Florida Statute 101.75 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title IX
ELECTORS AND ELECTIONS

Chapter 101
VOTING METHODS AND PROCEDURE

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 101.75

101.75 Municipal elections; change of dates for cause.—

(1) In any municipality, when the date of the municipal election falls on the same date as any statewide or county election and the voting devices of the voting system used in the county are not available for both elections, the municipality may provide that the municipal election may be held within 30 days prior to or subsequent to the statewide or county election.

(2) The date of the municipal election shall be set by the municipality by ordinance.

(3) Notwithstanding any provision of local law or municipal charter, the governing body of a municipality may, by ordinance, move the date of any municipal election to a date concurrent with any statewide or countywide election. The dates for qualifying for the election moved by the passage of such ordinance shall be specifically provided for in the ordinance. The term of office for any elected municipal official shall commence as provided by the relevant municipal charter or ordinance.

History.—ss. 1, 2, ch. 59-493; s. 1, ch. 76-68; s. 24, ch. 77-175; s. 5, ch. 92-16; s. 26, ch. 2001-40; s. 4, ch. 2007-30; s. 23, ch. 2008-95; s. 42, ch. 2011-40.

Note.—Former s. 104.451.

F.S. 101.75 on Google Scholar

F.S. 101.75 on Casetext

Amendments to 101.75

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 101.75

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 101.75.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 101.75

Total Results: 6

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 2007-07-24T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: Section 4 of the act added subsection (3) to section 101.75, Florida Statutes, to provide: "Notwithstanding…charter change by ordinance, the amendment to section 101.75(3) by Chapter 07-39, Laws of Florida, would be

Barfield v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2001-08-31T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 792 So. 2d 706

Snippet: range under the 1994 guidelines was 61.05 months to 101.75 months. However, the corrected guideline scoresheet

State v. Hughes

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2000-04-12T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 756 So. 2d 1061

Snippet: reflected a sentencing range of 61.05 months to 101.75 months in Florida State Prison. The trial court

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1983-12-12T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: So.2d 597 (1 D.C.A. Fla., 1975); AGO's 78-101; 75-120; Florida Industrial Commission v. National

Fredericks v. FLORIDA DEPT. OF COMMERCE, INDUS. REL. COM'N

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1975-12-18T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 323 So. 2d 286

Snippet: Enterprises, Inc., Fla. App.3d, 1966, 187 So.2d 101. 75-867 District Court of Appeal of Florida

Haddock v. Robinson

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1974-02-12T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 289 So. 2d 449

Snippet: is grossly inadequate for the reason that it is $101.75 less than the proven out-of-pocket expenses of