Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 101.002 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 101.002 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 101.002 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 101.002

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title IX
ELECTORS AND ELECTIONS
Chapter 101
VOTING METHODS AND PROCEDURE
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 101.002
101.002 Use of system by municipalities.
(1) The board of county commissioners, with the concurrence of the supervisor of elections, may arrange the boundaries of the precincts in each municipality within the county to conform to the boundaries of the municipality, subject to the concurrence of the governing body of the municipality. All binders, files, and other equipment or materials necessary for the permanent registration system shall be furnished by the board of county commissioners.
(2) The supervisor of elections shall deliver the records required for a municipal election to the municipal elections boards or other appropriate elections officials before the election and collect them after the election. The municipality shall reimburse the county for the actual costs incurred.
(3) Any person who is a duly registered elector pursuant to this code and who resides within the boundaries of a municipality is qualified to participate in all municipal elections, the provisions of special acts or local charters notwithstanding. Electors who are not registered under the permanent registration system shall not be permitted to vote.
History.s. 4, ch. 25391, 1949; s. 2, ch. 26870, 1951; s. 10, ch. 27991, 1953; s. 2, ch. 29761, 1955; s. 1, ch. 57-136; s. 1, ch. 63-268; s. 6, ch. 65-134; s. 2, ch. 73-155; s. 5, ch. 77-175; s. 31, ch. 94-224.
Note.Former s. 97.04; s. 98.091.

F.S. 101.002 on Google Scholar

F.S. 101.002 on CourtListener

Amendments to 101.002


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 101.002

Total Results: 28

M.G.B. Homes, Inc. v. Ameron Homes, Inc., and Daniel James Brognano, Rick Brognano and Richard Patton

903 F.2d 1486, 15 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1282, 16 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1441, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 10077, 1990 WL 75074

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 25, 1990 | Docket: 142156

Cited 110 times | Published

nine categories of independent contractors in § 101(2) were treated specially: the buyer was only the

Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Toy King Distributors, Inc. v. Liberty Savings Bank, FSB (In Re Toy King Distributors, Inc.)

256 B.R. 1, 14 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 23, 43 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 23, 2000 Bankr. LEXIS 1352, 2000 WL 1716185

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 2000 | Docket: 1108287

Cited 54 times | Published

definition of insider. 11 U.S.C. § 101(31)(E). Section 101(2)(A) defines "affiliate" as an "entity that directly

Knapp v. Applewhite (In Re Knapp)

119 B.R. 285, 1990 Bankr. LEXIS 2017, 1990 WL 138989

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 28, 1990 | Docket: 1633200

Cited 9 times | Published

owned, controlled ... by the debtor...." 11 U.S.C. § 101(2). As a matter of law the Court finds defendant

Salkin v. Chira (In Re Chira)

353 B.R. 693

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Nov 20, 2006 | Docket: 2518625

Cited 8 times | Published

whose stock is owned by the Debtor. 11 U.S.C. § 101(2)(B). Lounge Corp. was such a corporation, and Elizabeth

Continental Bank v. Freehling (In Re Karl A. Neise, Inc.)

31 B.R. 409, 1983 Bankr. LEXIS 5865

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Jul 1, 1983 | Docket: 1758814

Cited 6 times | Published

The Debtors, affiliates within the meaning of § 101(2) of the Bankruptcy Code, were engaged in the business

In re Bos

561 B.R. 868, 2016 Bankr. LEXIS 773

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 11, 2016 | Docket: 65789370

Cited 4 times | Published

renewed post-petition. . "Affiliate” is defined in § 101(2). . In re Florida Fund of Coral Gables, Ltd.

In Re Jones

138 B.R. 289, 6 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 39, 1992 Bankr. LEXIS 461, 1992 WL 52123

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 16, 1992 | Docket: 1474103

Cited 4 times | Published

debtor." Finally, an "affiliate" is defined by Section 101(2)(B) as a "corporation 20 percent or more of

In Re Lakeside I Corp.

120 B.R. 231, 1990 Bankr. LEXIS 2266, 1990 WL 162308

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 23, 1990 | Docket: 1504603

Cited 3 times | Published

include an affiliate of the Debtor. 11 U.S.C. § 101(2)(B) in pertinent part defines an affiliate as a

Chira v. Salkin (In Re Chira)

378 B.R. 698, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84869, 2007 WL 4117448

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 2007 | Docket: 2518623

Cited 2 times | Published

of its stock is owned by the debtor. 11 U.S.C. § 101(2)(B). The bankruptcy court determined that Lounge

Rodriguez v. Education Resources Institute, Inc. (In Re Rodriguez)

319 B.R. 894, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 87, 2005 Bankr. LEXIS 104, 2005 WL 237761

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 2005 | Docket: 638053

Cited 2 times | Published

"affiliate" involves a multi-part analysis. 11 U.S.C. § 101(2). Accordingly, in the absence of a Bankruptcy Code

Stansfield v. Minute Maid Co.

124 F. Supp. 3d 1226, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106656, 2015 WL 4873685

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 2015 | Docket: 64303698

Cited 1 times | Published

The back has an “information panel.” See id. § 101.2. Plaintiffs do not assert that anything on the

City of West Palm Beach v. Roberts

72 So. 3d 294, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16360, 2011 WL 4949795

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 19, 2011 | Docket: 2356240

Cited 1 times | Published

1985 Edition, Ordinance No. 3522-02 (USBAC). Section 101.2, USBAC, authorizes the City to protect the public

Zucker v. Freeman (In Re Netbank, Inc.)

424 B.R. 568, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 334, 2010 Bankr. LEXIS 538, 52 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 260, 2010 WL 710677

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 19, 2010 | Docket: 1414619

Cited 1 times | Published

that would blur the line established by 11 U.S.C. § 101(2)(A), 31(E)." Id. at 442. Finally, the Fourth Circuit

Tavormina v. Weiss (In re Behr Contracting, Inc.)

79 B.R. 84, 1987 Bankr. LEXIS 1652

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Oct 22, 1987 | Docket: 65779470

Cited 1 times | Published

*87affiliate and an insider of the debtor. See 11 U.S.C. § 101(2); (30)(E). It is undisputed that the debtor transferred

Beemer v. Crandon Enterprises, Inc. (In Re Holly Hill Medical Center, Inc.)

53 B.R. 412, 1985 Bankr. LEXIS 5194

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 1985 | Docket: 1856775

Cited 1 times | Published

debtor corporation within the meaning of 11 U.S.C. § 101(2). The motion also suggests that Count XI of the

Roemelmeyer v. Mandel (In re Hostellerie d'Argenteuil, Inc.)

42 B.R. 292, 1984 Bankr. LEXIS 5009

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Sep 17, 1984 | Docket: 65778778

Cited 1 times | Published

definition of an “affiliate”, as defined by Section 101(2) of the Bankruptcy Code, is supported by the

In Re Joan Edna Shore, Debtor. Columbus College, a Unit of the University System of Georgia v. Joan Edna Shore

707 F.2d 1337, 8 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1007, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 26422, 10 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 1280

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 24, 1983 | Docket: 645626

Cited 1 times | Published

governmental unit within the meaning of 11 U.S.C. § 101(2) (Supp.IV.1980). That section defines a governmental

Beck v. Amato (In Re Amato)

10 B.R. 120

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Apr 16, 1981 | Docket: 1477807

Cited 1 times | Published

of the debtors, was an insider under 11 U.S.C. § 101(2)(A)(i), and she had reasonable cause to believe

Amy v. Carnival Corp.

360 F. Supp. 3d 1345

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 2018 | Docket: 64322798

Published

See Pl.'s Facts at 3-5 (¶¶ 18, 22, 24). See Section 101.2 of the IBC 2000, D.E. 58-2. D.E. 47-13 at

In re Sanomedics, Inc.

583 B.R. 796

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Mar 27, 2018 | Docket: 65790443

Published

"Tilius is not an affiliate (as defined in section 101(2) of the Bankruptcy Code ) or alter ego of KIPU

In re Falck

503 B.R. 904, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 281, 2014 WL 322522, 2014 Bankr. LEXIS 372

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Jan 29, 2014 | Docket: 65785864

Published

them, and any affiliate (as defined in 11 U.S.C. § 101(2)) or any insider (as defined in 11 U.S.C. § 101(31))

Voter Verified, Inc. v. Election Systems & Software, Inc.

745 F. Supp. 2d 1237, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103497, 2010 WL 3894054

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 29, 2010 | Docket: 2338071

Published

the `449 patent are not invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 101; 2. The Motion is GRANTED to the extent VVI seeks

Voter Verified, Inc. v. Premier Election Solutions, Inc.

739 F. Supp. 2d 1340, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96541, 2010 WL 3701338

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 15, 2010 | Docket: 2338778

Published

the '449 patent are not invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 101; 2. The Motion is GRANTED to the extent that VVI

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Aug 27, 2008 | Docket: 3256292

Published

Building Code, Residential in accordance with Section 101.2. Residential occupancies shall include the following:

Fun Spot of Florida, Inc. v. Magical Midway of Central Florida, Ltd.

242 F. Supp. 2d 1183, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25316, 2002 WL 31956277

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 6, 2002 | Docket: 2312772

Published

inseparable and interdependent whole. See 17 U.S.C. § 101. 2. Counterclaim Count I of the counterclaim seeks

Haynes v. Shoney's, Inc.

803 F. Supp. 393, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12711, 59 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 169, 1992 WL 207313

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 12, 1992 | Docket: 1954058

Published

conditions of the contractual relationship." See Section 101(2)(b). This would appear to effectively eliminate

Nordberg v. Murphy (In re Chase & Sanborn Corp.)

55 B.R. 451, 1985 Bankr. LEXIS 5213

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Oct 2, 1985 | Docket: 65779046

Published

Coffee was an “affiliate” of Chase & Sanborn. § 101(2)(B). By definition, therefore, Colombian Coffee

Captain's Paradise, Inc. v. Glasel (In re Captain's Paradise, Inc.)

29 B.R. 516, 1983 Bankr. LEXIS 6505

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Mar 31, 1983 | Docket: 65778449

Published

were “affiliates” of the Debtor as defined in Section 101(2)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code and were, therefore