Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
Total Results: 20
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-11-13
Snippet: strictly comply with the requirements of section 768.79(2) and rule 1.442(c)(2). Pratt, 161 So. 3d at 1273
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-08-14
Snippet: party to whom [the offer] is being made," § 768.79(2)(b), and must
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-08-02
Snippet: person"—which was a requirement at common law. See § 655.79(2); see also In re Est. of Combee, 601 So. 2d 1165
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-03-08
Snippet: to allow judgment”). Instead, section 768.79(2) provides that an offer made under the statute “shall
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-05-17
Snippet: survivorship. Estate of Sonder, 63 So. 3d at 10; § 655.79(2), Fla. Stat. (2021). We do not reweigh the evidence;
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-04-19
Snippet: 1014 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). Under section 768.79(2), an offer of judgment must: (a) Be in writing
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-01-18
Snippet: 4 § 768.79(2), Fla. Stat. Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.442
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-09-21
Snippet: be imposed for proscribed conduct . . . .” § 456.079(2), Fla. Stat. To impose a penalty above a guideline
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-11-10
Snippet: which may be awarded in a final judgment. § 768.79(2), Fla. Stat. Florida Rule of Civil Procedure
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-09-09
Snippet: fees, interest, or costs. Further, section 768.79(2) provides that “[t]he offer shall be construed
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-05-06
Snippet: arrest. Deviney, 112 So. 3d at 79. -2- On October 11, 2017, the
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-02-17
Snippet: (citations omitted). Id. at 478-79. 2 Adrian Legaspi. The underlying
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2020-06-10
Snippet: sufficient. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.422(c); § 768.79(2), Fla. Stat. (2017). Here, Garrison’s proposal was
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2020-06-10
Snippet: sufficient. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.422(c); § 768.79(2), Fla. Stat. (2017). Here, Garrison’s proposal was
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-07-29
Snippet: governing proposals for settlement. Section 768.79(2), Florida Statutes, provides the substantive law
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-02-22
Citation: 264 So. 3d 1147
Snippet: Civil Procedure 1.442 and Florida Statutes § 768.79. 2. SCANLAN proposes to settle all of SCANLAN's claim
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-02-22
Citation: 264 So. 3d 1147
Snippet: Civil Procedure 1.442 and Florida Statutes § 768.79. 2. SCANLAN proposes to settle all of SCANLAN's claim
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-01-04
Citation: 261 So. 3d 1236
Snippet: any. (d) State the total amount. § 768.79(2), Fla. Stat. (2018). The section also states that
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-08-29
Citation: 254 So. 3d 978
Snippet: faith, regarding the application of section 768.79. 2 The award of attorney’s fees did not differentiate
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-04-11
Citation: 242 So. 3d 518
Snippet: attributable to each offeror –implements section 768.79(2)(b)’s requirement that all settlement offers “[n]ame