Florida Statute 82.101 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Chapter 82
FORCIBLE ENTRY AND UNLAWFUL DETAINER

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 82.101

82.101 Effect of judgment.—No judgment rendered either for the plaintiff or the defendant bars any action of trespass for injury to the real property or ejectment between the same parties respecting the same real property. A judgment is not conclusive as to the facts therein in any future action for trespass, ejectment, or quiet title. A judgment rendered either for the plaintiff or the defendant pursuant to this chapter may be superseded, in whole or in part, by a subsequent judgment in an action for trespass for injury to the real property, ejectment, or quiet title involving the same parties with respect to the same real property.

History.—s. 20, ch. 1630, 1868; RS 1703; GS 2168; RGS 3472; CGL 5325; s. 33, ch. 67-254; s. 9, ch. 2018-94.

Note.—Former s. 82.17.

F.S. 82.101 on Google Scholar

F.S. 82.101 on Casetext

Amendments to 82.101

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 82.101

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 82.101.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 82.101

Total Results: 19

JOHN A. THOMPSON, etc. v. STEPHEN A. THOMPSON, etc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-07-06

Snippet: 3 e.g., § 82.101, Fla. Stat. (“A judgment rendered either for the

Margaret A. Allen v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-01-07

Citation: 261 So. 3d 1255

Snippet: - 51 - Franqui v. State, 59 So. 3d 82, 101-02 (Fla. 2011) (citations omitted) (quoting Tompkins

State v. Butler

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-01-04

Citation: 263 So. 3d 195

Snippet: been different.' " Franqui v. State , 59 So.3d 82, 101 (Fla. 2011) (quoting Strickler , 527 U.S. at 280

State v. Butler

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-01-04

Citation: 263 So. 3d 195

Snippet: been different.' " Franqui v. State , 59 So.3d 82, 101 (Fla. 2011) (quoting Strickler , 527 U.S. at 280

Margaret A. Allen v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-12-20

Snippet: to the conviction.” Franqai v. State, 59 So. 3d 82, 101-02 (Fla. 2011) (citations omitted) (quoting Tompkins

Margaret A. Allen v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-12-20

Snippet: the conviction.” Franqui v. State, 59 So. 3d 82, 101-02 (Fla. 2011) (citations omitted) (quoting Tompkins

LeShannon Jerome Shelly v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-12-13

Citation: 262 So. 3d 1

Snippet: 1602 ; Edwards v. Arizona , 451 U.S. 477, 481-82, 101 S.Ct. 1880, 68 L.Ed.2d 378 (1981). After being

& SC13-2112 Corey Smith v. State of Florida and Corey Smith v. Julie L. Jones, etc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-03-16

Citation: 213 So. 3d 722

Snippet: this assertion. See Franqui v. State, 59 So. 3d 82, 101 (Fla. 2011). Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s

Michael T. Rivera v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-11-25

Citation: 187 So. 3d 822, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 658, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 2627

Snippet: defendant. Franqui v. State, 59 So.3d 82, 101 (Fla.2011). To establish the materiality prong

Serrano v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-03-17

Citation: 64 So. 3d 93, 36 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 108, 2011 Fla. LEXIS 619, 2011 WL 904071

Snippet: Ct. 1602; Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477, 481-82, 101 S.Ct. 1880, 68 L.Ed.2d 378 (1981). After being

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 2010-01-04

Snippet: charter. For example, in Attorney General Opinion 82-101, this office was asked whether a city could amend

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 2009-04-01

Snippet: municipal charter. In Attorney General Opinion 82-101, this office was asked to determine whether a municipal

Welch v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-09-25

Citation: 992 So. 2d 206, 2008 WL 4346416

Snippet: Ct. 1602; Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477, 481-82, 101 S.Ct. 1880, 68 L.Ed.2d 378 (1981). After being

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 2002-11-12

Snippet: 240,242 (Fla. 1951); and see, Op. Att'y Gen. Fla. 82-101 (1982). Cf.,Hollywood, Inc. v. Broward County,

Fiscal Operations, Inc. v. Miami-Dade County

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1999-06-30

Citation: 735 So. 2d 598, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 8663, 1999 WL 459943

Snippet: court order in a lawful way.2 See §§ 82.03-071, 82.101, Fla.Stat. Fiscal also sought statutory damages

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1990-05-11

Snippet: be levied without referendum approval.2 In AGO 82-101, this office determined whether a municipal charter

In Re Rules of Crim. Proc.(sent. Guidelines)

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-09-08

Citation: 439 So. 2d 848

Snippet: |-----------|---------------------------------| | 82-101 | 4 years |

Nova v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1982-06-01

Citation: 414 So. 2d 629, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28999

Snippet: PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Knight v. State, 394 So.2d 997, 1001 (Fla.1981); Roth v. State, 385 So.2d 114, 115 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).

Forbes v. National Industrial Bank of Miami

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1971-02-05

Citation: 243 So. 2d 613, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 5444

Snippet: compulsory nature and the provisions of Section 82.101, Florida Statutes, F.S.A.5 do not have a savings