Florida Statutes
Fla. Stat. § 90.107 (2025)
Limited admissibility.
✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
90.107 Limited admissibility.—When evidence that is admissible as to one party or for one purpose, but inadmissible as to another party or for another purpose, is admitted, the court, upon request, shall restrict such evidence to its proper scope and so inform the jury at the time it is admitted.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 25
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1981–2025 · leading case: Hoskins v. State, 965 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 2007).
Hoskins v. State, 965 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 2007). “" § 90.107, Fla. Stat. (2004). Hoskins failed to preserve this argument.”
McDuffie v. State, 970 So. 2d 312 (Fla. 2007). “See § 90.107, Fla. Stat. (2005); Consalvo v. State, 697 So.”
Saleeby v. Rocky Elson Constr., Inc., 3 So. 3d 1078 (Fla. 2009). “See § 90.107, Fla. Stat. (2006) ("When evidence that is admissible as to one party or for one purpose, but inadmissible as to another party or for another purpose, is admitted, the court, upon request, shall restrict such evidence to its proper scope and so inform the jury at…”
Wright v. State, 19 So. 3d 277 (Fla. 2009). “at 813 (citing § 90.107, Fla. Stat. (1995)); see also Parsons v.”
State v. Smith, 573 So. 2d 306 (Fla. 1990). “[4] Section 90.107 of the Florida Statutes (1987) provides: When evidence that is admissible as to one party or for one purpose, but inadmissible as to another party or for another purpose, is admitted, the court, upon request, shall restrict such evidence to its proper scope…”
Parsons v. Motor Homes of Am., 465 So. 2d 1285 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). “§ 90.107, Fla. Stat. (1981). [3] See also: Fla.”
Kingery v. State, 523 So. 2d 1199 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). “" § 90.107, Fla. Stat. (1985); Mazzara v. State, 437 So.”
Consalvo v. State, 697 So. 2d 805 (Fla. 1997). “Under section 90.107, Florida Statutes (1995), evidence that is admissible for one purpose may be inadmissible for another purpose.”
Eugene v. State, 53 So. 3d 1104 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011). “See § 90.107, Fla. Stat. (2005). This is an example of such an instruction: A recorded police interrogation of the defendant has been introduced into evidence in this trial.”
Lopez v. State, 716 So. 2d 301 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998). “See § 90.107(1), Fla. Stat.; 1 Barbara E. Bergman & Nancy Hollander, Wharton's Criminal Evidence § 4.”
Mazzara v. State, 437 So. 2d 716 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). “Section 90.107, Florida Statutes (1981). This principle was recognized and applied before the adoption of the Florida Evidence Code to prior inconsistent statements admissible, as here, for impeachment purposes, but inadmissible as substantive evidence.”
State v. Palmore, 510 So. 2d 1152 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). “1984); see § 90.107, Fla. Stat. (1985). Although Palmore's statement may be inadmissible for the purpose of bolstering the victim's testimony, Van Gallon v.”
— 90.107(1) — 1 case
Lopez v. State, 716 So. 2d 301 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998). “See § 90.107(1), Fla. Stat.; 1 Barbara E. Bergman & Nancy Hollander, Wharton's Criminal Evidence § 4.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.