Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
Total Results: 20
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-12-11
Snippet: the defendant’s lowest permissible sentence was 79.8 months. Id. at 65. “The State urged the court to
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-06-15
Snippet: additional delay if litigation is prolonged. § 768.79(8)(b). The judge is also expressly authorized to consider
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-04-24
Citation: 269 So. 3d 629
Snippet: 4th DCA 2016) (noting that the offender's LPS was 79.8 months (6.65 years) yet he was sentenced to five
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-04-24
Citation: 269 So. 3d 629
Snippet: 4th DCA 2016) (noting that the offender's LPS was 79.8 months (6.65 years) yet he was sentenced to five
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-04-24
Snippet: DCA 2016) (noting that the offender's LPS was 79.8 months (6.65 years) yet he was sentenced to five
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-03-07
Citation: 239 So. 3d 101
Snippet: correct the procedural problem. Section 1012.79(8)(a), Florida Statutes (2017), provides the EPC shall:
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-10-26
Citation: 204 So. 3d 63, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 15940
Snippet: scoresheet, Appellant’s lowest permissible sentence was 79.8 months; The State urged the court to impose the
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-05-31
Snippet: scoresheet, Charles’s lowest permissible sentence was 79.8 months. The State urged the court to impose the
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-03-09
Citation: 83 So. 3d 597, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 181, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 507, 2012 WL 753122
Snippet: District 29 would be Democratic and would have voted 79.8% for Sink (D), 82.6% for Obama (D), and 75.1% for
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-12-08
Citation: 52 So. 3d 707, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 18759, 2010 WL 4962859
Snippet: Comprehensive Plan amendments to 27.4 acres of the remaining 79.8 acres of the designated Marine Industrial sites
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-09-01
Citation: 936 So. 2d 1203, 2006 WL 2520089
Snippet: rendered the offer of judgment inadmissible. § 768.79(8), Fla. Stat. (2002). [2] In Florida, generally
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-06-19
Citation: 819 So. 2d 915, 2002 WL 1332720
Snippet: Florida Attorney General Opinions Nos. 85-53; 67-44; 79-8; 75-250; 51-160; 53-188. *919 The Florida rule against
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1997-02-04
Citation: 687 So. 2d 254, 1996 WL 685577
Snippet: to custody, as the law and evidence require." § 79.08. In the present case, the trial court seemed to
Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1985-07-08
Snippet: be gratuitous. Attorney General Opinions 67-44; 79-8; 75-250; 51-160, January 14, 1951, Biennial Report
Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1983-10-25
Snippet: Stoutamire, 38 So.2d 684 (Fla. 1948); AGO's 79-35, 79-8, 75-249, 75-250. Moreover, it is not necessary or
Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1981-08-04
Snippet: J.S. Officers s. 224; and AGO's 079-59, 079-35, 079-8, 078-157, 078-134. It is also well settled that
Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1981-04-27
Snippet: service is deemed to be gratuitous. See, e.g., AGO's 079-8 and 079-59 and authorities cited and discussed therein
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1980-12-17
Citation: 392 So. 2d 583, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17879
Snippet: WONDER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION et al., Appellees. No. 79-8. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1979-07-24
Citation: 373 So. 2d 88, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15490
Snippet: PER CURIAM. The final and amended final declaratory judgments appealed from are reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court with directions to (a) grant the appellant’s motion for rehearing, (b) allow the appellant to file an amended answer, and (c) proceed to re-consider the legal issues in this cause in the light of Dewberry v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co., 363 So.2d 1077 (Fla.1978).
Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1979-04-03
Snippet: Fussell, 24 So.2d 804 (Fla. 1946); see also AGO 079-8 and the authorities cited therein which are applicable