Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 106.09 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 106.09 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 106.09

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title IX
ELECTORS AND ELECTIONS
Chapter 106
CAMPAIGN FINANCING
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 106.09
106.09 Cash contributions and contribution by cashier’s checks.
(1)(a) A person may not make an aggregate cash contribution or contribution by means of a cashier’s check to the same candidate or committee in excess of $50 per election.
(b) A person may not accept an aggregate cash contribution or contribution by means of a cashier’s check from the same contributor in excess of $50 per election.
(2)(a) Any person who makes or accepts a contribution in violation of subsection (1) commits a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.
(b) Any person who knowingly and willfully makes or accepts a contribution in excess of $5,000 in violation of subsection (1) commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
History.s. 9, ch. 73-128; s. 48, ch. 77-175; s. 2, ch. 2002-281; s. 45, ch. 2007-30; s. 63, ch. 2011-40.

F.S. 106.09 on Google Scholar

F.S. 106.09 on Casetext

Amendments to 106.09


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 106.09
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S106.09 - ELECTION LAWS - RENUMBERED. SEE REC#6400 - M: F
S106.09 2a - ELECTION LAWS - CASHIERS CHECK CAMPAIGN CONTRIB OVER 50 DOLS - M: F
S106.09 2b - ELECTION LAWS - MAKE ACCEPT CONTRIBUTION OVER 5K DOLS - F: T



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 106.09

Total Results: 19

McDaniel v. State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-11-13

Snippet: 916.13, s. 916.15, or s. 916.302." § 916.106(9), Fla. Stat. (2024). Mr. McDaniel is a forensic

CHARITY NOELLE WOOD v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-04-03

Snippet: 916.13, s. 916.15, or s. 916.302." § 916.106(9). 2

Morrow v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-12-18

Citation: 153 So. 3d 402, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 20564, 2014 WL 7184252

Snippet: committed to DCF custody under section 916.13(1). § 916.106(9), Fla. Stat. Section 916.15 sets forth the process

Department of Children & Family Services v. Amaya

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2009-03-25

Citation: 10 So. 3d 152, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2487, 2009 WL 763584

Snippet: Fla. Stat. (2008) (emphasis added). Section 916.106(9) defines a "forensic client" as one who has been

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 2007-05-02

Snippet: chapter from nonforensic residents." And see s. 916.106(9), Fla. Stat., defining "Forensic client" or "client"

Douse v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-06-12

Citation: 930 So. 2d 838, 2006 WL 1626908

Snippet: SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] See § 916.106(9), Fla. Stat. (2005) ("`Incompetent to proceed' means

Diaz De La Portilla v. FLA. ELECTIONS COM'N

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2003-09-10

Citation: 857 So. 2d 913, 2003 WL 22082173

Snippet: transaction violated the $100 limit of subsection 106.09(1), Florida Statutes (1999), and the $500 limit

Graham v. Jenne

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2003-02-12

Citation: 837 So. 2d 554, 2003 WL 289263

Snippet: to proceed," are defined by statute. See § 916.106(9), (11)-(12), Fla. Stat. (2002). If an accused is

Duffy v. Brooker

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1993-01-21

Citation: 614 So. 2d 539, 1993 WL 8994

Snippet: denying negligent injury."[3] Sections 766.106(5)-766.106(9) and 766.204-766.205 provide for informal presuit

Florida Bar v. Johnson

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1988-06-02

Citation: 526 So. 2d 53, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 367, 1988 Fla. LEXIS 677, 1988 WL 55628

Snippet: and ii); and Disciplinary Rules 1-102(A)(6), 2-106, 9-102(A)(2), 9-102(B)(3), and 9-102(B)(4) of the

Estate of Ganier v. Estate of Ganier

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1982-07-29

Citation: 418 So. 2d 256

Snippet: Wills and Administration in Florida § 8.10, at 106-09 (5th ed. 1977). For a general discussion of English

Davidson Lumber Co. v. Smith

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1980-12-09

Citation: 390 So. 2d 1221, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 18181

Snippet: wage of $176.81 and a weekly compensation rate of $106.09. Accordingly, the Deputy Commissioner’s order is

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1980-12-05

Snippet: district created and established pursuant to ss. 266.106(9) and 266.107(1), F. S. You state that presently

FIFTY-SIX SIXTY COLLINS AVE CONDOMINIUM, INC. v. Dawson

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1978-01-24

Citation: 354 So. 2d 432, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15144

Snippet: the point of law in Lungren v. Strawn, 151 Fla. 106, 9 So.2d 195 (1942). The essential elements of estoppel

Brown v. Ellingson

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1969-06-11

Citation: 224 So. 2d 391

Snippet: 113 So. 708 and Lungren v. Strawn, 1942, 151 Fla. 106, 9 So.2d 195. The Tilden case had to do with lowering

Eugene Wuesthoff Memorial Hospital Ass'n v. Sperano

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1960-02-10

Citation: 118 So. 2d 49

Snippet: prejudice and that its costs be taxed in the sum of $106.09 against the plaintiff. Pursuant to this motion

Morgan v. Bailey

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1925-06-18

Citation: 105 So. 143, 90 Fla. 47

Snippet: 394; King v. Welborn,83 Mich. 195, 47 N.W. Rep. 106, 9 L. R. A. 803; Clark v. Thias,173 Mo. 628, 73 S

Hill v. First National Bank

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1917-05-16

Citation: 73 Fla. 1092, 75 So. 614

Snippet: 451; King v. Welborn, 83 Mich. 195, 47 N. W. Rep. 106, 9 L. R. A. 803; Milton v. Milton, 63 Fla. 533, 58

Smith v. Davis

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1886-06-15

Citation: 22 Fla. 405

Snippet: the same and recovered a judgment, thereon tor $106.09, upon which execution issued. That this judgment