Florida Statute 110.114 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title X
PUBLIC OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES, AND RECORDS

Chapter 110
STATE EMPLOYMENT

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 110.114

110.114 Employee wage deductions.—

(1) The state or any of its departments, bureaus, commissions, and officers are authorized and permitted, with the concurrence of the Department of Financial Services, to make deductions from the salary or wage of any employee or employees in such amount as shall be authorized and requested by such employee or employees and for such purpose as shall be authorized and requested by such employee or employees and shall pay such sums so deducted as directed by such employee or employees. The concurrence of the Department of Financial Services shall not be required for the deduction of a certified bargaining agent’s membership dues deductions pursuant to s. 447.303 or any deductions authorized by a collective bargaining agreement.

(2) The approval of and making of approved deductions shall not require the approval or making of other requested deductions.

(3) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsections (1) and (2), the deduction of an employee’s membership dues deductions as defined in s. 447.203(15) for an employee organization as defined in s. 447.203(11) shall be authorized or permitted only for an organization that has been certified as the exclusive bargaining agent pursuant to chapter 447 for a unit of state employees in which the employee is included. Such deductions shall be subject to the provisions of s. 447.303.

(4) Records of employee requests and employer authorizations for deductions from an employee’s wage or salary, or the legal authority for the deduction, shall be maintained by each employing entity.

History.—s. 20, ch. 79-190; s. 7, ch. 94-113; s. 4, ch. 96-399; s. 114, ch. 2003-261; s. 7, ch. 2023-35.

F.S. 110.114 on Google Scholar

F.S. 110.114 on Casetext

Amendments to 110.114

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 110.114

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 110.114.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 110.114

Total Results: 20

John W. Schmitz v. Dorothy Joan Schmitz

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-09-11

Snippet: computation. See Amerace Corp. v. Stallings, 823 So. 2d 110, 114 (Fla. 2002) (analyzing Argonaut and finding that

SAM SHRIVASTAVA, VENN THERAPEUTICS, LLC AND SANDIP PATEL v. CAC PHARMA INVESTMENTS LLC, AND C & J HEALTHCARE INVESTMENTS, LLC

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-03-06

Snippet: ADR/JB, Corp. v. MCY III, Inc., 299 F. Supp. 2d 110, 114 (E.D.N.Y. 2004)). The court noted that "[a]rbitration

SAM SHRIVASTAVA, VENN THERAPEUTICS, LLC AND SANDIP PATEL v. CAC PHARMA INVESTMENTS LLC, AND C & J HEALTHCARE INVESTMENTS, LLC

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-03-06

Snippet: ADR/JB, Corp. v. MCY III, Inc., 299 F. Supp. 2d 110, 114 (E.D.N.Y. 2004)). The court noted that "[a]rbitration

IATAI ENTERPRISES, INC. v. LAYLIE LOYACONO, etc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2020-11-25

Snippet: Sugar Corp. v. Estate of Mullins, 211 So. 3d 110, 114 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017) (“Even if the subpoena arguably

Alexander v. Kalitan

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-01-09

Citation: 263 So. 3d 70

Snippet: entered. See Amerace Corp. v. Stallings , 823 So.2d 110, 114 (Fla. 2002) (finding the plaintiffs were not entitled

Alexander v. Kalitan

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-01-09

Citation: 263 So. 3d 70

Snippet: entered. See Amerace Corp. v. Stallings , 823 So.2d 110, 114 (Fla. 2002) (finding the plaintiffs were not entitled

ROB ALEXANDER, M.D. v. SUSAN KALITAN

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-01-09

Snippet: entered. See Amerace Corp. v. Stallings, 823 So. 2d 110, 114 (Fla. 2002) (finding the plaintiffs were not entitled

R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company v. Evers

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-09-15

Snippet: (2012); Amerace Corp. v. Stallings, 823 So. 2d 110, 114 (Fla. 2002); Shoemaker v. Sliger, 187 So. 3d 863

Faith Freight Forwarding Corp. v. Anias

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-09-28

Citation: 206 So. 3d 753, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 14527

Snippet: See Amerace Corp. v. Stallings, 823 So.2d 110, 114 (Fla.2002); Ford Motor Co. v. Jimenez,

Faith Freight Forwarding Corp. v. Anias

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-09-07

Snippet: interest. See Amerace Corp. v. Stallings, 823 So. 2d 110, 114 (Fla. 2002); Ford Motor Co. v. Jimenez, 870 So

N.C. v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-01-25

Citation: 947 So. 2d 1201, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 821, 2007 WL 173886

Snippet: the statement....” Distefano v. State, 526 So.2d 110, 114 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988), disapproved on other grounds

Inquiry Concerning Judge Sloop

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-12-07

Citation: 946 So. 2d 1046, 31 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 823, 2006 Fla. LEXIS 2807

Snippet: sensitivity training); In re Schwartz, 755 So.2d 110, 114-15 (Fla.2000) (approving stipulated recommendation

In Re Sloop

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-12-07

Citation: 946 So. 2d 1046, 2006 WL 3511513

Snippet: sensitivity training); In re Schwartz, 755 So.2d 110, 114-15 (Fla.2000) (approving stipulated recommendation

Coral Cadillac, Inc. v. Stephens

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-03-03

Citation: 867 So. 2d 556, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2809, 2004 WL 384884

Snippet: 9%. See Amerace Corp. v. Stallings, 823 So.2d 110, 114 (Fla.2002) (interest does not accrue until the

GULFSTREAM PARK RACING ASSOCIATION, INC. v. Gold Spur Stable, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-05-22

Citation: 820 So. 2d 957, 2002 WL 1021736

Snippet: & P.R. Co. v. Chicago & N.W. Ry. Co., 280 F.2d 110, 114 (8th Cir.1960)). Common liability means that "`each

State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. Higgins

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2001-01-03

Citation: 788 So. 2d 992, 2001 WL 6187

Snippet: Casualty Co. v. Intercity Supply Corp., 212 So.2d 110, 114 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968), and Smith v. Milwaukee Insurance

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1998-03-03

Snippet: Butterworth Attorney General RAB/tgh 1 Compare, s. 110.114(1), Fla. Stat., making provision for employee wage

Williams v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1993-12-09

Citation: 627 So. 2d 1279, 1993 WL 502610

Snippet: was prejudiced. Distefano v. State, 526 So.2d 110, 114 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). This hearing was conducted

Valle v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1987-01-05

Citation: 502 So. 2d 1225, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 51

Snippet: S.Ct. at 1670-71, quoting Eddings, 455 U.S. at 110, 114, 102 S.Ct. at 874, 876. In reaching this conclusion

Wallace v. Strassel

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-12-04

Citation: 479 So. 2d 231, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2667

Snippet: & P.R. Co. v. Chicago & N.W. Ry. Co., 280 F.2d 110, 114, the Federal court of the Eighth Circuit had occasion