Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 76.10 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 76.10 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 76.10

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
Chapter 76
ATTACHMENT
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 76.10
76.10 Motion when debt not due.When the debt is not actually due, the motion shall state the amount of the debt or demand; that it is actually an existing debt; and the existence of one or more of the special grounds in s. 76.05, stating specifically the grounds and plaintiff shall produce before the officer granting the attachment satisfactory proof, by affidavit (other than his or her own) or otherwise, of the existence of the special ground.
History.s. 2, Feb. 14, 1835; RS 1643; GS 2107; RGS 3408; CGL 5261; s. 26, ch. 67-254; s. 374, ch. 95-147.

F.S. 76.10 on Google Scholar

F.S. 76.10 on Casetext

Amendments to 76.10


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 76.10
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 76.10.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

In KING,, 508 B.R. 71 (Bankr. N.D. Ind. 2014)

. . . deposit, as reflected in the account statement/daily balance summary attached to the Stipulation, was $76.10 . . . Using “first-in first-out” we know that the $76.10 previously in the account was gone and what was left . . .

AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE, v. PERIODICALS PUBLICACOES TECNICAS,, 581 F. Supp. 2d 1248 (S.D. Fla. 2008)

. . . complaint or a separate affidavit of the plaintiff, and all applicable requirements of s. 76.09, s. 76.10 . . .

In FLAG TELECOM HOLDINGS LIMITED, USA USA USA v. LLC, L. P. L. P., 320 B.R. 763 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2005)

. . . or prevented by law or decree or administrative action in that location.” 14 Corbin on Contracts § 76.10 . . .

SHIRT v. HAZELTINE,, 336 F. Supp. 2d 976 (D.S.D. 2004)

. . . population) 75.81 77.09 77.11 District 28 Senate (VAP) 68.3 69.25 69.29 (total population) 75.03 76.04 76.10 . . . 75.Í 76.02 District 28A single-member House (VAP) 68.38 69.25 69.29 (total population) 75.03 76.04 76.10 . . .

D. FRASHER, v. FOX DISTRIBUTING OF S. W. FLORIDA, INC., 813 So. 2d 1017 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . complaint or a separate affidavit of the plaintiff, and all applicable requirements of s. 76.09, s. 76.10 . . . Sections 76.09, 76.10, and 76.11, together with sections 76.04, 76.05, and 76.07, set forth what actions . . .

HAMPTON v. BOROUGH OF TINTON FALLS POLICE DEPARTMENT Y. a a, 98 F.3d 107 (3d Cir. 1996)

. . . Peterson had an average score of 82.16 and Hampton had an average score of 76.10. . . .

MEYER d b a v. NORWEST BANK IOWA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,, 924 F. Supp. 964 (D.S.D. 1996)

. . . (e) The deposition of Thomas Cleveland taken March 23, 1995, in the amount of $76.10. . . .

HORDIS BROTHERS, INC. v. SENTINEL HOLDINGS, INC., 562 So. 2d 715 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . complaint, or a separate affidavit of the plaintiff, and all applicable requirements of s. 76.09, s. 76.10 . . .

BROWN, By v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF TOPEKA, SHAWNEE COUNTY, KANSAS,, 892 F.2d 851 (10th Cir. 1989)

. . . 92.1 745.6 12.35 1979-80 89.2 721.4 12.36 1980-81 90.5 706.5 12.81 1981-82 82.3 666.5 12.35 1982-83 76.10 . . .

WIEGAND, SSN XXX- XX- XXXX v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,, 710 F. Supp. 1153 (S.D. Ohio 1989)

. . . Heckler, (83-1300) where $3,786 was requested, to 76.10 hours in Cooperwood v. . . . Schweiker 4.355.10 1,088.77 76.10 25 14.31 C — 1—82—1598 (85) Kincaid v. . . .

BERRY, v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF CITY OF BENTON HARBOR,, 703 F. Supp. 1277 (W.D. Mich. 1986)

. . . Jones 76.10 Michael H. . . . 458.50 $ 75.00 $ 34,387.50 Demchak 616.05 $ 75.00 $ 46,203.75 Atkins 1777.83 $150.00 $266,674.50 Jones 76.10 . . . Demchak 427.80 $ 75.00 $ 32,085.00 $ 35,293.50 Atkins 1665.25 $150.00 $249,787.50 $274,766.25 Jones 76.10 . . .

JORDAN v. A. ALLAIN, T. H. III, J. C. B. H. BROOKS, H. R. E. E. v. A. ALLAIN, L. A., 619 F. Supp. 98 (N.D. Miss. 1985)

. . . Research work and expenses 597.44 December 1983 trial transcript 1,014.00 Documents from State Auditor 76.10 . . .

VEST, v. O. WARING, M. D., 565 F. Supp. 674 (N.D. Ga. 1983)

. . . . § 76.10 provides that “Subject to the conditions set forth in section 76.11 and the procedural requirements . . .

HAMME, B. v. DREIS KRUMP MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. COLE BUSINESS FURNITURE, DIVISION OF LITTON BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC., 716 F.2d 152 (3d Cir. 1982)

. . . Larson, The Law of Workmen’s Compensation § 76.10, at 14-287 & n.62 (1976). . . .

W. WHITE, M. A. J. W. W. C. V. R. L. L. J. T. E. O. W. T. R. C. v. JOHNS- MANVILLE CORPORATION a H. K. a RAYBESTOS- MANHATTEN CORPORATION, a a v. NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING AND DRYDOCK COMPANY, W. WHITE, M. A. J. W. W. C. V. R. L. L. J. T. E. O. W. T. R. C. v. UNARCO INDUSTRIES, a JOHNS- MANVILLE CORPORATION a H. K. a a v. NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING AND DRYDOCK COMPANY, W. WHITE, M. A. J. W. W. C. V. R. L. L. J. T. E. O. W. T. R. C. v. CELOTEX CORPORATION, JOHNS- MANVILLE CORPORATION a a H. K. a a v. NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING AND DRYDOCK COMPANY,, 662 F.2d 243 (4th Cir. 1981)

. . . United States, 493 F.2d 881 (3d Cir. 1974); 2A Larson, supra, § 76.10, at 14-292 to -295; and that in . . .

C. THOMAS, Jr. v. LOCKHEED AIRCRAFT CORPORATION, a v. UNITED STATES, 665 F.2d 1330 (D.C. Cir. 1981)

. . . Larson, Workmen’s Compensation Law § 76.10 at 14-288 (1976). . . .

HOLDEN, v. PLACID OIL COMPANY, 473 F. Supp. 1097 (E.D. La. 1979)

. . . Larson, Workmen’s Compensation Law § 76.10, at 14-287 (1974). . . .

WILLIAMS, v. WEILER CO. A v. ST. PAUL COMPANIES, 498 F. Supp. 917 (S.D. Iowa 1979)

. . . See Larson’s Workmen’s Compensation Law, Sec. 76.10, p. 229. . . .

H. ROY v. STAR CHOPPER COMPANY, INC. v. ADVANCED MATERIALS SYSTEMS, INC., 442 F. Supp. 1010 (D.R.I. 1977)

. . . comparison of the relationships of the two parties to the injury,” it is barred. 2A Larson’s, supra, at § 76.10 . . .

LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS v. CITY OF SANTA ANA, a, 410 F. Supp. 873 (C.D. Cal. 1976)

. . . firefighter applicants since 1971 are as follows: White Mean Mexican-American Mean 1972 Short Form Test 76.10 . . .

NEW ENGLAND TELEPHONE TELEGRAPH CO. v. CENTRAL VERMONT PUBLIC SERVICE CORP. TV,, 391 F. Supp. 420 (D. Vt. 1975)

. . . most evenly-balanced controversy in all of compensation law,” Larson (2 Workmen’s Compensation Law § 76.10 . . .

C. O NEILL Co. v. UNITED STATES v. AMBROSE- AUGUSTERFER CORPORATION C. O NEILL Co. v. UNITED STATES v. AMBROSE- AUGUSTERFER CORPORATION,, 450 F.2d 1012 (3d Cir. 1971)

. . . relationship from which the legal obligations of reimbursement springs.” 2 Larson, Workmen’s Compensation 76.10 . . .

UNITED STATES v. L. GLASS, M. J., 298 F. Supp. 396 (S.D. Ala. 1969)

. . . interest thereon at the rate of 5y2% per annum until paid, being payable in monthly installments of $76.10 . . .

TRAIL BUILDERS SUPPLY COMPANY, v. REAGAN, a H., 409 F.2d 1059 (5th Cir. 1969)

. . . Effect of Workmen’s Compensation Acts, 42 Va.L.Rev. 959 (1956) ; 2 Larson, Workmen’s Compensation Law § 76.10 . . .

NEWPORT AIR PARK, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 293 F. Supp. 809 (D.R.I. 1968)

. . . most evenly-balanced controversy in all of compensation law.” 2 Larson, Workmen’s Compensation Law § 76.10 . . .

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY v. CUBAN AMERICAN NICKEL COMPANY, 396 F.2d 89 (5th Cir. 1968)

. . . employer’s negligence has caused or contributed to the injury.” 2 Larson, Workmen’s Compensation Law § 76.10 . . .

BREEDING v. MASSEY, 378 F.2d 171 (8th Cir. 1967)

. . . Jeffers, 204 Ark. 400, 162 S.W.2d 472 (1942); Mathes & Devitt, Federal Jury Practice and Instructions <§ 76.10 . . .

HUDSON v. AMERICAN OIL COMPANY,, 152 F. Supp. 757 (E.D. Va. 1957)

. . . Under § 33-76.10 of the Code of Virginia 1950, the effect of abandonment is set forth: “In case of the . . .