Cases from cite.case.law:

R. JOHNSON, v. AMERICAN FIRST FEDERAL, INC., 133 So. 3d 559 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . The court in Aysisayh quoted and highlighted the statute as then written, saying: Section 78.03 establishes . . . Section 78.03, however, was sub-divided and reworded in 1993. . . . The title of section 78.03 was changed from “Venue and Jurisdiction” to “Jurisdiction” and its language . . .

WINMAR, INC. v. AL JAZEERA INTERNATIONAL,, 741 F. Supp. 2d 165 (D.D.C. 2010)

. . . in the amount of $102,764.32 for the period between February 8, 2006 and September 18, 2009, plus $78.03 . . .

A. DELPIN APONTE, v. UNITED STATES,, 83 Fed. Cl. 80 (Fed. Cl. 2008)

. . . result of multiplying the contribution of night differential and Sunday premium to the regular rate ($78.03 . . .

BARNETT, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, BONILLA v. CITY OF CHICAGO,, 969 F. Supp. 1359 (N.D. Ill. 1997)

. . . was 41.34% white and was 55.63% African-American while the 19th ward has a total population that was 78.03% . . .

REA, v. COMPACTOR- BALER SERVICE, INC., 627 So. 2d 488 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . See § 78.03, Fla.Stat. (1991); New Holland, Inc. v. Trunk, 511 So.2d 746 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987). . . .

FLORIDA LEAGUE OF CITIES, INC. St. v. DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AND TREASURER, 540 So. 2d 850 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . are not cited as statutory authority for the rule and do not give DOT the power to implement rule 14-78.03 . . .

HURI ENTERPRISES, INC. v. SPECTACULAR MIDWAYS, INC., 530 So. 2d 956 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . Section 78.03, Florida Statutes (1987) provides as follows: 78.03 Venue and jurisdiction. . . .

G. HUTCHENS, v. MAXICENTERS, U. S. A., 541 So. 2d 618 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . . § 78.03, Fla.Stat. (1987). . . .

NEW HOLLAND, INC. v. J. TRUNK d b a, 511 So. 2d 746 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . . § 78.03, Fla.Stat. (1985). . . .

CAPELETTI BROTHERS, INC. v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, v. CAPELETTI BROTHERS, INC., 499 So. 2d 855 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . Transportation (DOT) appeals a final order of the Division of Administrative Hearings finding that Rule 14-78.03 . . . Rule 14-78.03 authorizes DOT to establish WBE and DBE goals for each project. . . . Regarding the rule challenge, the hearing officer determined that (1) rule 14-78.03 implements section . . . 339.0805, Florida Statutes (1983), insofar as it deals with DBEs, and that (2) rule 14-78.03, to the . . . Rule 14-78.03 refers to section 339.0805 as its implementing authority. . . .

AYSISAYH v. C. W. ELLIS,, 497 So. 2d 1316 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . Section 78.03 establishes venue and jurisdiction requirements for replevin actions, and states that “ . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, v. HENDRY CORPORATION,, 500 So. 2d 218 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . provisions for W.B.E. goals, which DOT adhered to in the instant case, were all expressly set out in Rule 14-78.03 . . . That DOT’s W.B.E. requirements were established in a duly promulgated rule (Rule 14-78.03(2)(b), Florida . . . correct such alleged error, and that Section 339.-0805, Florida Statutes, upon which authority Rule 14-78.03 . . . alleged erroneous refusal to entertain in the 120.57 hearing Hendry’s attack on the validity of Rule 14-78.03 . . .

C. H. BARCO CONTRACTING COMPANY, v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION N., 483 So. 2d 796 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . excuse a contractor from accepting a quotation from a DBE or a WBE, despite the provision of Rule 14-78.03 . . . circumstance, Barco felt that it was appropriate to use the non-DBEs quotations as envisioned by Rule 14-78.03 . . . Florida Administrative Code Rule 14-78.03(2)(b)(4)(B)(i-ix) (1984 supp.) sets forth nine non-exclusive . . .

LANDMARK FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF FORT LAUDERDALE, v. BEACH BAIT AND TACKLE SHOP, INC. J. a k a, 449 So. 2d 1287 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . See, e.g., §§ 78.03 and 78.19(2). . . .

MANHATTAN STATE CITIZENS GROUP, INC. v. F. BASS, R. L., 524 F. Supp. 1270 (S.D.N.Y. 1981)

. . . Section 78.03 of the MHL sets out the procedures for competency proceedings generally. . . .

S. ZUCKERMAN R. v. PROFESSIONAL WRITERS OF FLORIDA, INC., 398 So. 2d 870 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . Appellants also claim that the circuit court did not have jurisdiction over the matter pursuant to Section 78.03 . . .

PETERSON, HOWELL HEATHER d b a D. C. a v. O NEILL,, 314 So. 2d 808 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

. . . . §§ 63.102, 78.03, 83.11, 910.005 et seq., that the lawsuit should be tried in the area where the cause . . .