Florida Statute 92.26 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VII
EVIDENCE

Chapter 92
WITNESSES, RECORDS, AND DOCUMENTS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 92.26

92.26 Records destroyed by fire; use of sworn copies.—A sworn copy of any writing admissible under s. 92.25 made by the person or persons having possession of such writing shall be admissible in evidence; provided, the party desiring to use such sworn copy, as aforesaid, shall have given the opposite party a reasonable opportunity to verify the correctness of such copy; and provided, that no abstract of title or letter-press copy thereof, extract or minutes or copy made admissible in evidence by this section, shall be so admitted by virtue hereof unless a copy thereof shall have been served on the opposite party, or the opposite party’s attorney or counsel, at least 10 days before the same is offered in evidence. Nothing herein shall be construed to prevent the impeachment of such evidence, or its exclusion by the court for good and sufficient cause.

History.—s. 1, ch. 4951, 1901; GS 1530; RGS 2730; CGL 4402; s. 513, ch. 95-147; s. 12, ch. 95-280.

F.S. 92.26 on Google Scholar

F.S. 92.26 on Casetext

Amendments to 92.26

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 92.26

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 92.26.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 92.26

Total Results: 14

Amerisure Mutual Insurance Co. v. Florida Department of Financial Services, Division of Workers' Compensation

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-01-01

Citation: 156 So. 3d 520, 2015 WL 46515

Snippet: corresponding quarterly WCATF assessment of $16,092.26. Amerisure made no payment to the Division with

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 2006-06-15

Snippet: Fla. 82-35 (1982). 2 See Ops. Att'y Gen. Fla. 92-26 (1992) and 98-13 (1998).And see Town of Palm Beach

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 2003-06-25

Snippet: council on personnel matters, Op. Att'y Gen. Fla. 92-26 (1992); an ad hoc committee appointed to meet with

Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure—Capital Postconviction Public Records Production

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1998-06-25

Citation: 719 So. 2d 869, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 363, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 1239, 1998 WL 333542

Snippet: Set Aside, or Correct Sentence), Nos. 82,322 & 92,026 (Fla. Apr. 8, 1998) (Order). In tolling the time

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1998-02-16

Snippet: council on personnel matters, Op. Att'y Gen. Fla. 92-26 (1992); anad hoc committee appointed to meet with

In re Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1998-01-15

Citation: 708 So. 2d 912, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 39, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 6, 1998 WL 19208

Snippet: June 1, 1998, for certain cases in ease number 92,026, and ordered that new inventories be filed in accordance

Harris v. Wilson

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1997-03-20

Citation: 693 So. 2d 945

Snippet: area of the County. Clay County, Fla., Ordinance 92-26 (Nov. 10, 1992). Additionally, the affidavits submitted

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1996-05-06

Snippet: office, for example, in Attorney General Opinion 92-26 concluded that a personnel advisory committee, responsible

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1995-01-27

Snippet: 2d 694 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Op. Att'y Gen. Fla. 92-26 (1992) (committee responsible for making recommendations

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1994-03-16

Snippet: (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). And see, Op. Att'y Gen. Fla. 92-26 (1992) (city personnel committee appointed to advise

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1993-06-07

Snippet: Justice Commission. As this office stated in AGO 92-26, officials may discuss matters for which no action

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1993-01-04

Snippet: S. (1992 Supp.). Prior to its amendment by Ch. 92-26, Laws of Florida, s. 230.23(6)(c), F.S. 1991, provided

County Waste, Inc. v. Miami Trucolor Offset Service Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-12-23

Citation: 611 So. 2d 38, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12854, 1992 WL 379839

Snippet: HOY, JOHN J., Associate Judge. Appellant County Waste, Inc., appeals a summary judgment granted in favor of ap-pellee Miami Trucolor Offset Services Company. We reverse. County Waste sued Trucolor for breach of contract. Trucolor moved for summary judgment claiming that its employee who signed the contract had no authority to do so. We find the record contains conflicting evidence and material issues of fact on the question of apparent authority and thus the summary judgment was improperly granted

Suarez v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-11-24

Citation: 608 So. 2d 581, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12985, 1992 WL 348422

Snippet: PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See and compare Brimmer v. State, 462 So.2d 29, 30 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).