Cases from cite.case.law:

VILLAMOREY, S. A. v. BDT INVESTMENTS, INC., 245 So. 3d 909 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . Pursuant to section 77.06(3) of the Florida Statutes (2017), however, Bank's answer specifically alleged . . . garnishee may include and retain the same, ... subject to disposition as provided in this chapter.... § 77.06 . . .

SALCEDO, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A., 223 So. 3d 1099 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . Fargo “has placed a ‘hold’ on the Safe Deposit Box in accordance with Chapter 77, and primarily-Section 77.06 . . . First Issue: Cause of Action Section 77.06(1) and (2), Florida Statutes (2012)-, imposed a statutory . . . There is no reason to apply a different interpretation of section 77.06 when tangible property in a safe . . . Wells Fargo suggests that there is no private cause of action created by section 77.06, but we disagreed . . . found none, suggesting that a claim against a negligent bank for a breach of its duty under section 77.06 . . .

DANIELS, v. SORRISO DENTAL STUDIO, LLC,, 164 So. 3d 778 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . Holdings, Inc., 982 So.2d 628, 632 (Fla.2008) (citing § 77.06, Fla. Stat. (2002)). . . .

REGIONS BANK, v. S. HYMAN,, 91 F. Supp. 3d 1234 (M.D. Fla. 2015)

. . . The Court notes that USAmeribank’s Answer does not comply with Ch. 77.06(2), Fla. . . . The filing of US-Ameribank’s Answer which complies with Sec. 77.06, F-S., would trigger Plaintiff Regions . . .

BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, a FDIC v. ARK DEVELOPMENT OCEANVIEW, LLC, a SKD a d b a LLC, a I LLC, a LLC, a a, 150 So. 3d 817 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . See § 77.06(1), Fla. Stat. (2013). . . .

SOUTHERN SKY AIR TOURS, LLC d b a v. ARROW ENERGY, INC., 103 So. 3d 256 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . good faith has retained the sum of 428, 129.06 in accordance with Chapter 77, and primarily Section 77.06 . . . See also § 77.06(3), Fla. . . .

SMITH, FDB II LP, v. POWDER MOUNTAIN, LLC, a PFP LLC,, 492 F. App'x 981 (11th Cir. 2012)

. . . . § 77.06. . . .

In DELTA- T CORPORATION, P. v. LLC, N. V. DCR M I, 475 B.R. 495 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 2012)

. . . . § 77.06(1). . . .

CORTEZ COMMUNITY BANK, v. G. COBB, II, a W. LLC, a LLC, a LLC, a LLC, a a, 56 So. 3d 80 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . Section 77.06(1), Florida Statutes (2008), specifically provides that in a garnishment action, “[sjervice . . .

ZIVITZ, v. ZIVITZ P. A., 16 So. 3d 841 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . garnishee's answer should be regarded as anything other than its statutory compliance with section 77.06 . . .

In NEWGENT GOLF, INC. E. v. P. A. MSM LLC., 402 B.R. 424 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2009)

. . . Florida Statute Section 77.06 established the effect of service of a writ of garnishment upon a garnishee . . . and provided in relevant part as follows: 77.06. . . . Stat § 77.06 (1999). . . . The Florida legislature amended Florida Statute Section 77.06 in 2000, abrogating the ruling of the Eleventh . . . Pursuant to the amended Section 77.06, service of a writ of garnishment thereafter did create a lien . . .

In SPECIALTY PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT, INC. d b a P E d b a P E v., 399 B.R. 857 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2008)

. . . virtue of the amendment to the Florida garnishment statute effective July 1, 2000, Florida Statutes § 77.06 . . . Stat. § 77.06, was adopted by the Florida legislature to alter the previous decision held by the Eleventh . . . The court in Marinean, held that “[u]nder current § 77.06 Fla. . . . Plaintiff does not dispute the proposition of the effect of the amendment to Florida garnishment statute § 77.06 . . . Stat. § 77.06(1) provides that the service of a writ creates a lien which attaches to the property at . . .

In ENGLER, s E. Jr. v. AG E. Jr. v. AG, 394 B.R. 598 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2008)

. . . . § 77.06(1) provides that the “service of a writ creates a lien in or upon any such debts or property . . . legislature in its amendment to the Florida garnishment statute effective in 2000, Florida Statutes § 77.06 . . . Stat. § 77.06, which became effective July 1, 2000, specifically overruled the decision in In re Masvidal . . . The court in Martineau held that “[u]nder current § 77.06 Fla. . . . Stat. § 77.06(1) provides that the service of a writ creates a lien which attaches to the property at . . .

ARNOLD, MATHENY AND EAGAN, P. A. v. FIRST AMERICAN HOLDINGS, INC., 982 So. 2d 628 (Fla. 2008)

. . . . § 77.06(2), Fla. Stat. (2002). . . . Section 77.06(3), Florida Statutes (2002), states: In any case where a garnishee in good faith is in . . . See § 77.06(2), Fla. Stat. . . . See § 77.06(3), Fla. Stat. . . . See § 77.06(3), Fla. Stat. As stated by the Third District in Dixie National Bank v. . . .

FIRST AMERICAN HOLDINGS, INC. a v. PRECLUDE, INC. a P. A., 955 So. 2d 1231 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . . § 77.06. . . . Section 77.06(3) provides that the garnishee shall not be held liable to the defendant or “to any other . . .

GENERAL R. A. C. INC. v. COLDWELL BANKER RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE, INC., 876 So. 2d 606 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . General argues, however, that amendments made to section 77.01 and section 77.06(1), Florida Statutes . . .

In E. GILES,, 271 B.R. 903 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2002)

. . . decision in Mims, however, the Florida legislature amended the Florida garnishment statute, section 77.06 . . . Stat. § 77.06(a) (last line to subsection (a) was added by the amendments). . . .

M. RUDD, v. FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA, FL,, 761 So. 2d 1189 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . . & Publ’g Corp., 679 So.2d 795, 800 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996), approved, 698 So.2d 254 (Fla.1997); § 77.06( . . .

MICHAEL ACRI BOXING PROMOTIONS, INC. a v. G. MILES,, 758 So. 2d 704 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . See §§ 77.01, 77.06, Fla. . . .

SEALES, v. AMOCO CORPORATION,, 82 F. Supp. 2d 1312 (M.D. Ala. 2000)

. . . Plaintiff Robert Hilson would have received $132.83 under the repayment option and $77.06 if he elected . . .

FARM CREDIT OF NORTH FLORIDA, ACA, v. DOUBLE H DAIRY, INC. a, 742 So. 2d 436 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . Appellees contend that Farm Credit violated the requirements of section 77.06, Florida Statutes, by failing . . .

ADVERTISING PUBLISHING CORP. v. SECURITY BANK, N. A., 698 So. 2d 254 (Fla. 1997)

. . . The district court found that section 77.06(1), Florida Statutes (1995), only allowed Bell-South to satisfy . . . was clear that Security Bank’s liability in default could not exceed the amount prescribed in section 77.06 . . . Section 77.06, Florida Statutes (1995), specifies the effect of a writ of garnishment. . . . Security Bank, 679 So.2d at 804 (Jorgenson, J., dissenting); accord § 77.06(2), Fla. Stat. (1995). . . .

SECURITY BANK, N. A. v. BELLSOUTH ADVERTISING PUBLISHING CORPORATION,, 679 So. 2d 795 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . .” § 77.06(1), Fla.Stat. (1993). As stated in United Presidential Life Ins. v. . . . and any other persons having or appearing to have an ownership interest in the involved property. § 77.06 . . . disagree with the court's assertion that this provision is in any way inconsistent with subsection 77.06 . . . Subsection 77.06(1) makes the garnishee liable to the plaintiff for the assets of the garnishment defendant . . . . § 77.06(1) Fla.Stat. (1993). . . . The statute states: 77.06 Writ; effect.— (1) Service of the writ shall make garnishee liable for all . . . Subsection 77.06(1), quoted in part II. . . . Subsection 77.06(1) by its terms applies to all writs of garnishment. . . . Subsection 77.081(2), relied on by BellSouth, must be read in pari materia with subsection 77.06(1). . . .

In MASVIDAL, CONTINENTAL NATIONAL BANK OF MIAMI, v. E. TAVORMINA,, 10 F.3d 761 (11th Cir. 1993)

. . . . § 77.06(1) (1989). . . . Specifically, the court held: First of all, the effect of service according to Fla.Stat. § 77.06(2) is . . .

In MASVIDAL, CONTINENTAL NATIONAL BANK OF MIAMI, v. E. TAVORMINA,, 10 F.3d 761 (11th Cir. 1993)

. . . . § 77.06(1) (1989). . . . Specifically, the court held: First of all, the effect of service according to Fla.Stat. § 77.06(2) is . . .

FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, v. PRUITT, HUMPHRESS, POWERS MUNROE ADVERTISING AGENCY, INC., 587 So. 2d 561 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . Pursuant to sections 77.055 and 77.06, Florida Statutes (1989), the advertising agency served a copy . . . personal property of defendant in his possession or control at the time of the service of the writ....” § 77.06 . . .

WATERS, v. ALBANESE,, 547 So. 2d 197 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . The garnishment statute, section 77.06, Florida Statutes, provides that a garnishee is liable to the . . .

In DIESEL ENGINEERS, INC. E. RAYMOS, v. LANAHAN, 99 B.R. 1020 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1989)

. . . Section 77.06(1), Florida Statutes, provides: Service of the writ shall make garnishee liable for all . . . Under the clear terms of § 77.06(1), National Health Laboratories, Inc., remains liable to plaintiff . . .

In BROGDON a k a BROGDON a k a v. TEXAS COMMERCE BANK, 75 B.R. 79 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1987)

. . . . § 77.06 (1981). . . . Section 77.06 of the Florida Statutes provides in pertinent part as follows: (1) Service of the writ . . . Fla.Stat. § 77.06(1) (1981) (emphasis added). . . .

In A. RYDER, Sr. A. RYDER, Sr. v. LANDMARK FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF FORT LAUDERDALE,, 59 B.R. 868 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1986)

. . . Section 77.06 of the Florida Statutes provides in pertinent part as follows: Section 77.06. . . .

DIXIE NATIONAL BANK, v. W. CHASE, II,, 485 So. 2d 1353 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . We hold that under Section 77.06(1), Florida Statutes (1983), the garnishee bank is liable to the garnishor . . . It therefore follows that under Section 77.06(1), Florida Statutes (1983), the garnishee is liable to . . . Under Section 77.06(1), Florida Statutes (1983), this sum represents the full extent of the garnishee . . . Section 77.06(2), Florida Statutes (1983), specifically so provides: "(2) [The garnishee] shall report . . . Section 77.06(3), Florida Statutes (1983), specifically so provides: "(3) In any case where a garnishee . . .

CARPENTER, v. BENSON a k a, 478 So. 2d 353 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . Section 77.06 provides that service of the writ of garnishment on the garnishee shall make the garnishee . . .

ATLANTIC NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA v. TRUMBORE FIRST AMERICAN BANK OF PALM BEACH COUNTY ATLANTIC NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA v. TRUMBORE, FIRST AMERICAN BANK OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, 9 Fla. Supp. 2d 156 (Fla. Cty. Ct. 1984)

. . . motions to dissolve solely upon plaintiff’s failure to comply with the notice provisions of Section 77.06 . . . Section 77.06(2) Florida Statutes carves an exception to this general rule by requiring notice of the . . . Taken against this statutory framework, the notice provision of Section 77.06(2) Florida Statutes is . . . Therefore, a plaintiffs failure to serve Section 77.06(2) notice on the defendant cannot form the basis . . . the entry of a final judgment in garnishment until such time as the plaintiff complies with Section 77.06 . . .

FINANCIAL INVESTMENT PLANNING, INC. v. LIEBERMAN, GHERMAN, v. LIEBERMAN,, 452 So. 2d 1022 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . Section 77.06, Florida Statutes (1979), limits the liability of a garnishee to those “debts due by him . . .

In C. SNEDAKER,, 39 B.R. 41 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1984)

. . . Florida Statutes, § 77.06; In re Demountable House Corp., 58 F.Supp. 955 (S.D.Fla.1945). . . .

WALTER E. HELLER COMPANY SOUTHEAST, INC. v. B. W. WILLIAMS, Jr., 450 So. 2d 521 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . warrant on the Dubins and their response — the applicable period under the garnishment statute, section 77.06 . . .

In BOB RIGBY, INC. BOB RIGBY, INC. v. FLEETWING CORP., 36 B.R. 531 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1983)

. . . Section 77.06 of the Florida Statutes provides in pertinent part as follows: Section 77.06. . . . . § 77.06(1) Fla.Stat. (1981). . . .

In H. RAINES, 33 B.R. 379 (M.D. Tenn. 1983)

. . . NORTON, BANKRUPTCY LAW AND PRACTICE § 77.06, at 6-11 (1982). . . .

In DELANY,, 28 B.R. 956 (Bankr. D. Conn. 1983)

. . . . § 77.06 at Part 77 — Page 6 (1981). . . .

RYDER TRUCK RENTAL, INC. v. SOUTHEAST FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MIAMI,, 427 So. 2d 302 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . The provision, codified as Section 77.06(2), Florida Statutes (1979), requires a garnishee bank to report . . . We do not read Section 77.06(2) as imposing liability upon a garnishee bank for whatever sum is reflected . . . More importantly, Section 77.06(2) makes absolutely no reference to liability. . . . Section 77.06(1) governs the liability of garnishees. . . .

In OVERSTREET,, 23 B.R. 712 (Bankr. W.D. La. 1982)

. . . . & Prac. 77.06, at pp. 6-7 (1982). . . .

INTERNATIONAL TRAVEL CARD, INC. a v. R. C. HASLER, INC. a, 411 So. 2d 215 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . The only notice requirement is set forth in § 77.06(2), which provides that where the garnishee is a . . . service of the writ on the garnishee; the 20 day time period could end before any notice is given under § 77.06 . . . scheme of Chapter 77 there is no provision for service of the writ upon the judgment debtor; even § 77.06 . . . circumstance: when a “bank or other financial institution authorized to accept deposits” is the garnishee. § 77.06 . . . Since the debtor in this case received notice under the provisions of § 77.06(2) we do not need to resolve . . .

In L. REYNOLDS, M., 17 B.R. 489 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 1981)

. . . . & Pract,, Part 77.06. . . .

REPUBLIC NATIONAL BANK OF MIAMI, v. L. SARTAIN, 384 So. 2d 271 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . Spanos Enterprises, Inc., 332 So.2d 663 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976); §§ 77.06(3), 77.061, Fla.Stat. (1979). . . .

STATE v. MILLER,, 373 So. 2d 677 (Fla. 1979)

. . . . §§ 77.031, 77.04, 77.06, 77.07, Fla.Stat. (1975). . § 85.031(2), Fla.Stat. (1977): BY SALE WITHOUT . . .

M. GARRETT v. HOFFMAN, U. S. R. J. U. S., 441 F. Supp. 1151 (E.D. Pa. 1977)

. . . . § 77.06(1) (West Supp.1977); 3 Florida Jurisprudence § 112, at 277-78 (1955). . . .

SOUTHEAST FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MIAMI, v. A. BUTTER,, 350 So. 2d 573 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . order dissolving a writ of garnishment entered prior to judgment pursuant to Sections 77.031, 77.04, 77.06 . . .

RAY LEIN CONSTRUCTION, INC. v. M. WAINWRIGHT, a, 346 So. 2d 1029 (Fla. 1977)

. . . of recent judicial treatment of similar prejudgment procedures, we hold that Sections 77.031, 77.04, 77.06 . . . Sections 77.031, 77.04, 77.06, and 77.07, Florida Statutes (1975), insofar as they pertain to prejudgment . . . The writ shall state the amount named in plaintiffs motion. 77.06 Writ; effect — (1)Service of the writ . . . District Court of Appeal who, in turn, transferred it here: Are the provisions of §§ 77.031, 77.04 and 77.06 . . .

BROWN, v. LIBERTY LOAN CORPORATION OF DUVAL, S., 539 F.2d 1355 (5th Cir. 1976)

. . . The Florida statutory prejudgment provisions, §§ 77.031, 77.04, and 77.06 et seq., Fla. . . . General Finance Corp., Sup.Ct.Fla.1974, 297 So.2d 6 (15 U.S.C. § 1673 preempts Fla.Stat. §§ 77.01 and 77.06 . . .

D. BUNTON, a v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF TAMPA, a, 394 F. Supp. 793 (M.D. Fla. 1975)

. . . . §§ 77.031, 77.04, and 77.06 et seq. . . .

B. REEVES, v. DON L. TULLIS ASSOCIATES, INC., 305 So. 2d 813 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

. . . . § 77.06 provides that service of the writ of garnishment upon the garnishee “shall make garnishee liable . . .

CENTRAL PLAZA BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, a v. L. E. PARKER,, 300 So. 2d 735 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

. . . alleged fear of liability for improperly garnisheeing the wrong accounts since Florida Statutes, § 77.06 . . .

T. PHILLIPS, v. GENERAL FINANCE CORPORATION OF FLORIDA, 297 So. 2d 6 (Fla. 1974)

. . . . § 77.06(1), F.S.A., reads: “Service of the writ shall make garnishee liable for all debts due by him . . . It is clear that Florida garnishment statutory provisions §§ 77.01 and 77.06, F.S.A., do not contain . . . Specifically, 15 U.S.C. § 1673, pre-empts Fla.Stat. §§ 77.01 and 77.06, F.S.A. . . . conclusion, we hold that 15 U.S.C. § 1673, is a substantive provision and preempts Fla.Stat. §§ 77.01 and 77.06 . . .

KIPNIS, v. L. TAUB, 286 So. 2d 271 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)

. . . . § 77.06(2), F.S.A. See also Fla.Stat. § 673.3-409, F.S.A. Cf. Poland v. . . .

J. STEINGOLD a v. R. FIXEL Al, 226 So. 2d 267 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)

. . . Appellants refer to §§ 77.04 and 77.06 Fla.Stat., F.S.A. requiring the garnishee to respond by answer . . .

HARRIS AND COMPANY ADVERTISING, INC. a v. REPUBLIC OF CUBA,, 127 So. 2d 687 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1961)

. . . . §§ 77.01, 77.06, 77.18, Fla. Stat., F.S.A. . . .

CHAACHOU d b a K. a v. KULHANJIAN, a, 104 So. 2d 23 (Fla. 1958)

. . . By the terms of our statute, § 77.06, Fla.Stat.1957, F.S.A., the garnishee is answerable “for all indebtedness . . .