The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Chapter 80
QUO WARRANTO

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 80.01

80.01 Quo warranto; refusal of Attorney General to institute.—Any person claiming title to an office which is exercised by another has the right, on refusal by the Attorney General to commence an action in the name of the state upon the claimant’s relation, or on the Attorney General’s refusal to file a petition setting forth the claimant’s name as the person rightfully entitled to the office, to file an action in the name of the state against the person exercising the office, setting up his or her own claim. The court shall determine the right of the claimant to the office, if the claimant so desires. No person shall be adjudged entitled to hold an office except upon full proof of the person’s title to the office in any action of this character.

History.—s. 2, ch. 1874, 1872; RS 1782; GS 2259; RGS 3582; CGL 5447; s. 30, ch. 67-254; s. 419, ch. 95-147.

F.S. 80.01 on Google Scholar

F.S. 80.01 on Casetext

Amendments to 80.01

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 80.01

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 80.01.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

BEVERLY CLARK COLLECTION, LLC, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,, 571 F. App'x 601 (9th Cir. 2014)

. . . This argument hinged on the IRS’s contention that the Clarks’ purported sale in December 1999 of an 80.01% . . .

EVANS, v. NANTUCKET COMMUNITY SAILING, INC. a O, 582 F. Supp. 2d 121 (D. Mass. 2008)

. . . . § 80.01(a). . . . establishing the demarcation lines in Part 80 of Title 33 of the Code of Federal Regulations. 33 C.F.R. § 80.01 . . . rules apply to “demarcation lines set forth in regulations by the Coast Guard,” citing 33 C.F.R. §§ 80.01 . . . In pertinent part, the foregoing regulation reads: § 80.01 General basis and purpose of demarcation lines . . . The waters outside the lines are COLREGS waters. 33 C.F.R. § 80.01. . . . .

L. WHITTINGTON, Sr. v. NORDAM GROUP INC., 429 F.3d 986 (10th Cir. 2005)

. . . Larson, Employment Discrimination § 80.01[1] (2d ed. 2005) (“Prior to enactment of the Civil Rights Act . . .

H. PRICE K. v. SOCIALIST PEOPLE S LIBYAN ARAB JAMAHIRIYA,, 384 F. Supp. 2d 120 (D.D.C. 2005)

. . . See 5-80 Texas Torts and Remedies § 80.01 (summarizing available damage awards); 4-50 California Torts . . .

CROPLIFE AMERICA, INC. d b a s LLC LLC v. CITY OF MADISON, N., 373 F. Supp. 2d 905 (W.D. Wis. 2005)

. . . APPENDIX i 80.01 - 80.07(2) l_ CHAPTER 80 ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS FOR LAWN FERTILIZER APPLICATION AND . . . SALE 80.01 Authority. 80.02 Purpose And Intent 80.03 Applicability. 80.04 Definitions. 80.05 Regulation . . . Safe of Fertilizer Containing Phosphorus. 80.08 Enforcement. 80.09 Penalty. 80.10 Severability Clause. 80.01 . . . (HISTORY: Ch 80 (sec. 80.01 Ihrough 80.t0) er . Sub 1 lo OA 33.2003-04, pub. 04/30/04.] . . .

BLOUIN, As ESTATE OF POULIOT, v. L. SPITZER, H., 356 F.3d 348 (2d Cir. 2004)

. . . Law §§ 80.01, 80.03, 80.07 (McKinney 1996). . . .

R. MAULER A. v. BAYFIELD COUNTY, a a, 204 F. Supp. 2d 1168 (W.D. Wis. 2001)

. . . . § 80.01(2)(a). E. . . .

FOUTS, v. E. BOLAY,, 795 So. 2d 1116 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . Section 80.01 of the Florida Statutes (1999) authorizes the pursuit of quo warranto relief but has been . . .

BARNETT, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, BONILLA v. CITY OF CHICAGO,, 969 F. Supp. 1359 (N.D. Ill. 1997)

. . . Taylor’s parameters are 0-50%, 50.01-80%, and 80.01-100%. . . .

FOLKSTONE MARITIME, LIMITED, a B. v. CSX CORPORATION, a CSX a, 64 F.3d 1037 (7th Cir. 1995)

. . . . §§ 80.01 to 80.1705 (1995). . . .

JUNO SRL, v. S V ENDEAVOUR, JUNO SRL, v. S V ENDEAVOUR,, 58 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 1995)

. . . . § 80.01 et seq. . . .

In MID- SOUTH CABINET MILLWORK, INC. BROWN, v. HEIGEL LUMBER HARDWARE,, 125 B.R. 16 (Bankr. E.D. Ark. 1990)

. . . On July 27, 1986, Heigel sold $80.01 worth of materials to Mid-South on credit. . . .

In C. KERNS,, 111 B.R. 777 (S.D. Ind. 1990)

. . . Norton, Bankruptcy Law and Practice § 80.01 (1987). . . .

A. BUTTERWORTH, E. R. A. M. v. R. ESPEY,, 523 So. 2d 1278 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . . § 80.01, Fla.Stat. (1985); State ex rel. Clark v. Klingensmith, 121 Fla. 297, 163 So. 704 (1935). . . . Also, the Attorney General did not refuse to commence this suit and, therefore, section 80.01, Florida . . .

v., 90 T.C. 405 (T.C. 1988)

. . . had a remaining life of between 17 and 18 years, and had a loan-to-original-value ratio of between 80.01 . . .

TUSA, v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA,, 825 F.2d 69 (5th Cir. 1987)

. . . Age 29 Age 28 544.71 + $5.00 fee $68.01 $300.00 $67.24 $184.96 1981 Age 29 Age 28 $52.60 + 55.00 fee $80.01 . . .

UNITED STATES v. UNITED PENN BANK, 608 F. Supp. 685 (M.D. Pa. 1984)

. . . Coal Law & Regulation, Theiss, et al. vol. 4, § 80.01[3], 80-8; Wheelock v. . . .

STATE OF LOUISIANA, J. GUSTE, Jr. v. M V TESTBANK,, 564 F. Supp. 729 (E.D. La. 1983)

. . . . §§ 80.01-.45 (1979) (Pilot Rules). 3. . . .

In RUSSELL RUSSELL v. ASSOCIATES FINANCIAL SERVICES COMPANY OF OKLAHOMA, INC., 29 B.R. 270 (Bankr. W.D. Okla. 1983)

. . . Associates”), on a Curtis Mathis Home Entertainment Center for a purchase price of $1,999.99 with tax of $80.01 . . .

APPELBAUM, v. CERES LAND COMPANY, R., 546 F. Supp. 17 (D. Minn. 1981)

. . . . §§ 80.01, 80.26 (repealed). . . .

ZENITH RADIO CORPORATION, v. MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL CO. LTD. NATIONAL UNION ELECTRIC CORPORATION, v. MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL CO. LTD. In JAPANESE ELECTRONIC PRODUCTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION, 505 F. Supp. 1190 (E.D. Pa. 1980)

. . . See 7 Moore’s Federal Practice Part 2 ¶ 80.01 at 80-2. . . .

FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CHICAGO, J. v. MATERIAL SERVICE CORPORATION, a, 544 F.2d 911 (7th Cir. 1976)

. . . . §§ 80.01 to 96.10-1. . . .

D. BAILEY N. C. v. PIPER, JAFFRAY HOPWOOD, INC., 414 F. Supp. 475 (D. Minn. 1976)

. . . . § 80.01 et seq. . . . 80.26 is the statute of limitation provision contained in the Minnesota Blue Sky Law, Minn.Stat. § 80.01 . . . indirectly in the sale of any stocks, bonds, investment contracts, or securities, as defined in section 80.01 . . .

WASHINGTON UTILITIES TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Co. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REGULATORY UTILITY COMMISSIONERS, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, 513 F.2d 1142 (9th Cir. 1975)

. . . R.C.W. 80.01.-075. . . .

S. PETERSEN v. HEAD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,, 367 F. Supp. 1072 (D.D.C. 1973)

. . . . §§ 80.01-80.45, the rules governing the Protection of Navigable Waters and Harbor and River Improvements . . . The Pilot Rules for Inland Waters, 33 C.F.R. §§ 80.01-80.45 further amplify this general requirement: . . .

VERNON J. ROCKLER AND CO. a v. GRAPHIC ENTERPRISES, INC. a, 52 F.R.D. 335 (D. Minn. 1971)

. . . . § 80.01 et seq. The court need not venture tó rule on this issue. . . .

W. WIRTZ, v. A- AMBULANCE SERVICE, INC., 299 F. Supp. 197 (E.D. Ark. 1969)

. . . paying a minimum of $75.00 per week to the employees, and after an apprenticeship this is raised to $80.01 . . .

BAILLIE v. WALKER, 30 Fla. Supp. 113 (Dade Cty. Cir. Ct. 1968)

. . . See §80.01, Florida Statutes. . . .

W. WIRTZ, v. COMPANIA DE SERVICIOS ELECTRICOS, S. A. P. W. De S. A., 304 F. Supp. 697 (D.C.Z. 1967)

. . . De J. 275.17 Castillo, Aníbal 30.00 Castillo, Jose M. 309.34 Castillo, Luis A. 426.61 Cedeno, Edwin 80.01 . . .

AMERICAN EXPORT LINES, INC. S. S. EXEMPLAR, v. DREDGE ADMIRAL, BARGE A- ARUNDEL CORPORATION, A- v. S. S. EXEMPLAR,, 254 F. Supp. 1 (S.D.N.Y. 1966)

. . . . § 80.01, with 33 C.F.R. 201.1(b). See generally 33 U.S.C. § 2.63-5 (1964). . . . .

LEE v. CANDIES, M V CAPTAIN PAUL,, 216 F. Supp. 665 (E.D. La. 1963)

. . . . § 210, Coast Guard Regulations, 33 C.F.R. 80.01-80.36. . . .

CALIFORNIA TRANSPORT CORPORATION, v. THE ACCENTOR, C. Jr., 183 F. Supp. 817 (E.D. La. 1960)

. . . . §§ 80.01-80.36. . See Culbertson v. . . .

WASHINGTON COUNTY KENNEL CLUB, a v. STATE, 107 So. 2d 176 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1958)

. . . . * M-- * ” Section 80.01, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., provides: “Any person claiming title to an office . . .

DEEP SEA TANKERS, THE s t RINCON HILLS, v. THE LONG BRANCH, THE NO. THE NO. THE AJAX THE BJAX, THE A, THE B, THE C, CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY THE CRR OF NJ NO. CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY THE CRR OF NJ NO., 258 F.2d 757 (2d Cir. 1958)

. . . . §§ 80.01-80.36; nor was the one-blast signal here given with any such intent. . . .

SADOWSKI, THE MARECO, v. THE GREMLIN, a, 147 F. Supp. 869 (D. Md. 1957)

. . . See 33 C.F.R. 80.01, 13 F.R. 7303, 13 F.R. 519, 19 F.R. 8038. . . .

STATE OF FLORIDA, N. VERNON HAWTHORNE, v. MARSHALL C. WISEHEART, 158 Fla. 267 (Fla. 1946)

. . . Hawthorne proceeded to file the information in his own name under the statute, Sec. 80.01 Fla. . . . Under the Statute, 80.01 Fla. Statutes 1941 (same F.S.A.) . . .

THREEDY v. BRENNAN, 40 F. Supp. 69 (E.D. Wis. 1941)

. . . . * * *” The defendants claim that even though the proceedings were irregular, Sec. 80.01(1), Wisconsin . . .