Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 82.05 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 82.05 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 82.05

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
Chapter 82
FORCIBLE ENTRY AND UNLAWFUL DETAINER
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 82.05
82.05 Service of process.
(1) After at least two attempts to obtain service as provided by law, if the defendant cannot be found in the county in which the action is pending and either the defendant does not have a usual place of abode in the county or there is no person 15 years of age or older residing at the defendant’s usual place of abode in the county, the sheriff must serve the summons and complaint by attaching them to some conspicuous part of the real property involved in the proceeding. The minimum amount of time allowed between the two attempts to obtain service is 6 hours.
(2) If a plaintiff causes, or anticipates causing, a defendant to be served with a summons and complaint solely by attaching them to some conspicuous part of real property involved in the proceeding, the plaintiff must provide the clerk of the court with two additional copies of the summons and the complaint and two prestamped envelopes addressed to the defendant. One envelope must be addressed to the defendant’s residence, if known. The second envelope must be addressed to the defendant’s last known business address, if known. The clerk of the court shall immediately mail the copies of the summons and complaint by first-class mail, note the fact of mailing in the docket, and file a certificate in the court file of the fact and date of mailing. Service is effective on the date of posting or mailing, whichever occurs later, and at least 5 days must have elapsed after the date of service before a final judgment for removal of the defendant may be entered.
History.s. 20, ch. 1630, 1868; RS 1691; GS 2156; RGS 3460; CGL 5313; s. 33, ch. 67-254; s. 7, ch. 2018-94.

F.S. 82.05 on Google Scholar

F.S. 82.05 on Casetext

Amendments to 82.05


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 82.05
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 82.05.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

DIAMOND SAWBLADES MANUFACTURERS COALITION, v. UNITED STATES, Co. Co. Co., 704 F. App'x 924 (Fed. Cir. 2017)

. . . had received from ATM made it appropriate for Commerce to recalculate the PRC-wide, entity rate to 82.05% . . .

IRWIN INDUSTRIAL TOOL COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES,, 222 F. Supp. 3d 1210 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2017)

. . . Explanatory Notes Chapter 82, 82.05. . . . The heading does not, however, cover tap wrenches (heading 82.05). (2) Interchangeable spanner sockets . . .

DIAMOND SAWBLADES MANUFACTURERS COALITION, v. UNITED STATES, Co. Co. Co., 219 F. Supp. 3d 1368 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2017)

. . . surrogate financial statements, (2) valuation of steel cores, and (3) assignment of the PRC-wide rate of 82.05 . . . Commerce calculated the 82.05 percent rate through a simple average of the PRC-wide rate, 164.09 percent . . . The PRC-wide rate of 82.05 percent for this fourth DSB review is the same rate as that sustained for . . . If by liquidated “as entered”, Gang Yan means subject to the PRC-wide rate of 82.05 percent, see 80 Fed . . . sustained redetermination of the PRC-wide margin for the first and second administrative reviews to 82.05 . . .

UNITED STATES Ru z, v. VILLAGE OF PORT CHESTER,, 704 F. Supp. 2d 411 (S.D.N.Y. 2010)

. . . For example, in Modified Plan A, District 3, District 4, District 5, and District 6 contain 82.05 percent . . .

GEZALYAN, v. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC,, 697 F. Supp. 2d 1168 (C.D. Cal. 2010)

. . . Anderson worked 82.05 hours at a rate of $425 per hour. Ms. . . .

In HENNING d b a, 52 B.R. 350 (Bankr. D.S.D. 1985)

. . . NEEDLER 82.05. hrs. at $100/hr. (Reduced from $150/hr.). $ 8,205.00 JEFFREY P. . . .

T. G. Co. Co. v., 69 Cust. Ct. 8 (Cust. Ct. 1972)

. . . Neither the Brussels Nomenclature (heading 82.05) nor the TSUS headnote on “interchangeable tools”, cited . . .

UNITED STATES I. BURACK, INC. a v. SOVEREIGN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, a, 338 F. Supp. 657 (S.D.N.Y. 1972)

. . . The deliveries were as follows: Delivery Date Invoice # Amount 4/23/63 38858 $ 82.05 5/24/63 39429 1,376.60 . . .

v., 64 Cust. Ct. 441 (Cust. Ct. 1970)

. . . Heading 82.05 reads in part as follows: 82.05 — INTERCHANGEABLE TOOLS FOR JÜAND TOOLS, FOR MACHINE Tools . . .

SOUTHEASTERN FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY, a v. BERMAN, J., 231 So. 2d 249 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1970)

. . . See § 82.05, Fla.Stat, F.S.A. . . .

v., 62 Cust. Ct. 268 (Cust. Ct. 1969)

. . . in the present heading ii the working edge is smooth apart from the abrasive coating, but in heading 82.05 . . . abrasive tools remain within the scope of the present Chapter (see Explanatory Notes to headings 82.02 and 82.05 . . .

M. FLORO, v. N. PARKER E., 205 So. 2d 363 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967)

. . . Sec. 82.05 F.S.A, says that “no question of title, but only a right of possession and of damages, shall . . .

v. J. v., 42 T.C. 859 (T.C. 1964)

. . . 73,675.29 18,079.44 Dec. 31,1958 (3-month 51, 320.89 HXARbal 27,900.33 20.00 1,287.97 Dec. 31,1959. 82.05 . . .

HORACE HEIDT FOUNDATION v. THE UNITED STATES, 145 Ct. Cl. 322 (Ct. Cl. 1959)

. . . treat members of organization at ranch and on tour-$1,484.95 Gilbert Shepard — hospitalization, etc- 82.05 . . .

DORSEY, v. HORNE,, 11 Fla. Supp. 149 (Palm Beach Cty. J. Ct. 1957)

. . . F.S.A. 82.05. . . .

FLORIDA ATHLETIC HEALTH CLUB, a R. G. SMILEY, v. C. E. ROYCE AUDREY S. ROYCE,, 160 Fla. 27 (Fla. 1948)

. . . , shall hold the same afterwards against the consent ■of the party entitled to possession thereof. “82.05 . . . Sec. 82.05, F.S. 1941, F.S.A. . . .

BOYD v. UNITED STATES, 275 F. 16 (4th Cir. 1921)

. . . Corn @ 82.05, $2,027.30. Less freight, $280.74,—$2,346.02. . . .

In LEWIN, 103 F. 852 (D. Vt. 1900)

. . . valued at $50, and a road cart at $15, which were put in, and, according to the report of the referee, $82.05 . . .