Florida Statute 106.09 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title IX
ELECTORS AND ELECTIONS

Chapter 106
CAMPAIGN FINANCING

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 106.09

106.09 Cash contributions and contribution by cashier’s checks.—

(1)(a) A person may not make an aggregate cash contribution or contribution by means of a cashier’s check to the same candidate or committee in excess of $50 per election.

(b) A person may not accept an aggregate cash contribution or contribution by means of a cashier’s check from the same contributor in excess of $50 per election.

(2)(a) Any person who makes or accepts a contribution in violation of subsection (1) commits a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.

(b) Any person who knowingly and willfully makes or accepts a contribution in excess of $5,000 in violation of subsection (1) commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.

History.—s. 9, ch. 73-128; s. 48, ch. 77-175; s. 2, ch. 2002-281; s. 45, ch. 2007-30; s. 63, ch. 2011-40.

F.S. 106.09 on Google Scholar

F.S. 106.09 on Casetext

Amendments to 106.09

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 106.09

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S106.09 - ELECTION LAWS - RENUMBERED. SEE REC#6400 - M: F

S106.09 2a - ELECTION LAWS - CASHIERS CHECK CAMPAIGN CONTRIB OVER 50 DOLS - M: F

S106.09 2b - ELECTION LAWS - MAKE ACCEPT CONTRIBUTION OVER 5K DOLS - F: T

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 106.09

Total Results: 18

CHARITY NOELLE WOOD v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-04-03T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: . 916.13, s. 916.15, or s. 916.302." § 916.106(9). 2

Morrow v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2014-12-18T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 153 So. 3d 402

Snippet: committed to DCF custody under section 916.13(1). § 916.106(9), Fla. Stat. Section 916.15 sets forth the process

Department of Children & Family Services v. Amaya

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2009-03-25T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 10 So. 3d 152

Snippet: Fla. Stat. (2008) (emphasis added). Section 916.106(9) defines a "forensic client" as one who

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 2007-05-02T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: from nonforensic residents." And see s. 916.106(9), Fla. Stat., defining "Forensic client"

Douse v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2006-06-12T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 930 So. 2d 838

Snippet: SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] See § 916.106(9), Fla. Stat. (2005) ("`Incompetent to proceed

Diaz De La Portilla v. FLA. ELECTIONS COM'N

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2003-09-10T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 857 So. 2d 913

Snippet: transaction violated the $100 limit of subsection 106.09(1), Florida Statutes (1999), and the $500 limit

Graham v. Jenne

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2003-02-12T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 837 So. 2d 554

Snippet: proceed," are defined by statute. See § 916.106(9), (11)-(12), Fla. Stat. (2002). If an accused is…proceed" as that term is defined in section 916.106(9). A number of psychologists agreed that Graham is

Duffy v. Brooker

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1993-01-20T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 614 So. 2d 539

Snippet: negligent injury."[3] Sections 766.106(5)-766.106(9) and 766.204-766.205 provide for informal presuit

Florida Bar v. Johnson

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1988-06-02T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 526 So. 2d 53

Snippet: and ii); and Disciplinary Rules 1-102(A)(6), 2-106, 9-102(A)(2), 9-102(B)(3), and 9-102(B)(4) of the

Estate of Ganier v. Estate of Ganier

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1982-07-29T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 418 So. 2d 256

Snippet: Wills and Administration in Florida § 8.10, at 106-09 (5th ed. 1977). For a general discussion of English

Davidson Lumber Co. v. Smith

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1980-12-09T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 390 So. 2d 1221

Snippet: wage of $176.81 and a weekly compensation rate of $106.09. Accordingly, the Deputy Commissioner’s order is…$176.81 and a resultant weekly compensation rate of $106.09. Otherwise, the order is AFFIRMED. ROBERT P. SMITH

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1980-12-04T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: district created and established pursuant to ss. 266.106(9) and 266.107(1), F. S. You state that presently …regulations necessary to effect the purposes of s. 266.106(9), the composition of the Architectural Review Board

FIFTY-SIX SIXTY COLLINS AVE CONDOMINIUM, INC. v. Dawson

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1978-01-23T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 354 So. 2d 432

Snippet: the point of law in Lungren v. Strawn, 151 Fla. 106, 9 So.2d 195 (1942). The essential elements of estoppel

Brown v. Ellingson

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1969-06-11T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 224 So. 2d 391

Snippet: 113 So. 708 and Lungren v. Strawn, 1942, 151 Fla. 106, 9 So.2d 195. The Tilden case had to do with lowering

Eugene Wuesthoff Memorial Hospital Ass'n v. Sperano

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1960-02-10T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 118 So. 2d 49

Snippet: prejudice and that its costs be taxed in the sum of $106.09 against the plaintiff. Pursuant to this motion,

Morgan v. Bailey

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1925-06-18T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 105 So. 143, 90 Fla. 47

Snippet: 394; King v. Welborn,83 Mich. 195, 47 N.W. Rep. 106, 9 L. R. A. 803; Clark v. Thias,173 Mo. 628, 73 S.

Hill v. First National Bank

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1917-05-16T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 73 Fla. 1092

Snippet: 451; King v. Welborn, 83 Mich. 195, 47 N. W. Rep. 106, 9 L. R. A. 803; Milton v. Milton, 63 Fla. 533, 58

Smith v. Davis

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1886-06-14T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 22 Fla. 405

Snippet: the same and recovered a judgment, thereon tor $106.09, upon which execution issued. That this judgment