Home
Jacksonville Location Phone Call/Texting Policy How do Fees Work?
Criminal Defense DUI Defense Foreclosure Defense Copyright Workers Compensation Attorney Jacksonville Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statutes Georgia Code Jacksonville Accident Attorney Real Estate Attorney Jacksonville Florida Criminal Lawyer Jacksonville Notary Public
Menu
904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 88.2091 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 88.2091 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 88.2091

The 2023 Florida Statutes

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
Chapter 88
UNIFORM INTERSTATE FAMILY SUPPORT ACT
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 88.2091
88.2091 Credit for payments.—A tribunal of this state shall credit amounts collected for a particular period pursuant to any child support order against the amounts owed for the same period under any other child support order for support of the same child issued by the tribunal of this state, another state, or a foreign country.
History.—s. 2, ch. 96-189; s. 13, ch. 2011-92.

F.S. 88.2091 on Google Scholar

F.S. 88.2091 on Casetext

Amendments to 88.2091


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 88.2091
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 88.2091.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

10 Cases from Casetext:Date Descending

U.S. Supreme Court11th Cir. - Ct. App.11th Cir. - MD FL11th Cir. - ND FL11th Cir. - SD FLFed. Reg.Secondary Sources - All

  1. Houston v. Maglio

    845 So. 2d 971 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)   Cited 1 times
    Once a Florida support order is entered, either party may request that Florida enter an order determining which support order controls, and a certified copy of that order may be filed with Michigan. § 88.2071(3)-(6). Any amounts paid under the Michigan order while the Florida order is in force must be credited against the Florida obligation. § 88.2091, Fla. Stat. (2002). If Maglio seeks to challenge entry of the Michigan order and his obligations under said order, he must bring that challenge in the Michigan courts. See Barr v. Barr, 749 So.2d 992 (Pa.Super.Ct. 2000).
    PAGE 973

    Cases from cite.case.law:

    HOUSTON v. A. MAGLIO,, 845 So. 2d 971 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

    . . . . § 88.2091, Fla. Stat. (2002). . . .