Notes of Decisions
ST. JOHNS RIVER v. Consol.-Tomoka, 717 So. 2d 72 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).
· cites it 29× “The term "rule" is defined broadly in section 120.52(15) to include an "agency statement of general applicability.”
Daniels v. Florida Parole & Prob. Comm'n, 401 So. 2d 1351 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).
· cites it 10× “Section 120.52(10)'s reference to "proceeding" does not limit or restrict the word to proceedings that are cognizable only under the APA.”
Dep't of High. Saf. v. Schluter, 705 So. 2d 81 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997).
· cites it 18× “" The majority approves this characterization of half the challenged policies, but concludes that the other half do not only because they contain the phrase "in certain circumstances" amount to illicit rules.”
Wood v. Marston, 442 So. 2d 934 (Fla. 1983).
· cites it 6× “" § 120.52(1), Fla. Stat. (1981). On the other hand "educational unit" is defined to include state universities.”
Fla. Dept. of Bus. Reg. v. Invest. Corp., 747 So. 2d 374 (Fla. 1999).
· cites it 9× “Section 120.52 provides a starting point for the analysis, supplying statutory definitions of the terms of art used in chapter 120.”
Citizens of State v. Pub. Serv. COM'N, 425 So. 2d 534 (Fla. 1982).
· cites it 7× “072 is inapplicable and that the effective date of the new rates is prescribed solely by section 120.52(9), Florida Statutes (1979), which defines a "final order" with reference to the time the written order is filed.”
Hill v. Div. of Ret., 687 So. 2d 1376 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997).
· cites it 8× “"[T]he final order in a proceeding which affects substantial interests must be in writing and include findings of fact, if any, and conclusions of law separately stated.”
Whiley v. Scott, 79 So. 3d 702 (Fla. 2011).
· cites it 8× “52(17), Fla. Stat. (2010). “Rules” are “statement[s] of general applicability that implement! ], interpret!], or prescribe!] law or policy or describe! ] the procedure or practice requirements of an agency.”
Agrico Chem. Co. v. Dep't, Etc., 406 So. 2d 478 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981).
· cites it 5× “57 hearing in a chapter 403 permitting procedure, the LRACT Rule makes competitive economic injury a matter of agency concern and confers standing on Freeport and Sulphur Terminals pursuant to section 120.52(10)(b), Florida Statutes. DER claims the right to grant standing to…”
— 120.52(1) — 29 cases
Wood v. Marston, 442 So. 2d 934 (Fla. 1983).
“" § 120.52(1), Fla. Stat. (1981). On the other hand "educational unit" is defined to include state universities.”
— 120.52(1)(C) — 1 case
— 120.52(1)(a) — 8 cases
— 120.52(1)(b) — 22 cases
— 120.52(1)(b)(3) — 1 case
— 120.52(1)(c) — 18 cases
— 120.52(1)(d) — 1 case
— 120.52(10) — 34 cases
Daniels v. Florida Parole & Prob. Comm'n, 401 So. 2d 1351 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).
“Section 120.52(10)'s reference to "proceeding" does not limit or restrict the word to proceedings that are cognizable only under the APA.”
— 120.52(10)(a) — 1 case
Daniels v. Florida Parole & Prob. Comm'n, 401 So. 2d 1351 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).
“Section 120.52(10)'s reference to "proceeding" does not limit or restrict the word to proceedings that are cognizable only under the APA.”
— 120.52(10)(b) — 14 cases
Agrico Chem. Co. v. Dep't, Etc., 406 So. 2d 478 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981).
“57 hearing in a chapter 403 permitting procedure, the LRACT Rule makes competitive economic injury a matter of agency concern and confers standing on Freeport and Sulphur Terminals pursuant to section 120.52(10)(b), Florida Statutes. DER claims the right to grant standing to…”
— 120.52(10)(c) — 2 cases
Agrico Chem. Co. v. Dep't, Etc., 406 So. 2d 478 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981).
“57 hearing in a chapter 403 permitting procedure, the LRACT Rule makes competitive economic injury a matter of agency concern and confers standing on Freeport and Sulphur Terminals pursuant to section 120.52(10)(b), Florida Statutes. DER claims the right to grant standing to…”
— 120.52(10)(d) — 11 cases
Daniels v. Florida Parole & Prob. Comm'n, 401 So. 2d 1351 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).
“Section 120.52(10)'s reference to "proceeding" does not limit or restrict the word to proceedings that are cognizable only under the APA.”
— 120.52(11) — 15 cases
— 120.52(11)(a) — 1 case
— 120.52(11)(b) — 3 cases
— 120.52(11)(d) — 1 case
— 120.52(12) — 11 cases
— 120.52(12)(a) — 3 cases
— 120.52(12)(b) — 8 cases
— 120.52(12)(c) — 3 cases
— 120.52(12)(d) — 5 cases
— 120.52(13) — 9 cases
— 120.52(13)(a) — 6 cases
— 120.52(13)(b) — 8 cases
— 120.52(13)(c) — 1 case
— 120.52(14) — 35 cases
— 120.52(14)(a) — 4 cases
— 120.52(14)(b) — 1 case
— 120.52(14)(c)(4) — 1 case
Wood v. Marston, 442 So. 2d 934 (Fla. 1983).
“" § 120.52(1), Fla. Stat. (1981). On the other hand "educational unit" is defined to include state universities.”
— 120.52(15) — 39 cases
Dep't of High. Saf. v. Schluter, 705 So. 2d 81 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997).
“" The majority approves this characterization of half the challenged policies, but concludes that the other half do not only because they contain the phrase "in certain circumstances" amount to illicit rules.”
Fla. Dept. of Bus. Reg. v. Invest. Corp., 747 So. 2d 374 (Fla. 1999).
“Section 120.52 provides a starting point for the analysis, supplying statutory definitions of the terms of art used in chapter 120.”
— 120.52(15)(a) — 5 cases
Dep't of High. Saf. v. Schluter, 705 So. 2d 81 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997).
“" The majority approves this characterization of half the challenged policies, but concludes that the other half do not only because they contain the phrase "in certain circumstances" amount to illicit rules.”
— 120.52(15)(b) — 1 case
— 120.52(16) — 36 cases
Whiley v. Scott, 79 So. 3d 702 (Fla. 2011).
“52(17), Fla. Stat. (2010). “Rules” are “statement[s] of general applicability that implement! ], interpret!], or prescribe!] law or policy or describe! ] the procedure or practice requirements of an agency.”
— 120.52(16)(a) — 3 cases
— 120.52(16)(c) — 1 case
— 120.52(17) — 5 cases
Whiley v. Scott, 79 So. 3d 702 (Fla. 2011).
“52(17), Fla. Stat. (2010). “Rules” are “statement[s] of general applicability that implement! ], interpret!], or prescribe!] law or policy or describe! ] the procedure or practice requirements of an agency.”
— 120.52(18) — 1 case
— 120.52(2) — 35 cases
— 120.52(20) — 7 cases
— 120.52(3) — 9 cases
— 120.52(5) — 1 case
— 120.52(6) — 3 cases
Wood v. Marston, 442 So. 2d 934 (Fla. 1983).
“" § 120.52(1), Fla. Stat. (1981). On the other hand "educational unit" is defined to include state universities.”
— 120.52(7) — 16 cases
Hill v. Div. of Ret., 687 So. 2d 1376 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997).
“"[T]he final order in a proceeding which affects substantial interests must be in writing and include findings of fact, if any, and conclusions of law separately stated.”
— 120.52(8) — 65 cases
ST. JOHNS RIVER v. Consol.-Tomoka, 717 So. 2d 72 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).
“The term "rule" is defined broadly in section 120.52(15) to include an "agency statement of general applicability.”
Fla. Dept. of Bus. Reg. v. Invest. Corp., 747 So. 2d 374 (Fla. 1999).
“Section 120.52 provides a starting point for the analysis, supplying statutory definitions of the terms of art used in chapter 120.”
— 120.52(8)(a) — 17 cases
ST. JOHNS RIVER v. Consol.-Tomoka, 717 So. 2d 72 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).
“The term "rule" is defined broadly in section 120.52(15) to include an "agency statement of general applicability.”
— 120.52(8)(b) — 20 cases
ST. JOHNS RIVER v. Consol.-Tomoka, 717 So. 2d 72 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).
“The term "rule" is defined broadly in section 120.52(15) to include an "agency statement of general applicability.”
— 120.52(8)(c) — 26 cases
ST. JOHNS RIVER v. Consol.-Tomoka, 717 So. 2d 72 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).
“The term "rule" is defined broadly in section 120.52(15) to include an "agency statement of general applicability.”
— 120.52(8)(d) — 13 cases
— 120.52(8)(e) — 7 cases
ST. JOHNS RIVER v. Consol.-Tomoka, 717 So. 2d 72 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).
“The term "rule" is defined broadly in section 120.52(15) to include an "agency statement of general applicability.”
— 120.52(8)(f) — 4 cases
— 120.52(8)(g) — 1 case
— 120.52(9) — 16 cases
Citizens of State v. Pub. Serv. COM'N, 425 So. 2d 534 (Fla. 1982).
“072 is inapplicable and that the effective date of the new rates is prescribed solely by section 120.52(9), Florida Statutes (1979), which defines a "final order" with reference to the time the written order is filed.”
Daniels v. Florida Parole & Prob. Comm'n, 401 So. 2d 1351 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).
“Section 120.52(10)'s reference to "proceeding" does not limit or restrict the word to proceedings that are cognizable only under the APA.”
— 120.52(l)(a) — 4 cases
— 120.52(l)(b) — 3 cases
— 120.52(l)(c) — 4 cases
— 120.52(ll)(a) — 1 case
— 120.52(ll)(c) — 1 case
— 120.52(ll)(d) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.