Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 76.10 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 76.10 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 76.10

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
Chapter 76
ATTACHMENT
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 76.10
76.10 Motion when debt not due.When the debt is not actually due, the motion shall state the amount of the debt or demand; that it is actually an existing debt; and the existence of one or more of the special grounds in s. 76.05, stating specifically the grounds and plaintiff shall produce before the officer granting the attachment satisfactory proof, by affidavit (other than his or her own) or otherwise, of the existence of the special ground.
History.s. 2, Feb. 14, 1835; RS 1643; GS 2107; RGS 3408; CGL 5261; s. 26, ch. 67-254; s. 374, ch. 95-147.

F.S. 76.10 on Google Scholar

F.S. 76.10 on Casetext

Amendments to 76.10


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 76.10
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 76.10.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 76.10

Total Results: 14

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 2011-12-05

Snippet: matching funds. Questions Three and Four Section 394.76(10), Florida Statutes, authorizes a local governing

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 2008-04-08

Snippet: members: "21 are of African American heritage (61.76%); 10 are of Hispanic heritage (29.41%); 2 are of non-Hispanic

Inquiry Concerning a Judge No. 03-119, re Gooding

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2005-06-16

Citation: 905 So. 2d 121, 30 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 457, 2005 Fla. LEXIS 1295

Snippet: prior to the day of that election”); Op. Div. Elec. 76-10 (Aug. 7, 1976) (stating that a candidate’s deposit

In Re Gooding

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2005-06-16

Citation: 905 So. 2d 121, 2005 WL 1412960

Snippet: prior to the day of that election"); Op. Div. Elec. 76-10 (Aug. 7, 1976) (stating that a candidate's deposit

Frasher v. Fox Distributing of S.W. Florida, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-04-05

Citation: 813 So. 2d 1017, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 4462, 2002 WL 507167

Snippet: requirements of s. 76.09, s. 76.10, or s. 76.11 are met.” Sections 76.09, 76.10, and 76.11, together with

Hordis Bros., Inc. v. Sentinel Holdings, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1990-04-24

Citation: 562 So. 2d 715, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2867, 1990 WL 49827

Snippet: and all applicable requirements of s. 76.09, s. 76.10, or s. 76.11 are met." § 76.08, Fla. Stat. (1989)

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1979-06-25

Snippet: 1965); 67 C.J.S. Officers s. 224; and AGO's 076-113, 076-10, 075-250, and 072-221. Cf. Gavagan v. Marshall

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1979-02-05

Snippet: 1965); 67 C.J.S.Officers s. 224; AGO's 076-113, 076-10, 075-250, and 072-221. Seealso Gavagan v. Marshall

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1978-08-15

Snippet: 634, 635-636 (Fla. 1921); AGO's 077-120, 076-113, 076-10, and 075-253. Thus, neither the provisions of Ch

General Development Corp. v. DIVISION OF STATE PLANNING, DEPT. OF ADMINIS.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1977-12-22

Citation: 353 So. 2d 1199, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 17273

Snippet: Admin. Code R. 22F-1-16(6), (10), eff. 10/13/76. [10] "All such rules and orders, catalogued by a subject-matter

Askew v. Green, Simmons, Green & High-Tower, P. A.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1977-08-22

Citation: 348 So. 2d 1245, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16433

Snippet: the appellee law firms. Marion County ordinance 76-10 authorizes payment of public funds for reasonable

Wilson v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1977-06-10

Citation: 348 So. 2d 10

Snippet: PER CURIAM. Upon consideration of the record, briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, we determine the trial court erred in not declaring a mistrial and appointing separate counsel for indigent co-defendants when it became apparent their interests and defenses were conflicting. Baker v. State, 202 So.2d 563 (Fla.1967). Reversed and remanded for a new trial. CROSS, ANSTEAD and DAUKSCH, JJ., concur.

Weiner v. Weisberg

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1977-02-08

Citation: 342 So. 2d 535, 204 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 431, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15293

Snippet: PER CURIAM. Plaintiffs appeal an adverse summary judgment in this action to enjoin infringement and unfair competitive use of a trade name. In 1970 plaintiff, Myron Weiner, commenced his jewelry business in Coconut Grove, Florida under the name of OM Jewelry & Leather Shop, Inc., which corporate name was changed to OM Industries, Inc. In 1973 Weiner also organized OM Jewelry Manufacturing, Inc. Defendant, Jerome Weisberg, is an exporter/importer, manufacturer, retailer and wholesaler of jewelry

T. & C. Corp. v. Eikenberry

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1938-01-05

Citation: 178 So. 137, 130 Fla. 509, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1306

Snippet: above mentioned tax sale certificate being $17.76. "10. Your complainant would further show unto the court