Cases from cite.case.law:

HERITAGE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE CO. v. ROMANACH, 224 So. 3d 262 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . .” § 86.111, Fla. Stat. (2015). . . .

GREEN, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 225 So. 3d 229 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . .” § 86.111, Fla. Stat. (2015). . . .

M. GILBERT, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 95 F. Supp. 3d 1358 (M.D. Fla. 2015)

. . . Plaintiffs Complaint states that Count III is brought pursuant to Florida Statutes §§ 86.011-86.111 et . . .

CITY OF APALACHICOLA, v. FRANKLIN COUNTY,, 132 So. 3d 1217 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . Florida’s Declaratory Judgment Act, sections 86.11 through 86.111, Florida Statutes (2012), gives jurisdiction . . .

ANGELO S AGGREGATE MATERIALS, LTD. a v. PASCO COUNTY, a M., 118 So. 3d 971 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . . § 86.111, Fla. Stat. . . .

ROSENKRANTZ, v. E. FEIT,, 81 So. 3d 526 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Florida’s Declaratory Judgment Act, §§ 86.11 to 86.111, Fla. . . .

STITZEL, Co- v. NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 361 F. App'x 20 (11th Cir. 2009)

. . . . §§ 86-86.111, to determine the benefits due under the Policy. . . .

ORANGE COUNTY, v. EXPEDIA, INC. LLC,, 985 So. 2d 622 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . . § 86.111, Fla. Stat. . . . Stat., and the existence of other adequate remedies does not preclude declaratory relief. § 86.111, Fla . . .

SEHRINGER, v. BIG LOTS, INC., 532 F. Supp. 2d 1335 (M.D. Fla. 2007)

. . . Florida Statute § 86.111 provides that “existence of another adequate remedy does not preclude a judgment . . . Florida Statute § 86.111 states: "The court may order a speedy hearing of an action for declaratory judgment . . .

TRANSPORTATION CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, n k a v. SOIL TECH DISTRIBUTORS, INC. Co- Co-, 966 So. 2d 8 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . .” § 86.111, Fla. Stat. . . . rescission is the insurer’s only remedy, then this argument is foreclosed by the plain language of section 86.111 . . .

G. PRICE, v. L. TYLER,, 890 So. 2d 246 (Fla. 2004)

. . . See § 86.111, Fla. Stat. (2001). . . .

AMBER REINFORCING, INC. v. HUBBARD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,, 801 So. 2d 314 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . that Appellee “will call up for hearing its complaint for declaratory judgment in accordance with § 86.111 . . . Section 86.111, Florida Statutes (1999), provides, inter alia, that “[t]he court may order a speedy hearing . . .

ITT HARTFORD, a v. A. CLEARY,, 737 So. 2d 567 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . carrier, filed a complaint in circuit court for declaratory judgment pursuant to sections 86.101 and 86.111 . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, v. RAY CONSTRUCTION OF OKALOOSA COUNTY,, 667 So. 2d 859 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . The only statutory guidance of which we are aware is found in section 86.111, in which the legislature . . .

METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, a v. SUNLINK CORPORATION,, 642 So. 2d 551 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . Justus, 335 So.2d 818 (Fla. 1976); § 86.021, Fla.Stat. (1989); see § 86.111, Fla.Stat. (1989) ("The existence . . .

CONLEY, v. MORLEY REALTY CORPORATION,, 575 So. 2d 253 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . .” § 86.111, Fla.Stat. (1989). The order of dismissal must therefore be reversed. . . .

MIAMI DOLPHINS, LTD. v. GENDEN BACH, P. A. Ed, 545 So. 2d 294 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . . § 86.111, Fla.Stat. (1987). . . .

UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, v. ALGERNON- BLAIR, INC., 705 F. Supp. 1507 (M.D. Ala. 1988)

. . . . §§ 86.011-86.111 (1987); see generally 19 Fla.Jur.2d 5-6 (1980). . . .

W. McINTOSH, M. W. S. v. HARBOUR CLUB VILLAS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION,, 468 So. 2d 1075 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . Although declaratory relief is not precluded by the existence of another adequate remedy, § 86.111, Fla . . . was section 87.12, Florida Statutes (1951), which was substantially the same as the present section 86.111 . . .

N. MACIEJEWSKI, v. M. HOLLAND, Jr. P. A. M. Jr. M. Jr. P. A., 441 So. 2d 703 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . . § 86.111, Fla.Stat. (1981). . . .

STATE COMMISSION ON ETHICS, v. SULLIVAN, 430 So. 2d 928 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . Further, section 86.111 provides that the “existence of another adequate remedy does not preclude a judgment . . .

KELNER, v. W. WOODY By- a L. J. A. E. A. W. B. M. L., 399 So. 2d 35 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . Moreover, although the existence of other remedies does not preclude declaratory judgment, section 86.111 . . .

SCHOOL BOARD OF LEON COUNTY, v. S. MITCHELL,, 346 So. 2d 562 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . Section 86.111, Florida Statutes (1975). . . .

B. MILLS, I. v. BALL, 344 So. 2d 635 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . It should be further noted that § 86.111, Fla.Stat. (1975), provides in part that: “The existence of . . .

CITY OF CORAL SPRINGS, a v. FLORIDA NATIONAL PROPERTIES, INC. a, 340 So. 2d 1271 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . Likewise, the provision of Section 86.111, Florida Statutes (1975), that “The existence of another adequate . . .

JENSEN J. v. DiPAOLO S ITALIAN FOODS CO. a, 244 So. 2d 513 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1970)

. . . . '§ 86.111 (1969), F.S.A. . . .

FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION v. NEAL,, 224 So. 2d 774 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)

. . . . § 86.111, F.S.A. . . .