Cases from cite.case.law:

FLORIDA BANKERS ASSOCIATION, v. FLORIDA DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION, v., 176 So. 3d 1258 (Fla. 2015)

. . . Section 75.02, Florida Statutes, expressly states that the plaintiff in a bond validation proceeding . . .

P. DONOVAN, v. OKALOOSA COUNTY,, 82 So. 3d 801 (Fla. 2012)

. . . .” § 75.02, Fla. Stat. . . .

In J. HENNEY, v., 451 B.R. 724 (W.D. Mich. 2011)

. . . Moreover, significantly, Michigan has a Model Civil Jury Instruction on “Intoxication”, Nos. 75.02, and . . . Rather, the state trial court gave only the Model Civil Jury Instructions 75.01, 75.02 and 75.11, which . . . which the Michigan Legislature provided in an actual statute, in favor of a standard jury instruction (75.02 . . . Henney’s intoxication was inappropriate, would not change if the court used Michigan Jury Instruction 75.02 . . .

ABBOTT LABORATORIES LLC, v. LUPIN LIMITED, 753 F. Supp. 2d 382 (D. Del. 2010)

. . . The '967 patent is found at D.I. 62, JA000050-75.02. .The '691 patent is found at D.I. 62, JA000076-102 . . .

UMG RECORDINGS, INC. v. LINDOR,, 531 F. Supp. 2d 453 (E.D.N.Y. 2007)

. . . See 4 Julian O. von Kalinowski et al., Antitrust Laws and Trade Regulation § 75.02 (2d ed.2007). . . .

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, v. LA WEIGHT LOSS,, 509 F. Supp. 2d 527 (D. Md. 2007)

. . . Larson, Employment Discrimination § 75.02[2] (Lexis 2d ed.1997) (concurring with the Ninth Circuit’s . . .

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, v. DIAL CORPORATION,, 156 F. Supp. 2d 926 (N.D. Ill. 2001)

. . . Larson & Arthur Larson, Employment Discrimination § 75.02[2] (2d ed.1997)); see also supra note 12 and . . .

KEYS CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBLE GOVERNMENT, INC. v. FLORIDA KEYS AQUEDUCT AUTHORITY,, 795 So. 2d 940 (Fla. 2001)

. . . Section 75.02, Florida Statutes (2000), provides that the party seeking bond validation can file a complaint . . .

CITY OF OLDSMAR, v. STATE, 790 So. 2d 1042 (Fla. 2001)

. . . Section 75.02, Florida Statutes (2000), entitled “Plaintiff,” lists who may bring the cause of action . . . The City contends that a change to the language of section 75.02 indicates that validation proceedings . . . the 1927 version of section 5106, Compiled General Laws, which was the predecessor statute to section 75.02 . . . The City contends that this change reflects the fact that the current version of section 75.02 contemplates . . . Although the current statutory language of section 75.02 may not be as explicit as its predecessor with . . .

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, v. MITSUBISHI MOTOR MANUFACTURING OF AMERICA, INC. f k a, 990 F. Supp. 1059 (C.D. Ill. 1998)

. . . Larson & Arthur Larson, Employment Discrimination § 75.02[2] (2d ed.1997) (more than one unlawful act . . .

STATE v. INLAND PROTECTION FINANCING CORPORATION, a, 699 So. 2d 1352 (Fla. 1997)

. . . for the Second Judicial Circuit challenged the sufficiency of the complaint as violative of section 75.02 . . . STANDING Regarding the State Attorney’s standing argument, section 75.02, Florida Statutes (1995), provides . . .

STATE v. FLORIDA HURRICANE CATASTROPHE FUND FINANCE CORPORATION,, 699 So. 2d 685 (Fla. 1997)

. . . Corporation was properly created by section 215.555; (3) the Corporation lacks standing under section 75.02 . . .

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, v. HARVEY L. WALNER ASSOCIATES L., 91 F.3d 963 (7th Cir. 1996)

. . . LARSON & ARTHUR LARSON, EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION § 75.02 (2d ed.1996). . . .

J. PENN, v. FLORIDA DEFENSE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING SERVICE CENTER AUTHORITY,, 623 So. 2d 459 (Fla. 1993)

. . . Compare § 75.02, Fla.Stat. (1991) with § 163.01(13), Fla.Stat. (1991); see art. V, § 5(b), Fla. . . .

FLEXI- VAN LEASING, INC. v. PHAROS LINES, S. A., 808 F. Supp. 255 (S.D.N.Y. 1992)

. . . Date Amount # of Days Interest G94A051 12-Apr-89 490.00 1,202 242.05 G95A025 25-May-89 157.50 1,159 75.02 . . .

UNITED STATES v. ROJAS,, 801 F. Supp. 644 (S.D. Fla. 1992)

. . . identified herself as the M/V “Harbour”, a Panamanian vessel, near Latitude 19.01 North, Longitude 75.02 . . .

PEOPLE AGAINST TAX REVENUE MISMANAGEMENT, INC. v. COUNTY OF LEON,, 583 So. 2d 1373 (Fla. 1991)

. . . . §§ 75.02, 100.321, Fla. Stat. (1989). . . . Under section 75.02, the county (as a plaintiff) has express standing to litigate “its authority to incur . . . of all proceedings in connection therewith, including assessment of taxes levied or to be levied.” § 75.02 . . .

In CLASSIC DRYWALL, INC. a k a J. MORRIS, v. KANSAS DRYWALL SUPPLY COMPANY, INC., 121 B.R. 69 (D. Kan. 1990)

. . . /88 04/11/88 668.76 4628 6913 01/25/88 02/20/88 04/11/88 63.09 4628 6943 01/29/88 03/25/88 04/11/88 75.02 . . .

STATE v. SCHOOL BOARD OF SARASOTA COUNTY, STATE v. SCHOOL BOARD OF COLLIER COUNTY, STATE v. FLORIDA SCHOOL BOARDS ASSOCIATION, INC., 561 So. 2d 549 (Fla. 1990)

. . . Section 75.02 provides that a political subdivision of the state may determine its authority to incur . . . We accordingly find that the boards are proper plaintiffs within the meaning of section 75.02. . . . Section 75.02, Florida Statutes (1989), provides: Plaintiff. — Any county, municipality, taxing district . . .

WILLIAMS v. CITY OF DALLAS,, 734 F. Supp. 1317 (N.D. Tex. 1990)

. . . (Diane Ragsdale, who was unopposed), and District 8 (A1 Lipscomb won over two black opponents with 75.02% . . .

A. SAVERING, v. UNITED STATES, 18 Cl. Ct. 704 (Cl. Ct. 1989)

. . . 84 5.0 16.67 83.35 3/8/84 2.5 41.68 4/12/84 2.5 41.68 5/6/84 2.5 41.68 5/29/84 2.5 41.68 8/30/84 4.5 75.02 . . .

In E. GIRDAUKAS,, 92 B.R. 373 (Bankr. E.D. Wis. 1988)

. . . Norton Bankruptcy Law and Practice, § 75.02, Part 75—Page 6, states: There is a split of authority on . . .

BROWARD COUNTY, STATE, 515 So. 2d 1273 (Fla. 1987)

. . . . §§ 75.01, 75.02, 75.04, 75.05. . . .

RINKER MATERIALS CORPORATION, a v. TOWN OF LAKE PARK, a, 494 So. 2d 1123 (Fla. 1986)

. . . The Council then filed this action pursuant to section 75.02, Florida Statutes (1985), to have the bonds . . .

O. ADAMS, v. M. HECKLER,, 794 F.2d 303 (7th Cir. 1986)

. . . Civ.P. 75(c) and generally 7-Pt. 2 Moore’s II 75.02. . . . .

A. M. SEAMON v. UPHAM,, 536 F. Supp. 931 (E.D. Tex. 1982)

. . . 320.01; and that part of Dallas County included in census tracts 2.01, 71.01, 73.01, 73.02, 74, 75.01, 75.02 . . .

Dr. GLATSTEIN, v. CITY OF MIAMI, a a, 399 So. 2d 1005 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . In construing Sections 75.02, 75.-07, and 75.09, Florida Statutes (1979), concerning bond validation, . . .

GILBERT, v. SOWDERS,, 646 F.2d 1146 (6th Cir. 1981)

. . . be provided in lieu of the original. (2) The transcript or parts thereof filed as provided in Rule 75.02 . . .

STATE v. MIAMI BEACH REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY,, 392 So. 2d 875 (Fla. 1980)

. . . Section 75.02 provides for the filing of a complaint to determine authority to incur bonded debt by “ . . .

GREENE, v. SINCLAIR, St. St. St. St. St. a, 491 F. Supp. 19 (W.D. Mich. 1980)

. . . (f) Dance hall. 75.02 Necessity for License to Hawk, Vend or Peddle. . . .

C. BRUNS, v. P. ARCHER, C. C., 352 So. 2d 121 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . Appellant became a defendant in this proceeding pursuant to Section 75.02, Florida Statutes (1975) since . . .

F. NOHRR, v. BREVARD COUNTY EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES AUTHORITY,, 247 So. 2d 304 (Fla. 1971)

. . . . § 75.02, F. S.A., so as to be authorized to bring validation proceedings. . . . . § 75.02, F.S.A., provides that, “Any county, municipality, taxing district or other political district . . . Fla.Stat. § 75.02, F.S.A., was amended in 1949 to include state agencies, commissions and departments . . .

FAIR, M. S. v. FAIR, 317 F. Supp. 859 (M.D. Fla. 1970)

. . . Sections 75.02 and 75.03 of the Florida Statutes, F.S.A., provide that any county, municipality, taxing . . .

BADGER PIPE LINE COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES, 185 Ct. Cl. 547 (Ct. Cl. 1968)

. . . .- Rockford, Illinois_ 21,563 6,383 16,170 75.02 607 Rockford, Illinois - _ Madison, Wisconsin. 18,363 . . .

S. HOLLOWAY, v. CURCIE BROTHERS, INC., 203 So. 2d 499 (Fla. 1967)

. . . responsibility for compensation for temporary total disability based on the average weekly wage of $75.02 . . .

STATE v. CITY OF MIAMI,, 103 So. 2d 185 (Fla. 1958)

. . . Section 75.02 expressly provides that “Any * * * municipality * * * 0f this state * * * may, if deemed . . .

STATE v. INTER- AMERICAN CENTER AUTHORITY, a, 84 So. 2d 9 (Fla. 1955)

. . . validation statute, Chapter 75, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., and since that decision it appears that Sec. 75.02 . . .

NORTH SHORE BANK v. TOWN OF SURFSIDE BOEHRER v. TOWN OF SURFSIDE, 72 So. 2d 659 (Fla. 1954)

. . . Section 75.02, Florida Statutes 1953, F.S.A. . . .

v. Co., 18 C.C.P.A. 460 (C.C.P.A. 1931)

. . . W. quality; cotton 24.98; rubber 75.02”; “2 rolls 24 yards — 48 yards 44 x 3 ply blkt. reg.; finish.” . . .

CATLETT v. COLUMBIAN INS. CO., 5 F. Cas. 287 (C.C.D.C. 1827)

. . . proceeds of the cargo, paid over by Thompson and Creed to Captain McKnight, at Cape Hay-tien, namely, $75.02 . . .

C. J. v. Co., 3 D.C. 192 (C.C.D.C. 1827)

. . . proceeds of the cargo, paid over by Thompson and Creed to Captain McKnight, at Cape Haytien, namely, $75.02 . . . coffee .... $3,517.40 Thirty doubloons.$480.00 Amount overpaid, by Thompson and Creed, on the ship.75.02 . . . To net proceeds of 220 bags coffee . . . $3,517.40 “ amount overpaid on ship.75.02 “ balance paid T. . . .