Florida Statute 90.614 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VII
EVIDENCE

Chapter 90
EVIDENCE CODE

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 90.614

90.614 Prior statements of witnesses.—

(1) When a witness is examined concerning the witness’s prior written statement or concerning an oral statement that has been reduced to writing, the court, on motion of the adverse party, shall order the statement to be shown to the witness or its contents disclosed to him or her.

(2) Extrinsic evidence of a prior inconsistent statement by a witness is inadmissible unless the witness is first afforded an opportunity to explain or deny the prior statement and the opposing party is afforded an opportunity to interrogate the witness on it, or the interests of justice otherwise require. If a witness denies making or does not distinctly admit making the prior inconsistent statement, extrinsic evidence of such statement is admissible. This subsection is not applicable to admissions of a party-opponent as defined in s. 90.803(18).

History.—s. 1, ch. 76-237; s. 1, ch. 77-77; ss. 17, 22, ch. 78-361; ss. 1, 2, ch. 78-379; s. 492, ch. 95-147.

F.S. 90.614 on Google Scholar

F.S. 90.614 on Casetext

Amendments to 90.614

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 90.614

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 90.614.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 90.614

Total Results: 20

JUSTIN J. HAWN v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2020-07-22

Snippet: person to whom the statement was allegedly made. § 90.614(2), Fla. Stat. (2018); Pearce, 880 So. 2d. at 569–70

JEFFREY A HELMS v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-05-15

Citation: 271 So. 3d 1030

Snippet: giving it to the detective, pursuant to section 90.614, Florida Statutes (2017), the detective could testify

Billy Joe Pitts v. State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-08-10

Citation: 227 So. 3d 674

Snippet: presented during trial.” (citation omitted)); § 90.614(2), Fla. Stat. (2015) (providing that extrinsic

Khalid Ali Pasha v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-05-11

Citation: 225 So. 3d 688, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 569, 2017 WL 1954975, 2017 Fla. LEXIS 1067

Snippet: attention to the prior inconsistent statement. See § 90.614(2), Fla. Stat. (2012); Pearce, 880 So.2d at 570

Dominique Wright v. State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-06-29

Citation: 199 So. 3d 1019, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 9986

Snippet: deposition as inconsistent statements. See § 90.614(2), Fla. Stat. (2011) (“Extrinsic evidence of a

Dominique Wright v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-07-23

Citation: 143 So. 3d 995, 2014 WL 3605605, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 11175

Snippet: deposition as inconsistent statements. See § 90.614(2), Fla. Stat. (2011) (“Extrinsic evidence of a

Louis v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-11-21

Citation: 104 So. 3d 1126, 2012 WL 5870078, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 20225

Snippet: id. (citing § 90.614(2), Fla. Stat. (2008)) (explaining the requirement in section 90.614(2) that the witness

Elmer v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-10-12

Citation: 114 So. 3d 198, 2012 WL 4838884, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 17748

Snippet: may be proved by another witness. See id. Section 90.614(2), Florida Statutes (2010), provides that before

K.P. v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-06-13

Citation: 90 So. 3d 890, 2012 WL 2122162, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 9580

Snippet: opportunity to explain or deny the prior statement.” § 90.614(2), Fla. Stat. (2010). Without the ability to direct

Suarez v. Benihana National of Florida Corp.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-05-09

Citation: 88 So. 3d 349, 2012 WL 1605268, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7208

Snippet: in a deposition”) (emphasis added). See also § 90.614, Fla. Stat.2006 (impeachment of witness permitted

Rodriguez v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-07-13

Citation: 65 So. 3d 1133, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 11007, 2011 WL 2694428

Snippet: inconsistent statement within the meaning of section 90.614(2), Florida Statutes (2009), so that extrinsic

Davis v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-12-21

Citation: 52 So. 3d 52, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 19940, 2010 WL 5540943

Snippet: to impeach the witness under sections 90.608 and 90.614(2), Florida Statutes (2006), because Combs repeatedly

Pennsylvania Lumbermens Mutual Insurance Co. v. Indiana Lumbermens Mutual Insurance Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-09-15

Citation: 43 So. 3d 182, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 13622, 2010 WL 3564711

Snippet: statement to impeach the homeowner under section 90.614, Florida Statutes, his testimony does not go to

Ramsammy v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-08-11

Citation: 43 So. 3d 100, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 11750, 2010 WL 3194460

Snippet: his hearsay statements as required under section 90.614(2), Florida Statutes. Before extrinsic evidence

Woodall v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-06-25

Citation: 39 So. 3d 419, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 9210, 2010 WL 2539429

Snippet: admissible for impeachment purposes under section 90.614, Florida Statutes, as long as a proper foundation

McDaniel v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2009-12-11

Citation: 24 So. 3d 654, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 19299, 2009 WL 4723310

Snippet: testimony with prior inconsistent statements. See § 90.614, Fla. Stat. (2007); Varas v. State, 815 So.2d 637

Thomas v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-05-20

Citation: 981 So. 2d 1254, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 7569

Snippet: PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See § 90.614(2), Fla. Stat. (2006). ORFINGER, TORPY and COHEN, JJ., concur.

Thomas v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-05-20

Citation: 981 So. 2d 1254, 2008 WL 2152915

Snippet: Beach, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See § 90.614(2), Fla. Stat. (2006). ORFINGER, TORPY and COHEN

D.M.L. v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-03-19

Citation: 976 So. 2d 670, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 3868

Snippet: extrinsic evidence of such statement is admissible. § 90.614(2). “Prior to questioning a witness about the contents

DML v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-03-19

Citation: 976 So. 2d 670, 2008 WL 724024

Snippet: extrinsic evidence of such statement is admissible. § 90.614(2). "Prior to questioning a witness about the contents