The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . later, resulting in APR of about 104% using plaintiffs' formula: 10 ___ 100 × 365 _________ × 100 = 104.29% . . .
. . . distinguished from this case because here New Jersey’s In Rem Tax Foreclosure Act (1948), N.J.S.A. 54:5—104.29 . . .
. . . , 548 A.2d 521 (“Foreclosure by a municipality under the [In Rem Tax Foreclosure Act, N.J.S.A. 54:5-104.29 . . .
. . . PX 104 11166, at 104.17-104.18, 104.26-104.29; Tr. at 647-48. . . .
. . . The contract contains the then applicable Defense Acquisition Regulation (DAR) standard clause 7-104.29 . . .
. . . Court therefore awards the following: District Court Proceedings 1995 Attorneys Fees 126.50 hours @ $104.29 . . .
. . . . §§ N.J.Stat.Ann. 54:5-104.29 et seq., the In Rem Tax Foreclosure Act. . . .
. . . adjusted by increases in the cost of living) and award petitioner attorney’s fees at an hourly rate of $104.29 . . . Thus, the parties’ awards were as follows: (1) Petitioner = (.25 x (95.6 x 104.29)) + (.1988 x (225.2 . . . 107.37)) + (.01 x (296.5 x 109.83)) + (.01 x 4,844.65); (2) Hon Family Ventures, Ltd. = (.2308 x (95.6 x 104.29 . . . .03 x (296.5 x 109.83)) + (.03 X 4,844.65); and (3) Hon Property Investments, Inc. = (.0052 x (95.6 x 104.29 . . .
. . . Pursuant to the requirements of the In Rem Tax Foreclosure Act, N.J.S.A. 54:5-104.29, et seq., the City . . . Citing New Jersey In Rem Foreclosure Act, N.J.S.A. 54:5-104.29 et seq. and NJ.S.A. 54:5-104.30(a) ("Municipality . . .
. . . Regulation § 7-104.29 (1976) reprinted in 32 C.F.R. Parts 1-39, Vol. II, at 133-34 (1981). . . .
. . . the constitutionality of the provisions of the New Jersey In Rem Tax Foreclosure Act, N.J.S.A. 54:5-104.29 . . . 1981, the Township sought to obtain an in rem foreclosure on the property pursuant to N.J.S.A. 54:5-104.29 . . .
. . . . §§ 3-807-5, 7-104.29(b) (1970). . . .
. . . . §§ 3-807-5, 7-104.29(b) (1970). . . .
. . . Defendants allege that the basic monthly grant should be $60.55 for a one person household, $104.29 for . . .
. . . For that period the amount due at the contract rates was $624,821.50, the balance of $632,-104.29 being . . .
. . . 96.02% apportioned on tracks owned and operated and leased and operated and the three use factors, 104.29% . . .