Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 110.118 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 110.118 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 110.118

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title X
PUBLIC OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES, AND RECORDS
Chapter 110
STATE EMPLOYMENT
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 110.118
110.118 Administrative leave for certain athletic competition.
(1) As used in this section, the term “United States team” includes any group leader, coach, official, or athlete who is a member of the official delegation of the United States to world, Pan American, or Olympic competition.
(2) Any employee of the state who qualifies as a member of the United States team for athletic competition on the world, Pan American, or Olympic level in a sport contested in either Pan American or Olympic competition shall be granted administrative leave without loss of pay or other benefits or rights for the purpose of preparing for and engaging in the competition. In no event shall the paid leave under this section exceed the period of the official training camp and competition combined or 30 calendar days a year, whichever is less.
History.s. 20, ch. 79-190; s. 4, ch. 2013-18.

F.S. 110.118 on Google Scholar

F.S. 110.118 on Casetext

Amendments to 110.118


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 110.118
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 110.118.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 110.118

Total Results: 5

Botee v. Southern Fidelity Insurance Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-02-06

Citation: 162 So. 3d 183, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 1566, 2015 WL 477836

Snippet: Calvert Cnty. v. Ackerman, 162 Md.App. 1, 872 A.2d 110, 118 (Md.Ct.Spec.App.2005) (finding that “a reasonable

MacKendrick v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-05-09

Citation: 112 So. 3d 131, 2013 WL 1908406, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 7411

Snippet: 2d 938 (2004)); see State v. Weiss, 935 So.2d 110, 118-19 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). The next part of our inquiry

First Fla. Bank, NA v. Max Mitchell & Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1990-03-08

Citation: 558 So. 2d 9, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 125, 1990 Fla. LEXIS 360, 1990 WL 26382

Snippet: Andersen & Co., 65 N.Y.2d 536, 551, 483 N.E.2d 110, 118, 493 N.Y.S.2d 435, 443 (1985), recently explained

Southern Menhaden Co. v. How

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1916-02-08

Citation: 71 Fla. 128, 70 So. 1000

Snippet: 147, 20 South. Rep. 249; 8 R. C. L. “Damages,” §§110-118; Kilbourne v. Burt & Brabb Lumber Co. 111 Ky. 693

Smith v. Croom

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1857-01-15

Citation: 7 Fla. 180

Snippet: following authorities : 1 Curtis, 856 ; 2 Binn., 110-118 ; 2 Scam., 392; 10 Mass., 488; 3 Greenleaf; 11