The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . See § 90.608(4), Fla. Stat. (2016) ; Edwards v. . . .
. . . "To impeach a witness by use of a prior inconsistent statement pursuant to section 90.608, Florida Statutes . . . that the statements in the affidavit "were not 'statements of the witness' as contemplated by section 90.608 . . . Court in a postconviction case theorized that the defendant there could have introduced, under section 90.608 . . .
. . . Section 90.608, Florida Statutes, provides that Appellant can "attack the credibility of a witness" by . . . a witness by pointing out lack of competency is not collateral and may be used for impeachment); § 90.608 . . . Under section 90.608, a party may attack the credibility of a witness by "[s]howing a defect of capacity . . .
. . . Section 90.608, Florida Statutes (2016), provides that "[a]ny party, including the party calling the . . .
. . . Section 90.608(5), Florida Statutes (2010), states that any party "may attack the credibility of a witness . . .
. . . testimony was admissible because it directly contradicted the former girlfriend’s testimony. ’See § 90.608 . . .
. . . State, 569 So.2d 425, 429 (Fla. 1990); see §§ 90.608-610, Fla. Stat. (2012). In Cruse v. . . . did] not fall under any of the express ways allowed to attack a witness’s credibility” under section 90.608 . . .
. . . . § 90.608, Fla. Stat. (2014). . . . Our reading of section 90.608 leads us to conclude that the impeachment evidence in this case does not . . . Clause, the introduction of the statement to impeach the aunt was nonetheless improper under section 90.608 . . .
. . . And section 90.608, Florida Statutes, provides that “[a]ny party, including the party calling the witness . . . See majority op. at 23 (citing § 90.608(2), Fla. Stat., and Steinger, 103 So.3d at 203). . . . . § 90.608(2), Fla. Stat. (2015). . . .
. . . See § 90.608(1), Fla. Stat. (2015). . . . ’s prior inconsistent statement be reduced to writing in order to impeach the witness under section 90.608 . . .
. . . State, 59 So.3d 1092, 1099 (Fla.2011)); see also § 90.608(2), Fla. . . .
. . . “Section 90.608(2), Florida Statutes, permits cross-examination to ‘attack the credibility of a witness . . .
. . . Further, such matters are not' the proper subject for impeachment ■ under section 90.608, Florida Statutes . . . Section 90.608(3) allows impeachment of the character of the witness by evidence of character relating . . .
. . . Under section 90.608, Florida Statutes (2013), parties can impeach a witness by: “1) introducing statements . . .
. . . impeached in Florida by “[a]ny party, including the party calling the witness,” pursuant to section 90.608 . . . Under section 90.608(5), Florida Statutes, “[a]ny party, including the party calling the witness, may . . .
. . . witness” pursuant to section 90.615(1), Florida Statutes, in light of the 1990 amendment to section 90.608 . . . Appellant argues that the court witness rule is no longer necessary or appropriate based upon section 90.608 . . .
. . . . § 90.608(2), Fla. Stat. (2009). . . .
. . . To impeach a witness by use of a prior inconsistent statement pursuant to section 90.608, Florida Statutes . . . Detective Hardy’s arrest affidavit were not “statements of the witness” as contemplated by section 90.608 . . .
. . . See § 90.608(1), Fla. Stat. (2001); Marshall v. . . . See § 90.608(1); see also Charles W. Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence § 608.4 (2013 ed.) . . .
. . . Carlisle further contends the evidence was admissible under sections 90.404(2) and 90.608(2), Florida . . . Section 90.608(2) (Impeachment by Showing the Witness is Biased) Pantoja addressed the admissibility . . . of the false accusations under 90.608(2), which allows impeachment by “ ‘[sjhowing that the witness is . . . biased.’ ” Id. at 1097 (quoting § 90.608(2), Fla. . . . Applying the Court’s discussion of section 90.608(2) to the instant case, we must conclude the trial . . .
. . . Section 90.608(5), Florida Statutes (2011), provides that a witness’s credibility may be attacked by . . .
. . . The court then observed that the Florida Rules of Evidence, specifically Rule 90.608, gave Childers the . . . Florida Evidence Rule 90.608 provides that: "[a]ny party, including the party calling the witness, may . . . Stat. § 90.608. . . . .
. . . . § 90.608, a trial court should allow a defendant to impeach the credibility of a state -witness. . . .
. . . Section 90.608, Florida Statutes (2012), states that any party may attack the credibility of a witness . . .
. . . Section 90.608(2), Florida Statutes (2009), allows a party to attack the credibility of a witness by . . .
. . . While bias is a permissible basis for attacking a witness’s credibility under section 90.608(2), Florida . . .
. . . Under Section 90.608(2), Florida Statutes (2009), any party may impeach a witness’s credibility by showing . . . Letter of Protection Any party may attack the credibility of a witness by exposing a potential bias. § 90.608 . . .
. . . See § 90.608(2), Fla. Stat. (2011). . . .
. . . .” § 90.608(5), Fla. Stat. (2010). . . .
. . . Section 90.608(1), Florida Statutes (2010), provides that a party may impeach a witness by introducing . . .
. . . this limited record that the testimony would be non-hearsay and admissible to show bias under section 90.608 . . .
. . . surrounding the plea bargain in the victim’s pending case were admissible to show bias under section 90.608 . . .
. . . .” § 90.608(2), Fla. Stat. (2010). . . .
. . . See § 90.608(2), Fla. Stat. (2011); Steinger, Iscoe & Greene, P.A. v. GEICO Gen. Ins. . . .
. . . State, 25 So.3d 656, 657 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (emphasis original) (quoting § 90.608(5), Fla. . . .
. . . . § 90.608(2), Fla. Stat. (2012). . . .
. . . Section 90.608(1), Florida Statutes (2008), allows for the admission of prior inconsistent statements . . .
. . . Section 90.608, Florida Statutes, (2008), lists the grounds for impeaching a witness. . . .
. . . State, 688 So.2d 383, 384 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997); see also § 90.608(1), Fla. Stat. (2010). . . . prior inconsistent statement to be reduced to writing in order to impeach the witness under section 90.608 . . .
. . . Section 90.608(2), Florida Statutes (2009), allows a party to attack the credibility of a witness by . . .
. . . Section 90.608(1), Florida Statutes, permits the impeachment of a witness through the introduction of . . .
. . . .” § 90.608(1), Fla. Stat. (2008). . . .
. . . Section 90.608(5), Florida Statutes (2009), provides that “[a]ny party ... may attack the credibility . . .
. . . Section 90.608, Florida Statutes (2006), specifies the permissible methods of impeachment, including . . .
. . . Under subsection 90.608(5), Florida Statutes (2009), any party “may attack the credibility of a witness . . .
. . . .” § 90.608(5), Fla. Stat. (2009) (emphasis added). . . .
. . . Section 90.608 allowed counsel for the Harrises to impeach without a showing that the witness was adverse . . .
. . . State, 472 So.2d 1350, 1352 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985) (citing § 90.608(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1983)). . . .
. . . The City asserted that, pursuant to section 90.608, Florida Statutes (2009), evidence of these prior . . . Section 90.608 provides in pertinent part: Any party, including the party calling the witness, may attack . . . specifically provides that nothing in section 90.610 affects the admissibility of evidence under section 90.608 . . .
. . . See § 90.608(5), Fla. Stat. (2008) (“Any party ... may attack the credibility of a witness by ... . . .
. . . not know who shot him; that statement was admissible as a prior inconsistent statement under section 90.608 . . . The Supreme Court described the operation of a section 90.608(1) prior inconsistent statement in Pearce . . . his trial testimony that Rodriguez shot him, so it was “inconsistent” within the meaning of section 90.608 . . .
. . . See § 90.608(2), Fla. Stat. (1993); see also Diaz v. State, 597 So.2d 368 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). . . . State, 680 So.2d 567, 568 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); see also § 90.608(2), Fla. . . .
. . . He also argued that barring this cross-examination violated Florida Evidence Rule 90.608(2), which allows . . .
. . . .; see also § 90.608, Fla. . . . But even though section 90.608 permits a party to impeach its own witness, “it is still improper under . . .
. . . admissible. (3) Nothing in this section affects the admissibility of evidence under s. 90.404 or s. 90.608 . . . In so holding, we have explained, “Allowing this testimony would violate sections 90.608, 90.609, and . . . Pantoja further argues that the victim’s prior false accusation is admissible under section 90.608(2) . . . Evidence that is relevant to a witness’ bias is admissible under section 90.608(2). . . . ways of showing the witness’ bias, and, thus, are also proper grounds for impeachment under section 90.608 . . . In a particular case, however, the evidence might be admissible under section 90.608(2) to show the witness . . . Section 90.608, Florida Statutes (2006), provides that “the credibility of a witness” may be attacked . . .
. . . . § 90.608, Fla. Stat. (2008). . . .
. . . properly argued this ground before the trial court, Gooch’s testimony would be inadmissible under section 90.608 . . . “Section 90.608(5) provides that any party may attack the credibility of a witness by contradictory testimony . . .
. . . Nor was the officer’s statement admissible to impeach the witness under sections 90.608 and 90.614(2) . . .
. . . .” § 90.608(2),. Fla. Stat. (2008). . . .
. . . .” § 90.608(2), Fla. Stat. (2008). . . . See § 90.608, Fla.Stat. (1987). . . . Tanzi, on the other hand, was decided under section 90.608, Florida Statutes, which was the section involved . . . See §§ 90.608, 609, 610, Fla. Stat. (2007). See also Fernandez v. . . .
. . . In addition, section 90.608(1), Florida Statutes, states that “[a]ny party, including the party calling . . .
. . . See also § 90.608(5), Fla. . . . . § 90.608(5), Fla. . . .
. . . . § 90.608(1), Fla. Stat. (2008). . . .
. . . . § 90.608, and Florida case law. . . . Stat. § 90.608 ("Any party ... may attack the credibility of a witness by ... . . . State, 661 So.2d 288, 291 (Fla.1995); and that " 'Section 90.608(2), Florida Statutes, as well as the . . .
. . . Section 90.608(1), Florida Statutes, states that “[a]ny party, including the party calling the witness . . .
. . . relevant evidence that prior drug use affects the witness’s ability to observe, remember, and recount); § 90.608 . . .
. . . Section 90.608(1), Florida Statutes, states that “[a]ny party, including the party calling the witness . . .
. . . .” § 90.608(5), Fla. Stat. (2009) (emphasis added). . . .
. . . . § 90.608(2), Fla. Stat. (2008). . . .
. . . Under section 90.608(2), Florida Statutes (2007), any party may attack the credibility of a witness by . . .
. . . . § 90.608(2), Fla. Stat. (2009). . . .
. . . Evid.Code § 90.608(1). . . .
. . . Section 90.608(2), Florida Statutes (2006), expressly authorizes the introduction of evidence to attack . . . Here, section 768.041(3) should not be applied in derogation of section 90.608(2). . . . the situation in which a choice was required between applying section 768.041(3) and applying section 90.608 . . .
. . . Section 90.608, Florida Statutes, permits “[a]ny party, including the party calling the witness,” to . . . introducing statements of the witness which are ineonsis-tent with the witness’s present testimony.” § 90.608 . . . appellant claims that the attorney’s testimony would have been evidence of bias, admissible under section 90.608 . . .
. . . . § 90.608, Fla. Stat. (2008). . . .
. . . (holding that a trial court properly refused to allow impeachment by a means not listed in section 90.608 . . . Section 90.608 provides a complete list of the proper ways to attack a witness’ credibility: (1) Introducing . . . Evidence that is relevant to a witness’ bias is admissible under section 90.608(2). . . . ways of showing the witness’ bias, and, thus, are also proper grounds for impeachment under section 90.608 . . .
. . . In doing so, we noted that section 90.608, Florida Statutes, permits the credibility of a witness' to . . . In light of Doremus and considering the limitations on impeachment as contained in section 90.608, Florida . . .
. . . Id. at 770-71; see also §§ 90.403, 90.608(1), Fla. Stat. (2007). . . .
. . . introducing evidence about Peters’s racial bias, since such testimony was admissible under section 90.608 . . . Section 90.608(2)(e) provides that any party may attack the credibility of a witness by “[sjhowing that . . . well as a generalized prejudice against black persons, are proper subjects to explore under section 90.608 . . .
. . . . § 90.608, Fla. Stat. (2006). . . .
. . . (citing § 90.608(1), Fla. Stat. (1995), and State v. Smith, 573 So.2d 306, 313 (Fla. 1990))). . . . . our analysis, we need not decide whether this would have constituted proper impeachment under section 90.608 . . .
. . . Section 90.608(2), Florida Statutes, permits cross-examination to “attack the credibility of a witness . . .
. . . In theory, the Sanchez-Velasco affidavit could be introduced under section 90.608, Florida Statutes ( . . . Because Sanchez-Velasco died without perpetuating his testimony, impeachment pursuant to section 90.608 . . .
. . . justify the use of the false reporting evidence (1) to establish bias or motive pursuant to section 90.608 . . .
. . . .” § 90.608(4), Fla. Stat. (2006). . . .
. . . . § 90.608, Fla. Stat. (2005); § 90.702, Fla. Stat. (2005). . . .
. . . . — Evidence of the character of a witness, as provided in ss. 90.608-90.610. . . . Section 90.608 deals with “[w]ho may impeach” a witness and section 90.609 defines the “[c]haracter of . . .
. . . Slocum did indeed read section 90.608 to exclude cross examination of a police officer about his interrogation . . . Slocum is also contrary to Gibson which interpreted section 90.608 to liberally permit cross examination . . .
. . . As the state correctly notes, section 90.608(5), Florida Statutes, provides that a party may attack the . . .
. . . However, rule 90.608(2) of the Florida Evidence Code provides that a party may attack the credibility . . . of a witness by showing that the witness is biased. § 90.608(2), Fla. . . .
. . . See § 90.608, Fla. Stat. (2005). . . .