Cases from cite.case.law:

JOHNSON, v. STATE, 252 So. 3d 1114 (Fla. 2018)

. . . . § 90.701, Fla. Stat. . . . We agree with the Fifth District's conclusion that in the context of section 90.701, Florida Statutes . . .

JOHNSON, v. STATE, 254 So. 3d 617 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . Section 90.701, Florida Statutes, describes when lay witnesses may give opinion testimony: If a witness . . . But under section 90.701, Florida Statutes, the question is, first, was he required to "communicate . . . . The second question we must answer under section 90.701, Florida Statutes, is whether the officer's testimony . . .

J. LAMB, v. STATE, 246 So. 3d 400 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . Section 90.701, Florida Statutes (2016), states: If a witness is not testifying as an expert, the witness's . . . We recently examined section 90.701 to determine the circumstances when a court may allow a lay person . . .

SAJIUN, v. HERNANDEZ,, 226 So. 3d 875 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . . § 90.701, Fla. Stat. (1991). . . . testimony of a lay witness is only permitted if it is based on what the witness has personally perceived. § 90.701 . . . , 646 So.2d 746, 748-49 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994) (alteration in original) (footnote omitted); see also § 90.701 . . . See § 90.701, Fla. Stat. (2015). The statute does not limit perception to visual perception. Id. . . . 189 So.3d at 259-60 (“Officer Munecas’s testimony was admissible lay opinion testimony under Section 90.701 . . .

JOHNSON, v. STATE, 215 So. 3d 644 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . Rather than authenticity, the evidentia-ry error in Evans involved section 90.701, Florida Statutes, . . . The dissent also makes a vague assertion that section 90.701 and federal rule 701 have been “interpreted . . . Because Evans does not mention either section 90.701 or any federal precedents, we assume the dissent . . . What this means in the context of section 90.701 is that, prior to trial, the identification witness . . .

R. C. v. STATE, 192 So. 3d 606 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . So.2d 1225, 1232 (Fla.1990) (discussing the limitations on lay opinion testimony imposed by section 90.701 . . .

QUAKNINE, v. STATE, 189 So. 3d 290 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . Section 90.701, Florida Statutes (2013), governs opinion testimony of lay witnesses and provides: If . . .

L. L. a v. STATE, 189 So. 3d 252 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . reasoning, we hold that the officer’s opinion was admissible as lay opinion testimony under Section 90.701 . . . Section 90.701: Lay Opinion Testimony We begin with the text of Section 90.701, Florida Statutes: 90.701 . . . Similar to its federal counterpart, Section 90.701 forbids lay opinion testimony that requires “special . . . The text of the Federal Rules offers more guidance than does Section 90.701 because it specifies that . . . Officer Munecas’s testimony was admissible lay opinion testimony under Section 90.701 because it was . . .

SEYMOUR, v. STATE, 187 So. 3d 356 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . . § 90.701, Fla. Stat. (2013). . . .

WADE, v. STATE, 156 So. 3d 1004 (Fla. 2014)

. . . opinion that the two tape samples were the same type of tape, is a permissible lay opinion under section 90.701 . . .

HERRING, v. STATE, 132 So. 3d 342 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . . § 90.701, Fla. Stat. (2011). . . .

ALVAREZ, v. STATE, 147 So. 3d 537 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . Nodine, 646 So.2d 746 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994), where this court recognized that under section 90.701, Florida . . . The state concedes that the detective’s testimony was that of a lay person. .Section 90.701, Florida . . .

KIPP, v. STATE, 128 So. 3d 879 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . See § 90.701, Fla. . . .

VICTORINO, v. STATE v. D., 127 So. 3d 478 (Fla. 2013)

. . . may not testify to a matter unless ... the witness has personal knowledge of the matter” and section 90.701 . . .

WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A. v. BOHATKA,, 112 So. 3d 596 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . See §§ 90.701-.702, Fla. Stat. . . .

REYNOLDS, v. STATE v. S., 99 So. 3d 459 (Fla. 2012)

. . . Section 90.701, Florida Statutes (2011), provides: If a witness is not testifying as an expert, the witness . . . iot require a special knowledge, skill, experience, or training. § 90.701, Fla. . . .

GONZALES, v. STATE, 95 So. 3d 1002 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Section 90.701, Florida Statutes (2012), governs the opinion testimony of lay witnesses. . . . See § 90.701, Fla. Stat. (2012). . . .

L. JONES, v. STATE, 95 So. 3d 426 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . . § 90.701, Fla. Stat. (2009). . . .

HOLLAND, v. S. TUCKER,, 854 F. Supp. 2d 1229 (S.D. Fla. 2012)

. . . See Floyd, 569 So.2d at 1232; § 90.701, Fla. Stat. (2004). . . .

CLIFF BERRY, INC. v. STATE, 116 So. 3d 394 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . See § 90.701, Fla. Stat. (2009); Murphy v. . . .

FIDELITY WARRANTY SERVICES, INC. a a v. FIRSTATE INSURANCE HOLDINGS, INC. PR,, 74 So. 3d 506 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . See § 90.701(2), Fla. Stat. (2008). . . .

BOLIN, Jr. v. STATE, 41 So. 3d 151 (Fla. 2010)

. . . Section 90.701, Florida Statutes provides: If a witness is not testifying as an expert, the witness’s . . . ) The opinions and inferences do not require a special knowledge, skill, experience, or training. § 90.701 . . .

JAMES CRYSTAL LICENSES, LLC, LLC, a k a v. INFINITY RADIO INC. a f k a CBS, 43 So. 3d 68 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . Section 90.701, Florida Statutes, requires a lay witness to base his or her opinion upon facts the witness . . .

CHESSER, v. STATE, 30 So. 3d 625 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . The exception to this rule set out in section 90.701, Florida Statutes (2006), does not apply here where . . . Section 90.701, opinion testimony of lay witnesses, provides: If a witness is not testifying as an expert . . .

SERRANO, v. STATE, 15 So. 3d 629 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . .” § 90.701(2), Fla. Stat. (2006). . . .

BRYANT, v. STATE, 17 So. 3d 713 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . Because the witness’s testimony was admissible pursuant to section 90.701, Florida Statutes, and we cannot . . . ) The opinions and inferences do not require a special knowledge, skill, experience, or training. § 90.701 . . . Under the first prong of section 90.701, the description was necessary for Byrd to adequately communicate . . .

SMITH, v. STATE, 7 So. 3d 473 (Fla. 2009)

. . . . § 90.701, Fla. Stat. (2005). . . .

PETIT- DOS, v. SCHOOL BOARD OF BROWARD COUNTY, a, 2 So. 3d 1022 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . However, section 90.701, Florida Statutes, provides that a lay witness may testify in the form of inference . . . ) The opinions and inferences do not require a special knowledge, skill, experience, or training. § 90.701 . . . According to section 90.701, Florida Statutes, Jackson should have been allowed to offer her opinion . . .

BARTLETT, v. STATE, 993 So. 2d 157 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . Section 90.701, Fla. . . . Stat. (2006), of the Florida Evidence Code states: 90.701 Opinion testimony of lay witnesses. — If a . . . This was held to be speculative and inadmissible under section 90.701 because the statute usually limits . . . However, citing section 90.701, the Fourth District Court in Nardone noted that a lay witness’ opinion . . . The State correctly notes that, under section 90.701(1), even the opinion testimony of a lay witness . . .

BIGHAM, v. STATE, 995 So. 2d 207 (Fla. 2008)

. . . Cavazos’ testimony was lay opinion testimony and, as such, was properly admitted under section 90.701 . . . Section 90.701 requires a two-prong test of lay opinion testimony: (1) The witness cannot readily, and . . . ) The opinions and inferences do not require a special knowledge, skill, experience, or training. § 90.701 . . .

MEUS, v. STATE, 968 So. 2d 706 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . . § 90.701(1), Fla. Stat. (2003); cf. Zwinge v. . . .

MILLER, v. STATE, 934 So. 2d 580 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . . § 90.701, Fla. Stat., (2005). . . .

KOLP, v. STATE, 932 So. 2d 1283 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . Initially, we conclude that the testimony was not admissible under section 90.701, Florida Statutes ( . . . 4th DCA 1994), we held that the kind of opinion testimony by lay witnesses admissible under section 90.701 . . .

STATE v. SANTIAGO,, 928 So. 2d 480 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . See §§ 90.701; 90.703, Fla. Stat. (2005). The witness in question was another inmate, Eric Durant. . . . Section 90.701, Florida Statutes, allows an eyewitness to explain “what he or she perceived ... in the . . .

ESSEX, v. STATE, 917 So. 2d 953 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . his opinion as to the consistency of the witnesses’ descriptions was inadmissible pursuant to section 90.701 . . .

HOLLAND, v. STATE v. V. Jr., 916 So. 2d 750 (Fla. 2005)

. . . See Floyd, 569 So.2d at 1232; § 90.701, Fla. Stat. (2004). . . .

CASTRO, v. BRAZEAU,, 873 So. 2d 516 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . See § 90.701(2), Fla. Stat. . . .

BENARDO, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, J. REILLY,, 819 So. 2d 161 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . such records, and the opinion of paternity contained in the report would be admissible under sections 90.701 . . .

BUSH, v. STATE, 809 So. 2d 107 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . .”); § 90.701, Florida Statutes (1999); see, e.g., Hixon v. . . .

NARDONE, v. STATE, 798 So. 2d 870 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . Section 90.701, Florida Statutes (2000), provides that: If a witness is not testifying as an expert, . . . See §§ 90.701 and 90.702, Fla. Stat. (2000). . . .

K. VEREB B. v. SARDONI, 795 So. 2d 260 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . business record] under paragraph (a) unless such opinion or diagnosis would be admissible under ss. 90.701 . . .

THORP, v. STATE, 777 So. 2d 385 (Fla. 2000)

. . . Section 90.701, Florida Statutes (1997), permits a lay witness to testify in the form of opinion and . . . inferences or opinions will not mislead the trier of fact to the prejudice of the objecting party. § 90.701 . . . I do recognize that the language of section 90.701 varies from the language of the lay opinion testimony . . . However, I do not read the different language of section 90.701 to render inadmissible a lay witness’ . . . An exception to this rule is found in section 90.701, Florida Statutes, which permits a lay witness to . . . ) The opinions and inferences do not require a special knowledge, skill, experience, or training. § 90.701 . . . See § 90.701; Ehrhardt, supra, at 540. . . . Accordingly, the second prong of section 90.701 is satisfied. . . .

MARTINEZ, v. VEGA a, 751 So. 2d 1268 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . Section 90.701 Florida Statutes (1999) provides: Opinion testimony of lay witnesses. — If a witness is . . .

SZUBA, v. STATE, 749 So. 2d 551 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . his opinion as to the consistency of the witnesses’ descriptions was inadmissible pursuant to section 90.701 . . .

ZACK, III, v. STATE, 753 So. 2d 9 (Fla. 2000)

. . . Lay opinion is proper pursuant to section 90.701, Florida Statutes (1995), when: (1) The witness cannot . . .

R. McELROY, E. v. C. PERRY,, 753 So. 2d 121 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . diagnosis is admissible under paragraph (a) unless such opinion or diagnosis would be admissable under §§ 90.701 . . .

LEE, v. STATE, 729 So. 2d 975 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . Second, the admission or exclusion of lay opinion is governed by section 90.701, Florida Statutes. . . . . § 90.701, Fla. Stat. Additionally, this court, in Shiver v. . . . their opinion about another’s mental state ... provided such testimony otherwise satisfies the [section 90.701 . . . It is also forbidden under section 90.701(1), Florida Statutes because, under the facts of this case, . . .

A. MORRIS, v. CRAWFORD,, 718 So. 2d 354 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . records and that the opinion of paternity contained in the report would be admissible under sections 90.701 . . . records and that the opinion of paternity contained in the report would be admissible under sections 90.701 . . .

LEWEK, v. STATE, 702 So. 2d 527 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . See § 90.701, Fla. Stat. (1995); Martinez v. . . .

HECKFORD, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,, 699 So. 2d 247 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . diagnosis is admissible under paragraph (a) unless such opinion or diagnosis would be admissible under ss. 90.701 . . .

BROCK, v. STATE, 676 So. 2d 991 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . diagnosis is admissible under paragraph (a) unless such opinion or diagnosis would be admissible under ss. 90.701 . . .

D. R. C. a v. STATE, 670 So. 2d 1183 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . See § 90.701, Fla.Stat. (1993). . . . Section 90.701 allows a lay witness to testify using opinions or inferences when the witness cannot otherwise . . .

CASA DE ALABANZA, v. BUS SERVICE, INC., 669 So. 2d 338 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . See § 90.701(1), (2), Fla.Stat. (1995). Reversed. . . .

Jo EICHELBERGER, v. STATE, 662 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . ability of a child with this syndrome to injure himself, it may have been admissible under section 90.701 . . .

THE FLORIDA BAR, v. CLEMENT,, 662 So. 2d 690 (Fla. 1995)

. . . . § 90.701, Fla.Stat. (1993); see also Cruse v. . . .

ASPLUNDH MANUFACTURING DIVISION, a DIVISION OF ASPLUNDH TREE EXPERT CO. PA. PA, No. v. BENTON HARBOR ENGINEERING, No., 57 F.3d 1190 (3d Cir. 1995)

. . . See Fla.Stat.Ann.Evidence Code § 90.701; Tenn R.Evid 701. . . .

CARUSO, Jr. v. STATE, 645 So. 2d 389 (Fla. 1994)

. . . See § 90.701, Fla.Stat. (1987). . . .

FINO, J. v. NODINE, E. H., 646 So. 2d 746 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . . § 90.701, Fla.Stat. (1991). . . . testimony of a lay witness is only permitted if it is based on what the witness has personally perceived. § 90.701 . . . Applying the conditions set out in section 90.701, the opinion testimony of these witnesses was unnecessary . . . Prior to adoption of section 90.701 in 1979, the general common law rule precluded lay witnesses from . . . Law Review Council Note, § 90.701, Fla.Stat.Ann. (1979). . . .

BERTRAM, v. STATE, 637 So. 2d 258 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . See § 90.701, Fla. Stat. (1991). In Davis v. . . .

ALEXANDER, v. STATE, 627 So. 2d 35 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . After reviewing section 90.701, Florida Statutes, the court ruled that it would be “completely and totally . . . the opinions and inferences “do not require a special knowledge, skill, experience, or training.” § 90.701 . . .

SOMERVILLE, Jr. v. STATE, 626 So. 2d 1070 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . Section 90.701, Fla.Stat. (1989). . . .

A. STEWART, Jr. v. STATE, 622 So. 2d 51 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . . § 90.701, Fla.Stat. (1983). . . .

J. LOVE, v. GARCIA,, 611 So. 2d 1270 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . diagnosis is admissible under paragraph (a) unless such opinion or diagnosis would be admissible under ss. 90.701 . . .

MITCHELL, v. STATE, 611 So. 2d 1269 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . . § 90.701(1), Fla.Stat. (1991); Floyd v. . . .

HANSEN, v. STATE, 585 So. 2d 1056 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . See § 90.701(1), Fla.Stat. (1989) (lay opinion is proper where “[t]he witness cannot readily, and with . . .

SOMERVILLE, v. STATE, 584 So. 2d 200 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . Section 90.701, Fla.Stat. (1989). . . .

DUNCAN, v. STATE, 583 So. 2d 439 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . . § 90.701(1), Fla.Stat. (1989). . . .

In J. H. a, 580 So. 2d 162 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . See § 90.701(l)-(2), Fla.Stat. (1989). . . .

FLOYD, v. STATE, 569 So. 2d 1225 (Fla. 1990)

. . . . § 90.701(1), (2), Fla. Stat. (1983). . . . opinions expressed by them called for “special knowledge, skill, experience, or training,” section 90.701 . . .

FERGUSON, v. A. WILLIAMS,, 566 So. 2d 9 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . records and that the opinion of paternity contained in the report would be admissible under sections 90.701 . . .

STATE v. CORDIA,, 564 So. 2d 601 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . Section 90.701, Florida Statutes (1989), permits opinion testimony by non-experts when (1) the witness . . . who actually received the original telephone call, their testimony goes beyond the scope of section 90.701 . . .

SHIVER, v. STATE, 564 So. 2d 1158 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . Section 90.701, Florida Statutes, provides: If a witness is not testifying as an expert his testimony . . . The court stated (512 So.2d at 929): Under Section 90.701, before a lay witness may testify in the form . . . The supreme court observed that “[ujnder section 90.701, before a lay witness may testify in the form . . .

T. C. a v. STATE, 557 So. 2d 925 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . . § 90.701, Fla.Stat. (1987). See Knight v. . . .

RUFFIN a k a v. STATE, 549 So. 2d 250 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . . § 90.701, Fla.Stat. (1987). . . .

LAWLOR, v. STATE, 538 So. 2d 86 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . Section 90.701, Florida Statutes. . . .

ZWINGE, v. J. HETTINGER, L., 530 So. 2d 318 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . Section 90.701(1), Florida Statutes (1985) , permits such opinion testimony if the witness cannot otherwise . . . Section 90.701, Florida Statutes (1985), provides in relevant part: If a witness is not testifying as . . .

ANDREWS v. M. TEW, a By TEW,, 512 So. 2d 276 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . . § 90.701, Florida Statutes (1985). . . .

KIGHT, v. STATE, 512 So. 2d 922 (Fla. 1987)

. . . argues that McGoogin’s lay opinion that Hutto was urging Eight to harm him was admissible under section 90.701 . . . Eight to harm him, this is not the type of lay opinion testimony which is admissible under section 90.701 . . .

F. BECK, Sr. v. GROSS,, 499 So. 2d 886 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . testimony of lay witnesses, and should have been excluded from the trial court’s consideration by section 90.701 . . .

KINYA v. LIFTER, INC. d b a, 489 So. 2d 92 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . Section 90.701, Fla.Stat. (1983), does not bar his testimony because he was not expressing an opinion . . .

GARDNER, v. STATE, 480 So. 2d 91 (Fla. 1985)

. . . . § 90.701, Fla.Stat. (1983). . . .

NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, A. Jr. v. VOSBURGH, a L., 480 So. 2d 140 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . Section 90.701, Florida Statutes (1983), provides that a lay witness may testify in the form of an opinion . . . The Law Revision Council Note indicates that Section 90.701 permits a lay witness to testify to things . . . We' find nothing in Section 90.701 or the Council Note which would permit a witness to testify about . . . State, 415 So.2d 1280 (Fla. 2d DCA), petition on review denied, 424 So.2d 760 (Fla.1982), that Section 90.701 . . . The Barnes court stated: Section 90.701, Florida Statutes (1979), allows opinions of lay witnesses only . . .

HOWARD BROTHERS v. SOTUYO D., 472 So. 2d 1264 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . See, Sections 90.701 and 90.-702, Florida Statutes (1983). . . .

DUTILLY, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH REHABILITATIVE SERVICES,, 450 So. 2d 1195 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . diagnosis is admissible under paragraph (a) unless such opinion or diagnosis would be admissible under ss. 90.701 . . . records and that the opinion of paternity contained in the report would be admissible under sections 90.701 . . .

K. McINTYRE, v. McINTYRE, n k a, 452 So. 2d 14 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . section 90.702, Florida Statutes, and the testimony was not admissible as lay opinion under section 90.701 . . .

W. CARVER, v. ORANGE COUNTY,, 444 So. 2d 452 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . Redwing Carriers, Inc., 127 So.2d 453 (Fla. 2d DCA 1961); §§ 90.701 & 90.702, Fla.Stat. (1981). . . . See §§ 90.701 & 90.702, Fla.Stat. (1981). . . .

MORERA, v. STATE, 439 So. 2d 929 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . .2d 942 (5th Cir.1978); and (b) the opinion testimony challenged at trial was properly admissible [§ 90.701 . . .

L. CARABETTA, v. STATE, 438 So. 2d 489 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . State, 133 So.2d 729, 731 (Fla.1961), cert. denied, 372 U.S. 904, 83 S.Ct. 742, 9 L.Ed.2d 730 (1963); § 90.701 . . .

POPE v. BANYAN TREE VILLAGE CONDOMINIUM ASSN., 3 Fla. Supp. 2d 178 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1982)

. . . diagnosis is admissible under paragraph (a) unless such opinion or diagnosis would be admissible under ss. 90.701 . . .

BARNES, v. STATE, 415 So. 2d 1280 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . Section 90.701, Florida Statutes (1979), allows opinions of lay witnesses only when based upon what the . . .

JONES, v. STATE, 408 So. 2d 690 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . McClung’s testimony would not have been admissible under section 90.701, Florida Statutes (1979), because . . . CAMPBELL, J., dissents with opinion. . 90.701 Opinion testimony of lay witnesses. . . . That rule is in harmony with section 90.701, Florida Statutes (1979), providing that non-expert witnesses . . .