Cases from cite.case.law:

FLORIDA RECOVERY ADJUSTERS, LLC v. PRETIUM HOMES, LLC,, 261 So. 3d 664 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . See § 77.01, Fla. Stat. (2017). . . .

J. KANE, N. P. A. v. STEWART TILGHMAN FOX BIANCHI, P. A. a C. P. A. a S. P. A. a, 197 So. 3d 137 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . Under section 77.01, Florida Statutes (2013), “[ejvery person or entity who has sued to recover a debt . . .

SALAZAR, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA,, 75 F. Supp. 3d 139 (D.D.C. 2014)

. . . Emergency Physicians ($34.62), Jefferson Memorial Hospital ($260.32), and Independent Fire Company ($77.01 . . .

ZELAYA CAPITAL INTERNATIONAL JUDGMENT, LLC, v. ZELAYA,, 769 F.3d 1296 (11th Cir. 2014)

. . . . §§ 77.01-.28. . . .

BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, a FDIC v. ARK DEVELOPMENT OCEANVIEW, LLC, a SKD a d b a LLC, a I LLC, a LLC, a a, 150 So. 3d 817 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . entitled to garnish property owned exclusively by or due exclusively to Joseph Kod-si,” relying on section 77.01 . . . tangible or intangible personal property of defendant in the possession or control of a third person. § 77.01 . . .

MERRIMAN INVESTMENTS, LLC, v. UJOWUNDU,, 123 So. 3d 1191 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . See § 77.01, Fla. . . .

UNITED STATES v. LUNDQUIST,, 731 F.3d 124 (2d Cir. 2013)

. . . Sand et al., Modern Federal Jury Instructions (Civil) ¶ 77.01, al Instruction 77-3 (2011) ("[Y]ou may . . .

JACKSON- PLATTS, f. k. a. v. GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION,, 727 F.3d 1127 (11th Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 77.01 (“Every person ... who ... has recovered judgment in any court ... has a right to a writ of . . .

PINEIRO, v. AMERICAN EXPRESS CARD SERVICES COMPANY, S. P. A., 105 So. 3d 614 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . Section 77.01, Florida Statutes (2010), states that “[e]very person or entity who ... has recovered [ . . . Reading sections 77.01, 77.03, and 77.0305 together, it is apparent that, for a post-judgment garnishment . . .

USAMERIBANK, a v. KLEPAL, Jr. CB, 100 So. 3d 56 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . . §§ 77.01, 77.0805, Fla. Stat. (2010). . . .

In LAMB, v. III, P. A., 409 B.R. 534 (Bankr. N.D. Fla. 2009)

. . . Pursuant to Section 77.01, Florida Statutes (2009), “[e]very person who has ... recovered a judgment . . .

ARNOLD, MATHENY AND EAGAN, P. A. v. FIRST AMERICAN HOLDINGS, INC., 982 So. 2d 628 (Fla. 2008)

. . . answering the certified question, we first provide an overview of the Florida garnishment statute, sections 77.01 . . . we discuss the proper interpretation of “possession or control” as those terms are used in section 77.01 . . . In Florida, the right to garnishment is created under section 77.01, which states in relevant part: Every . . . make is whether an attorney is in “possession or control” of funds as those terms are used in section 77.01 . . .

PAPADOPOULOS v. SIDI, 547 F. Supp. 2d 1262 (S.D. Fla. 2008)

. . . . §§ 77.01-77.28. . . . Stat. §§ 77.01 et. seq.; Barbouti v. . . .

CAPITAL FACTORS, INC. a v. ALBA RENT- A- CAR, INC. d b a a R., 965 So. 2d 1178 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . an unconfirmed arbitration award qualifies as a debt due subject to garnishment pursuant to section 77.01 . . . statute mandates transformation of an outstanding debt to a judgment in order to be garnishable. § 77.01 . . .

GALLAGHER, v. C. DUPONT,, 918 So. 2d 342 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . In Count II, Dupont sought garnishment pursuant to section 77.01, Florida Statutes (2002). . . .

BNP PARIBAS, a a v. A. WYNNE, III, A. III No., 944 So. 2d 1004 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . Sec. 77.01, Fla. Stat. . . .

GENERAL R. A. C. INC. v. COLDWELL BANKER RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE, INC., 876 So. 2d 606 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . General argues, however, that amendments made to section 77.01 and section 77.06(1), Florida Statutes . . . Section 77.01 states, in pertinent part, that a judgment creditor “has a right to a writ of garnishment . . .

FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA, v. A. KNYAL L., 874 So. 2d 716 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . . § 77.01, Fla. Stat. (2003). . . .

J. MURRAY, v. NATIONSBANK OF FLORIDA, N. A. PG C Co., 846 So. 2d 548 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . Revised General Statutes, section 3431 (1920), Compiled General Laws, section 5284 (1927), section 77.01 . . . , Florida Statutes (1941), and section 77.01, Florida Statutes (1965). . . . In 1967, the legislature changed the wording of section 77.01, to the following: Every person who has . . . It is section 77.01 that creates the right to garnishment. . . . Finally, the legislature has expanded the scope of section 77.01 to reach intangible personal property . . .

QUEENIE, LTD. v. NYGARD INTERNATIONAL, Co. Co. v., 204 F. Supp. 2d 601 (S.D.N.Y. 2002)

. . . Sand, et al., Modern Federal Jury Instructions § 77.01, Instruction 77-5). . . .

DEWS, Co. v. TOWN OF SUNNYVALE, TEXAS,, 109 F. Supp. 2d 526 (N.D. Tex. 2000)

. . . Metropolitan Area in 1989, 14.24% of total occupied housing units were occupied by black people and 77.01% . . .

MICHAEL ACRI BOXING PROMOTIONS, INC. a v. G. MILES,, 758 So. 2d 704 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . See §§ 77.01, 77.06, Fla. . . . This obligation arises out of an interpretation of the “possession and control” language in section 77.01 . . .

In M. MILLER, a k a, 248 B.R. 198 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2000)

. . . . § 77.01 provides that “[E]very person who has ... recovered judgment in any court against any person . . . Stat. § 77.01 (2000). Fla. . . .

ALEJANDRE, v. REPUBLIC OF CUBA v. AT T AT T L. L. C. De MCI IDB MCI v. v. AT T AT T L. L. C. De MCI IDB MCI T. De La De La M. De La v. v. AT T AT T L. L. C. De MCI IDE MCI, 42 F. Supp. 2d 1317 (S.D. Fla. 1999)

. . . StatAnn, § 77.01 (West 1998). . . . McMillian, 859 F.Supp. 560, 563 (N.D.Fla.1994), quoting Fla.Stat.Ann. § 77.01 (West 1998). . . . .

SECURITY BANK, N. A. v. BELLSOUTH ADVERTISING PUBLISHING CORPORATION,, 679 So. 2d 795 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . Section 77.01, Florida Statutes, describes the right to garnishment. . . .

J. DITTMANN, v. IRECO, INC., 903 F. Supp. 347 (N.D.N.Y. 1995)

. . . See 3 Sand, supra ¶ 77.01, Instr. 77-5, at 77-30. . The Hazen Paper Co. . . .

PAZ v. F. HERNANDEZ,, 654 So. 2d 1243 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . In 1993, pursuant to section 77.01, Florida Statutes (1993), the garnishment statute, writs of garnishment . . . Instead he proceeded under the garnishment statute (§ 77.01) which contains no statutory provision for . . .

L. HATTAWAY, v. A. McMILLIAN,, 859 F. Supp. 560 (N.D. Fla. 1994)

. . . .” § 77.01, Fla.Stat. (1991). . . .

GAYLE PIPPIN, v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA,, 845 F. Supp. 849 (M.D. Fla. 1994)

. . . Florida’s garnishment statute, Section 77.01 Fla.Stat. (1991), provides that a judgment creditor may . . .

HUGHES SUPPLY, INC. v. A. C. ELECTRIC CORPORATION OF LEE COUNTY M. Jr. E. D. W. C. E. S. No., 145 F.R.D. 590 (M.D. Fla. 1993)

. . . . § 77.01). . . .

L. FLANARY, v. BAILEY,, 591 So. 2d 308 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . We cannot find any basis for appellees’ argument that section 77.01, Florida Statutes (1989) has altered . . . See § 77.01, Fla.Stat. (1989). . . .

FEHLHABER, v. FEHLHABER, R. L. R. N. A., 850 F.2d 1453 (11th Cir. 1988)

. . . . § 77.01. . . .

W. SHARPE, v. T. CALABRESE,, 528 So. 2d 947 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . (See §§ 77.01 and 77.03, Fla. Stat.). . . . .

In READING COMPANY, CJI INDUSTRIES, INC., 838 F.2d 686 (3d Cir. 1988)

. . . .”); 5 Collier on Bankruptcy if 77.01[5] (14th ed. 1978). . . .

MERRELL v. BONITA SPRINGS GOLF COURSE, LTD. a, 512 So. 2d 974 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . The motion alleged that the writs were contrary to section 77.01, et seq., Florida Statutes (1985), in . . .

In ARMANDO GERSTEL, INC. EFRAIM ROSEN, INC. a v. E. TAVORMINA, GOODHART, ROSNER GREEN, P. A. a v. EFRAIM ROSEN, INC. E., 43 B.R. 925 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1984)

. . . See section 77.01, Florida Statutes. . . .

TRANSPORTES AEREOS MERCANTILES PANAMERICANOS, S. A. v. BANCO CAFETERO,, 451 So. 2d 932 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . Attachment and a Writ of Garnishment should be granted forthwith, pursuant to FS §§ 76.01, et seq. and FS §§ 77.01 . . .

C. C. TOMLIN, Jr. v. ANDERSON, 413 So. 2d 79 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . The garnishment statute, section 77.01, Florida Statutes (1979), allows garnishment only of “any debt . . . denied, 271 So.2d 461 (Fla.1972); 13 Fla.Jur.2d Creditors’ Rights and Remedies, §§ 82, 150 (1979). . § 77.01 . . .

MANHATTAN STATE CITIZENS GROUP, INC. v. F. BASS, R. L., 524 F. Supp. 1270 (S.D.N.Y. 1981)

. . . MHL § 77.01 (emphasis added). . . .

COLEMAN MUSIC AND GAMES CO. INC. v. A. McDANIEL, A. d b a, 411 So. 2d 193 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . . § 77.01, Fla.Stat. (1979). . . .

NATIONAL CAR RENTAL SYSTEMS, INC. v. BRUCE A. RYALS ENTERPRISES, INC. H. L., 380 So. 2d 529 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . . §§ 77.01, 77.03 Fla.Stat. (1975). . . .

CALVO, V. Jr. A. L. R. A. C. J. Jr. C. C. C. v. LOOK,, 597 F.2d 1267 (9th Cir. 1979)

. . . See 7 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶77.01[3], [4] (1978). . . .

AAA v. FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, 48 Fla. Supp. 143 (Martin Cty. Cir. Ct. 1978)

. . . And, along similar lines of reasoning, the Florida garnishment statute, FSA §77.01, et seq., was declared . . .

ITT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a v. BARTON, a k a A. R. R. P. A., 569 F.2d 1351 (5th Cir. 1978)

. . . . §§ 77.01, .02 (West Supp.1977), see note 14 supra. . . .

UNITED PRESIDENTIAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. v. M. KING, 361 So. 2d 710 (Fla. 1978)

. . . Appellant attacks the constitutionality of Sections 77.01 and 77.03, Florida Statutes (1975), asserting . . . Loan Corp. of Duval, 539 F.2d 1355 (5th Cir. 1976), recently upheld the constitutionality of Sections 77.01 . . . Accordingly, we hold Sections 77.01 and 77.03, Florida Statutes, to be constitutional and remand with . . . Section 77.01, Fla.Stat. (1975) provides: Every person who has sued to recover a debt or has recovered . . .

M. GARRETT v. HOFFMAN, U. S. R. J. U. S., 441 F. Supp. 1151 (E.D. Pa. 1977)

. . . . §§ 77.01, 77.03, 77.04, 77.07, 77.08 (West Supp. 1977); Brown v. . . .

Dr. BRADEN v. UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH W., 552 F.2d 948 (3d Cir. 1977)

. . . See Notes of Advisory Committee on Rule 77(d), quoted in 7 Moore’s Federal Practice, ¶ 77.01 [4], at . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION OF GENERAL SERVICE BUREAU v. GORDON BROTHERS CONCRETE, INC. a B., 339 So. 2d 1156 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . said to provide statutory. authority for a waiver of sovereign immunity in garnishment proceedings. 77.01 . . .

BROWN, v. LIBERTY LOAN CORPORATION OF DUVAL, S., 539 F.2d 1355 (5th Cir. 1976)

. . . Circuit Judge: The State of Florida appeals from a district court’s declaratory judgment holding §§ 77.01 . . . Clerk of the Circuit and County Courts of Duval County, issued a writ of garnishment pursuant to §§ 77.01 . . . garnishment was dissolved, Brown brought a class action in federal district court alleging that §§ 77.01 . . . the postjudgment garnishment procedures of Duval County ignores the district court’s holding that §§ 77.01 . . . Sections 77.01 and 77.03, Fla.Stat.Ann. . . .

PITTS, v. CATES v. D. BUSBEE,, 536 F.2d 56 (5th Cir. 1976)

. . . following Census Tracts of such county: Tracts 4, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 77.01 . . .

FLORIDA STEEL CORPORATION, v. A. G. SPANOS ENTERPRISES, INC., 332 So. 2d 663 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . . § 77.01 (1975) states, in part: “Every person who has sued to recover a debt or has recovered judgment . . . judgment against Spa-nos was clearly a debt within the meaning of the statutory language of Fla.Stat. § 77.01 . . .

FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, v. USAFORM HAIL POOL, INC., 523 F.2d 744 (5th Cir. 1975)

. . . See 7 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 77.01[4], The primary concern of the advisory committee in proposing . . .

D. BUNTON, a v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF TAMPA, a, 394 F. Supp. 793 (M.D. Fla. 1975)

. . . . §§ 77.01, 77.03, and 222.12) were declared unconstitutional for failure to provide notice and a prior . . .

BROWN, v. LIBERTY LOAN CORPORATION OF DUVAL, a S., 392 F. Supp. 1023 (M.D. Fla. 1974)

. . . For the reasons set forth below, this Court hereby concludes that it does. 77.01 Right to Garnishment . . . The motion for garnishment was made and the writ of garnishment was issued pursuant to Sections 77.01 . . . Best Diaper Service, and her costs of action; and, it is further Ordered and adjudged: That Sections 77.01 . . . Sections 77.01 and 77.03 of the Florida statutes provide as follows: . . . .

T. PHILLIPS, v. GENERAL FINANCE CORPORATION OF FLORIDA, 297 So. 2d 6 (Fla. 1974)

. . . . § 77.01, F.S.A., reads: “Every person who has sued to recover a debt or has receovered judgment in . . . It is clear that Florida garnishment statutory provisions §§ 77.01 and 77.06, F.S.A., do not contain . . . Specifically, 15 U.S.C. § 1673, pre-empts Fla.Stat. §§ 77.01 and 77.06, F.S.A. . . . In conclusion, we hold that 15 U.S.C. § 1673, is a substantive provision and preempts Fla.Stat. §§ 77.01 . . .

L. SCOGIN, v. SCOGIN S INC., 287 So. 2d 712 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

. . . jointly liable for a judgment can be named as a garnishee under the Florida Garnishment Statute (F.S. 77.01 . . .

In PENN CENTRAL TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, MORGAN GUARANTY TRUST COMPANY OF NEW YORK, MORGAN GUARANTY TRUST COMPANY OF NEW YORK, FIDELITY BANK, a FIDELITY BANK, A B No. MANUFACTURERS HANOVER TRUST COMPANY, No. SMITH, No. PENN CENTRAL COMPANY, No., 484 F.2d 323 (3d Cir. 1973)

. . . In the Matter of the Penn Central Transportation Co., 354 F.Supp. at 743. . 5 Collier, Bankruptcy § 77.01 . . .

NEWELL, v. R. AWBREY,, 277 So. 2d 18 (Fla. 1973)

. . . construed in conjunction with the provisions of the general law relating to garnishment, to-wit, Section 77.01 . . .

R. AWBREY, v. NEWELL,, 260 So. 2d 281 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

. . . construed in conjunction with the provisions of the general law relating to garnishment, to-wit, Section 77.01 . . .

I. M. v., 57 T.C. 804 (T.C. 1972)

. . . 2,106,730.00 85.78 3829. 4/12/65 1,795,801 2,139,148.00 83.96 3500. 4/25/66 1,893,500 2,468,786.70 77.01 . . .

JOHNSON, Sr. v. DAWSON, 257 So. 2d 282 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

. . . . §§ 77.01 and 77.03, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. . . .

STATE F. COSGROVE, v. JUVENILE AND DOMESTIC RELATIONS COURT IN AND FOR DADE COUNTY, E., 252 So. 2d 597 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971)

. . . Florida Statute § 77.01 F.S.A., provides: “Every person who has sued to recover a debt or has recovered . . .

THOMPSON v. HAYNES,, 36 Fla. Supp. 110 (Duval Cty. Cir. Ct. 1971)

. . . . §77.01 F.S.A., ch. 67-254, §27, eff. . . .

BARRETT, a v. E. TRAISTER,, 191 So. 2d 608 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)

. . . . § 77.01, F.S.A.; Oper v. Air Control Products, Inc. of Miami, Fla.App.1965, 174, So.2d 561, 563. . . .

PAYTON, v. A. C. SWANSON,, 175 So. 2d 48 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1965)

. . . Ch. 77.01 F.S., F.S.A. . . .

SEABOARD SURETY COMPANY, v. ACME WELLPOINT CORPORATION, a Wm. S. Co. a, 156 So. 2d 688 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1963)

. . . The statute (F.S. 77.01, F.S.A.) provides: “Every person who * * * shall have recovered a judgment in . . .

HARRIS AND COMPANY ADVERTISING, INC. a v. REPUBLIC OF CUBA,, 127 So. 2d 687 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1961)

. . . . §§ 77.01, 77.06, 77.18, Fla. Stat., F.S.A. . . .

GORDMAN CORPORATION, a v. BETHELL CONSTRUCTION CO. H., 77 So. 2d 449 (Fla. 1954)

. . . Section 5284, C.G.L., is the same as Section 77.01, Florida Statutes 1953, F.S.A., and provides that . . . So it can be seen that the court did not consider the question of whether Section 77.01 is applicable . . . our opinion, there is no sound basis for holding that the writ of garnishment provided for by Section 77.01 . . .

GULLET v. GULLET, 188 F.2d 719 (5th Cir. 1951)

. . . Sec. 77.01 et seq., F.S.A. . . .

COCA COLA BOTTLING WORKS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 53 F. Supp. 992 (M.D. Tenn. 1944)

. . . 342,821.07 53,736.91 289,084.16 275.000. 00 95.13 1939 373,359.83 61,693.09 311,666.74 240.000. 00 77.01 . . .

In CENTRAL OF GEORGIA RY. CO. J. S. FARLEE CO., 42 F. Supp. 940 (S.D. Ga. 1942)

. . . In 1932, when a receiver was first named for the properties, it was 77.01 miles in length. . . .