Florida Statute 86.111 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Chapter 86
DECLARATORY JUDGMENTS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 86.111

86.111 Existence of another adequate remedy; effect.—The existence of another adequate remedy does not preclude a judgment for declaratory relief. The court may order a speedy hearing of an action for a declaratory judgment and may advance it on the calendar. The court has power to give as full and complete equitable relief as it would have had if such proceeding had been instituted as an action in chancery.

History.—s. 12, ch. 21820, 1943; s. 2, ch. 29737, 1955; s. 38, ch. 67-254.

Note.—Former s. 87.12.

F.S. 86.111 on Google Scholar

F.S. 86.111 on Casetext

Amendments to 86.111

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 86.111

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 86.111.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 86.111

Total Results: 20

State of Florida v. Robert Jean Morris

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-03-06T00:00:00-08:00

Snippet: capable advocacy.” Harrington v. Richter, 562 U.S. 86, 111 (2011). “[T]o establish deficient performance

Floyd William Damren v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2023-09-14T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: 1984); see also Harrington v. Richter, 562 U.S. 86, 111-12 (2011) (noting that Strickland’s “reasonable

Billy Jim Sheppard, Jr. v. State of Florida & SC20-422 Billy Jim Sheppard, Jr. v. Ricky D. Dixon, etc.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2022-03-09T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: ); see also Harrington v. Richter, 562 U.S. 86, 111(2011) (“Strickland does not enact Newton’s third

MICHAEL A. MARKS, P.A. v. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2022-01-11T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: argues this conclusion was in error, because section 86.111, Florida Statutes (2020), expressly provides: “

STEPHEN OLENCHAK v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2020-11-17T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: 104 S.Ct. 2052. Harrington v. Richter, 562 U.S. 86, 111-12 (2011). Here, the prosecutor erroneously

James Milton Dailey v. State of Florida & James Milton Dailey v. Mark S. Inch, etc.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2019-11-12T00:00:00-08:00

Snippet: constitutionality of rule 3.852, Wyatt v. State, 71 So. 3d 86, 111 (Fla. 2011); Howell v. State, 133 So. 3d 511, 515

Heritage Property and Casualty Insurance Co. v. Romanach

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2017-07-12T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 224 So. 3d 262

Snippet: preclude a judgment for declaratory relief.” § 86.111, Fla. Stat. (2015). 4 Conclusion

Green v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2017-05-17T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 225 So. 3d 229

Snippet: preclude a judgment for declaratory relief.” § 86.111, Fla. Stat. (2015). As noted above, under section

& SC16-56 Cary Michael Lambrix v. State of Florida and Cary Michael Lambrix v. Julie L. Jones, etc.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2017-03-09T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 217 So. 3d 977

Snippet: discussion. See, e.g., Wyatt v. State, 71 So. 3d 86, 111 (Fla. 2011) (denying claim

& SC14-881 Charles L. Anderson v. State of Florida and Charles L. Anderson v. Julie L. Jones, etc.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2017-03-09T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 220 So. 3d 1133

Snippet: presentation.” Harrington v. Richter, 562 U.S. 86, 111 (2011). Here, the record demonstrates that the

Lionel Michael Miller v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2015-02-26T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 161 So. 3d 354

Snippet: waived. See Wyatt v. State, 71 So.3d 86, 111 n. 19 (Fla.2011). Standard Jury Instruction

City of Apalachicola v. Franklin County

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2014-02-26T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 132 So. 3d 1217

Snippet: Declaratory Judgment Act, sections 86.11 through 86.111, Florida Statutes (2012), gives jurisdiction to

Angelo's Aggregate Materials, Ltd. v. Pasco County

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2013-08-14T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 118 So. 3d 971, 2013 WL 4081010, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 12643

Snippet: remedy does not preclude a declaratory judgment. § 86.111, Fla. Stat. Thus we are called upon to decide whether

Lambrix v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2013-06-27T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 124 So. 3d 890

Snippet: discussion. See, e.g., Wyatt v. State, 71 So.3d 86, 111 (Fla.2011) (denying claim that these provisions

Walling v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2013-01-30T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 105 So. 3d 660, 2013 WL 335929, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 1384

Snippet: decisions in Arizona v. Fulminante, 499 U.S. 279, 285-86, 111 S.Ct. 1246, 113 L.Ed.2d 302 (1991) and Ramirez

Rosenkrantz v. Feit

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2012-02-08T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 81 So. 3d 526

Snippet: Florida's Declaratory Judgment Act, §§ 86.11 to 86.111, Fla. Stat. (2010), gives jurisdiction to the circuit

Wyatt v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2011-11-23T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 78 So. 3d 512

Snippet: ;s Pizza murders. See Wyatt v. State, 71 So.3d 86, 111 (Fla.2011). We also deny claim 7, challenging the

Wyche v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2008-07-10T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 987 So. 2d 23

Snippet: factors); Arizona v. Fulminante, 499 U.S. 279, 285-86, 111 S.Ct. 1246, 113 L.Ed.2d 302 (1991) (disapproving

Orange County v. Expedia, Inc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2008-06-13T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 985 So. 2d 622

Snippet: remedy does not preclude" declaratory relief. § 86.111, Fla. Stat. It is well settled that to obtain declaratory…remedies does not preclude declaratory relief. § 86.111, Fla. Stat. Use of a declaratory action in the

Transp. Cas. Ins. v. Soil Tech Distributors

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2007-08-08T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 966 So. 2d 8

Snippet: preclude a judgment for declaratory relief." § 86.111, Fla. Stat. Moreover, the availability of a remedy… is foreclosed by the plain language of section 86.111. If, instead, Soil Tech is arguing that the insurer