The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Chapter 79
HABEAS CORPUS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 79.12

79.12 Trial of accused pending appeal.—When in any criminal prosecution a writ of habeas corpus is applied for by any person charged with any criminal offense and the accused has been remanded to custody by the court to which such application is made, a supersedeas of the order made on appeal being taken to an appellate court shall not prevent the state from proceeding with the prosecution of the accused pending the decision by the appellate court in the habeas corpus, but the state may prosecute the accused as if appeal had not been taken in habeas corpus. If the accused is convicted of the charge, the court shall withhold imposition of sentence and final judgment until the appellate court has determined the issues presented in the habeas corpus.

History.—s. 1, ch. 10098, 1925; CGL 5445; s. 29, ch. 67-254.

F.S. 79.12 on Google Scholar

F.S. 79.12 on Casetext

Amendments to 79.12

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 79.12

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 79.12.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

RAYTHEON COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES,, 105 Fed. Cl. 236 (Fed. Cl. 2012)

. . . ) (38,710,808) Original CAS Period (25,157,449) 49.99% (12,576,491) Revised CAS Period (33,029,970) 79.12% . . . (2,866,134) Revised CAS Period (7,527,403) 79.12% (5,955,910) Riehardson/Waco 682,593 415,731 Original . . .

THEME PROMOTIONS, INC. a d b a Co- Op v. NEWS AMERICA MARKETING FSI, INC. a, 731 F. Supp. 2d 937 (N.D. Cal. 2010)

. . . $62.78 $172.00 $26.76 $73.32 2006 0.363 $65.61 $180.74 $27.73 $76.39 2007 0.363 $68.73 $189.34 $28.72 $79.12 . . .

TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL CO. LTD. v. W. DUDAS,, 511 F. Supp. 2d 81 (D.D.C. 2007)

. . . .2d 232, 235-36 (C.C.P.A.1966); Cady, 77 F.2d at 109; 1 Horowitz, Patent Office Rules and Practice § 79.12 . . .

S. WOLFERT, M. v. TRANSAMERICA HOME FIRST, INC., 439 F.3d 165 (2d Cir. 2006)

. . . . § 79.12(a) (2005). . . . . Comp.Code R. & Regs. 79.12(a). . . .

DAWSON, v. MILWAUKEE HOUSING AUTHORITY,, 930 F.2d 1283 (7th Cir. 1991)

. . . (Of the 79.12 million households above the poverty threshold, 1.73 million lived in public housing.) . . .

ANR PIPELINE COMPANY, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, 863 F.2d 959 (D.C. Cir. 1988)

. . . if the MBQ were eliminated from rate design, and the other changes were made, then the rate would be 79.12 . . .

PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY, El v. UNITED STATES STEEL CORP., 604 F. Supp. 555 (D. Del. 1985)

. . . same invention as that of roofing composition); see also 1 Horwitz, Patent Office Rules and Practice § 79.12 . . .

PAXTON, Jr. E. v. UNION NATIONAL BANK, a BROWN, v. UNION NATIONAL BANK OF LITTLE ROCK, PAXTON, Jr. E. v. UNION NATIONAL BANK, a, 688 F.2d 552 (8th Cir. 1982)

. . . 17.94 36 1975 ( 2.96) 14.98 ( 5) 1976 8.80 23.78 16 1977 11.00 35.14 18 1978 25.53 60.67 54 1979 18.45 79.12 . . .

E. MARSHALL v. A. WELCH,, 197 F. Supp. 874 (S.D. Ohio 1961)

. . . Service, the sum of $1,112 was disallowed as a charitable deduction and a refund in the amount of $79.12 . . .

v., 30 T.C. 156 (T.C. 1958)

. . . 82.58 per cent, of the 7,209 shares of Allis Corporation’s outstanding stock, and 6006% shares, or 79.12 . . .

STAFFORD ALLISON v. L. R. BAKER,, 152 Fla. 274 (Fla. 1943)

. . . Sections 79.01 to 79.12, Florida Statutes 1941, prescribe proceedings in habeas corpus. . . .

UNITED STATES v. VANDIVER, 133 F. 252 (E.D. Pa. 1904)

. . . but before the cases were delivered they were seized for undervaluation, and were duly appraised at $79.12 . . .

SAVIN v. JUNO, 21 F. Cas. 553 (C.C.D. La. 1873)

. . . Let there be a decree for the libellant for $79.12, the residue of his wages which it is conceded was . . .