Syfert Injury Law Firm

814 PROPERTY HOLDINGS, LLC, etc. v. NEW BIRTH BAPTIST CHURCH CATHEDRAL OF FAITH INTERNATIONAL, INC., etc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2022-07-13T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: the common elements and common surplus”); § 718.107(2), Fla. Stat. (“The share in the common elements

814 PROPERTY HOLDINGS, LLC, etc. v. NEW BIRTH BAPTIST CHURCH CATHEDRAL OF FAITH INTERNATIONAL, INC., etc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2022-06-29T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: the common elements and common surplus”); § 718.107(2), Fla. Stat. (“The share in the common elements

DIANE SWISS v. ALEXIS FLANAGAN

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2021-10-13T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: novo the legal question related to section 733.107(2), and we review the trial court’s factual findings

MARVALENE HANNIBAL AND KENDRA MATTHEWS v. PORTIA BRANDY NAVARRO AND ALZATA THURSTON

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2021-02-02T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: presumption of undue influence, pursuant to section 733.107(2), Florida Statutes (2019), and agreed that the … novo the legal question related to section 733.107(2), and we review the trial court’s factual findings

EASTWOOD SHORES PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-01-24T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: separate conveyance is not at issue. Cf. § 718.107(2) ("The share in the

Choice Plus, LLC v. Department of Financial Services, etc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2018-04-17T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: escheat to the State of Florida.” Per section 732.107(2), Mrs. Rigley’s real property was sold as provided…Financial Officer pursuant to chapter 717”) with § 732.107(2), Fla. Stat. (2013) (“ Property that escheats shall

In re Amendments to the Florida Evidence Code

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2017-02-16T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 210 So. 3d 1231

Snippet: substantially outweighs their prejudicial effect. Ch. 2013-107, § 2, Laws of Fla. The Committee recommends the Court

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Evidence Code

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2017-02-15T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: outweighs their prejudicial effect. Ch. 2013-107, § 2, Laws of Fla. The Committee recommends

Cynthia Richardson v. Aramark/Sedgwick CMS

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2016-04-28T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 193 So. 3d 880

Snippet: a statutory attorney’s fee of “only $164.54 for 107.2 hours of legal work reasonably necessary to secure

Marvin Castellanos v. Next Door Company

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2016-04-28T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 192 So. 3d 431, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 197, 2016 WL 1700521, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 885

Snippet: Castellanos’ attorney amounted to only $1.53 per hour for 107.2 hours of work, determined by the Judge of Compensation…défenses that were' asserted.” He agreed that the 107.2 hours claimed by Castellanos’ attorney were reasonable…found that “[t]here is no question ... that the 107.2 hours expended by his firm ... were reasonable and…affirmed the JCC’s decision to award “only $164.54 for 107.2 hours of legal work reasonably necessary to secure

Rocke v. American Research Bureau

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2016-01-20T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 184 So. 3d 1221

Snippet: burden of proof when a presumption arises. § 733.107(2), Fla. Stat. (2014) (“In any transaction or event…application. Consistent with sections 90.302(2) and 733.107(2), we hold that when the doctrine’s presumption arises

Rocke v. American Research Bureau

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2015-11-05T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: burden of proof when a presumption arises. § 733.107(2), Fla. Stat. (2014) ("In any transaction or…application. Consistent with sections 90.302(2) and 733.107(2), we hold that when the doctrine's presumption

THE LEAGUE OF WOMEN Voters of etc. v. Ken Detzner And Pam Bondi

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2014-10-06T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: 2010); Scott v. Williams, 107 2 So. 3d 379 (Fla. 2013). This

Charles Smith v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2014-08-13T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 145 So. 3d 189

Snippet: assist in preparing as required by section 916.107(2)(d), Florida Statutes (2013). Such an argument is

Dahl v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2014-05-28T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 139 So. 3d 944, 2014 WL 2197622, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 8085

Snippet: assist in preparing as required by section 916.107(2)(d), Florida *945Statutes (2013). Because the patient

Smith v. Effective Teleservices, Inc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2014-01-08T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 133 So. 3d 1048

Snippet: assignor’s possession, custody, or control.” § 727.107(2), Fla. Stat. (2010). Among the duties of the assignee

Chapman v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2014-01-08T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 133 So. 3d 1075

Snippet: treatment.”). On the second argument, section 916.107(2)(d), Florida Statutes (2013), provides: Not more…had an opportunity to assist in preparing. § 916.107(2)(d), Fla. Stat. (2013). Here, no evidence exists…evidence exists to show compliance with section 916.107(2)(d). Based on the foregoing, we reverse the circuit… compliance with sections 916.107(3)(a) and 916.107(2)(d). Reversed and remanded with instructions.

Castellanos v. Next Door Co.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2013-10-23T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 124 So. 3d 392

Snippet: s counsel an attorney’s fee of only $164.54 for 107.2 hours of legal work reasonably necessary to secure

Universal Insurance Co. of North America v. Warfel

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2012-01-26T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 82 So. 3d 47

Snippet: how to articulate that intent. See e.g., § 733.107(2), Fla. Stat. (2010) (“The presumption of undue influence…So.2d 440, 448 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004) (citing § 733.107(2), Fla. Stat. (2002)); Ferguson v. Williams, 566

Agee v. Brown

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2011-11-16T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 73 So. 3d 882

Snippet: , duress, mistake, or undue influence.”); § 733.107(2), Fla. Stat. (2009) (“The presumption of undue influence