Notes of Decisions
Cited in
398
cases (
15 in the last 5 years), 1975–2025 · leading case:
Whiley v. Scott, 79 So. 3d 702 (Fla. 2011).
Whiley v. Scott, 79 So. 3d 702 (Fla. 2011).
· cites it 53× “See §§ 120.54(1), (7) Fla. Stat. (2010). And once the rulemaking process is initiated, the agency is still responsible for abiding by the APA’s other time limits.”
Agrico Chem. Co. v. STATE, ETC., 365 So. 2d 759 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).
· cites it 30× “This is particularly significant since the environmental rulemaking legislation was passed after the passage of the general rulemaking procedures set forth in Section 120.54, Florida Statutes. ( Compare ch.”
Askew v. Cross Key Waterways, 372 So. 2d 913 (Fla. 1978).
· cites it 13× “The meeting was conducted in accordance with Section 120.54, Florida Statutes (1975), related to rulemaking procedures, and revisions in the recommendation of the Division of State Planning were proposed.”
McDonald v. Dept. of Banking & Fin., 346 So. 2d 569 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977).
· cites it 8× “Except when an agency acts by formal rulemaking (Section 120.54) or by declaratory statement concerning the applicability of a statute, rule or order (Section 120.”
Balino v. Dept. of Health & Rehabilitative, Etc., 362 So. 2d 21 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978).
· cites it 22× “On rehearing, HRS expressly takes no issue with this Court's holding that, as stated by HRS, "it committed a material error of procedure in the F.S. § 120.54 proceeding on the amendments to Rule 10c-7.”
State, Bd. of Optometry v. FLA. SOC. OF OPHTH., 538 So. 2d 878 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989).
· cites it 11× “217, Florida Statutes (1987), cited in the final order as authority for the Department's standing, provides: The secretary of the department shall have standing to challenge any rule or proposed rule of a board pursuant to §§ 120.54 and 120.56. In addition to challenges for any…”
State, Dept. of Ins. v. Ins. Servs. Off., 434 So. 2d 908 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).
· cites it 11× “The court declared that "appellant has assumed a heavy burden of proof in its attack upon the Rule," noting that it was not a case of "policymaking by case-by-case adjudication," nor an appeal from section 120.54 rulemaking proceedings "in which the agency's duty is to supply a…”
State, Dept. of Health, Etc. v. Alice P., 367 So. 2d 1045 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).
· cites it 12× “WHETHER THE HEARING OFFICER ERRED IN DECLARING INVALID THE DEPARTMENT'S ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENTS WHEN THE CHALLENGE THERETO WAS NOT CONTAINED IN THE ORIGINAL PETITION AND THE DEPARTMENT FOLLOWED THE COMMANDS OF § 120.54(2), F.S. We do not find it necessary to consider the…”
— 120.54(1) — 30 cases
Agrico Chem. Co. v. STATE, ETC., 365 So. 2d 759 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).
“This is particularly significant since the environmental rulemaking legislation was passed after the passage of the general rulemaking procedures set forth in Section 120.54, Florida Statutes. ( Compare ch.”
Whiley v. Scott, 79 So. 3d 702 (Fla. 2011).
“See §§ 120.54(1), (7) Fla. Stat. (2010). And once the rulemaking process is initiated, the agency is still responsible for abiding by the APA’s other time limits.”
— 120.54(1)(a) — 22 cases
— 120.54(1)(b) — 1 case
— 120.54(1)(c) — 2 cases
Agrico Chem. Co. v. STATE, ETC., 365 So. 2d 759 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).
“This is particularly significant since the environmental rulemaking legislation was passed after the passage of the general rulemaking procedures set forth in Section 120.54, Florida Statutes. ( Compare ch.”
— 120.54(1)(e) — 2 cases
— 120.54(1)(i) — 2 cases
— 120.54(1)(k) — 1 case
Whiley v. Scott, 79 So. 3d 702 (Fla. 2011).
“See §§ 120.54(1), (7) Fla. Stat. (2010). And once the rulemaking process is initiated, the agency is still responsible for abiding by the APA’s other time limits.”
— 120.54(10) — 13 cases
— 120.54(10)(a) — 1 case
— 120.54(11) — 3 cases
Askew v. Cross Key Waterways, 372 So. 2d 913 (Fla. 1978).
“The meeting was conducted in accordance with Section 120.54, Florida Statutes (1975), related to rulemaking procedures, and revisions in the recommendation of the Division of State Planning were proposed.”
— 120.54(11)(a) — 3 cases
Agrico Chem. Co. v. STATE, ETC., 365 So. 2d 759 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).
“This is particularly significant since the environmental rulemaking legislation was passed after the passage of the general rulemaking procedures set forth in Section 120.54, Florida Statutes. ( Compare ch.”
— 120.54(11)(b) — 2 cases
Agrico Chem. Co. v. STATE, ETC., 365 So. 2d 759 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).
“This is particularly significant since the environmental rulemaking legislation was passed after the passage of the general rulemaking procedures set forth in Section 120.54, Florida Statutes. ( Compare ch.”
— 120.54(12) — 3 cases
Agrico Chem. Co. v. STATE, ETC., 365 So. 2d 759 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).
“This is particularly significant since the environmental rulemaking legislation was passed after the passage of the general rulemaking procedures set forth in Section 120.54, Florida Statutes. ( Compare ch.”
— 120.54(13) — 4 cases
— 120.54(13)(a) — 1 case
— 120.54(13)(b) — 6 cases
— 120.54(14) — 9 cases
— 120.54(15) — 2 cases
— 120.54(16) — 13 cases
— 120.54(17) — 4 cases
State, Bd. of Optometry v. FLA. SOC. OF OPHTH., 538 So. 2d 878 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989).
“217, Florida Statutes (1987), cited in the final order as authority for the Department's standing, provides: The secretary of the department shall have standing to challenge any rule or proposed rule of a board pursuant to §§ 120.54 and 120.56. In addition to challenges for any…”
— 120.54(2) — 24 cases
Agrico Chem. Co. v. STATE, ETC., 365 So. 2d 759 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).
“This is particularly significant since the environmental rulemaking legislation was passed after the passage of the general rulemaking procedures set forth in Section 120.54, Florida Statutes. ( Compare ch.”
Whiley v. Scott, 79 So. 3d 702 (Fla. 2011).
“See §§ 120.54(1), (7) Fla. Stat. (2010). And once the rulemaking process is initiated, the agency is still responsible for abiding by the APA’s other time limits.”
— 120.54(2)(6) — 1 case
— 120.54(2)(a) — 17 cases
State, Dept. of Ins. v. Ins. Servs. Off., 434 So. 2d 908 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).
“The court declared that "appellant has assumed a heavy burden of proof in its attack upon the Rule," noting that it was not a case of "policymaking by case-by-case adjudication," nor an appeal from section 120.54 rulemaking proceedings "in which the agency's duty is to supply a…”
Whiley v. Scott, 79 So. 3d 702 (Fla. 2011).
“See §§ 120.54(1), (7) Fla. Stat. (2010). And once the rulemaking process is initiated, the agency is still responsible for abiding by the APA’s other time limits.”
— 120.54(2)(b) — 7 cases
— 120.54(2)(c) — 5 cases
Whiley v. Scott, 79 So. 3d 702 (Fla. 2011).
“See §§ 120.54(1), (7) Fla. Stat. (2010). And once the rulemaking process is initiated, the agency is still responsible for abiding by the APA’s other time limits.”
State, Dept. of Ins. v. Ins. Servs. Off., 434 So. 2d 908 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).
“The court declared that "appellant has assumed a heavy burden of proof in its attack upon the Rule," noting that it was not a case of "policymaking by case-by-case adjudication," nor an appeal from section 120.54 rulemaking proceedings "in which the agency's duty is to supply a…”
— 120.54(2)(d) — 2 cases
— 120.54(2)(e) — 1 case
Whiley v. Scott, 79 So. 3d 702 (Fla. 2011).
“See §§ 120.54(1), (7) Fla. Stat. (2010). And once the rulemaking process is initiated, the agency is still responsible for abiding by the APA’s other time limits.”
— 120.54(3) — 40 cases
Balino v. Dept. of Health & Rehabilitative, Etc., 362 So. 2d 21 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978).
“On rehearing, HRS expressly takes no issue with this Court's holding that, as stated by HRS, "it committed a material error of procedure in the F.S. § 120.54 proceeding on the amendments to Rule 10c-7.”
— 120.54(3)(a) — 12 cases
Whiley v. Scott, 79 So. 3d 702 (Fla. 2011).
“See §§ 120.54(1), (7) Fla. Stat. (2010). And once the rulemaking process is initiated, the agency is still responsible for abiding by the APA’s other time limits.”
— 120.54(3)(a)(1) — 1 case
Whiley v. Scott, 79 So. 3d 702 (Fla. 2011).
“See §§ 120.54(1), (7) Fla. Stat. (2010). And once the rulemaking process is initiated, the agency is still responsible for abiding by the APA’s other time limits.”
— 120.54(3)(a)(l) — 1 case
Whiley v. Scott, 79 So. 3d 702 (Fla. 2011).
“See §§ 120.54(1), (7) Fla. Stat. (2010). And once the rulemaking process is initiated, the agency is still responsible for abiding by the APA’s other time limits.”
— 120.54(3)(b) — 3 cases
Whiley v. Scott, 79 So. 3d 702 (Fla. 2011).
“See §§ 120.54(1), (7) Fla. Stat. (2010). And once the rulemaking process is initiated, the agency is still responsible for abiding by the APA’s other time limits.”
— 120.54(3)(c) — 1 case
Whiley v. Scott, 79 So. 3d 702 (Fla. 2011).
“See §§ 120.54(1), (7) Fla. Stat. (2010). And once the rulemaking process is initiated, the agency is still responsible for abiding by the APA’s other time limits.”
— 120.54(3)(d) — 4 cases
Whiley v. Scott, 79 So. 3d 702 (Fla. 2011).
“See §§ 120.54(1), (7) Fla. Stat. (2010). And once the rulemaking process is initiated, the agency is still responsible for abiding by the APA’s other time limits.”
— 120.54(3)(e) — 2 cases
Whiley v. Scott, 79 So. 3d 702 (Fla. 2011).
“See §§ 120.54(1), (7) Fla. Stat. (2010). And once the rulemaking process is initiated, the agency is still responsible for abiding by the APA’s other time limits.”
— 120.54(3)(e)(1) — 1 case
Whiley v. Scott, 79 So. 3d 702 (Fla. 2011).
“See §§ 120.54(1), (7) Fla. Stat. (2010). And once the rulemaking process is initiated, the agency is still responsible for abiding by the APA’s other time limits.”
— 120.54(4) — 79 cases
Agrico Chem. Co. v. STATE, ETC., 365 So. 2d 759 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).
“This is particularly significant since the environmental rulemaking legislation was passed after the passage of the general rulemaking procedures set forth in Section 120.54, Florida Statutes. ( Compare ch.”
State, Dept. of Health, Etc. v. Alice P., 367 So. 2d 1045 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).
“WHETHER THE HEARING OFFICER ERRED IN DECLARING INVALID THE DEPARTMENT'S ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENTS WHEN THE CHALLENGE THERETO WAS NOT CONTAINED IN THE ORIGINAL PETITION AND THE DEPARTMENT FOLLOWED THE COMMANDS OF § 120.54(2), F.S. We do not find it necessary to consider the…”
— 120.54(4)(a) — 21 cases
— 120.54(4)(b) — 9 cases
State, Dept. of Health, Etc. v. Alice P., 367 So. 2d 1045 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).
“WHETHER THE HEARING OFFICER ERRED IN DECLARING INVALID THE DEPARTMENT'S ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENTS WHEN THE CHALLENGE THERETO WAS NOT CONTAINED IN THE ORIGINAL PETITION AND THE DEPARTMENT FOLLOWED THE COMMANDS OF § 120.54(2), F.S. We do not find it necessary to consider the…”
Agrico Chem. Co. v. STATE, ETC., 365 So. 2d 759 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).
“This is particularly significant since the environmental rulemaking legislation was passed after the passage of the general rulemaking procedures set forth in Section 120.54, Florida Statutes. ( Compare ch.”
— 120.54(4)(c) — 7 cases
Agrico Chem. Co. v. STATE, ETC., 365 So. 2d 759 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).
“This is particularly significant since the environmental rulemaking legislation was passed after the passage of the general rulemaking procedures set forth in Section 120.54, Florida Statutes. ( Compare ch.”
— 120.54(4)(d) — 6 cases
State, Dept. of Health, Etc. v. Alice P., 367 So. 2d 1045 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).
“WHETHER THE HEARING OFFICER ERRED IN DECLARING INVALID THE DEPARTMENT'S ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENTS WHEN THE CHALLENGE THERETO WAS NOT CONTAINED IN THE ORIGINAL PETITION AND THE DEPARTMENT FOLLOWED THE COMMANDS OF § 120.54(2), F.S. We do not find it necessary to consider the…”
Agrico Chem. Co. v. STATE, ETC., 365 So. 2d 759 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).
“This is particularly significant since the environmental rulemaking legislation was passed after the passage of the general rulemaking procedures set forth in Section 120.54, Florida Statutes. ( Compare ch.”
— 120.54(5) — 33 cases
— 120.54(5)(a) — 9 cases
— 120.54(5)(b) — 12 cases
— 120.54(5)(b)(4) — 1 case
— 120.54(6) — 1 case
— 120.54(7) — 15 cases
— 120.54(7)(a) — 2 cases
— 120.54(8) — 11 cases
— 120.54(8)(a) — 3 cases
Askew v. Cross Key Waterways, 372 So. 2d 913 (Fla. 1978).
“The meeting was conducted in accordance with Section 120.54, Florida Statutes (1975), related to rulemaking procedures, and revisions in the recommendation of the Division of State Planning were proposed.”
— 120.54(8)(c) — 1 case
— 120.54(9) — 13 cases
— 120.54(9)(a) — 15 cases
— 120.54(9)(a)(1) — 1 case
— 120.54(9)(a)(3) — 3 cases
— 120.54(9)(c) — 5 cases
— 120.54(a) — 1 case
— 120.54(l)(a) — 13 cases
Whiley v. Scott, 79 So. 3d 702 (Fla. 2011).
“See §§ 120.54(1), (7) Fla. Stat. (2010). And once the rulemaking process is initiated, the agency is still responsible for abiding by the APA’s other time limits.”
— 120.54(l)(b) — 4 cases
Whiley v. Scott, 79 So. 3d 702 (Fla. 2011).
“See §§ 120.54(1), (7) Fla. Stat. (2010). And once the rulemaking process is initiated, the agency is still responsible for abiding by the APA’s other time limits.”
— 120.54(l)(d) — 1 case
Whiley v. Scott, 79 So. 3d 702 (Fla. 2011).
“See §§ 120.54(1), (7) Fla. Stat. (2010). And once the rulemaking process is initiated, the agency is still responsible for abiding by the APA’s other time limits.”
— 120.54(l)(k) — 1 case
Whiley v. Scott, 79 So. 3d 702 (Fla. 2011).
“See §§ 120.54(1), (7) Fla. Stat. (2010). And once the rulemaking process is initiated, the agency is still responsible for abiding by the APA’s other time limits.”
— 120.54(ll)(a) — 1 case
— 120.54(ll)(b) — 2 cases
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.