir. 1998)

. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 68.10 (3d ed.1997). . . .

In L. MOREIRA, L. MOREIRA, v. DIGITAL EMPLOYEES FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, W., 173 B.R. 965 (Bankr. D. Mass. 1994)

. . . deposit account against loan debt allowed even though loan was unmatured); 4 Collier on Bankruptcy § 68.10 . . . King, eds., 14th ed. 1978). . 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 68.10 [2] (James Wm. Moore, Lawrence P. . . .

COFFEY, v. FOAMEX L. P., 2 F.3d 157 (6th Cir. 1993)

. . . .) § 68.10). . . .

STAMP, v. INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA,, 116 B.R. 1375 (7th Cir. 1990)

. . . See 4 Collier on Bankruptcy II 68.10[2] (L. . . .

STAMP, v. INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA,, 908 F.2d 1375 (7th Cir. 1990)

. . . See 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 68.10[2] (L. . . .

In L. EGGEMEYER, L. EGGEMEYER, v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,, 75 B.R. 20 (Bankr. S.D. Ill. 1987)

. . . In re Lawrence, 19 B.R. 627 (Bankr.E.D.Ark.1981), citing, 4 Collier on Bankruptcy § 68.10[2] (14th ed . . .

O CONNOR, v. INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA,, 622 F. Supp. 611 (N.D. Ill. 1985)

. . . This is because the element of mutuality of obligation is lacking. 4 Collier On Bankruptcy ¶ 68.10[1] . . . due, or where a definite liability has accrued but is as yet unliquidated.” 4 Collier On Bankruptcy ¶ 68.10 . . .

K. SHEARER, J. L. v. HOMESTAKE MINING COMPANY,, 727 F.2d 707 (8th Cir. 1984)

. . . Larson, The Law of Workmen’s Compensation §§ 68.10, .13 (1976). . See Shearer v. . . .

In WALLER, R. STONITSCH, v. M. WALLER,, 28 B.R. 850 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 1983)

. . . This is because the element of mutuality of obligation is lacking.” 4 Collier on Bankruptcy para. 68.10 . . .

Re K. SHEARER, J. L. v. HOMESTAKE MINING COMPANY, 557 F. Supp. 549 (D.S.D. 1983)

. . . See, Larson, The Law of Workmen’s Compensation, Vol. 2A, §§ 68.10 and 68.13 (1976); Annotation, 96 A.L.R . . .

N. BARBIAN L. v. PANAGIS, 694 F.2d 476 (7th Cir. 1982)

. . . without a hearing, that the plaintiffs were entitled to a hearing under Wisconsin law, see Wis.Stat. 68.10 . . . Stats. §§ 68.10, 68.11 entitled them to a formal hearing. . . .

Re LAWRENCE, LAWRENCE, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,, 19 B.R. 627 (Bankr. E.D. Ark. 1981)

. . . the time of the filing of the petition even though not due or liquidated. 4 Collier on Bankruptcy, § 68.10 . . .

In AMERICAN MOTOR HOME RENTALS, INC. H. THOMPSON, Jr. v. CITICORP PERSON TO PERSON FINANCIAL CENTER, INC., 10 B.R. 53 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 1981)

. . . the date of bankruptcy cannot be made the subject of a valid setoff. 4 Collier on Bankruptcy para. 68.10 . . .

PETRUSKA, R. v. JOHNS- MANVILLE, 83 F.R.D. 39 (E.D. Pa. 1979)

. . . See also 2A Larson, The Law of Workmen’s Compensation, § 68.10. . . .

BAKER TRUSTEES IN REORGANIZATION v. GOLD SEAL LIQUORS, INC., 417 U.S. 467 (U.S. 1974)

. . . Collier, Bankruptcy ¶ 68.10 [2], pp. 898-900, n. 17 (1971). . . .

MUTUAL TRUST LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. S. WEMYSS, 309 F. Supp. 1221 (D. Me. 1970)

. . . Barnett National Bank of Jacksonville, 250 F. 983, 984 (5th Cir. 1918); 4 Collier ¶ 68.10 [1]. Cf. . . .

T. L. v., 36 T.C. 939 (T.C. 1961)

. . . of George and Jessie over the fiscal years 1947 through 1951 in the respective amounts of $211.34, $68.10 . . .

In A. M. TOWNSON CO., 283 F.2d 449 (3d Cir. 1960)

. . . As succinctly stated in 4 Collier on Bankruptcy, para. 68.10, page 743 (14th ed. 1942): “Generally speaking . . .

UNITED STATES v. R. BRUNNER, In L. BROWN E., 282 F.2d 535 (10th Cir. 1960)

. . . Vol. 4, § 68.10 points out that “The right of set-off may be asserted in the bankruptcy proceedings even . . .

MERRITT- CHAPMAN SCOTT CORPORATION, v. CORNELL STEAMSHIP COMPANY, THE LION,, 265 F.2d 537 (2d Cir. 1959)

. . . R., 68.10-5 & 68.10-25) required such lights- to be visible “against the background lighting for a distance . . .

MAGNOLIA PETROLEUM COMPANY, v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, OHIO OIL COMPANY, v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, SUPERIOR OIL COMPANY, v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, WEST, v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION,, 236 F.2d 785 (5th Cir. 1956)

. . . G-68.10, G-6811, G-2591 and G-2950. . . . .

In VICKSBURG BRIDGE TERMINAL CO., 29 F. Supp. 225 (S.D. Miss. 1938)

. . . charge of 12% cents apiece for issuing ■ checks is” excessive, and that 5 cents each for the 1362, or $68.10 . . .