The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
. . . /2017-8/1/2017 ($223.16) $106.74 8/1/2017 $219.62 $18,297.99 ($106.74) 8/1/2017-9/1/2017 ($112.88) $106.08 . . . 9/1/2017 $219.62 $18,185.11 ($106.08) 9/1/2017-10/1/2017 ($113.54) $105.42 10/2/2017 $219.62 $18,071.57 . . .
. . . Francesca Yabraian, Torrens' wife, which the complaint alleged to be a prima facie violation of section 106.08 . . . challenged the source of the funds in Torrens' campaign account, alleging that Torrens violated section 106.08 . . . The remedies related to violating section 106.08 are very specific and limit when a violation may result . . . first-degree misdemeanor to knowingly and willfully accept a contribution in excess of the limits in section 106.08 . . .
. . . . § 106.08(1)(a) (2014). . . . . § 106.08(1)(a). . . .
. . . profits generated on account of pre-disso-lution matters pursuant to D.C.Code §§ 33 — 104.04(b)(1) and 3S-106.08 . . .
. . . . § 106.08(4). The State did not appeal that ruling. II. . . .
. . . . § 106.08(1)(b)(2). Limited on Preemption Grounds West’s F.S.A. § 106.25(7). . . . . § 106.08(l)(b)(2) — which proscribes contributions by minors in excess of $100 to political candidates . . . Plaintiffs contend that, but for § 106.08(l)(b)(2), they would have made their desired contributions. . . . Plaintiffs allege that, while Defendants had the opportunity to advise Plaintiffs that § 106.08(l)(b) . . . Plaintiffs argue that since Defendants have been enjoined from giving any force or effect to § 106.08 . . . Stat. § 106.08(5), which prohibits political donations in the name of others, such arguments only bolster . . .
. . . Stat. § 106.08(l)(a)-(b). The limit for others, including adults, is $500. . . . Id. § 106.08(7)(a)-(b). When Ms. . . . of Section 106.08(l)(b) of the Florida Statutes. . . . Stat. § 106.08(l)(b)(2). . . . . Id. at 1321, 1325-26 (quoting Section 106.08 of the Florida Statutes). . . .
. . . . § 106.08(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2008). . . . mother was in excess of the $500 limit on individual campaign contributions established in section 106.08 . . . (a), Florida Statutes, and that the loan was received after the cut-off date established in section 106.08 . . . accept campaign donations on the day of the election or less than five days prior to the election. § 106.08 . . . Judge Turner’s conduct is a clear violation of sections 106.08(l)(a) and 106.08(3)(a) and could not plausibly . . .
. . . funds were in fact loans from her father made in violation of the contribution limits set by section 106.08 . . .
. . . See § 106.08(4). . . . See § 106.08(4), Fla. Stat. . . .
. . . . § 106.08(1)(a). . . . Id. § 106.08(1)(c). . . . Id. § 106.08(2)(b). . . . Id. § 106.08(1)(b)(1). . . . Stat. § 106.08(1)(a). . . .
. . . . § 106.08(l)(a) (2003) ($500 per election); Me. Rev. Stat. . . .
. . . improper $95,800 contribution to the Renke campaign from Judge Renke’s father in violation of sections 106.08 . . . (l)(a), 106.08(5) and 106.19(a) and (b), Florida Statutes (2002). . . . During the campaign, in violation of Canon 2, Canon 2 A and Canon 7 A(3)(a) and §§ 106.08(l)(a), 106.08 . . .
. . . This conduct violated Florida Statutes §§ 106.11 and 106.08 and Canons 1, 2, 6 B and 7. . . . in your campaign account after the deadline for depositing money into that account in violation of § 106.08 . . . This conduct is clearly prohibited under section 106.08(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2001). See Op. . . . person or committee contributing it and may not be used or expended by or on behalf of the candidate. § 106.08 . . .
. . . violated the $100 limit of subsection 106.09(1), Florida Statutes (1999), and the $500 limit of paragraph 106.08 . . .
. . . used for the individual’s campaign, may not contribute more than the amount which is allowed in s. 106.08 . . .
. . . Right to Life Committee, Inc., (“FRL”) appeals from the district court’s final judgment upholding § 106.08 . . . Contributions by Candidates under § 106.08(5) FRL challenges § 106.08(5), Florida Statutes, as facially . . . In turn, § 106.08(5) delineates three distinct exceptions to this blanket rule. . . . To do so would “rewrite the clear terms” of § 106.08(5). Dimmitt, 985 F.2d at 1572. . . . The Constitutionality of § 106.08(5) We have concluded that the plain language of § 106.08(5) creates . . .
. . . solicited the checks from his firm, Brown was not “politically active” and was not aware of section 106.08 . . . When the researching attorney notified Brown of section 106.08, Brown immediately met with Malone and . . . The Bar argues that the referee’s finding that Brown was not aware of section 106.08, Florida Statutes . . . The referee’s finding that Brown was unaware of section 106.08 when he solicited the contributions is . . . The Bar next contends that regardless of when Brown became aware of section 106.08, his solicitation . . . that Brown did not realize that his solicitation of these contributions was in violation of section 106.08 . . .
. . . The policy was credited with an experience refund of $106.08, and the Neonatology Plan paid the net premium . . . of $10,625.42 ($10,731.50 - $106.08). . . .
. . . . § 106.08(l)(a) (West Supp.1998) ($500 per election limit); Ky.Rev.Stat. . . .
. . . . § 106.08(8) Fla.Stat. (1989). . . .
. . . See sections 106.011(3), 106.08(2)(b), Fla.Stat. . . . The Republican Party argued that the ads were voter mobilization efforts under 106.08(2)(b)2.; that the . . . were clearly contributions, and appellant waived any challenge to the constitutionality of sections 106.08 . . .
. . . The Campaign Financing Act, Florida Statutes § 106.08(8) (1989), prohibited candidates for legislative . . .
. . . By comparison, subsection 106.08(1)(a)3 sets a general $500 limit on contributions to candidates for . . .
. . . See Hoffman, 492 U.S. at 101, 109 S.Ct. at 2822; 2 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶¶ 106.02-106.08 (15th ed. 1993 . . .
. . . I agree that section 106.08(8), Florida Statutes (1989) (the Campaign Financing Act), is unconstitutional . . . corruption or an appearance of corruption, I fully agree with the majority and conclude that section 106.08 . . . appeal an order of the Circuit Court of the Second Judicial Circuit declaring unconstitutional section 106.08 . . . accept or solicit any campaign contribution during a regular or special session of the Legislature. § 106.08 . . .
. . . Thus, we have the campaign finance limitation law, section 106.08, Florida Statutes (1987), and the contribution . . . Section 106.08(l)(e), Florida Statutes (1987) authorizes a person to contribute a sum not to exceed $1,000 . . . Since Florida law establishes a maximum limit of $1,000 per election for trial judges, § 106.08(1)(e) . . .
. . . Florida Statute 106.08 Contributions; limitations on.— (1) No person or political committee shall make . . .
. . . person who knowingly and willfully: (a) Accepts a contribution in excess of the limits prescribed by s. 106.08 . . .
. . . failed to return the $35,000 of post-election contributions in violation of Sections 106.141(10) and 106.08 . . . court entered summary judgment for the State, limiting, however, the penalty for violation of Section 106.08 . . . Sections 106.141 and 106.08 deal specifically with contributions received after an election. . . . Therefore, because the context in which the term contribution is used in Sections 106.141 and 106.08 . . . Section 106.08(2) provides: "Any contribution received by a candidate with opposition in an election . . .
. . . In this appeal from final agency action, appellants challenge the constitutionality of § 106.08(1)(f) . . . proceedings which resulted in a final order finding appellants to be in violation of §§ 106.19(1)(a) and 106.08 . . . respectively, for accepting and making contributions in excess of the maximum amount permitted by § 106.08 . . . Section 106.08, Florida Statutes, provides, in pertinent part, that: 1) No person or political committee . . . Because § 106.08(1)(f), Florida Statutes, may in this context be regarded as inhibiting circumvention . . .
. . . Section 106.08(l)(e) imposes such limitations and has substantial impact on protected freedoms. . . . Bellotti and Buckley cases and reasoned that one of the asserted state interests underlying section 106.08 . . . contributors is an important state interest, the restrictions upon political contributions in sections 106.08 . . . Section 106.08(l)(e), Florida Statutes (1974), impinges upon First Amendment rights. . . .
. . . Section 106.08(l)(d) of the code restricts the size of contributions to a single political committee . . . the division of elections, and the members of the state elections commission to invalidate section 106.08 . . . Stat.Ann. § 106.08(l)(e) (West Supp.1980), which applies to countywide elections in the same way that . . . section 106.08(l)(d) applies to statewide elections. . . . director of the division of elections, and members of the elections commission to invalidate section 106.08 . . .
. . . person who knowingly and willfully: (a) Accepts a contribution in excess of the limits prescribed by § 106.08 . . .
. . . . § 106.08(l)(d) (1977), which provides: (1) No person or political committee shall make contributions . . . Likewise, there is no doubt that section 106.08(l)(d) directly impacts upon the committee in curtailing . . . In light of this language, it cannot be gainsaid that the contribution limitations in section 106.08( . . . Accordingly, the fact that section 106.08(l)(d) of Florida’s campaign finance act does not affect the . . . Stat. §§ 106.011(2) and 106.08. . . .
. . . committee” within the definition of Section 106.011(2), Florida Statutes (1975), and as utilized in Section 106.08 . . . of $1,800 to him as a candidate for circuit judge since the maximum contribution allowed by Section 106.08 . . . finding that probable cause exists to believe that the Dade Judicial Trust Fund has violated Section 106.08 . . . We find that Section 106.011(2), Florida Statutes (1975), and Section 106.08, Florida Statutes (1975) . . . Accordingly, for the foregoing reasons, we find that Sections 106.011(2) and 106.08, Florida Statutes . . .
. . . compensation derived from any level of government service, or political contributions defined by F.S. 106.08 . . .
. . . My job as high pressure tester pays $106.08. . . . The job I was cutback to pays $106.08 (Utility). See Alexander v. . . .
. . . United States, and the cases were assessed with duty at the rate of 20 per centum ad valorem under item 106.08 . . .
. . . April 1962, making a total amount of $470.52 composed of $242.90 principal, $121.54 interest, and $106.08 . . .
. . . plaintiff’s Federal Employees’ Group Life Insurance, $418.44 to plaintiff’s Civil Service Betirement Fund, $106.08 . . .
. . . defendant finished paying: for the color television set on December-19, 1962, when he made a payment of $106.08 . . .