Florida Statute 110.115 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title X
PUBLIC OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES, AND RECORDS

Chapter 110
STATE EMPLOYMENT

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 110.115

110.115 Employees of historical commissions; other state employment permitted.—

(1) Staff members or employees of state historical commissions are hereby permitted or authorized to teach courses and hold part-time positions at state universities and be paid compensation from more than one appropriation if such teaching or employment does not interfere with the normal duties of such commission staff members or employees. Any agreement or contract relative to such employment must have the approval of the historical commission and the president of the university.

(2) Any provision of law which prohibits the payment of salaries or compensation from more than one appropriation shall not apply to the provisions of this section.

History.—s. 20, ch. 79-190.

F.S. 110.115 on Google Scholar

F.S. 110.115 on Casetext

Amendments to 110.115

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 110.115

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 110.115.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 110.115

Total Results: 18

DASMOND BRANNON v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-07-26

Snippet: 966–67 (Fla. 1992); Brown v. State, 45 So. 3d 110, 115 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010)). That section provides:

Daniel Jacob Craven, Jr. v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2020-10-22

Snippet: self-representation as equivocal. See Brown v. State, 45 So. 3d 110, 115 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (recognizing that, absent

Lynch v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-12-27

Citation: 260 So. 3d 1166

Snippet: orderly proceedings." Brown v. State , 45 So.3d 110, 115 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010). In this case, the court allowed

Lynch v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-12-27

Citation: 260 So. 3d 1166

Snippet: orderly proceedings." Brown v. State , 45 So.3d 110, 115 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010). In this case, the court allowed

Willie Allen Lynch v. State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-12-27

Snippet: orderly proceedings.” Brown v. State, 45 So. 3d 110, 115 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010). In this case, the court allowed

YOUVENS MADEUS v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-03-28

Citation: 244 So. 3d 1095

Snippet: reviewed de novo.” State v. Weiss, 935 So. 2d 110, 115 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). The fundamental issue

Birlkey v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-05-24

Citation: 220 So. 3d 431, 2017 WL 2264648, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 7535

Snippet: 966-67 (Fla. 1992); Brown v. State, 45 So.3d 110, 115 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010). In Traylor, the Florida Supreme

Gibson Paul v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-10-15

Citation: 152 So. 3d 635, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 16789

Snippet: between the choices.” Brown v. State, 45 So.3d 110, 115-16 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (quoting Jones, 449 So

Atac v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-03-13

Citation: 125 So. 3d 806, 2013 WL 950052, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3951

Snippet: Commonwealth v. Stallworth, 566 Pa. 349, 781 A.2d 110, 115-16 (2001) (reaffirming the reasoning and holding

Wilson v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-12-28

Citation: 76 So. 3d 1085, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 20747, 2011 WL 6785268

Snippet: 957, 966-67 (Fla.1992); Brown v. State, 45 So.3d 110, 115 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010). The supreme court went on

Coultas v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-04-04

Citation: 955 So. 2d 64, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 4912, 2007 WL 981763

Snippet: de novo. See, e.g., State v. Weiss, 935 So.2d 110, 115 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). The knife in question is

Murphy v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1998-11-19

Citation: 723 So. 2d 313, 1998 WL 798693

Snippet: swerve to avoid being hit. He drove at speeds of 110-115 miles per hour in a 55 miles per hour speed zone

Ordini v. Ordini

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1997-11-26

Citation: 701 So. 2d 663, 1997 WL 731454

Snippet: Blickstein, 99 A.D.2d 287, 294, 472 N.Y.S.2d 110, 115 (1984). See also Tutak v. Tutak, 127 Misc.2d 436

Sol v. Sol

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1995-07-12

Citation: 656 So. 2d 206, 1995 WL 316529

Snippet: Blickstein, 99 A.D.2d 287, 294, 472 N.Y.S.2d 110, 115 (1994): It is not necessary that a party be contractually

Yukanovitz v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1989-08-16

Citation: 547 So. 2d 722, 1989 WL 97687

Snippet: community control. Distefano v. State, 526 So.2d 110, 115 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). In Distefano, we approved

State v. Romanez

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1989-05-09

Citation: 543 So. 2d 323, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1130, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2573, 1989 WL 47166

Snippet: (Fla. 2d DCA 1988); Distefano v. State, 526 So.2d 110, 115 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Glendening v. State, 503

Stang v. Waller

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1982-06-16

Citation: 415 So. 2d 123

Snippet: not. In re Sorrell, 20 Md. App. 179, 315 A.2d 110, 115 (1974). While we do not reaffirm Corley, we do

Burkart v. City of Fort Lauderdale

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1963-10-09

Citation: 156 So. 2d 752

Snippet: 24 L.Ed. 224. In Backus v. Detroit, 49 Mich. [110] 115, 13 N.W. [380] 382 (43 Am.Rep. 447), Judge Cooley