The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title IX
ELECTORS AND ELECTIONS

Chapter 104
ELECTION CODE: VIOLATIONS; PENALTIES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 104.11

104.11 Neglect of duty by sheriff or other officer.—Any sheriff, deputy sheriff, or other officer who willfully neglects or willfully refuses to perform his or her duties relating to elections is guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.

History.—s. 8, ch. 26870, 1951; s. 30, ch. 71-136; s. 35, ch. 77-175; s. 620, ch. 95-147.

F.S. 104.11 on Google Scholar

F.S. 104.11 on Casetext

Amendments to 104.11

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 104.11

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S104.11 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - NEGLECT ELECTION DUTY BY SHERIFF OR OFFICER - M: F

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

MORTON, Jr. v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION,, 318 F. Supp. 3d 40 (D.D.C. 2018)

. . . Braxton , 647 A.2d 1116, 1117 (D.C. 1994) (holding that 28 DCMR § 104.11 "expressly authorizes the [Commission . . . ) (2009); see also Bailey , 793 F.3d at 134, and the relevant guidelines, Dkt. 22-1 at 8; 28 DCMR § 104.11 . . . This finding comports with the guideline for determining non-standard set-offs, 28 DCMR § 104.11, and . . .

SAMUELS, v. FISCHER, D. D. M. C. R. K. L. T. R. Jr. C. J. S., 168 F. Supp. 3d 625 (S.D.N.Y. 2016)

. . . violated various rules of inmate behavior and charging him with two counts of violent conduct (Rule 104.11 . . . November 23, 2010, Brereton concluded the hearing and found Plaintiff guilty of violent conduct (Rule 104.11 . . .

SHAKIR, v. FULWOOD, Jr., 108 F. Supp. 3d 1 (D.D.C. 2015)

. . . Id., § 104.11. . . . Braxton, 647 A.2d 1116, 1117 (D.C.1994) (§ 104.2 “is clearly not mandatory,” as § 104.11 “expressly authorizes . . .

SLOANE, v. BORAWSKI,, 64 F. Supp. 3d 473 (W.D.N.Y. 2014)

. . . Plaintiff Sloane was charged with the following violations: 100.11 attempted assault; 104.11 violent . . . I have found you guilty of the charges, 104.11 violent conduct, 104.13 creating a disturbance, 107.10 . . . Plaintiff Sloane was charged with the following violations: 100.11 attempted assault; 104.11 violent . . .

WHITLEY, v. J. MILLER, D. DOCCS DOCCS, 57 F. Supp. 3d 152 (N.D.N.Y. 2014)

. . . Plaintiff was charged with violating five prison disciplinary rules, including rule 100.13 (fighting); rule 104.11 . . .

WESTMORELAND, v. L. SUTHERLAND,, 662 F.3d 714 (6th Cir. 2011)

. . . the scene and, as the highest ranking fire official, [plaintiff] was in command under Ohio Fire Code 104.11 . . .

MEZU, v. MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY,, 775 F. Supp. 2d 801 (D. Md. 2011)

. . . R. 104.11.C. . . . R. 104.11.c provides: Limitation on Cost of Photocopying Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, the amount . . .

FLORES, v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA,, 770 F. Supp. 2d 768 (D. Md. 2011)

. . . Local Rule 104.11.b (D.Md. 2010) (limiting fees charged by treating physicians to $325 per hour). . . .

TELTSCHIK, v. WILLIAMS JENSEN, PLLC,, 683 F. Supp. 2d 33 (D.D.C. 2010)

. . . . §§ 102.5(a), 104.3(d), 104.10, 104.11, 106.5(f) and 106.6.” Defs.’ Mot. for Summ. J. Ex. . . .

F. RAMSEY, v. S. GOORD,, 661 F. Supp. 2d 370 (W.D.N.Y. 2009)

. . . Ley, charging Plaintiff with violating DOCS Rules 102.10 (spoken threat), 104.11 (threat of violence) . . .

R. LORRAINE v. MARKEL AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY,, 241 F.R.D. 534 (D. Md. 2007)

. . . Federal Rules of Evidence Manual, 104.03[l][b] (9th ed.2006)(hereinafter “Saltzburg”); Weinstein at § 104.11 . . . Weinstein at § 104.11 [3]. . Id.; United States v. Branch, 970 F.2d 1368 (4th Cir.1992). . . . .

BOLANTE, v. ACHIM,, 457 F. Supp. 2d 898 (E.D. Wis. 2006)

. . . Charles Gordon, Stanley Mailman & Stephen Yale-Loehr, 8 Immigration Law and Procedure § 104.11[2] (Rev . . . See Gordon, Mailman & Yale-Loehr, supra, § 104.11[2]. . . .

A. FLETCHER, v. F. REILLY, Jr. D. C., 433 F.3d 867 (D.C. Cir. 2006)

. . . Regs. tit. 28, § 104.11. At D.C. . . .

In A. KIEFFER P. In, 306 B.R. 197 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 2004)

. . . the report of sale and lodging an objection to an exemption claimed by the debtors, and expenses of $104.11 . . .

C. J. SCOTT, v. T. A. COUGHLIN, Jr. J. M. R. W. F. J. J., 344 F.3d 282 (2d Cir. 2003)

. . . Scott for violation of prison rules 100.11 for attempted assault, 106.10 for violating a direct order, 104.11 . . .

GAYLE, v. P. GONYEA, T. F. Co, P. Co, T. R. T. D. S. S. P. J. S. NYS DOCS, D. H. T. J., 313 F.3d 677 (2d Cir. 2002)

. . . Gayle was not charged with violating rule 104.11, which provides that "[i]nmates shall not engage in . . .

ESPINAL, v. S. GOORD, Lt. Lt. A. B. D. C. R., 180 F. Supp. 2d 532 (S.D.N.Y. 2002)

. . . Specifically, Espinal was accused of violating Prison Rules 104.11 (violent conduct), 100.10 (assault . . .

HIGGINBOTHAM, III, DDS, v. KCS INTERNATIONAL, INC. t a, 202 F.R.D. 444 (D. Md. 2001)

. . . Local Rule 104.11.b provides in pertinent part that a party noticing the deposition of a treating physician . . .

COOPER HOSPITAL UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, v. M. SULLIVAN, v. FLEX SYS, 183 F.R.D. 119 (D.N.J. 1998)

. . . Weinstein’s Federal Evidence, § 104.11[l][a], In making his finding that the United States and the State . . . Ev. 802; see also Weinstein’s Federal Evidence, §§ 104.11[1][a], 104.13[8]. . . .

E. BLAIR- BEY, v. QUICK,, 151 F.3d 1036 (D.C. Cir. 1998)

. . . Id., § 104.11. The D.C. . . .

CHARLES, v. COUGHLIN, A., 985 F. Supp. 88 (E.D.N.Y. 1997)

. . . charging him with violations of 7 NYCRR §§ 001.00 (“Penal Law Offense”), 100.10 (“Assault on Inmate”) and 104.11 . . .

PORTER, v. Mr. A. COUGHLIN, III, E. Mr. P., 964 F. Supp. 97 (W.D.N.Y. 1997)

. . . Plaintiff was charged with two DOCS Rule Book violations: Rule 104.10 (riot takeover) and Rule 104.11 . . . plaintiffs June 1991 Superintendent’s Hearing for charges that he had violated DOCS Rules 104.10 and 104.11 . . .

In CHINCHILLA, AT T UNIVERSAL CARD SERVICES CORP. v. CHINCHILLA,, 202 B.R. 1010 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1996)

. . . Before application of the new finance charge of $104.11, the account balance was $6,599.13, less than . . .

O. PERKINS, v. S. HENDERSON,, 881 F. Supp. 55 (D.D.C. 1995)

. . . . § 104.11. . . .

RUSSELL, v. A. COUGHLIN, III, J. J. A. C. L. Jo, 774 F. Supp. 189 (S.D.N.Y. 1991)

. . . misbehavior report (“MR”) charging Russell with violations of DOCS disciplinary rules 100.10 (assault), 104.11 . . .

OF AMERICA BANK, MID- MICHIGAN, N. A. a E. W. v. UNITED STATES, 752 F. Supp. 764 (E.D. Mich. 1990)

. . . 729.47 119.34 2013 0.00 0.00 2014 0.00 0.00 2015 852.68 111.20 2016 0.00 0.00 2017 0.00 0.00 2018 996.70 104.11 . . .

LOTT, v. SELSKY,, 747 F. Supp. 226 (S.D.N.Y. 1990)

. . . inmate misbehavior report charging Lott with violating the following DOCS Rules: 100.10 (assault); 104.11 . . . including Lott’s evidence, Demskie found plaintiff guilty of violating DOCS Rules 100.10 (assault) and 104.11 . . .

Dr. ROGERS, v. Dr. BENNETT,, 873 F.2d 1387 (11th Cir. 1989)

. . . . §§ 104.11-.14 (1988), and require that educational institutions provide the handicapped access to the . . .

W. SPANNAUS, K. v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION,, 641 F. Supp. 1520 (S.D.N.Y. 1986)

. . . . §§ 104.3(d) and 104.11. . . . See 11 C.F.R. §§ 100.7(a)(4); 104.11(a) and 114.10. . . .

CLEAN- UP a v. C. HEINRICH,, 759 F.2d 1511 (11th Cir. 1985)

. . . . §§ 877.03, 104.11, 104.051, 104.061, 104.091, 104.185, 104.23, and 104.41. . . .

MODERN AMUSEMENTS, INC. v. MARRIOTT CORPORATION, 599 F. Supp. 1548 (S.D.N.Y. 1985)

. . . Westchester County Charter sec. 161.11 (Gen'l Code Publisher’s Corp.1979); see also id. sec. 104.11(5 . . .

CLEAN- UP v. C. HEINRICH,, 582 F. Supp. 125 (M.D. Fla. 1984)

. . . . § 104.11. . . .

RAPP, v. STATE, 274 So. 2d 18 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)

. . . later, the defendant paid for groceries at a Titusville Winn-Dixie store with a check in the amount of $104.11 . . .

J. A. MALONEY, v. R. KIRK, Jr., 212 So. 2d 609 (Fla. 1968)

. . . “Section 104.11, Florida Statutes, defines as a felony the corrupt making of a false affidavit in connection . . .

NATIONAL BISCUIT COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES, 140 Ct. Cl. 443 (Ct. Cl. 1957)

. . . and notice, the plaintiff paid additional income taxes for 1942 of $1,984.35 and interest thereon of $104.11 . . .