Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 79.02 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 79.02 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 79.02

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
Chapter 79
HABEAS CORPUS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 79.02
79.02 Bond may be required.When it appears necessary, the court, justice, or judge granting the writ shall require bond with surety to be approved by the judge or clerk payable to the Governor executed in such manner and reasonable penalty as the court, justice, or judge prescribes; conditioned for the payment of the charges and costs awarded against the prisoner and that he or she will not escape by the way. The bond shall be filed and may be sued on in the name of the Governor for the benefit of any person interested therein. In the event of inability to give bond for the payment of charges and costs, he or she may be permitted, in the place thereof, to make deposit in such amount as the court, justice, or judge requires.
History.s. 1, Sept. 16, 1822; s. 1, ch. 3129, 1879; RS 1771; GS 2248; RGS 3571; CGL 5435; s. 29, ch. 67-254; s. 414, ch. 95-147.

F.S. 79.02 on Google Scholar

F.S. 79.02 on Casetext

Amendments to 79.02


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 79.02
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 79.02.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 79.02

Total Results: 20

United Cab of Broward, LLC and Ernsault Maurice v. Nathalia Muller

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-11-13

Snippet: strictly comply with the requirements of section 768.79(2) and rule 1.442(c)(2). Pratt, 161 So. 3d at 1273

CITY OF SARASOTA, OFFICER JUAN JAIMES v. ESTATE OF JOHN KAAFI, SOUCY

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-08-14

Snippet: party to whom [the offer] is being made," § 768.79(2)(b), and must

LOUMPOS v. RAYMOND JAMES & ASSOCIATES, INC., BANK ONE

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-08-02

Snippet: person"—which was a requirement at common law. See § 655.79(2); see also In re Est. of Combee, 601 So. 2d 1165

JEFFREY WAYNE MORRIS v. RACHEL BOYER

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-03-08

Snippet: to allow judgment”). Instead, section 768.79(2) provides that an offer made under the statute “shall

GROVER L. LARKINS, JR. v. SERGIO L. MENDEZ, etc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-05-17

Snippet: survivorship. Estate of Sonder, 63 So. 3d at 10; § 655.79(2), Fla. Stat. (2021). We do not reweigh the evidence;

MARK SPANAKOS v. HAWK SYSTEMS, INC.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-04-19

Snippet: 1014 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). Under section 768.79(2), an offer of judgment must: (a) Be in writing

VIRGINIA HADAD GONZALEZ v. MILLIN A. NOBREGAS

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-01-18

Snippet: 4 § 768.79(2), Fla. Stat. Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.442

Kimberley McQueary v. Florida Department of Health, State of Florida Board of Nursing

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-09-21

Snippet: be imposed for proscribed conduct . . . .” § 456.079(2), Fla. Stat. To impose a penalty above a guideline

SAFEPOINT INSURANCE COMPANY v. JANNIE WILLIAMS

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-11-10

Snippet: which may be awarded in a final judgment. § 768.79(2), Fla. Stat. Florida Rule of Civil Procedure

CCM Condominium Association, Inc., etc. v. Petri Positive Pest Control, Inc., etc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-09-09

Snippet: fees, interest, or costs. Further, section 768.79(2) provides that “[t]he offer shall be construed

Randall T. Deviney v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-05-06

Snippet: arrest. Deviney, 112 So. 3d at 79. -2- On October 11, 2017, the

MONICA SAMARA v. TENET FLORIDA PHYSICIAN SERVICES, LLC, etc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-02-17

Snippet: (citations omitted). Id. at 478-79. 2 Adrian Legaspi. The underlying

SUSAN MATRISCIANI v. GARRISON PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2020-06-10

Snippet: sufficient. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.422(c); § 768.79(2), Fla. Stat. (2017). Here, Garrison’s proposal was

SUSAN MATRISCIANI v. GARRISON PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2020-06-10

Snippet: sufficient. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.422(c); § 768.79(2), Fla. Stat. (2017). Here, Garrison’s proposal was

Palmentere Bros. Cartage Service, Inc. v. Heather Copeland and Phillip Copeland, her husband

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-07-29

Snippet: governing proposals for settlement. Section 768.79(2), Florida Statutes, provides the substantive law

Breger v. Robshaw Custom Homes, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-02-22

Citation: 264 So. 3d 1147

Snippet: Civil Procedure 1.442 and Florida Statutes § 768.79. 2. SCANLAN proposes to settle all of SCANLAN's claim

Breger v. Robshaw Custom Homes, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-02-22

Citation: 264 So. 3d 1147

Snippet: Civil Procedure 1.442 and Florida Statutes § 768.79. 2. SCANLAN proposes to settle all of SCANLAN's claim

Sandra Kent Wheaton v. Mardella Wheaton

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-01-04

Citation: 261 So. 3d 1236

Snippet: any. (d) State the total amount. § 768.79(2), Fla. Stat. (2018). The section also states that

21ST CENTURY CENTENNIAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. DWAYNE WALKER

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-08-29

Citation: 254 So. 3d 978

Snippet: faith, regarding the application of section 768.79. 2 The award of attorney’s fees did not differentiate

Peltz v. Trust Hospitality International, LLC

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-04-11

Citation: 242 So. 3d 518

Snippet: attributable to each offeror –implements section 768.79(2)(b)’s requirement that all settlement offers “[n]ame