Florida Statute 83.61 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Chapter 83
LANDLORD AND TENANT

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 83.61

83.61 Disbursement of funds in registry of court; prompt final hearing.—When the tenant has deposited funds into the registry of the court in accordance with the provisions of s. 83.60(2) and the landlord is in actual danger of loss of the premises or other personal hardship resulting from the loss of rental income from the premises, the landlord may apply to the court for disbursement of all or part of the funds or for prompt final hearing. The court shall advance the cause on the calendar. The court, after preliminary hearing, may award all or any portion of the funds on deposit to the landlord or may proceed immediately to a final resolution of the cause.

History.—s. 2, ch. 73-330; s. 2, ch. 74-146.

F.S. 83.61 on Google Scholar

F.S. 83.61 on Casetext

Amendments to 83.61

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 83.61

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 83.61.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 83.61

Total Results: 7

Cenvill Investors, Inc. v. Condominium Owners Organization of Century Village East, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1990-02-14

Citation: 556 So. 2d 1197, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 878, 1990 WL 11125

Snippet: rental income from the premises,” quoting section 83.61, Florida Statutes (1977), as an example of a provision

High Point Condominium Resorts v. Day

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1986-08-14

Citation: 494 So. 2d 508, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1812, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9400

Snippet: 82-226 was saved from repeal by section 1, chapter 83-61, Laws of Florida, but, more importantly, pursuant

Edwards v. Yellow Cab Co. of Lakeland

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1984-01-04

Citation: 443 So. 2d 417, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11245

Snippet: PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Our decision, however, does not preclude appellants from filing appropriate actions against any parties other than appellee Yellow Cab. We also note that appellants, of course, are not precluded from seeking relief which might be available in federal bankruptcy court. GRIMES, A.C.J., RYDER, J., and HAN-LON, Morton J., Associate Judge, concur.

Ladd v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-09-15

Citation: 437 So. 2d 245, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 23520

Snippet: PER CURIAM. DISMISSED. See Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla.1979). ORFINGER, C.J., and FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., and COWART, JJ., concur.

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1982-06-18

Snippet: 55(83.761[2]),83.56(83.763), 83.60(83.763), and 83.61(83.763[3]). Other provisions within Part II, Ch

Pomponio v. Claridge of Pompano Condominium

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1979-11-15

Citation: 378 So. 2d 774, 1979 Fla. LEXIS 4852

Snippet: dissenting). [46] § 83.60(2), Fla. Stat. (1977). [47] § 83.61, Fla. Stat. (1977) (emphasis supplied). [48] As

Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Palm Beach County

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1963-10-30

Citation: 157 So. 2d 820

Snippet: Automobile Indemnity Ass’n., 1945, 326 Ill.App. 83, 61 N.E.2d 577; Employers’ Liability Assur. Corp. v