Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 112.80 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 112.80 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 112.80

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title X
PUBLIC OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES, AND RECORDS
Chapter 112
PUBLIC OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES: GENERAL PROVISIONS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 112.80
112.80 Short title.This part may be cited as the “Firefighters’ Bill of Rights.”
History.s. 1, ch. 86-6.

F.S. 112.80 on Google Scholar

F.S. 112.80 on Casetext

Amendments to 112.80


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 112.80
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 112.80.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

AMADOR, v. TOWN OF PALM BEACH, a B., 517 F. App'x 834 (11th Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 112.80 et seq, Amador could not be fired without notice and a hearing. . . .

MONSANTO COMPANY, v. L. RALPH,, 382 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2004)

. . . $5.00 technology fee for each of the 264 bags of soybean seed that Ralph purchased, plus 120 times the $112.80 . . .

THOMPSON, v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 149 F. Supp. 2d 38 (S.D.N.Y. 2001)

. . . the standard, rather than the substandard, weekly industrial policy, he would have paid a total of $112.80 . . .

HUNTER v. OLD BEN COAL COMPANY,, 844 F.2d 428 (7th Cir. 1988)

. . . Paragraph 112.80 of the new act provides that: The dissolution of a corporation either (1) by the issuance . . . Ill.Rev.Stat. ch. 32, para. 112.80 (Smith-Hurd Supp.1987). . . . .

SAVE OUR CUMBERLAND MOUNTAINS, INC. v. P. HODEL,, 651 F. Supp. 1528 (D.D.C. 1986)

. . . This claim already excludes a total of nearly one-third or 112.80 hours which were eliminated in the . . .

CARROLL v. TERMPLAN, INC. OF EAST ATLANTA,, 476 F. Supp. 727 (N.D. Ga. 1979)

. . . Under the general heading “prepaid finance charge,” defendant disclosed two side-by-side figures, $112.80 . . .

R. c. t. a. v., 63 T.C. 485 (T.C. 1975)

. . . determining the value of this stock, McCune placed a value of $60 a share on it while O’Farrell valued it at $112.80 . . . concluded that the fair market value of 2,500 shares of Anahma stock as of the valuation date was $112.80 . . .

WYNN OIL COMPANY, a v. PUROLATOR CHEMICAL CORPORATION, a v. E. WYNN E., 391 F. Supp. 522 (M.D. Fla. 1974)

. . . Stewart 64.50 Allen Weinsehell 12.50 Bruce Rich 112.80 F. R. Brock 4.75 Edward C. . . .

NATIONAL BANK OF EASTERN ARKANSAS v. BLANKENSHIP, 177 F. Supp. 667 (E.D. Ark. 1959)

. . . As of July 30, 1957, there was due thereon the sum of $112.80 principal, plus $1.53 interest. 7. . . .

JOHNSON K. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,, 233 F.2d 952 (4th Cir. 1956)

. . . Minnehoma credited taxpayer’s reserve account with $4,816.32 and $12,-112.80 in 1949 and 1950, respectively . . .

GIBBS v. AMERICAN MUT. LIABILITY INS. CO., 112 F. Supp. 800 (E.D. Tenn. 1953)

. . . . - At the time of his injury, plaintiff was earning a weekly wage of $112.80. . . . The mathematics of the case is as follows: The difference between the former wage of $112.80 per week . . .

BELSER v. MUTUAL LIFE INS. CO. OF NEW YORK, 77 F. Supp. 826 (E.D.S.C. 1948)

. . . life of the plaintiff in the amount of $5000, in consideration of the payment of an annual premium of $112.80 . . .

CHEMICAL BANK TRUST CO. v. EARLY, 67 F. Supp. 530 (E.D. Va. 1946)

. . . .-. 112.80 Leslie Banks & Co., Accounting Services re Post-Hope Amendment Transfers...... 400.00 Estimated . . .

NOLEN v. WARE TRUST CO., 10 F. Supp. 297 (D. Mass. 1935)

. . . Co....... 112.80 $456.65 Itemized statements of said claims or accounts are attached hereto. . . .

OFNER v. WEIGEL, 199 F. 720 (9th Cir. 1912)

. . . Dry Goods Co........................................... 112.80 Mrs. . . .

HENRY ROMEYN v. THE UNITED STATES, 20 Ct. Cl. 373 (Ct. Cl. 1885)

. . . No transportation having been furnished the petitioner, the amount claimed is $112.80. . . .