Florida Statute 73.041 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Chapter 73
EMINENT DOMAIN

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 73.041

73.041 Acquiring or perfecting title after appropriation.—In any instance, where the petitioner has not acquired the title to or a necessary interest in any lands which it is using, or if at any time after an attempt to acquire such title or interest, it is found to be defective, the petitioner may proceed under this chapter to acquire or perfect such title or interest; provided, however, that the compensation to be allowed the defendants shall be determined as of the date of appropriation.

History.—s. 1, ch. 65-369.

F.S. 73.041 on Google Scholar

F.S. 73.041 on Casetext

Amendments to 73.041

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 73.041

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 73.041.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 73.041

Total Results: 8

Basic Energy Corp. v. Dept. of Corrections

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1998-03-11

Citation: 709 So. 2d 124, 1998 WL 101695

Snippet: meaning of the word "appropriation" in section 73.041, Florida Statutes. In March 1994 the City of Jasper

Crigger v. Florida Power Corp.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-05-30

Citation: 469 So. 2d 941, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1343, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14320

Snippet: situation here is like that contemplated by Section 73.041, which provides for the acquisition or perfection

Dade County v. American Hospital of Miami, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1984-04-03

Citation: 463 So. 2d 232, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 520, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12565

Snippet: particular, at all. See 1973 Op.Att’y Gen. Fla. 073-41 (November 26, 1973).2 And section 155.03 in any

County of Volusia v. Pickens

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-09-22

Citation: 439 So. 2d 276

Snippet: 1973). [2] Art. X, § 6(a), Fla. Const. [3] See §§ 73.041 and 73.071(2), Fla. Stat. (1981). [4] Counsel

RESNICK DEVELOPERS SOUTH v. Clerici

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1976-12-10

Citation: 340 So. 2d 1194

Snippet: the owner's property for an unpaid balance of $36,073.41. Thereafter the owner caused the subcontractor's

McGhee v. City of Frostproof

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1974-01-18

Citation: 289 So. 2d 751, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 8125

Snippet: McNULTY, Judge. This appeal is before us in a peculiar posture. Appellant McGhee was charged with an offense in the Frostproof City Court. He sought by motion in that court to disqualify the presiding city judge for the reason that the judge was also the city *752attorney.1 The city judge denied the motion and appellant sought certiorari in the circuit court. Before any appearance by the city, the circuit judge sua sponte dismissed the petition for certiorari stating that: “ . . . Certiorari is

Walker v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1973-09-28

Citation: 283 So. 2d 414, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 9078

Snippet: Appeal from Circuit Court, Martin County; C. Pfeiffer Trowbridge, Judge. Appeal dismissed.

Laird v. City of Miami

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1973-04-24

Citation: 277 So. 2d 46, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6696

Snippet: PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Arnold v. Shumpert, Fla. 1968, 217 So.2d 116, and 8 Fla.Jur. Courts § 222 (1956) and Mullen v. Mullen, Fla. App.1960, 122 So.2d 488.