Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 107.02 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 107.02 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 107.02

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title IX
ELECTORS AND ELECTIONS
Chapter 107
CONVENTIONS TO CONSIDER PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 107.02
107.02 Delegates.Conventions shall consist of 67 delegates from the state at large. Each delegate shall possess the qualifications of a member of the House of Representatives of the Legislature of this state; and each shall hold office from the date of his or her election and until the convention shall have discharged the duties for which it was selected.
History.s. 2, ch. 16180, 1933; CGL 1936 Supp. 319(2); s. 656, ch. 95-147.

F.S. 107.02 on Google Scholar

F.S. 107.02 on Casetext

Amendments to 107.02


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 107.02
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 107.02.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 107.02

Total Results: 20

814 PROPERTY HOLDINGS, LLC, etc. v. NEW BIRTH BAPTIST CHURCH CATHEDRAL OF FAITH INTERNATIONAL, INC., etc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-07-13

Snippet: the common elements and common surplus”); § 718.107(2), Fla. Stat. (“The share in the common elements

814 PROPERTY HOLDINGS, LLC, etc. v. NEW BIRTH BAPTIST CHURCH CATHEDRAL OF FAITH INTERNATIONAL, INC., etc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-06-29

Snippet: the common elements and common surplus”); § 718.107(2), Fla. Stat. (“The share in the common elements

DIANE SWISS v. ALEXIS FLANAGAN

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-10-13

Snippet: novo the legal question related to section 733.107(2), and we review the trial court’s factual findings

MARVALENE HANNIBAL AND KENDRA MATTHEWS v. PORTIA BRANDY NAVARRO AND ALZATA THURSTON

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-02-03

Snippet: presumption of undue influence, pursuant to section 733.107(2), Florida Statutes (2019), and agreed that the

EASTWOOD SHORES PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-01-25

Citation: 264 So. 3d 264

Snippet: separate conveyance is not at issue. Cf. § 718.107(2) ("The share in the

Choice Plus, LLC v. Department of Financial Services, etc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-04-17

Citation: 244 So. 3d 343

Snippet: escheat to the State of Florida.” Per section 732.107(2), Mrs. Rigley’s real property was sold as provided

Cynthia Richardson v. Aramark/Sedgwick CMS

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-04-28

Citation: 193 So. 3d 880, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 207, 2016 WL 1704132, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 888

Snippet: a statutory attorney’s fee of “only $164.54 for 107.2 hours of legal work reasonably necessary to secure

Marvin Castellanos v. Next Door Company

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-04-28

Citation: 192 So. 3d 431, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 197, 2016 WL 1700521, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 885

Snippet: Castellanos’ attorney amounted to only $1.53 per hour for 107.2 hours of work, determined by the Judge of Compensation

Rocke v. American Research Bureau

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-01-20

Citation: 184 So. 3d 1221, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 698

Snippet: burden of proof when a presumption arises. § 733.107(2), Fla. Stat. (2014) (“In any transaction or event

Rocke v. American Research Bureau

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-11-06

Snippet: burden of proof when a presumption arises. § 733.107(2), Fla. Stat. (2014) ("In any transaction or

THE LEAGUE OF WOMEN Voters of etc. v. Ken Detzner And Pam Bondi

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-10-06

Snippet: 2010); Scott v. Williams, 107 2 So. 3d 379 (Fla. 2013). This

Charles Smith v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-08-13

Citation: 145 So. 3d 189, 2014 WL 3928419, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12429

Snippet: assist in preparing as required by section 916.107(2)(d), Florida Statutes (2013). Such an argument is

Dahl v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-05-28

Citation: 139 So. 3d 944, 2014 WL 2197622, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 8085

Snippet: required to prove that the requirements of section 916.107(2)(d), Florida Statutes, were met. Even if this had

Chapman v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-01-08

Citation: 133 So. 3d 1075, 2014 WL 51656, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 150

Snippet: treatment.”). On the second argument, section 916.107(2)(d), Florida Statutes (2013), provides: Not more

Smith v. Effective Teleservices, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-01-08

Citation: 133 So. 3d 1048, 2014 WL 51686, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 144

Snippet: assignor’s possession, custody, or control.” § 727.107(2), Fla. Stat. (2010). Among the duties of the assignee

Castellanos v. Next Door Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-10-23

Citation: 124 So. 3d 392, 2013 WL 5744449, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 16898

Snippet: claimant’s counsel an attorney’s fee of only $164.54 for 107.2 hours of legal work reasonably necessary to secure

Universal Insurance Co. of North America v. Warfel

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-01-26

Citation: 82 So. 3d 47, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 50, 2012 WL 224104, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 195

Snippet: how to articulate that intent. See e.g., § 733.107(2), Fla. Stat. (2010) (“The presumption of undue influence

Agee v. Brown

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-11-16

Citation: 73 So. 3d 882, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 18106, 2011 WL 5554833

Snippet: duress, mistake, or undue influence.”); § 733.107(2), Fla. Stat. (2009) (“The presumption of undue influence

Bend v. Shamrock Services

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-02-28

Citation: 59 So. 3d 153, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 2515, 2011 WL 680282

Snippet: the carrier or employer (see, e.g. section 440.107(2), Florida Statutes (2007) (effective October 1,

Warfel v. Universal Insurance Co. of North America

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-05-12

Citation: 36 So. 3d 136, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 6572, 2010 WL 1874367

Snippet: undue influence arises in a will contest. See § 733.107(2), Fla. Stat. (2002); Hack v. Janes, 878 So.2d 440