Cases from cite.case.law:

C. TORRENS, v. SHAW,, 257 So. 3d 168 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . and the signature of the candidate, which must be verified under oath or affirmation pursuant to s. 92.525 . . .

IN RE AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA FAMILY LAW RULES OF PROCEDURE- FORM A, 235 So. 3d 800 (Fla. 2018)

. . . be notarized and instead require the parties to execute a “written declaration” pursuant to section 92.525 . . .

RBS CITIZENS N. A. v. S. REYNOLDS a k a A., 231 So. 3d 591 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . . § 92.525, Fla. . . .

T- QUIP OF FLORIDA, INC. v. C. TIETIG, 207 So.3d 958 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . final summary judgment, and in support of the motion, filed a sworn declaration pursuant to section 92.525 . . .

WILSON, Sr. v. STATE, 202 So. 3d 135 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . Additionally, each affiant included the following attestation tracking the language of section 92.525 . . . Additionally, section 92.525 provides as follows: (1) If authorized or required by law, by rule of an . . . The affidavits at issue here each contained an attestation tracking the language of section 92.525(2) . . . Additionally, the Florida Supreme Court has held that “the unnotarized oath from subsection 92.525(2) . . . 1 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (“The Florida Supreme Court has determined that the oath set forth in section 92.525 . . .

WRIGHT, v. CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS,, 200 So. 3d 765 (Fla. 2016)

. . . and the signature of the candidate, which must be verified under oath or affirmation pursuant to s. 92.525 . . . its face, including whether items that must be verified have been properly verified pursuant to s. 92.525 . . . its face, including whether items that must be verified have been properly verified pursuant to s. 92.525 . . .

A. D. A. M. J. L. v. D. M. F., 204 So.3d 523 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . We understand that a person who knowingly makes a false declaration pursuant to s. 92.525(2) or 382.026 . . .

INTEGO SOFTWARE, LLC d b a v. CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT, INC., 198 So. 3d 887 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . See §§ 92.50 and 92.525, Fla. Stat. . . .

MATTHEWS v. U. S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, N. A. LXS, 197 So. 3d 1140 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . sworn before a notary public and did not qualify as an unnotarized, .written declaration under section 92.525 . . .

DAVIDIAN v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, FDIC FA,, 178 So. 3d 45 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . F.S. 92.525.” The Davidians moved to quash the summons and to quash service of process. . . .

PLACIDE, v. STATE, 189 So. 3d 810 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . This statement would be insufficient to constitute a signed, written declaration under section 92.525 . . . Among other things, a written declaration must state that it is made “[u]nder penalties of- perjury.” § 92.525 . . .

FLORES, v. SANCHEZ,, 137 So. 3d 1104 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . paternity that is witnessed by two individuals and signed under penalty of perjury as specified by s. 92.525 . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA SMALL CLAIMS RULES, 123 So. 3d 41 (Fla. 2013)

. . . Pursuant to section 92.525, Florida Statutes, under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read . . . Pursuant to section 92.525, Florida Statutes, under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read . . .

J. CAMPBELL, v. STATE, 115 So. 3d 434 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . hereby state under penalty of perjury the foregoing is based upon true facts, [sic] oath pursuant to 92.525 . . .

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, v. PREVRATIL, 120 So. 3d 573 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.110(b) and section 92.525, Florida Statutes (2011), govern verification . . . Section 92.525 provides, in pertinent part, as follows: (1) When it is authorized or required by law, . . .

VAN WEELDE, v. VAN WEELDE,, 110 So. 3d 918 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . paternity that is witnessed by two individuals and signed under penalty of perjury as specified by s. 92.525 . . . paternity that is witnessed by two individuals and signed under penalty of perjury as specified by s. 92.525 . . .

BAC HOME LOAN SERVICING, L. P. f k a L. P. v. R. STENTZ a k a R. L. N. A., 91 So. 3d 235 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . The trial court determined that BAC did not properly verify its complaint in accordance with section 92.525 . . . the best of my knowledge and belief’ did not sufficiently verify the complaint pursuant to section 92.525 . . . provides for a verification based on knowledge and belief, the generally applicable declaration in section 92.525 . . .

BECKER, v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, INDX s, 88 So. 3d 361 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Pelt, 84 So.3d 369 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (holding trial court erred in relying on section 92.525(2), Fla . . .

TRUCAP GRANTOR TRUST v. W. PELT A. No. PNC N. A., 84 So. 3d 369 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . The court stated that pursuant to section 92.525(2), Florida Statutes (2010), the amended complaint must . . . Section 92.525, upon which the trial court relied, provides that when a document must be verified, the . . . I declare that I have read the foregoing [document] and that the facts stated in it are true[.]” § 92.525 . . . Section 92.525(2) provides an exception “when a verification on information or belief is permitted by . . . Section 92.525(4)(b) defines “document” to include any “pleading[ ] or paper.” See also Muss v. . . .

UNIVERSAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, v. WARFEL,, 82 So. 3d 47 (Fla. 2012)

. . . , which is witnessed by two individuals and signed under penalty of perjury as specified by section 92.525 . . .

HYDEN, v. STATE, 117 So. 3d 1 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . Section 92.525(1), Florida Statutes (2009), provides that any document that must be verified by a person . . . In this case, Hyden used the oath set forth in section 92.525(2) to verify his motion to dismiss and . . . The Florida Supreme Court has determined that the oath set forth in section 92.525(2) is sufficient to . . . Since Shearer, several courts have determined that the oath in section 92.525(2) is sufficient to meet . . . We note that this court has suggested that, under Shearer, the oath in section 92.525(2) is available . . .

MORENO- GONZALEZ, v. STATE, 67 So. 3d 1020 (Fla. 2011)

. . . The district court noted that section 92.525, Florida Statutes (2007), provides, in relevant part: (1 . . . See id. at 1185 (quoting § 92.525(4)(b)). . . . Id. § 92.525(4)(c) (emphasis supplied). . . . See id. § 92.525(4)(b). . . . Under section 92.525, an affidavit need not be formally signed to comply with the Florida Statutes. . . .

ENZYME ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC. v. D. ELIAS,, 60 So. 3d 1158 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . The three defendants filed Declarations pursuant to section 92.525, Florida Statutes (2009). . . .

A. QUARLES, v. STATE, 56 So. 3d 857 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . The complaint was under oath pursuant to section 92.525, Florida Statutes. . . .

MOHORN, v. THOMAS, 30 So. 3d 710 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . paternity, which is witnessed by two individuals and signed under penalty of perjury as specified by s. 92.525 . . .

W. DOE, III v. SUNTRUST BANK, W. Jr. W. Jr. a a, 32 So. 3d 133 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . court may, upon request of a party providing a sworn statement or written declaration as provided by s. 92.525 . . .

L. M. A. L. v. In ADOPTION OF J. A. M. L., 23 So. 3d 837 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . Defense Control: Declarations are sanctioned by the federal statute and by Florida statute section 92.525 . . .

STATE v. MORENO- GONZALEZ,, 18 So. 3d 1180 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . supported by affidavit,” this requirement may also be satisfied by oath or affirmation under section 92.525 . . . affirmation taken or administered before an officer authorized under s. 92.50 to administer oaths § 92.525 . . . limitation, any form, application, claim, notice, tax return, inventory, affidavit, pleading, or paper.” § 92.525 . . . Because section 92.525 provides that any document, which expressly includes an affidavit, requiring verification . . .

D. S. In a v. J. L., 18 So. 3d 1103 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . However, section 92.525, Florida Statutes (2008), sets forth the proper manner for verifying a pleading . . . affidavit requires an oath, Swartz, 816 So.2d at 622, and a verified response does not, see section 92.525 . . .

DEFENSE CONTROL USA, INC. v. ATLANTIS CONSULTANTS LIMITED CORP., 4 So. 3d 694 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . Declarations are sanctioned by the federal statute and by Florida statute section 92.525(2), requiring . . .

J. S. L. CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, a L. v. LEVY, 994 So. 2d 394 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . This is an oath authorized by section 92.525 of the Florida Statutes. See § 92.525(1), (2), Fla. . . . declared to be based on facts represented as being true, is an unnotarized oath authorized by section 92.525 . . . concluding that for purposes of defendant’s 3.850 motion, “[i]n addition to a notarized oath ... section 92.525 . . .

SMITH, v. STATE, 990 So. 2d 1162 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . Pursuant to Section 92.525, Florida Statutes, I state under the penalties of perjury that I have read . . .

S. BROWNING, v. YOUNG,, 993 So. 2d 64 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . Section 92.525, Florida Statutes provides that a document may be verified in two different ways: (1) . . . The full text of the form for the latter method of verification is set out in section 92.525(2). . . .

WOODS, v. STATE, 963 So. 2d 348 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . See § 92.525(2), Fla. Stat. . . .

JIMENEZ, v. RATINE a k a d b a By El, d b a By El,, 954 So. 2d 706 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . The amended motion to disqualify clearly contains a written declaration pursuant to section 92.525, Florida . . . Section 92.525 provides an appropriate method to verify a document, i.e., to sign the document stating . . . See § 92.525(3)(c). . . .

M. BERNAL, v. ALL AMERICAN INVESTMENT REALTY, INC. LTDS LTDAS, 479 F. Supp. 2d 1291 (S.D. Fla. 2007)

. . . . § 92.525. . While these messages were offensive and inflammatory. . . .

GREEN, v. STATE, 941 So. 2d 1250 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . Shearer, 628 So.2d 1102 (Fla.1993) and section 92.525, Florida Statutes, which sets forth the form to . . .

RUTHERFORD, v. STATE, 939 So. 2d 328 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . Section 92.525(3), Florida Statutes, states in relevant part: “A person who knowingly makes a false declaration . . . is guilty of the crime of perjury by false written declaration, a felony of the third degree.... ” § 92.525 . . .

D. SMITH, v. STATE, 917 So. 2d 409 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . . § 92.525, Fla. Stat. (2004). . . .

CRAIN, v. STATE, 914 So. 2d 1015 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . In my view, section 92.525 says nothing about how a statutory requirement of an affidavit may be met. . . . Section 92.525, on the other hand, deals with the verification of documents. . . . Section 92.525(4)(c) explains what is meant by “the requirement that a document be verified.” . . . if, by the terms of 92.525 itself, the declaration in 92.525(2) already always satisfies the affidavit . . . There can be no doubt that section 92.525 is a statute of general application. . . . Section 92.525 states in pertinent part as follows: (1) When it is ... required by law ..., or by rule . . . This is because section 92.525(4)(c) defines the “requirement” of “verification]” as including three . . . Accord Goines (applying section 92.525 to section 948.06); see also Shearer (Rule 8.987 form of oath . . . Because a section 92.525 declaration is made under penalty of perjury, its use in this manner does not . . . Moreover, the clear import of Shearer is that section, 92.525 applies to rules of criminal procedure . . . arrest affidavit to secure a warrant for violation of probation is valid if it is verified under section 92.525 . . . must be sworn to before a person authorized to administer oaths and that verification under section 92.525 . . . We held in Jackson that section 92.525 does not apply to an affidavit to secure an arrest warrant. . . . .” § 92.525(1), Fla. Stat. (2003). . . . . § 92.525(4)(c), Fla. Stat. (2003); Mieles v. . . .

GOLDEN, v. STATE, 913 So. 2d 744 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . See section 92.525(2), which authorizes verification in certain instances. . See U.S. . . .

E. MIRANDA, v. STATE, 909 So. 2d 997 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . sworn to before a person authorized to administer oaths, nor was it verified as set forth in section 92.525 . . .

LEWIS, v. STATE, 908 So. 2d 1173 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . The Petitioner’s un-notarized oath loosely follows the model declaration set forth in section 92.525, . . .

RUIZ, v. STATE, 908 So. 2d 508 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . “affidavit” is a statement made under oath before an authorized official such as a notary, section 92.525 . . . the facts or matters stated or recited in the document are true, or words of that import or effect. § 92.525 . . . 593 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997); see Shearer (rule 3.987 form of oath requiring notary satisfied by section 92.525 . . . Padilla, 629 So.2d 180 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993) (finding that section 92.525 “verified” document satisfied . . .

MARTINEZ, v. ABRAHAM CHEVROLET- TAMPA, INC., 891 So. 2d 579 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . Section 92.525, Florida Statutes (2001), which explains the requirements for verification of documents . . . Section 92.525(1) states that verification “may” be accomplished in the statutory manner. . . . Rather, section 92.525(4)(c) explains that “[t]he requirement that a document be verified means that . . . complete,” was sufficient to meet verification requirements and subject signer to perjury under section 92.525 . . .

RALEY, v. STATE, 884 So. 2d 501 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . While unquestionably section 92.525(2), Florida Statutes (2008), allows an unsworn oath to be used for . . .

ARMEY, v. STATE, 880 So. 2d 1269 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . The circuit court overlooked the fact that section 92.525(2), Florida Statutes (2001), allows an unnotar-ized . . .

S. JACKSON, v. STATE, 881 So. 2d 666 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . We recognize that the charging document was “verified” pursuant to 92.525, Florida Statutes. . . . Fla. 95-40 (1995)(document verified under section 92.525 is not affidavit within meaning of section 322.2615 . . . Johnston, 553 So.2d 730 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989) and § 92.525(3), Fla. Stat. (2002). . . . . was under "oath” because it contained the "under penalty of perjury" statement set forth in section 92.525 . . . A charging document can be under "oath” within the meaning of section 92.525, and still not qualify as . . .

STATE v. RUTHERFORD,, 863 So. 2d 445 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . Vernell, 721 So.2d 705, 707 (Fla.1998) (citing section 92.525, Florida Statutes (1995)). . . .

FLORIDA HOSPITAL WATERMAN, v. STOLL, 855 So. 2d 271 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . Section 92.525 provides that verification may be accomplished by either an oath taken before an officer . . .

G. DODRILL, II, v. INFE, INC. f k a a, 837 So. 2d 1187 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . deposes and says: This first paragraph qualifies this as a verified document under oath under section 92.525 . . .

M. THEOC, v. STATE, 832 So. 2d 261 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . The State overlooked the fact that section 92.525, Florida Statutes (2001), allows an unnotarized oath . . .

KEPHART, H. J. v. KEARNEY,, 826 So. 2d 517 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . See § 92.525(2), Fla. Stat. (2001); Muss v. Lennar Fla. . . .

PINDER, v. STATE, 804 So. 2d 350 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . unnotarized oath that Pinder used in his motion was not in the form set forth in Florida Statutes § 92.525 . . .

DIAZ, v. STATE, 768 So. 2d 1231 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . See also § 92.525(2), Fla. Stat. (1999); Zipperer v. Singletary, 693 So.2d 122 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). . . .

M. WILLIAMS v. E. E. BIERMAN, F. Ph. D. G., 46 F. Supp. 2d 1262 (M.D. Fla. 1999)

. . . filed false statements in the petition filed on September 25, 1996 in violation of Florida Statute § 92.525 . . .

THE FLORIDA BAR, v. VERNELL, Jr., 721 So. 2d 705 (Fla. 1998)

. . . Under section 92.525, Florida Statutes (1995), a signed declaration using the language contained in rule . . .

ZEIGLER, v. STATE, 714 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . conduct that was the basis of both the offense of perjury by false information in violation of section 92.525 . . .

A. MERCADE, v. STATE, 698 So. 2d 1313 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . support and bolster these allegations, the appellant executed an unnotarized oath pursuant to section 92.525 . . .

GOINES, v. STATE, 691 So. 2d 593 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . Pursuant to section 92.525, Florida Statutes (1995), such a statement constitutes “verification” of any . . .

ROYLE v. FLORIDA HOSPITAL- EAST ORLANDO, R. D. O., 679 So. 2d 1209 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . The court concluded that the declaration using the language set forth in section 92.525, Florida Statutes . . . Section 92.525 provides that, in order for a document to be verified, it must be signed or executed by . . .

A. MUSS, v. LENNAR FLORIDA PARTNERS I, L. P. a, 673 So. 2d 84 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . Section 92.525(4)(e), Florida Statutes (1993) states that “[t]he requirement that a document be verified . . . Further, section 92.525(2) authorizes verification solely on information and belief only where “permitted . . . The term document includes pleadings. § 92.525(4)(b) (1993). . . . Reviewing section 702.10 in light of the requirements in section 92.525, we find no basis for permitting . . . We have considered Appellant’s contention that we need not be concerned with section 92.525 in light . . .

D. BARTON, v. CIRCUIT COURT OF NINETEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT,, 659 So. 2d 1262 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . Section 92.525, Florida Statutes (1993), provides that documents may be verified by either (1) giving . . .

MIELES, v. SOUTH MIAMI HOSPITAL,, 659 So. 2d 1265 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . Section 92.525, Florida Statutes (1993), sets forth the legal requirements for verification of documents . . . administer oaths, such as a notary, or by the signing of the written declaration prescribed in section 92.525 . . . Section 92.525(4)(c) further provides: The requirement that a document be verified means that the document . . . Vega’s signed declaration, using the language set forth in section 92.525, substantially complies with . . .

ANDERSON a k a v. STATE, 669 So. 2d 262 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . . § 92.525, Fla.Stat. (1993). . . . .

KEENE, v. NUDERA,, 661 So. 2d 40 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . See § 92.525, Fla.Stat. (1993). . . .

STATE v. E. SHEARER,, 628 So. 2d 1102 (Fla. 1993)

. . . In addition to a notarized oath such as the one in rule 3.987, however, section 92.525, Florida Statutes . . . The district court analyzed the oaths set out in section 92.525 and rule 3.987 in light of our decisions . . . It concluded that the unnotarized oath from subsection 92.525(2) could be used in a rule 3.850 motion . . . As pointed out by the district court, the oath from subsection 92.525(2) addresses this concern. . . . Therefore, we agree with the district court that the oath from subsection 92.525(2) is an acceptable . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY MOTOR VEHICLES, v. PADILLA,, 629 So. 2d 180 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . Section 92.525 states, in part, as follows: (1) When it is authorized or required by law, by rule of . . . Thus, section 92.525 contemplates that an affidavit may include such language and may be recognized as . . .

E. SHEARER, v. STATE, 617 So. 2d 721 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . The oath used by Shearer in this appeal in connection with his 3.850 motion is headed, “OATH F.S. 92.525 . . . The oath used by the appellant was taken from section 92.525(2), Florida Statutes (1991), which states . . . Section 92.525 provides, in pertinent part, that when it is required by rule or order of court that a . . . Instead, subsection 92.525(3) provides that a person who knowingly makes a false written declaration . . . Because the Gorham decision was issued two months after section 92.525 became effective, and there is . . . amend our prior opinion by adding the following thereto: IS THE WRITTEN DECLARATION FOUND IN SECTION 92.525 . . .