Cases from cite.case.law:

FLORIDA BANKERS ASSOCIATION, v. FLORIDA DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION, v., 176 So. 3d 1258 (Fla. 2015)

. . . Complaint An order to show cause was issued by the circuit court and published as required by section 75.06 . . .

THOMAS, v. CLEAN ENERGY COASTAL CORRIDOR,, 176 So. 3d 249 (Fla. 2015)

. . . See § 75.06, Fla. Stat. . . .

R. REYNOLDS, v. LEON COUNTY ENERGY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT,, 176 So. 3d 254 (Fla. 2015)

. . . status of “parties defendant to the action” resulting from, the publication of notice under section 75.06 . . .

Dr. L. STRAND, v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY,, 992 So. 2d 150 (Fla. 2008)

. . . Section 75.06, Florida Statutes (2006), provides that notice of a bond validation hearing shall be effectuated . . .

KEYS CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBLE GOVERNMENT, INC. v. FLORIDA KEYS AQUEDUCT AUTHORITY,, 795 So. 2d 940 (Fla. 2001)

. . . See § 75.06(1), Fla. Stat. (2000). . . . See §§ 75.05, 75.06, Fla. Stat. (2000). Under the Mathews v. . . .

STATE v. FLORIDA HURRICANE CATASTROPHE FUND FINANCE CORPORATION,, 699 So. 2d 685 (Fla. 1997)

. . . actions under chapter 75 to validate any bonds issued by the corporation, the notice required by s. 75.06 . . .

BRUNSWICK CORPORATION, AB, v. UNITED STATES,, 34 Fed. Cl. 532 (Fed. Cl. 1995)

. . . Moore reported for the A060 hex nets resistance of 75.06 ohms +/- 5.58; for the A060 rhombic nets of . . .

BANCAMERICA COMMERCIAL CORPORATION ASARCO v. TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INC., 900 F. Supp. 1427 (D. Kan. 1995)

. . . $225.00 $1,670.50 86.42% $247.05 $213.50 $1,884.00 3/93 4/20/93 $2,177.00 $1,634.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,634.00 75.06% . . .

v., 17 Ct. Int'l Trade 1080 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1993)

. . . The margins found in the Preliminary Review were .48 percent for Saha Thai and 75.06 percent for Siam . . .

PRIMARY STEEL, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 834 F. Supp. 1374 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1993)

. . . The margins found in the Preliminary Review were .48 percent for Saha Thai and 75.06 percent for Siam . . .

In BEVERLY HILLS FIRE LITIGATION., 639 F. Supp. 915 (E.D. Ky. 1986)

. . . $355.14 Claim 3 No additional documentation has been provided for the Americana Inn expenses totalling $75.06 . . .

In HEAD BANK OF DOVER, v. HEAD,, 39 B.R. 102 (Bankr. W.D. La. 1983)

. . . Original Amount: $10,010.00 Payments Received: DATE INTEREST PRINCIPAL 12/19/77 $ 73.84 $ 307.37 1/18/78 $ 75.06 . . .

In KING,, 7 B.R. 110 (Bankr. S.D. Cal. 1980)

. . . The sum of $75.06 will be applied to pay back the principal arrearage, while $27.02 will cover interest . . .

J. PENN, v. PENSACOLA- ESCAMBIA GOVERNMENTAL CENTER AUTHORITY ESCAMBIA COUNTY FREEHOLDERS ASSOCIATION, v. PENSACOLA- ESCAMBIA GOVERNMENTAL CENTER AUTHORITY, 311 So. 2d 97 (Fla. 1975)

. . . in a newspaper of general circulation in Escambia County, Florida, in the manner required by Section 75.06 . . .

PENSACOLA- ESCAMBIA GOVERNMENTAL CENTER AUTHORITY v. STATE OF FLORIDA,, 41 Fla. Supp. 51 (Escambia Cty. Cir. Ct. 1974)

. . . of this court in a newspaper of general circulation in Escambia County, in the manner required by §75.06 . . .

M. KELTON, v. DIVISION OF BOND FINANCE OF DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES, 261 So. 2d 813 (Fla. 1972)

. . . that even though the Department of Bond Finance has met the notice requirements of Florida Statutes § 75.06 . . . admitted compliance by the Division of Bond Finance with the notice requirements of Florida Statutes § 75.06 . . . DEKLE, J., dissents. . “75.06 Publication of notice. — (1) Before the date set for hearing, the clerk . . .

STAUFFER CHEMICAL COMPANY, v. W. D. BRUNSON,, 409 F.2d 1327 (5th Cir. 1969)

. . . See Buie 10(b), FBAP, and 9 Moore’s Federal Practice § 75.06. . . .

SOLEY, v. STAR HERALD CO., 390 F.2d 364 (5th Cir. 1968)

. . . Fed.R.Civ.P. 75(b), explained in 7 Moore, Federal Practice § 75.06[3] (1966) (and cases cited therein . . .

J. KEARNEY v. CITY OF FORT PIERCE,, 160 So. 2d 99 (Fla. 1964)

. . . is that the publication of notice of the rule nisi, or order to show cause, did not comply with Sec. 75.06 . . . Sarasota, supra, was decided Sec. 75.06 warranted the interpretation given in that case, but the statute . . .

STATE v. SUWANNEE COUNTY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF SUWANNEE COUNTY,, 122 So. 2d 190 (Fla. 1960)

. . . interpretation of the allegations required in a petition for validation the provisions of Sections 75.05 and 75.06 . . .

MEYERS, C. C. E. H. St. v. CITY OF ST. CLOUD,, 78 So. 2d 402 (Fla. 1955)

. . . It is provided by Section 75.06, F.S., F.S.A., that by the publication of the said order, all property . . . It, therefore, appears that Sections 75.05 and 75.06, F.S., F.S.A., must be construed together in connection . . . . § 75.06, F.S.A. [as amended, Laws 1945, c. 22623, § 1, Laws 1949, c. 25263, § 4]. . . .

STATE OF FLORIDA THE TAXPAYERS, PROPERTY OWNERS CITIZENS OF SAID CITY OF SARASOTA, INCLUDING NON- RESIDENTS, OWNING PROPERTY OR SUBJECT TO TAXATION THEREIN, v. CITY OF SARASOTA, a, 154 Fla. 250 (Fla. 1944)

. . . In order to comply with Sec. 75.06 F.S. 1941, it was necessary that a copy of this notice and order to . . . jurisdiction of the parties was subsequently obtained by compliance with the provisions of Section 75.05 and 75.06 . . .

VON S INV. CO. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 92 F.2d 861 (9th Cir. 1937)

. . . Immediately thereafter Grocers owned 75.06 per cent, and Linda Von Der Ahe owned 24.04 per cent, of petitioner . . .