Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 92.05 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 92.05 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 92.05

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title VII
EVIDENCE
Chapter 92
WITNESSES, RECORDS, AND DOCUMENTS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 92.05
92.05 Final judgments and decrees of courts of record.All final judgments and decrees heretofore or hereafter rendered and entered in courts of record of this state, and certified copies thereof, shall be admissible as prima facie evidence in the several courts of this state of the entry and validity of such judgments and decrees. For the purposes of this section, a court of record shall be taken and construed to mean any court other than a municipal court or the Metropolitan Court of Miami-Dade County.
History.s. 1, ch. 4723, 1899; GS 1522; RGS 2722; CGL 4390; s. 7, ch. 22858, 1945; s. 1, ch. 67-362; s. 15, ch. 73-334; s. 13, ch. 2008-4.

F.S. 92.05 on Google Scholar

F.S. 92.05 on Casetext

Amendments to 92.05


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 92.05
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 92.05.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a v. WOODY CREEK VENTURES, LLC, a a, 830 F.3d 1209 (10th Cir. 2016)

. . . Co., 366 Ark. 508, 237 S.W.3d 15, 19 (2006) (quoting Powell on Real Property, § 92.05). . . .

SHIRING, v. TIER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 244 F.R.D. 307 (E.D. Va. 2007)

. . . See 7-92 Securities Law Techniques § 92.05 (noting that “[cjourts have precluded named plaintiffs from . . . Securities Litigation, 110 F.Supp.2d 427, 435 n. 14 (E.D.Va.2000) (same); 7-92 Securities Law Techniques § 92.05 . . .

G. SEIBERT, v. SCHEDEL,, 89 F. App'x 588 (7th Cir. 2004)

. . . Code HFS § 92.05, not a violation of the Constitution or federal law. See J.H. ex rel Higgen v. . . .

SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, v. AMERICAN TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY,, 556 F. Supp. 825 (D.D.C. 1982)

. . . - 3-023) March 9,1975: C 60 31.55 D 240 89.35 (Agreed Fact 1-3-024) March 29,1976: C 60 32.50 D 240 92.05 . . .

MASON, v. MELENDEZ,, 525 F. Supp. 270 (W.D. Wis. 1981)

. . . See id. at §§ 92.05 (third element), 92.11, 92.12, 92.16. . . .

HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, a v. DODD, 416 F. Supp. 1216 (D. Md. 1976)

. . . 75% to Matthews ($6,903.41); 20% to Dodd ($1,840.91); 4% to Deedon ($368.18); and 1% to Lockwood ($92.05 . . .

SECURITIES EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. W. J. HOWEY CO., 151 F.2d 714 (5th Cir. 1945)

. . . these sales were of non-bearing trees totaling 103.21 acres and 43 were sales of bearing trees totaling 92.05 . . .

GENERAL PROPERTIES CORPORATION v. R. H. GORE, R. H. GORE COMPANY,, 153 Fla. 236 (Fla. 1943)

. . . See Sections 92.05, 92.10, and 92.19, Fla. Stats. 1941. . . .

UNITED STATES v. INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER CO., 214 F. 989 (D. Minn. 1914)

. . . In 1903 the International Company sold 92.05 per cent, of all the mowers sold in the United States; in . . .

In DR. VOORHEES AWNING HOOD CO., 187 F. 611 (M.D. Pa. 1911)

. . . The regular salesman’s commissions on the sales that he. made would be $92.05. . . . “Commission on Sales of Merchandise to April 29, 1908 (estimated), $92.05.” . . .