Florida Statute 78.03 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Chapter 78
REPLEVIN

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 78.03

78.03 Jurisdiction.—An action for replevin must be brought in a court of competent jurisdiction based on the value of the property sought to be replevied. When property consists of separate articles, the value of any one of which is within the jurisdiction of a lower court but taken together will exceed that jurisdiction, the plaintiff may not divide the property to give jurisdiction to the lower court to enable the plaintiff to bring separate actions therefor.

History.—s. 14, Mar. 11, 1845; RS 1709; GS 2173; RGS 3478; CGL 5331; s. 28, ch. 67-254; s. 1, ch. 73-20; s. 15, ch. 73-334; s. 1, ch. 93-81.

F.S. 78.03 on Google Scholar

F.S. 78.03 on Casetext

Amendments to 78.03

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 78.03

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 78.03.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 78.03

Total Results: 20

RYAN KEHOE v. KELLY KEHOE

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-12-27

Snippet: parents for replevin under sections 78.01 and 78.03, Florida Statutes (2021). Count III is a claim against

AVANT DESIGN GROUP, INC., etc. v. AQUASTAR HOLDINGS, LLC, etc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-10-12

Snippet: Aquastar believed it had paid Avant $1,117,890.78.3 Thus, according to Avant, Aquastar’s balance due

TRIPLE-S MANAGEMENT CORP., and TRIPLE-S SALUD d/b/a BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF PUERTO RICO v. AMERICAN CLINICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-07-13

Snippet: Insurance Co., supra, 355 U.S., at 223, 78 3 S.Ct., at 201; see also Kulko

Johnson v. American First Federal, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-02-07

Citation: 133 So. 3d 559, 2014 WL 474986, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 1749

Snippet: highlighted the statute as then written, saying: Section 78.03 establishes venue and jurisdiction requirements

Hopkins v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-09-13

Citation: 105 So. 3d 470, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 551, 2012 WL 4009511, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 1799

Snippet: contact with [specified fluids or materials]. § 784.078(3)(a), (b), Fla. Stat. (2007) (emphasis added). In

Holmes v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-06-30

Citation: 933 So. 2d 1205, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 10786, 2006 WL 1791702

Snippet: days or both. See Lakeland, Fla., Code §§ 1-14, 78-3 (1960). Holmes was arrested on February 21, 2006

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 2003-06-25

Snippet: (1990), and 86-106 (1986). Cf., Ops. Att'y Gen. Fla. 78-03 (1978) (board of trustees of city's pension fund

Dormezil v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-03-31

Citation: 754 So. 2d 168, 2000 WL 332649

Snippet: 661, 663 (Fla.1989); Restrepo, 438 So.2d at 77-78. [3] The comment which garnered defense counsel's

State Contracting v. Dept. of Transp.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1998-04-09

Citation: 709 So. 2d 607, 1998 WL 161227

Snippet: rejected the judge's interpretation of a rule. Rule 14-78.003 lists the requirements for participation by disadvantaged

SOUTHFORK INVESTMENTS GROUP v. Williams

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1998-02-18

Citation: 706 So. 2d 75, 1998 WL 62848

Snippet: redeem by virtue of the last ruling described below. *78 3) The court held that the promissory notes were secured

Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Southwest Transport, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-02-28

Citation: 668 So. 2d 1068, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1611, 1996 WL 82355

Snippet: any storage charges against such vehicle. § 713.78(3)(b), (8), Fla.Stat. (emphasis added). In this case

Advance Barricades & Signing, Inc. v. State, Department of Transportation

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1994-03-02

Citation: 632 So. 2d 704, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1650, 1994 WL 59453

Snippet: a different subcontractor, pursuant to Rule 14-78.-003(2)(b)5. Advance Barricades unsuccessfully sought

Rea v. Compactor-Baler Service, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1993-04-07

Citation: 627 So. 2d 488, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 5843, 1993 WL 326597

Snippet: the county where the property is located. See § 78.03, Fla.Stat. (1991); New Holland, Inc. v. Trunk, 511

Asphalt Pavers, Inc. v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-04-30

Citation: 602 So. 2d 558, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4836, 1992 WL 85094

Snippet: with the bid for evaluation as required by Rule 14-78.003(2)(b)3c. The company attempted to meet the goal

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1990-01-29

Snippet: not related to towing and storage). 4 Section 713.78(3)(a), Fla. Stat. 5 See, s. 715.07(8), Fla. Stat.

Hutchens v. MAXICENTERS, USA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1989-04-13

Citation: 541 So. 2d 618, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 986, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2375, 1988 WL 34665

Snippet: Orange County and had been used in Orange County. § 78.03, Fla. Stat. (1987). However, we agree with Hutchens

Florida League of Cities, Inc. v. Department of Insurance and Treasurer

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1989-02-28

Citation: 540 So. 2d 850, 1989 WL 15937

Snippet: do not give DOT the power to implement rule 14-78.03. The omission may be a legislative oversight; nevertheless

Huri Enterprises, Inc. v. Spectacular Midways, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1988-07-28

Citation: 530 So. 2d 956, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1783, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3403, 1988 WL 76422

Snippet: jurisdiction to lie. Section 78.03, Florida Statutes (1987) provides as follows: 78.03 Venue and jurisdiction

New Holland, Inc. v. Trunk

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1987-08-27

Citation: 511 So. 2d 746, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2085, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10032

Snippet: in the county where the property is located. § 78.03, Fla.Stat. (1985). In a multi-count suit or one

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1986-12-16

Snippet: sovereign power of city was municipal officer); AGO 78-3 (officers and employees of city's board of trustees