Florida Statute 121.091 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

121.091 Benefits payable under the system.—Benefits may not be paid under this section unless the member has terminated employment as provided in s. 121.021(39)(a) or begun participation in the Deferred Retirement Option Program as provided in subsection (13), and a proper application has been filed in the manner prescribed by the department. The department may cancel an application for retirement benefits when the member or beneficiary fails to timely provide the information and documents required by this chapter and the department’s rules. The department shall adopt rules establishing procedures for application for retirement benefits and for the cancellation of such application when the required information or documents are not received.

(1) NORMAL RETIREMENT BENEFIT.—Upon attaining his or her normal retirement date, the member, upon application to the administrator, shall receive a monthly benefit which shall begin to accrue on the first day of the month of retirement and be payable on the last day of that month and each month thereafter during his or her lifetime. The normal retirement benefit, including any past or additional retirement credit, may not exceed 100 percent of the average final compensation. The amount of monthly benefit shall be calculated as the product of A and B, subject to the adjustment of C, if applicable, as set forth below:

(a)1. For creditable years of Regular Class service, A is 1.60 percent of the member’s average final compensation, up to the member’s normal retirement date. Upon completion of the first year after the normal retirement date, A is 1.63 percent of the member’s average final compensation. Following the second year after the normal retirement date, A is 1.65 percent of the member’s average final compensation. Following the third year after the normal retirement date, and for subsequent years, A is 1.68 percent of the member’s average final compensation.

2. For creditable years of special risk service, A is:

a. Two percent of the member’s average final compensation for all creditable years prior to October 1, 1974;

b. Three percent of the member’s average final compensation for all creditable years after September 30, 1974, and before October 1, 1978;

c. Two percent of the member’s average final compensation for all creditable years after September 30, 1978, and before January 1, 1989;

d. Two and two-tenths percent of the member’s final monthly compensation for all creditable years after December 31, 1988, and before January 1, 1990;

e. Two and four-tenths percent of the member’s average final compensation for all creditable years after December 31, 1989, and before January 1, 1991;

f. Two and six-tenths percent of the member’s average final compensation for all creditable years after December 31, 1990, and before January 1, 1992;

g. Two and eight-tenths percent of the member’s average final compensation for all creditable years after December 31, 1991, and before January 1, 1993;

h. Three percent of the member’s average final compensation for all creditable years after December 31, 1992; and

i. Three percent of the member’s average final compensation for all creditable years of service after September 30, 1978, and before January 1, 1993, for any special risk member who retires after July 1, 2000, or any member of the Special Risk Administrative Support Class entitled to retain the special risk normal retirement date who was a member of the Special Risk Class during the time period and who retires after July 1, 2000.

3. For creditable years of Senior Management Service Class service after January 31, 1987, A is 2 percent;

4. For creditable years of Elected Officers’ Class service as a Supreme Court Justice, district court of appeal judge, circuit judge, or county court judge, A is 31/3 percent of the member’s average final compensation, and for all other creditable service in such class, A is 3 percent of average final compensation;

(b) B is the number of the member’s years and any fractional part of a year of creditable service earned subsequent to November 30, 1970; and

(c) C is the normal retirement benefit credit brought forward as of November 30, 1970, by a former member of an existing system. Such normal retirement benefit credit shall be determined as the product of X and Y when X is the percentage of average final compensation which the member would have been eligible to receive if the member had attained his or her normal retirement date as of November 30, 1970, all in accordance with the existing system under which the member is covered on November 30, 1970, and Y is average final compensation as defined in s. 121.021(24). However, any member of an existing retirement system who is eligible to retire and who does retire, become disabled, or die prior to April 15, 1971, may have his or her retirement benefits calculated on the basis of the best 5 of the last 10 years of service.

(d) A member’s average final compensation shall be determined by formula to obtain the coverage for the 5 highest fiscal years’ salaries, calculated as provided by rule.

(2) BENEFITS PAYABLE FOR DUAL NORMAL RETIREMENT AGES.—If a member accumulates retirement benefits to commence at different normal retirement ages by virtue of having performed duties for an employer which would entitle him or her to benefits as both a member of the Special Risk Class and a member of either the Regular Class, Senior Management Service Class, or Elected Officers’ Class, the amount of benefits payable shall be computed separately with respect to each such age and the sum of such computed amounts shall be paid as provided in this section.

(3) EARLY RETIREMENT BENEFIT.—Upon retirement on his or her early retirement date, the member shall receive an immediate monthly benefit that shall begin to accrue on the first day of the month of the retirement date and be payable on the last day of that month and each month thereafter during his or her lifetime. Such benefit shall be calculated as follows:

(a) For a member initially enrolled:

1. Before July 1, 2011, the amount of each monthly payment shall be computed in the same manner as for a normal retirement benefit, in accordance with subsection (1), but shall be based on the member’s average monthly compensation and creditable service as of the member’s early retirement date. The benefit so computed shall be reduced by five-twelfths of 1 percent for each complete month by which the early retirement date precedes the normal retirement date of age 62 for a member of the Regular Class, Senior Management Service Class, or the Elected Officers’ Class, and age 55 for a member of the Special Risk Class, or age 52 if a special risk member has completed 25 years of creditable service in accordance with s. 121.021(29)(b)3.

2. On or after July 1, 2011, the amount of each monthly payment shall be computed in the same manner as for a normal retirement benefit, in accordance with subsection (1), but shall be based on the member’s average monthly compensation and creditable service as of the member’s early retirement date. The benefit so computed shall be reduced by five-twelfths of 1 percent for each complete month by which the early retirement date precedes the normal retirement date of age 65 for a member of the Regular Class, Senior Management Service Class, or the Elected Officers’ Class, and age 55 for a member of the Special Risk Class, or age 52 if a special risk member has completed 25 years of creditable service in accordance with s. 121.021(29)(b)3.

(b) If the employment of a member is terminated by reason of death within 10 years before normal retirement as described in s. 121.021(29)(a)1.b. or s. 121.021(29)(a)2.b., the monthly benefit payable to the member’s beneficiary shall be calculated in accordance with subsection (1), but must be based on average monthly compensation and creditable service as of the date of death. The benefit so computed shall be reduced by five-twelfths of 1 percent for each complete month by which death precedes the normal retirement date specified above or the date on which the member would have attained the normal retirement date had he or she survived and continued his or her employment, whichever provides a higher benefit.

(4) DISABILITY RETIREMENT BENEFIT.—

(a) Disability retirement; entitlement and effective date.—

1.a. A member who becomes totally and permanently disabled, as defined in paragraph (b), after completing 5 years of creditable service, or a member who becomes totally and permanently disabled in the line of duty regardless of service, is entitled to a monthly disability benefit; except that any member with less than 5 years of creditable service on July 1, 1980, or any person who becomes a member of the Florida Retirement System on or after such date must have completed 10 years of creditable service before becoming totally and permanently disabled in order to receive disability retirement benefits for any disability which occurs other than in the line of duty. However, if a member employed on July 1, 1980, who has less than 5 years of creditable service as of that date becomes totally and permanently disabled after completing 5 years of creditable service and is found not to have attained fully insured status for benefits under the federal Social Security Act, such member is entitled to a monthly disability benefit.

b. Effective July 1, 2001, a member of the pension plan who becomes totally and permanently disabled, as defined in paragraph (b), after completing 8 years of creditable service, or a member who becomes totally and permanently disabled in the line of duty regardless of service, is entitled to a monthly disability benefit.

2. If the division has received from the employer the required documentation of the member’s termination of employment, the effective retirement date for a member who applies and is approved for disability retirement shall be established by rule of the division.

3. For a member who is receiving Workers’ Compensation payments, the effective disability retirement date may not precede the date the member reaches Maximum Medical Improvement (MMI), unless the member terminates employment before reaching MMI.

(b) Total and permanent disability.—A member shall be considered totally and permanently disabled if, in the opinion of the administrator, he or she is prevented, by reason of a medically determinable physical or mental impairment, from rendering useful and efficient service as an officer or employee.

(c) Proof of disability.—The administrator, before approving payment of any disability retirement benefit, shall require proof that the member is totally and permanently disabled as provided herein:

1. Such proof shall include the certification of the member’s total and permanent disability by two licensed physicians of the state and such other evidence of disability as the administrator may require, including reports from vocational rehabilitation, evaluation, or testing specialists who have evaluated the applicant for employment. A member whose position with an employer requires that the member work full time outside this state in the United States may include certification by two licensed physicians of the state where the member works. A member who is receiving care at a federal Veterans Health Administration facility may include certification by two licensed physicians working at the facility.

2. It must be documented that:

a. The member’s medical condition occurred or became symptomatic during the time the member was employed in an employee/employer relationship with his or her employer;

b. The member was totally and permanently disabled at the time he or she terminated covered employment; and

c. The member has not been employed with any other employer after such termination.

3. If the application is for in-line-of-duty disability, in addition to the requirements of subparagraph 2., it must be documented by competent medical evidence that the disability was caused by a job-related illness or accident which occurred while the member was in an employee/employer relationship with his or her employer.

4. The unavailability of an employment position that the member is physically and mentally capable of performing will not be considered as proof of total and permanent disability.

(d) Election on appeal.—A member whose application for regular disability retirement has been denied and who has filed an appeal to the State Retirement Commission may, if eligible, elect to receive normal or early service retirement benefits while he or she is awaiting the decision on the appeal. However:

1. If the member elects to receive service retirement benefits and disability benefits are later approved as a result of the appeal, the payment option chosen by the member may not be changed.

2. If the member elects to receive early service retirement and the appeal is later denied, the member may not change his or her election of early retirement.

Before such regular or early retirement benefits may be paid by the division, the member must provide to the division a written statement indicating that the member understands that such changes are not permitted after he or she begins receiving the benefits.

(e) Disability retirement benefit.—Upon the retirement of a member on his or her disability retirement date, the member shall receive a monthly benefit that shall begin to accrue on the first day of the month of disability retirement and shall be payable on the last day of that month and each month thereafter during his or her lifetime and continued disability.

(f) Computation of disability retirement benefit.—The amount of each monthly payment shall be computed in the same manner as for a normal retirement benefit, in accordance with subsection (1), but shall be based on disability option actuarial equivalency tables and the average monthly compensation and creditable service of the member as of the disability retirement date, subject to the following conditions:

1. If the member’s disability occurred in the line of duty, the monthly Option 1 benefit shall not be less than:

a. Forty-two percent of average monthly compensation as of the disability retirement date; or

b. Sixty-five percent of the average monthly compensation as of the disability retirement date for a member of the special risk class who retires on or after July 1, 2000; or

2. If the member’s disability occurred other than in the line of duty, the monthly Option 1 benefit shall not be less than 25 percent of average monthly compensation as of the disability retirement date.

(g) Reapplication.—A member, whose initial application for disability retirement has been denied, may reapply for disability benefits. However, such member’s reapplication will be considered only if the member presents new medical evidence of a medical condition that existed prior to the member’s termination of employment. The division may prescribe by rule procedures for reapplication and for review and approval or disapproval of reapplication.

(h) Recovery from disability.—The administrator may require periodic reexaminations at the expense of the retirement fund. The division may adopt rules establishing procedures for conducting and review of such reexaminations.

1. If the administrator finds that a member who is receiving disability benefits is, at any time prior to his or her normal retirement date, no longer disabled, the administrator shall direct that the benefits be discontinued. The decision of the administrator on this question shall be final and binding. If such member:

a. Does not reenter the employ of an employer and was not vested as of the disability retirement date, he or she shall be entitled to the excess, if any, of his or her accumulated contributions over the total disability benefits received up to the date of recovery.

b. Does not reenter the employ of an employer, but was vested as of the disability retirement date, he or she may elect to receive:

(I) The excess, if any, of his or her accumulated contributions over the total disability benefits received up to the date of recovery; or

(II) A deferred benefit commencing on the last day of the month of the normal retirement date which shall be payable on the last day of the month thereafter during his or her lifetime. The amount of such monthly benefit shall be computed in the same manner as for a normal retirement benefit, in accordance with subsection (1), but shall be based on average monthly compensation and creditable service as of the member’s disability retirement date.

c. Reenters employment of an employer within 6 months after recovery, the member’s service will be deemed to have been continuous, but the period beginning with the first month for which he or she received a disability benefit payment and ending with the date he or she reentered employment will not be considered as creditable service for the purpose of computing benefits except as provided in sub-subparagraph d. As used in this section, the term “accumulated contributions” for such member means the excess of the member’s accumulated contributions as of the disability retirement date over the total disability benefits received under paragraph (e).

d. Terminates his or her disability benefit, reenters covered employment, and is continuously employed for a minimum of 1 year of creditable service, he or she may claim as creditable service the months during which he or she was receiving a disability benefit, upon payment of the required contributions. Contributions shall equal the total required employee and employer contribution rate applicable during the period the retiree received retirement benefits, multiplied times his or her rate of monthly compensation prior to the commencement of disability retirement for each month of the period claimed, plus 4 percent interest until July 1, 1975, and 6.5 percent interest thereafter, compounded annually each June 30 to the date of payment. If the member does not claim credit for all of the months he or she received disability benefits, the months claimed must be the most recent months of retirement. Such credit for periods of disability, when purchased under the Florida Retirement System, shall apply toward vesting requirements for eligibility to purchase additional credit for other service.

2. Both the member receiving disability benefits who reenters employment and the employer employing such disability retiree shall notify the division immediately upon reemployment, and the division shall terminate such member’s disability benefits, effective the first day of the month following the month in which notification of recovery is received. If the member is reemployed with a Florida Retirement System employer at the time of benefit termination, and he or she has received disability retirement benefit and salary payments concurrently prior to notifying the division, he or she may elect within 30 days to:

a. Retain the retirement benefits received prior to termination of disability benefits and begin receiving retirement service credit effective upon the date of termination of benefits; or

b. Repay, within 12 months after his or her decision to receive service credit, the retirement benefits received for each month of reemployment prior to termination of disability benefits and begin receiving retirement service credit effective upon the date of reemployment. Any such unpaid benefits shall have compound interest of 6.5 percent added June 30.

A member may not receive both retirement service credit for employment and retirement benefits for the same month.

3. If, after recovery of disability and reentry into covered employment, the member again becomes disabled and is again approved for disability retirement, the Option 1 monthly retirement benefit shall not be less than the Option 1 monthly benefit calculated at the time of the previous disability, plus any cost of living increases up to the time the disability benefit was terminated upon his or her reentry into covered employment.

(i) Nonadmissible causes of disability.—A member shall not be entitled to receive any disability retirement benefit if the disability is a result of any of the following:

1. Injury or disease sustained by the member while willfully participating in a riot, civil insurrection, or other act of violence or while committing a felony;

2. Injury or disease sustained by the member after his or her employment has terminated; or

3. Intentional, self-inflicted injury.

(j) Disability retirement of justice or judge by order of Supreme Court.—

1. If a member is a justice of the Supreme Court, judge of a district court of appeal, circuit judge, or judge of a county court who has served for the number of years equal to, or greater than, the vesting requirement in s. 121.021(45) as an elected constitutional judicial officer, including service as a judicial officer, in any court abolished pursuant to Art. V of the State Constitution, and who is retired for disability by order of the Supreme Court upon recommendation of the Judicial Qualifications Commission pursuant to Art. V of the State Constitution, the member’s Option 1 monthly benefit as provided in subparagraph (6)(a)1. may not be less than two-thirds of his or her monthly compensation as of the member’s disability retirement date. Such member may alternatively elect to receive a disability retirement benefit under any other option as provided in paragraph (6)(a).

2. Should any justice or judge who is a member of the Florida Retirement System be retired for disability by order of the Supreme Court upon recommendation of the Judicial Qualifications Commission pursuant to Art. V of the State Constitution, then all contributions to his or her account and all contributions made on his or her behalf by the employer shall be transferred to and deposited in the General Revenue Fund of the state, and there is hereby appropriated annually out of the General Revenue Fund, to be paid into the Florida Retirement System Fund, an amount necessary to pay the benefits of all justices and judges retired from the Florida Retirement System pursuant to Art. V of the State Constitution.

(5) TERMINATION BENEFITS.—A member whose employment is terminated prior to retirement retains membership rights to previously earned member-noncontributory service credit, and to member-contributory service credit, if the member leaves the member contributions on deposit in his or her retirement account. If a terminated member receives a refund of member contributions, such member may reinstate membership rights to the previously earned service credit represented by the refund by completing 1 year of creditable service and repaying the refunded member contributions, plus interest.

(a) A member whose employment is terminated for any reason other than death or retirement before becoming vested is entitled to the return of his or her accumulated contributions as of the date of termination. Effective July 1, 2011, upon termination of employment from all participating employers for 3 calendar months as defined in s. 121.021(39)(c) for any reason other than retirement, a member may receive a refund of all contributions he or she has made to the pension plan, subject to the restrictions otherwise provided in this chapter. The refund may be received as a lump-sum payment, a rollover to a qualified plan, or a combination of these methods. Partial refunds are not permitted. The refund may not include any interest earnings on the contributions for a member of the pension plan. Employer contributions made on behalf of the member are not refundable. A member may not receive a refund of employee contributions if a pending or an approved qualified domestic relations order is filed against his or her retirement account. By obtaining a refund of contributions, a member waives all rights under the Florida Retirement System and the health insurance subsidy to the service credit represented by the refunded contributions, except the right to purchase his or her prior service credit in accordance with s. 121.081(2).

(b) A member whose employment is terminated for any reason other than death or retirement after becoming vested may elect to receive a deferred monthly benefit which shall begin to accrue on the first day of the month of normal or early retirement and shall be payable on the last day of that month and each month thereafter during his or her lifetime. The amount of monthly benefit shall be computed in the same manner as for a normal retirement benefit in accordance with subsection (1) or early retirement benefit in accordance with s. 121.021(30), but based on average monthly compensation and creditable service as of the date of termination.

(c) In lieu of the deferred monthly benefit provided in paragraph (b), the terminated member may elect to receive a lump-sum amount equal to his or her accumulated contributions as of the date of termination. Effective July 1, 2011, upon termination of employment from all participating employers for 3 calendar months as defined in s. 121.021(39)(c) for any reason other than retirement, a member may receive a refund of all contributions he or she has made to the pension plan, subject to the restrictions otherwise provided in this chapter. Partial refunds are not permitted. The refund may not include any interest earnings on the contributions for a member of the pension plan. Employer contributions made on behalf of the member are not refundable. A member may not receive a refund of employee contributions if a pending or an approved qualified domestic relations order is filed against his or her retirement account. By obtaining a refund of contributions, a member waives all rights under the Florida Retirement System and the health insurance subsidy to the service credit represented by the refunded contributions, except the right to purchase his or her prior service credit in accordance with s. 121.081(2).

(d) If any retired member dies without having received in benefit payments an amount equal to his or her accumulated contributions, there shall be payable to his or her designated beneficiary an amount equal to the excess, if any, of the member’s accumulated contributions over the total monthly payments made to the member prior to the date of death.

(e) A member shall be deemed a terminated member when termination of employment has occurred as provided in s. 121.021(39).

(f) Any member who has been found guilty by a verdict of a jury, or by the court trying the case without a jury, of committing, aiding, or abetting any embezzlement or theft from his or her employer, bribery in connection with the employment, or other felony specified in chapter 838, except ss. 838.15 and 838.16, committed prior to retirement, or who has entered a plea of guilty or of nolo contendere to such crime, or any member whose employment is terminated by reason of the member’s admitted commitment, aiding, or abetting of an embezzlement or theft from his or her employer, bribery, or other felony specified in chapter 838, except ss. 838.15 and 838.16, shall forfeit all rights and benefits under this chapter, except the return of his or her accumulated contributions as of the date of termination.

(g) Any elected official who is convicted by the Senate of an impeachable offense shall forfeit all rights and benefits under this chapter, except the return of his or her accumulated contributions as of the date of the conviction.

(h) Any member who, prior to retirement, is adjudged by a court of competent jurisdiction to have violated any state law against strikes by public employees, or who has been found guilty by such court of violating any state law prohibiting strikes by public employees, shall forfeit all rights and benefits under this chapter, except the return of his or her accumulated contributions as of the date of the conviction.

(i) The division or the state board may not pay benefits to any member convicted of a felony committed on or after October 1, 2008, defined in s. 800.04 against a victim younger than 16 years of age, or defined in chapter 794 against a victim younger than 18 years of age, through the use or attempted use of power, rights, privileges, duties, or position of the member’s public office or employment position. However, the division or the state board shall return the member’s accumulated contributions, if any, that the member accumulated as of the date of conviction.

(j) Any beneficiary who by a verdict of a jury or by the court trying the case without a jury is found guilty, or who has entered a plea of guilty or nolo contendere, of unlawfully and intentionally killing or procuring the death of the member forfeits all rights to the deceased member’s benefits under this chapter, and the benefits will be paid as if such beneficiary had predeceased the decedent.

(k) Benefits may not be paid by the division or the state board pending final resolution of such charges against a member or beneficiary if the resolution of such charges could require the forfeiture of benefits as provided in paragraph (f), paragraph (g), paragraph (h), paragraph (i), paragraph (j), or chapter 112.

(6) OPTIONAL FORMS OF RETIREMENT BENEFITS AND DISABILITY RETIREMENT BENEFITS.—

(a) Prior to the receipt of the first monthly retirement payment, a member shall elect to receive the retirement benefits to which he or she is entitled under subsection (1), subsection (2), subsection (3), or subsection (4) in accordance with one of the following options:

1. The maximum retirement benefit payable to the member during his or her lifetime.

2. A decreased retirement benefit payable to the member during his or her lifetime and, in the event of his or her death within a period of 10 years after retirement, the same monthly amount payable for the balance of such 10-year period to his or her beneficiary or, in case the beneficiary is deceased, in accordance with subsection (8) as though no beneficiary had been named.

3. A decreased retirement benefit payable during the joint lifetime of both the member and his or her joint annuitant and which, after the death of either, shall continue during the lifetime of the survivor in the same amount, subject to the provisions of subsection (12).

4. A decreased retirement benefit payable during the joint lifetime of the member and his or her joint annuitant and which, after the death of either, shall continue during the lifetime of the survivor in an amount equal to 662/3 percent of the amount that was payable during the joint lifetime of the member and his or her joint annuitant, subject to the provisions of subsection (12).

The spouse of any member who elects to receive the benefit provided under subparagraph 1. or subparagraph 2. shall be notified of and shall acknowledge any such election. The division shall establish by rule a method for selecting the appropriate actuarial factor for optional forms of benefits selected under subparagraphs 3. and 4., based on the age of the member and the joint annuitant.

(b) The benefit payable under any option stated above shall be the actuarial equivalent, based on tables adopted by the administrator for this purpose, of the amount to which the member was otherwise entitled.

(c) A member who elects the option in subparagraph (a)2. shall, in accordance with subsection (8), designate one or more persons to receive the benefits payable in the event of his or her death. Such persons shall be the beneficiaries of the member. The member may also designate one or more contingent beneficiaries to receive any benefits remaining upon the death of the primary beneficiary.

(d) A member who elects the option in subparagraph (a)3. or subparagraph (a)4. shall, on a form provided for that purpose, designate a joint annuitant to receive the benefits which continue to be payable upon the death of the member. After benefits have commenced under the option in subparagraph (a)3. or subparagraph (a)4., the following shall apply:

1. A retired member may change his or her designation of a joint annuitant only twice. If such a retired member desires to change his or her designation of a joint annuitant, he or she shall file with the division a notarized “change of joint annuitant” form and shall notify the former joint annuitant in writing of such change. Effective the first day of the next month following receipt by the division of a completed change of joint annuitant form, the division shall adjust the member’s monthly benefit by the application of actuarial tables and calculations developed to ensure that the benefit paid is the actuarial equivalent of the present value of the member’s current benefit. The consent of a retired member’s first designated joint annuitant to any such change shall not be required. However, if either the member or the joint annuitant dies before the effective date of the request for change of joint annuitant, the requested change shall be void, and survivor benefits, if any, shall be paid as if no request had been made.

2. In the event of the dissolution of marriage of a retired member and a joint annuitant, such member may make an election to nullify the joint annuitant designation of the former spouse, unless there is an existing qualified domestic relations order preventing such action. The member shall file with the division a written, notarized nullification which shall be effective on the first day of the next month following receipt by the division. Benefits shall be paid as if the former spouse predeceased the member. A member who makes such an election may not reverse the nullification but may designate a new joint annuitant in accordance with subparagraph 1.

(e) The election of an option shall be null and void if the member dies before the effective date of retirement.

(f) A member who elects to receive benefits under the option in subparagraph (a)3. may designate one or more qualified persons, either a spouse or other dependent, as his or her joint annuitant to receive the benefits after the member’s death in whatever proportion he or she so assigns to each person named as joint annuitant. The division shall adopt appropriate actuarial tables and calculations necessary to ensure that the benefit paid is the actuarial equivalent of the benefit to which the member is otherwise entitled under the option in subparagraph (a)1.

(g) Upon the death of a retired member or beneficiary receiving monthly benefits under this chapter, the monthly benefits shall be paid through the last day of the month of death and shall terminate, or be adjusted, if applicable, as of that date in accordance with the optional form of benefit selected at the time of retirement.

(h) The option selected or determined for payment of benefits as provided in this section shall be final and irrevocable at the time a benefit payment is cashed or deposited or credited to the Deferred Retirement Option Program as provided in subsection (13).

(7) DEATH BENEFITS.—

(a) If the employment of a member is terminated by reason of his or her death prior to being vested, except as provided in paragraph (f), there shall be payable to his or her designated beneficiary the member’s accumulated contributions.

(b) If the employment of an active member who may or may not have applied for retirement is terminated by reason of his or her death subsequent to becoming vested and prior to his or her effective date of retirement, if established, it shall be assumed that the member retired as of the date of death in accordance with subsection (1) if eligible for normal retirement benefits, subsection (2) if eligible for benefits payable for dual normal retirement, or subsection (3) if eligible for early retirement benefits. Benefits payable to the designated beneficiary shall be as follows:

1. For a beneficiary who qualifies as a joint annuitant, the optional form of payment provided in accordance with subparagraph (6)(a)3. shall be paid for the joint annuitant’s lifetime.

2. For a beneficiary who does not qualify as a joint annuitant, no continuing monthly benefit shall be paid and the beneficiary shall be entitled only to the return of the member’s personal contributions. If there is no monetary interest in the member’s retirement account for which such beneficiary is eligible, the beneficiary shall be the next named beneficiary or, if no other beneficiary is named, the beneficiary shall be the next eligible beneficiary according to subsection (8).

(c) If a retiring member dies on or after the effective date of retirement, but prior to a benefit payment being cashed or deposited, or credited to the Deferred Retirement Option Program, benefits shall be paid as follows:

1. For a designated beneficiary who qualifies as a joint annuitant, benefits shall be paid in the optional form of payment provided in subparagraph (6)(a)3. for the joint annuitant’s lifetime or, if the member chose the optional form of payment provided in subparagraph (6)(a)2., the joint annuitant may select the form provided in either subparagraph (6)(a)2. or subparagraph (6)(a)3.

2. For a designated beneficiary who does not qualify as a joint annuitant, any benefits payable shall be paid as provided in the option selected by the member; or if the member has not selected an option, benefits shall be paid in the optional form of payment provided in subparagraph (6)(a)1.

(d) Notwithstanding any other provision in this chapter to the contrary, with the exception of the Deferred Retirement Option Program, as provided in subsection (13):

1. The surviving spouse of any member killed in the line of duty may receive a monthly pension equal to one-half of the monthly salary being received by the member at the time of death for the rest of the surviving spouse’s lifetime or, if the member was vested, such surviving spouse may elect to receive a benefit as provided in paragraph (b). Benefits provided by this paragraph shall supersede any other distribution that may have been provided by the member’s designation of beneficiary.

2. If the surviving spouse of a member killed in the line of duty dies, the monthly payments that would have been payable to such surviving spouse had such surviving spouse lived shall be paid for the use and benefit of such member’s child or children under 18 years of age and unmarried until the 18th birthday of the member’s youngest child. Beginning July 1, 2016, such payments may be extended, for the surviving child of a member in the Special Risk Class at the time he or she was killed in the line of duty on or after July 1, 2013, until the 25th birthday of any child of the member if the child is unmarried and enrolled as a full-time student. Beginning July 1, 2017, such payments may be extended, for the surviving child of a member in the Special Risk Class at the time he or she was killed in the line of duty on or after July 1, 2002, until the 25th birthday of any child of the member if the child is unmarried and enrolled as a full-time student.

3. If a member killed in the line of duty leaves no surviving spouse but is survived by a child or children under 18 years of age, the benefits provided by subparagraph 1., normally payable to a surviving spouse, shall be paid for the use and benefit of such member’s child or children under 18 years of age and unmarried until the 18th birthday of the member’s youngest child. Beginning July 1, 2016, such monthly payments may be extended, for the surviving child of a member in the Special Risk Class at the time he or she was killed in the line of duty on or after July 1, 2013, until the 25th birthday of any child of the member if the child is unmarried and enrolled as a full-time student. Beginning July 1, 2017, such monthly payments may be extended, for the surviving child of a member in the Special Risk Class at the time he or she was killed in the line of duty on or after July 1, 2002, until the 25th birthday of any child of the member if the child is unmarried and enrolled as a full-time student.

4. The surviving spouse of a member whose benefit terminated because of remarriage shall have the benefit reinstated beginning July 1, 1993, at an amount that would have been payable had the benefit not been terminated.

(e) The surviving spouse or other dependent of any member, except a member who participated in the Deferred Retirement Option Program, whose employment is terminated by death shall, upon application to the administrator, be permitted to pay the required contributions for any service performed by the member which could have been claimed by the member at the time of his or her death. Such service shall be added to the creditable service of the member and shall be used in the calculation of any benefits which may be payable to the surviving spouse or other surviving dependent.

(f) Notwithstanding any other provisions in this chapter to the contrary and upon application to the administrator, an eligible joint annuitant, of a member whose employment is terminated by death within 1 year of such member satisfying the service requirements for vesting and retirement eligibility, shall be permitted to purchase only the additional service credit necessary to vest and qualify for retirement benefits, not to exceed a total of 1 year of credit, by one or a combination of the following methods:

1. Such eligible joint annuitant may use the deceased member’s accumulated hours of annual, sick, and compensatory leave to purchase additional creditable service, on an hour by hour basis, provided that such deceased member’s accumulated leave is sufficient to cover the additional months required. For each month of service credit needed prior to the final month, credit for the total number of work hours in that month must be purchased, using an equal number of the deceased member’s accumulated leave hours. Service credit required for the final month in which the deceased member would have become vested shall be awarded upon the purchase of 1 hour of credit. Such eligible joint annuitant shall pay the contribution rate in effect for the period of time being claimed for the deceased member’s class of membership, multiplied by such member’s monthly salary at the time of death, plus 6.5 percent interest compounded annually. The accumulated leave payment used in the average final compensation shall not include that portion of the payment that represents any leave hours used in the purchase of such creditable service.

2. Such eligible joint annuitant may purchase additional months of creditable service for any periods of out-of-state service as provided in s. 121.1115, and in-state service as provided in s. 121.1122, that the deceased member would have been eligible to purchase prior to his or her death.

Service purchased under this paragraph shall be added to the creditable service of the member and used to vest for retirement eligibility, and shall be used in the calculation of any benefits which may be payable to the eligible joint annuitant. Any benefits paid in accordance with this paragraph shall only be made prospectively.

(g) Notwithstanding any other provisions in this chapter to the contrary, if any member who is vested dies and the surviving spouse receives a refund of the accumulated contributions made to the retirement trust fund, such spouse may pay to the Division of Retirement an amount equal to the sum of the amount of the deceased member’s accumulated contributions previously refunded plus interest at 4 percent compounded annually each June 30 from the date of refund until July 1, 1975, and 6.5 percent interest compounded annually thereafter, until full payment is made, and receive the monthly retirement benefit as provided in paragraph (b).

(h) The designated beneficiary who is the surviving spouse or other dependent of a member whose employment is terminated by death subsequent to becoming vested, but prior to actual retirement, may elect to receive a deferred monthly benefit as if the member had lived and had elected a deferred monthly benefit, as provided in paragraph (5)(b), calculated on the basis of the average final compensation and creditable service of the member at his or her death and the age the member would have attained on the commencement date of the deferred benefit elected by the beneficiary, paid in accordance with option 3 of paragraph (6)(a).

(i) Notwithstanding any provision in this chapter to the contrary, if a member in the Special Risk Class, other than a participant in the Deferred Retirement Option Program under subsection (13), is killed in the line of duty on or after July 1, 2002, the following benefits are payable in addition to the benefits provided in paragraph (d):

1. The surviving spouse may receive a monthly pension equal to one-half of the monthly salary being received by the member at the time of the member’s death for the rest of the surviving spouse’s lifetime or, if the member was vested, such surviving spouse may elect to receive a benefit as provided in paragraph (b). Benefits provided by this paragraph supersede any other distribution that may have been provided by the member’s designation of beneficiary.

2. If the surviving spouse dies, the monthly payments that otherwise would have been payable to such surviving spouse shall be paid for the use and benefit of the member’s child or children under 18 years of age and unmarried until the 18th birthday of the member’s youngest child. Such monthly payments may be extended until the 25th birthday of the member’s child if the child is unmarried and enrolled as a full-time student.

3. If the member leaves no surviving spouse but is survived by a child or children under 18 years of age, the benefits provided by subparagraph 1., normally payable to a surviving spouse, shall be paid for the use and benefit of such member’s child or children under 18 years of age and unmarried until the 18th birthday of the member’s youngest child. Such monthly payments may be extended until the 25th birthday of any of the member’s children if the child is unmarried and enrolled as a full-time student.

(8) DESIGNATION OF BENEFICIARIES.—

(a) Each member may, on a form provided for that purpose, signed and filed with the division, designate a choice of one or more persons, named sequentially or jointly, as his or her beneficiary who shall receive the benefits, if any, which may be payable in the event of the member’s death pursuant to the provisions of this chapter. If no beneficiary is named in the manner provided above, or if no beneficiary designated by the member survives the member, the beneficiary shall be the spouse of the deceased, if living. If the member’s spouse is not alive at his or her death, the beneficiary shall be the living children of the member. If no children survive, the beneficiary shall be the member’s father or mother, if living; otherwise, the beneficiary shall be the member’s estate. The beneficiary most recently designated by a member on a form or letter filed with the division shall be the beneficiary entitled to any benefits payable at the time of the member’s death, except that benefits shall be paid as provided in paragraph (7)(d) when death occurs in the line of duty. Notwithstanding any other provisions in this subsection to the contrary, for a member who dies prior to his or her effective date of retirement on or after January 1, 1999, the spouse at the time of death shall be the member’s beneficiary unless such member designates a different beneficiary as provided herein subsequent to the member’s most recent marriage.

(b) A designated beneficiary of a retirement account for whom there is a monetary interest may disclaim his or her monetary interest as provided in chapter 739 and in accordance with division rules governing such disclaimers. Such disclaimer must be filed within 24 months after the event that created the interest, that is, the death of the member or annuitant.

(c) Notwithstanding the member’s designation of benefits to be paid through a trust to a beneficiary that is a natural person as provided in s. 121.021(46), and notwithstanding the provisions of the trust, benefits shall be paid directly to the beneficiary if the person is no longer a minor or an incapacitated person as defined in s. 744.102.

¹(9) EMPLOYMENT AFTER RETIREMENT; LIMITATION.—

(a) Any person who is retired under this chapter, except under the disability retirement provisions of subsection (4), may be employed by an employer that does not participate in a state-administered retirement system and receive compensation from that employment without limiting or restricting in any way the retirement benefits payable to that person.

(b) Any person whose retirement is effective before July 1, 2010, or whose participation in the Deferred Retirement Option Program terminates before July 1, 2010, except under the disability retirement provisions of subsection (4) or as provided in s. 121.053, may be reemployed by an employer that participates in a state-administered retirement system and receive retirement benefits and compensation from that employer, except that the person may not be reemployed by an employer participating in the Florida Retirement System before meeting the definition of termination in s. 121.021 and may not receive both a salary from the employer and retirement benefits for 12 calendar months immediately subsequent to the date of retirement. However, a DROP participant shall continue employment and receive a salary during the period of participation in the Deferred Retirement Option Program, as provided in subsection (13).

1. A retiree who violates such reemployment limitation before completion of the 12-month limitation period must give timely notice of this fact in writing to the employer and to the Division of Retirement or the state board and shall have his or her retirement benefits suspended for the months employed or the balance of the 12-month limitation period as required in sub-subparagraphs b. and c. A retiree employed in violation of this paragraph and an employer who employs or appoints such person are jointly and severally liable for reimbursement to the retirement trust fund, including the Florida Retirement System Trust Fund and the Florida Retirement System Investment Plan Trust Fund, from which the benefits were paid. The employer must have a written statement from the retiree that he or she is not retired from a state-administered retirement system. Retirement benefits shall remain suspended until repayment has been made. Benefits suspended beyond the reemployment limitation shall apply toward repayment of benefits received in violation of the reemployment limitation.

a. A district school board may reemploy a retiree as a substitute or hourly teacher, education paraprofessional, transportation assistant, bus driver, or food service worker on a noncontractual basis after he or she has been retired for 1 calendar month. A district school board may reemploy a retiree as instructional personnel, as defined in s. 1012.01(2)(a), on an annual contractual basis after he or she has been retired for 1 calendar month. Any member who is reemployed within 1 calendar month after retirement shall void his or her application for retirement benefits. District school boards reemploying such teachers, education paraprofessionals, transportation assistants, bus drivers, or food service workers are subject to the retirement contribution required by subparagraph 2.

b. A Florida College System institution board of trustees may reemploy a retiree as an adjunct instructor or as a participant in a phased retirement program within the Florida College System, after he or she has been retired for 1 calendar month. A member who is reemployed within 1 calendar month after retirement shall void his or her application for retirement benefits. Boards of trustees reemploying such instructors are subject to the retirement contribution required in subparagraph 2. A retiree may be reemployed as an adjunct instructor for no more than 780 hours during the first 12 months of retirement. A retiree reemployed for more than 780 hours during the first 12 months of retirement must give timely notice in writing to the employer and to the Division of Retirement or the state board of the date he or she will exceed the limitation. The division shall suspend his or her retirement benefits for the remainder of the 12 months of retirement. Any retiree employed in violation of this sub-subparagraph and any employer who employs or appoints such person without notifying the division to suspend retirement benefits are jointly and severally liable for any benefits paid during the reemployment limitation period. The employer must have a written statement from the retiree that he or she is not retired from a state-administered retirement system. Any retirement benefits received by the retiree while reemployed in excess of 780 hours during the first 12 months of retirement must be repaid to the Florida Retirement System Trust Fund, and retirement benefits shall remain suspended until repayment is made. Benefits suspended beyond the end of the retiree’s first 12 months of retirement shall apply toward repayment of benefits received in violation of the 780-hour reemployment limitation.

c. The State University System may reemploy a retiree as an adjunct faculty member or as a participant in a phased retirement program within the State University System after the retiree has been retired for 1 calendar month. A member who is reemployed within 1 calendar month after retirement shall void his or her application for retirement benefits. The State University System is subject to the retired contribution required in subparagraph 2., as appropriate. A retiree may be reemployed as an adjunct faculty member or a participant in a phased retirement program for no more than 780 hours during the first 12 months of his or her retirement. A retiree reemployed for more than 780 hours during the first 12 months of retirement must give timely notice in writing to the employer and to the Division of Retirement or the state board of the date he or she will exceed the limitation. The division shall suspend his or her retirement benefits for the remainder of the 12 months. Any retiree employed in violation of this sub-subparagraph and any employer who employs or appoints such person without notifying the division to suspend retirement benefits are jointly and severally liable for any benefits paid during the reemployment limitation period. The employer must have a written statement from the retiree that he or she is not retired from a state-administered retirement system. Any retirement benefits received by the retiree while reemployed in excess of 780 hours during the first 12 months of retirement must be repaid to the Florida Retirement System Trust Fund, and retirement benefits shall remain suspended until repayment is made. Benefits suspended beyond the end of the retiree’s first 12 months of retirement shall apply toward repayment of benefits received in violation of the 780-hour reemployment limitation.

d. The Board of Trustees of the Florida School for the Deaf and the Blind may reemploy a retiree as a substitute teacher, substitute residential instructor, or substitute nurse on a noncontractual basis after he or she has been retired for 1 calendar month. Any member who is reemployed within 1 calendar month after retirement shall void his or her application for retirement benefits. The Board of Trustees of the Florida School for the Deaf and the Blind reemploying such teachers, residential instructors, or nurses is subject to the retirement contribution required by subparagraph 2.

e. A developmental research school may reemploy a retiree as a substitute or hourly teacher or an education paraprofessional as defined in s. 1012.01(2) on a noncontractual basis after he or she has been retired for 1 calendar month. A developmental research school may reemploy a retiree as instructional personnel, as defined in s. 1012.01(2)(a), on an annual contractual basis after he or she has been retired for 1 calendar month after retirement. Any member who is reemployed within 1 calendar month voids his or her application for retirement benefits. A developmental research school that reemploys retired teachers and education paraprofessionals is subject to the retirement contribution required by subparagraph 2.

f. A charter school may reemploy a retiree as a substitute or hourly teacher on a noncontractual basis after he or she has been retired for 1 calendar month. A charter school may reemploy a retired member as instructional personnel, as defined in s. 1012.01(2)(a), on an annual contractual basis after he or she has been retired for 1 calendar month after retirement. Any member who is reemployed within 1 calendar month voids his or her application for retirement benefits. A charter school that reemploys such teachers is subject to the retirement contribution required by subparagraph 2.

2. The employment of a retiree or DROP participant of a state-administered retirement system does not affect the average final compensation or years of creditable service of the retiree or DROP participant. Before July 1, 1991, upon employment of any person, other than an elected officer as provided in s. 121.053, who is retired under a state-administered retirement program, the employer shall pay retirement contributions in an amount equal to the unfunded actuarial liability portion of the employer contribution which would be required for regular members of the Florida Retirement System. Effective July 1, 1991, contributions shall be made as provided in s. 121.122 for retirees who have renewed membership or, as provided in subsection (13), for DROP participants.

3. Any person who is holding an elective public office which is covered by the Florida Retirement System and who is concurrently employed in nonelected covered employment may elect to retire while continuing employment in the elective public office if he or she terminates his or her nonelected covered employment. Such person shall receive his or her retirement benefits in addition to the compensation of the elective office without regard to the time limitations otherwise provided in this subsection. A person who seeks to exercise the provisions of this subparagraph as they existed before May 3, 1984, may not be deemed to be retired under those provisions, unless such person is eligible to retire under this subparagraph, as amended by chapter 84-11, Laws of Florida.

(c) Any person whose retirement is effective on or after July 1, 2010, or whose participation in the Deferred Retirement Option Program terminates on or after July 1, 2010, who is retired under this chapter, except under the disability retirement provisions of subsection (4) or as provided in s. 121.053, may be reemployed by an employer that participates in a state-administered retirement system and receive retirement benefits and compensation from that employer. However, a person may not be reemployed by an employer participating in the Florida Retirement System before meeting the definition of termination in s. 121.021 and may not receive both a salary from the employer and retirement benefits for 6 calendar months after meeting the definition of termination, except as provided in paragraph (d). However, a DROP participant shall continue employment and receive a salary during the period of participation in the Deferred Retirement Option Program, as provided in subsection (13).

1. The reemployed retiree may not renew membership in the Florida Retirement System, except as provided in s. 121.122.

2. The employer shall pay retirement contributions in an amount equal to the unfunded actuarial liability portion of the employer contribution that would be required for active members of the Florida Retirement System in addition to the contributions required by s. 121.76.

3. A retiree initially reemployed in violation of this paragraph and an employer that employs or appoints such person are jointly and severally liable for reimbursement of any retirement benefits paid to the retirement trust fund from which the benefits were paid, including the Florida Retirement System Trust Fund and the Florida Retirement System Investment Plan Trust Fund, as appropriate. The employer must have a written statement from the employee that he or she is not retired from a state-administered retirement system. Retirement benefits shall remain suspended until repayment is made. Benefits suspended beyond the end of the retiree’s 6-month reemployment limitation period shall apply toward the repayment of benefits received in violation of this paragraph.

(d) Beginning July 1, 2024, a retiree who has met the definition of termination in s. 121.021 may be reemployed by an employer that participates in a state-administered retirement system and receive retirement benefits and compensation from that employer but may not receive both a salary from the employer and retirement benefits for 6 calendar months immediately subsequent to the date of retirement.

(e) This subsection applies to retirees, as defined in s. 121.4501(2), of the Florida Retirement System Investment Plan, subject to the following conditions:

1. A retiree may not be reemployed with an employer participating in the Florida Retirement System until such person has been retired for 6 calendar months.

2. A retiree employed in violation of this subsection and an employer that employs or appoints such person are jointly and severally liable for reimbursement of any benefits paid to the retirement trust fund from which the benefits were paid. The employer must have a written statement from the retiree that he or she is not retired from a state-administered retirement system.

(f) The limitations of this subsection apply to reemployment in any capacity irrespective of the category of funds from which the person is compensated.

(10) FUTURE BENEFITS BASED ON ACTUARIAL DATA.—It is the intent of the Legislature that future benefit increases enacted into law in this chapter shall be financed concurrently by increased contributions or other adequate funding, and such funding shall be based on sound actuarial data as developed by the actuary or state retirement actuary, as provided in ss. 121.021(6) and 121.192.

(11) A member who becomes eligible to retire and has accumulated the maximum benefit of 100 percent of average final compensation may continue in active service, and, if upon the member’s retirement the member elects to receive a retirement compensation pursuant to subsection (2), subsection (6), or subsection (7), the actuarial equivalent percentage factor applicable to the age of such member at the time the member reached the maximum benefit and to the age, at that time, of the member’s spouse shall determine the amount of benefits to be paid.

(12) SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR PAYMENT OF CERTAIN SURVIVOR BENEFITS.—Notwithstanding any provision of this chapter to the contrary, for members with an effective date of retirement, or date of death if prior to retirement, on or after January 1, 1996, the named joint annuitant, as defined in s. 121.021(28)(b), who is eligible to receive benefits under subparagraph (6)(a)3. or subparagraph (6)(a)4., shall receive the maximum monthly retirement benefit that would have been payable to the member under subparagraph (6)(a)1.; however, payment of such benefit shall cease the month the joint annuitant attains age 25 unless such joint annuitant is disabled and incapable of self-support, in which case, benefits shall cease when the joint annuitant is no longer disabled. The administrator may require proof of disability or continued disability in the same manner as is provided for a member seeking or receiving a disability retirement benefit under subsection (4).

²(13) DEFERRED RETIREMENT OPTION PROGRAM.—In general, and subject to this section, the Deferred Retirement Option Program, hereinafter referred to as DROP, is a program under which an eligible member of the Florida Retirement System may elect to participate, deferring receipt of retirement benefits while continuing employment with his or her Florida Retirement System employer. The deferred monthly benefits shall accrue in the Florida Retirement System on behalf of the member, plus interest compounded monthly, for the specified period of the DROP participation, as provided in paragraph (c). Upon termination of employment, the member shall receive the total DROP benefits and begin to receive the previously determined normal retirement benefits. Participation in the DROP does not guarantee employment for the specified period of DROP.

(a) Eligibility of member to participate in DROP.—All active Florida Retirement System members in a regularly established position, and all active members of the Teachers’ Retirement System established in chapter 238 or the State and County Officers’ and Employees’ Retirement System established in chapter 122, which are consolidated within the Florida Retirement System under s. 121.011, are eligible to elect participation in DROP if:

1. The member is not a renewed member under s. 121.122 or a member of the State Community College System Optional Retirement Program under s. 121.051, the Senior Management Service Optional Annuity Program under s. 121.055, or the optional retirement program for the State University System under s. 121.35.

2. Election to participate in DROP may be made at any time following the date on which the member first reaches his or her normal retirement date. The member shall advise his or her employer and the division in writing of the date DROP begins. When establishing eligibility to participate in DROP, the member may elect to include or exclude any optional service credit purchased by the member from the total service used to establish the normal retirement date. A member who has dual normal retirement dates is eligible to elect to participate in DROP after attaining normal retirement date in either class.

3. The employer of a member electing to participate in DROP, or employers if dually employed, shall acknowledge in writing to the division the date the member’s participation in DROP begins and the date the member’s employment and DROP participation terminates.

4. Simultaneous employment of a member by additional Florida Retirement System employers subsequent to the commencement of a member’s participation in DROP is permissible if such employers acknowledge in writing a DROP termination date no later than the member’s existing termination date or the maximum participation period provided in paragraph (b).

5. A member may change employers while participating in DROP, subject to the following:

a. A change of employment takes place without a break in service so that the member receives salary for each month of continuous DROP participation. If a member receives no salary during a month, DROP participation ceases unless the employer verifies a continuation of the employment relationship for such member pursuant to s. 121.021(39)(b).

b. The member and new employer notify the division of the identity of the new employer on forms required by the division.

c. The new employer acknowledges, in writing, the member’s DROP termination date, which may be extended but not beyond the maximum participation period provided in paragraph (b), acknowledges liability for any additional retirement contributions and interest required if the member fails to timely terminate employment, and is subject to the adjustment required in sub-subparagraph (c)5.d.

(b) Participation in DROP.—Except as provided in this paragraph, an eligible member may elect to participate in DROP for a period not to exceed a maximum of 96 calendar months.

1.a. Members who are instructional personnel employed by the Florida School for the Deaf and the Blind and authorized by the Board of Trustees of the Florida School for the Deaf and the Blind, who are instructional personnel as defined in s. 1012.01(2)(a)-(d) in grades K-12 and authorized by the district school superintendent, or who are instructional personnel as defined in s. 1012.01(2)(a) employed by a developmental research school and authorized by the school’s director, or if the school has no director, by the school’s principal, may:

(I) Extend DROP participation beyond the initial 96-calendar-month period if the instructional personnel’s termination date is before the end of the school year. Such instructional personnel may have DROP participation extended until the last day of the last calendar month of the school year in which their original DROP termination date occurred if a date other than the last day of the last calendar month of the school year is designated.

(II) Participate in DROP for up to 24 calendar months beyond the 96-month period. Instructional personnel who are authorized to extend DROP participation beyond the 96-month period must have a termination date that is the last day of the last calendar month of the school year within the DROP extension granted by the employer. If the member’s DROP participation has already been extended for the maximum 24 calendar months and the extension period concludes before the end of the school year, the member’s DROP participation may be extended through the last day of the last calendar month of that school year. This sub-sub-subparagraph expires June 30, 2029.

The employer shall notify the division of the change in termination date and the additional period of DROP participation for the affected instructional personnel.

b. Administrative personnel in grades K-12, as defined in s. 1012.01(3), may be authorized to extend DROP participation beyond the initial 96 calendar month period if the administrative personnel’s termination date is before the end of the school year. Such administrative personnel may have DROP participation extended until the last day of the last calendar month of the school year in which their original DROP termination date occurred if a date other than the last day of the last calendar month of the school year is designated. The employer shall notify the division of the change in termination date and the additional period of DROP participation for the affected administrative personnel.

2. Upon deciding to participate in DROP, the member shall submit, on forms required by the division:

a. A written election to participate in DROP;

b. Selection of DROP participation and termination dates that satisfy the limitations stated in paragraph (a) and this paragraph. The termination date must be in a binding letter of resignation to the employer establishing a deferred termination date. The member may change the termination date within the limitations of this paragraph, but only with the written approval of the employer;

c. A properly completed DROP application for service retirement as provided in this section; and

d. Any other information required by the division.

3. The DROP participant is a retiree under the Florida Retirement System for all purposes, except for paragraph (5)(f) and subsection (9) and ss. 112.3173, 112.363, 121.053, and 121.122. DROP participation is final and may not be canceled by the participant after the first payment is credited during the DROP participation period. However, participation in DROP does not alter the participant’s employment status, and the member is not deemed retired from employment until his or her deferred resignation is effective and termination occurs as defined in s. 121.021.

4. Elected officers are eligible to participate in DROP subject to the following:

a. An elected officer who reaches normal retirement date during a term of office may defer the election to participate until the next succeeding term in that office. An elected officer who exercises this option may participate in DROP for up to 96 calendar months or no longer than the succeeding term of office, whichever is less.

b. An elected or a nonelected participant may run for a term of office while participating in DROP and, if elected, extend the DROP termination date accordingly; however, if such additional term of office exceeds the 96-month limitation established in this paragraph, and the officer does not resign from office within such limitation, the retirement and the participant’s DROP is null and void as provided in sub-subparagraph (c)5.d.

c. An elected officer who is dually employed and elects to participate in DROP must terminate all employment relationships as provided in s. 121.021(39) for the nonelected position within the original period or maximum participation period as provided in this paragraph. For DROP participation ending:

(I) Before July 1, 2010, the officer may continue employment as an elected officer as provided in s. 121.053. The elected officer shall be enrolled as a renewed member in the Elected Officers’ Class or the Regular Class, as provided in ss. 121.053 and 121.122, on the first day of the month after termination of employment in the nonelected position and termination of DROP. Distribution of the DROP benefits shall be made as provided in paragraph (c).

(II) On or after July 1, 2010, the officer may continue employment as an elected officer but must defer termination as provided in s. 121.053.

d. An elected officer who has deferred termination as provided in s. 121.053 before June 30, 2023, is ineligible to extend DROP participation beyond 60 months.

1. Effective on the date of DROP participation, the member’s initial normal monthly benefit, including creditable service, optional form of payment, and average final compensation, and the effective date of retirement are fixed. The beneficiary established under the Florida Retirement System is the beneficiary eligible to receive any DROP benefits payable if the DROP participant dies before completing the period of DROP participation. If a joint annuitant predeceases the member, the member may name a beneficiary to receive accumulated DROP benefits payable. The retirement benefit, the annual cost of living adjustments provided in s. 121.101, and interest accrue monthly in the Florida Retirement System Trust Fund. For members whose DROP participation begins:

a. Before July 1, 2011, the interest accrues at an effective annual rate of 6.5 percent compounded monthly, on the prior month’s accumulated ending balance, up to the month of termination or death, except as provided in s. 121.053(7).

b. On or after July 1, 2011, the interest accrues:

(I) Through June 30, 2023, at an effective annual rate of 1.3 percent, compounded monthly, on the prior month’s accumulated ending balance, up to the month of termination or death, except as provided in s. 121.053(7).

(II) Beginning July 1, 2023, at an effective annual rate of 4 percent, compounded monthly, on the prior month’s accumulated ending balance, up to the month of termination or death, except as provided in s. 121.053(7).

2. Each employee who elects to participate in DROP may elect to receive a lump-sum payment for accrued annual leave earned in accordance with agency policy upon beginning participation in DROP. The accumulated leave payment certified to the division upon commencement of DROP shall be included in the calculation of the member’s average final compensation. The employee electing the lump-sum payment is not eligible to receive a second lump-sum payment upon termination, except to the extent the employee has earned additional annual leave which, combined with the original payment, does not exceed the maximum lump-sum payment allowed by the employing agency’s policy or rules. An early lump-sum payment shall be based on the hourly wage of the employee at the time he or she begins participation in DROP. If the member elects to wait and receive a lump-sum payment upon termination of DROP and termination of employment with the employer, any accumulated leave payment made at that time may not be included in the member’s retirement benefit, which was determined and fixed by law when the employee elected to participate in DROP.

3. The effective date of DROP participation and the effective date of retirement of a DROP participant shall be the first day of the month selected by the member to begin participation in DROP, provided such date is properly established, with the written confirmation of the employer, and the approval of the division, on forms required by the division.

4. Normal retirement benefits and any interest continue to accrue in DROP until the established termination date of DROP or until the member terminates employment or dies before such date, except as provided in s. 121.053(7). Although individual DROP accounts may not be established, a separate accounting of each member’s accrued benefits under DROP shall be calculated and provided to the member.

5. At the conclusion of the member’s participation in DROP, the division shall distribute the member’s total accumulated DROP benefits, subject to the following:

a. The division shall receive verification by the member’s employer or employers that the member has terminated all employment relationships as provided in s. 121.021(39).

b. The terminated DROP participant or, if deceased, the member’s named beneficiary, shall elect on forms provided by the division to receive payment of the DROP benefits in accordance with one of the options listed below. If a member or beneficiary fails to elect a method of payment within 60 days after termination of DROP, the division shall pay a lump sum as provided in sub-sub-subparagraph (I).

(I) Lump sum.—All accrued DROP benefits, plus interest, less withholding taxes remitted to the Internal Revenue Service, shall be paid to the DROP participant or surviving beneficiary.

(II) Direct rollover.—All accrued DROP benefits, plus interest, shall be paid from DROP directly to the custodian of an eligible retirement plan as defined in s. 402(c)(8)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code. However, in the case of an eligible rollover distribution to the surviving spouse of a deceased member, an eligible retirement plan is an individual retirement account or an individual retirement annuity as described in s. 402(c)(9) of the Internal Revenue Code.

(III) Partial lump sum.—A portion of the accrued DROP benefits shall be paid to DROP participant or surviving spouse, less withholding taxes remitted to the Internal Revenue Service, and the remaining DROP benefits must be transferred directly to the custodian of an eligible retirement plan as defined in s. 402(c)(8)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code. However, in the case of an eligible rollover distribution to the surviving spouse of a deceased member, an eligible retirement plan is an individual retirement account or an individual retirement annuity as described in s. 402(c)(9) of the Internal Revenue Code. The proportions must be specified by the DROP participant or surviving beneficiary.

c. The form of payment selected by the DROP participant or surviving beneficiary must comply with the minimum distribution requirements of the Internal Revenue Code.

d. A DROP participant who fails to terminate all employment relationships as provided in s. 121.021(39) shall be deemed as not retired, and the DROP election is null and void. Florida Retirement System membership shall be reestablished retroactively to the date of the commencement of DROP, and each employer with whom the member continues employment must pay to the Florida Retirement System Trust Fund the difference between the DROP contributions paid in paragraph (i) and the contributions required for the applicable Florida Retirement System class of membership during the period the member participated in DROP, plus 6.5 percent interest compounded annually.

6. The retirement benefits of any DROP participant who terminates all employment relationships as provided in s. 121.021(39) but is reemployed in violation of the reemployment provisions of subsection (9) are suspended during those months in which the retiree is in violation. Any retiree in violation of this subparagraph and any employer that employs or appoints such person without notifying the division to suspend retirement benefits are jointly and severally liable for any benefits paid during the reemployment limitation period. The employer must have a written statement from the retiree that he or she is not retired from a state-administered retirement system. Any retirement benefits received by a retiree while employed in violation of the reemployment limitations must be repaid to the Florida Retirement System Trust Fund, and his or her retirement benefits shall remain suspended until payment is made. Benefits suspended beyond the end of the reemployment limitation period apply toward repayment of benefits received in violation of the reemployment limitation.

7. The accrued benefits of any DROP participant, and any contributions accumulated under the program, are not subject to assignment, execution, attachment, or any legal process except for qualified domestic relations court orders, income deduction orders as provided in s. 61.1301, and federal income tax levies.

8. DROP participants are not eligible for disability retirement benefits as provided in subsection (4).

(d) Death benefits under DROP.—

1. Upon the death of a DROP participant, the named beneficiary is entitled to apply for and receive the accrued benefits in DROP as provided in sub-subparagraph (c)5.b.

2. The normal retirement benefit accrued to DROP during the month of a participant’s death is the final monthly benefit credited for such DROP participant.

3. Eligibility to participate in DROP terminates upon death of the participant. If the participant dies on or after the effective date of enrollment in DROP, but before the first monthly benefit is credited to DROP, Florida Retirement System benefits are paid in accordance with subparagraph (7)(c)1. or subparagraph 2.

4. A DROP participant’s survivors are not eligible to receive Florida Retirement System death benefits as provided in paragraph (7)(d).

(e) Cost-of-living adjustment.—On each July 1, the participant’s normal retirement benefit shall be increased as provided in s. 121.101.

(f) Retiree health insurance subsidy.—DROP participants are not eligible to apply for the retiree health insurance subsidy payments as provided in s. 112.363 until such participants have terminated employment and participation in DROP.

(g) Renewed membership.—DROP participants are not eligible for renewed membership in the Florida Retirement System under ss. 121.053 and 121.122 until all employment relationships are terminated as provided in s. 121.021(39).

(h) Employment limitation after DROP participation.—Upon termination as defined in s. 121.021, DROP participants are subject to the same reemployment limitations as other retirees. Reemployment restrictions applicable to retirees as provided in subsection (9) do not apply to DROP participants until their employment and participation in DROP are terminated.

(i) Contributions.—

1. All employers paying the salary of a DROP participant filling a regularly established position shall contribute 8.0 percent of such participant’s gross compensation for the period of July 1, 2002, through June 30, 2003, and the percentage of such compensation required by s. 121.71 thereafter, which shall constitute the entire employer DROP contribution with respect to such participant. Such contributions, payable to the Florida Retirement System Trust Fund in the same manner as required in s. 121.071, must be made as appropriate for each pay period and are in addition to contributions required for social security and the Retiree Health Insurance Subsidy Trust Fund. Such employer, social security, and health insurance subsidy contributions are not included in DROP.

2. The employer shall, in addition to subparagraph 1., also withhold one-half of the entire social security contribution required for the participant. Contributions for social security by each participant and each employer, in the amount required for social security coverage as provided by the federal Social Security Act, are in addition to contributions specified in subparagraph 1.

3. All employers paying the salary of a DROP participant filling a regularly established position shall contribute the percent of such participant’s gross compensation required in s. 121.071(4), which constitutes the employer’s health insurance subsidy contribution with respect to such participant. Such contributions must be deposited by the administrator in the Retiree Health Insurance Subsidy Trust Fund.

(j) Forfeiture of retirement benefits.—This section does not remove DROP participants from the scope of s. 8(d), Art. II of the State Constitution, s. 112.3173, and paragraph (5)(f). DROP participants who commit a specified felony offense while employed are subject to forfeiture of all retirement benefits, including DROP benefits, pursuant to those provisions of law.

(k) Administration of program.—The division shall adopt rules as necessary for the effective and efficient administration of this subsection. The division is not required to advise members of the federal tax consequences of an election related to the DROP but may advise members to seek independent advice.

(14) PAYMENT OF BENEFITS.—This subsection applies to the payment of benefits to a payee (retiree or beneficiary) under the Florida Retirement System:

(a) Federal income tax shall be withheld in accordance with federal law, unless the payee elects otherwise on Form W-4P. The division shall prepare and distribute to each recipient of monthly retirement benefits an appropriate income tax form that reflects the recipient’s income and federal income tax withheld for the calendar year just ended.

(b) Subject to approval by the division in accordance with rule 60S-4.015, Florida Administrative Code, a payee receiving retirement benefits under the system may also have the following payments deducted from his or her monthly benefit:

1. Premiums for life and health-related insurance policies from approved companies.

2. Life insurance premiums for the State Group Life Insurance Plan, if authorized in writing by the payee and by the department.

3. Repayment of overpayments from the Florida Retirement System Trust Fund, the State Employees’ Health Insurance Trust Fund, or the State Employees’ Life Insurance Trust Fund, upon notification of the payee.

4. Payments to an alternate payee for alimony or child support pursuant to an income deduction order under s. 61.1301, or division of marital assets pursuant to a qualified domestic relations order under s. 222.21.

5. Payments to the Internal Revenue Service for federal income tax levies, upon notification of the division by the Internal Revenue Service.

(c) A payee must notify the division of any change in his or her address. The division may suspend benefit payments to a payee if correspondence sent to the payee’s mailing address is returned due to an incorrect address. Benefit payments shall be resumed upon notification to the division of the payee’s new address.

(d) A payee whose retirement benefits are reduced by the application of maximum benefit limits under s. 415(b) of the Internal Revenue Code, as specified in s. 121.30(5), shall have the portion of his or her calculated benefit in the Florida Retirement System Pension Plan which exceeds such federal limitation paid through the Florida Retirement System Preservation of Benefits Plan, as provided in s. 121.1001.

(e) The Division of Retirement may issue retirement benefits payable for division of marital assets pursuant to a qualified domestic relations order directly to the alternate payee, any court order to the contrary notwithstanding, in order to meet Internal Revenue Code requirements.

(f) A benefit may not be reduced for the purpose of preserving the member’s eligibility for a federal program.

(g) The division shall adopt rules establishing procedures for determining that persons to whom benefits are being paid are still living. The division shall suspend the benefits being paid to any payee if it is unable to contact such payee and to confirm that he or she is still living.

(15) VOLUNTEER SERVICES.—Employers may establish postemployment volunteer programs to allow retirees to provide civic, charitable, and humanitarian services during the first 12 calendar months following retirement without causing the retiree to violate the requirement concerning termination of employment as defined in 26 C.F.R. s. 1.409A-1(h)(1)(ii), provided that the program meets all of the following criteria:

(a) Before the date of retirement, there was no agreement or understanding between the employer and the retiree that the retiree would provide any service for the employer.

(b) The employer or a third party may not provide any form of compensation, including any cash equivalents, to a volunteer for his or her volunteer service.

(c) Except as otherwise provided in law, a volunteer may not be provided any employee benefits, including health or life insurance benefits. However, a volunteer may be provided certain perquisites necessary for, and for the limited purpose of, completing tasks associated with the volunteer program, such as an assigned uniform or the provision of equipment.

(d) The number of volunteer hours per week, including training hours, that the volunteer may provide is no more than 20 percent of the number of hours that the volunteer was expected to work per week before his or her date of retirement.

(e) There is a clear distinction between the duties of a volunteer and the duties of an employee.

(f) The schedule of a volunteer, including the number of hours volunteered and the number and type of assignments for which he or she agrees to volunteer, is controlled by the volunteer.

(g) The employer and the retiree are both required to maintain adequate records to document adherence to the criteria listed in this subsection. The records must be made available to the department or state board upon request.

History.—s. 9, ch. 70-112; s. 1, ch. 71-22; s. 1, ch. 72-332; s. 1, ch. 72-334; s. 2, ch. 72-344; s. 3, ch. 72-345; s. 3, ch. 72-388; ss. 6, 7, ch. 74-302; s. 2, ch. 74-328; s. 2, ch. 74-376; s. 1, ch. 75-86; s. 1, ch. 77-286; s. 6, ch. 78-308; s. 3, ch. 79-375; s. 2, ch. 80-126; s. 1, ch. 80-128; ss. 1, 3, ch. 80-130; s. 3, ch. 80-242; s. 5, ch. 81-307; s. 1, ch. 83-58; s. 7, ch. 83-76; ss. 1, 2, ch. 84-11; ss. 10, 20, ch. 84-266; s. 1, ch. 85-137; s. 4, ch. 85-220; s. 1, ch. 85-246; s. 3, ch. 86-172; s. 1, ch. 87-149; s. 1, ch. 88-61; s. 2, ch. 88-238; s. 13, ch. 88-382; s. 2, ch. 89-220; s. 1, ch. 89-260; s. 15, ch. 89-367; s. 13, ch. 90-274; s. 5, ch. 90-301; s. 1, ch. 91-276; s. 7, ch. 92-122; s. 5, ch. 93-149; s. 8, ch. 93-193; s. 4, ch. 93-285; s. 773, ch. 95-147; s. 2, ch. 95-338; s. 7, ch. 96-368; s. 2, ch. 97-154; s. 8, ch. 97-180; s. 1, ch. 98-18; s. 9, ch. 98-138; s. 9, ch. 98-292; s. 7, ch. 98-413; s. 54, ch. 99-2; s. 5, ch. 99-7; s. 6, ch. 99-9; s. 37, ch. 99-255; s. 1, ch. 99-389; s. 11, ch. 99-392; s. 1, ch. 2000-167; ss. 15, 17, ch. 2000-169; s. 7, ch. 2000-347; s. 2, ch. 2001-47; s. 19, ch. 2001-60; s. 2, ch. 2001-235; s. 5, ch. 2002-177; ss. 14, 15, ch. 2002-273; s. 899, ch. 2002-387; s. 2, ch. 2003-260; s. 8, ch. 2003-391; s. 15, ch. 2004-260; s. 25, ch. 2004-295; s. 3, ch. 2005-108; s. 1, ch. 2005-134; s. 2, ch. 2005-253; s. 29, ch. 2006-178; s. 20, ch. 2008-4; s. 4, ch. 2008-108; s. 9, ch. 2009-209; s. 15, ch. 2010-5; s. 15, ch. 2011-68; s. 6, ch. 2012-222; s. 17, ch. 2013-15; s. 1, ch. 2016-213; s. 9, ch. 2017-88; s. 7, ch. 2018-3; s. 10, ch. 2018-110; s. 1, ch. 2018-150; s. 1, ch. 2020-19; s. 1, ch. 2022-159; s. 1, ch. 2023-111; ss. 7, 8, ch. 2023-193; s. 2, ch. 2023-316; s. 8, ch. 2024-2; s. 1, ch. 2024-92.

¹Note.—Section 9, ch. 2003-260, provides in pertinent part that “[i]t is the intent of the Legislature that the costs attributable to the modifications to the retirement laws by this act regarding the reemployment of instructional personnel shall be funded by an increase in payroll contribution rates beginning in fiscal year 2004-2005.”

²Note.—

A. Section 11, ch. 2001-235, as amended by s. 8, ch. 2002-177, provides that “[i]t is the intent of the Legislature that the costs attributable to the additional cost-of-living increase for special risk retirees and Deferred Retirement Option Program participants as provided under section 2 shall be funded by recognition of excess actuarial assets, amortized over 30 years with the payments assumed to remain relatively stable when expressed as a percentage of payroll. For fiscal year 2001-2002, the payment shall be $9.3 million. For fiscal year 2002-2003, the payment shall be $15.1 million, and, thereafter, payments shall increase by 5 percent per year. If insufficient funds are available to fund this additional cost through recognition of excess actuarial assets in fiscal year 2002-2003 and any year thereafter, and there remains an unfunded actuarial liability attributable to the one-time cost-of-living increase provided under section 2, the payroll contribution rate for the Special Risk Class of the Florida Retirement System shall be increased by .93 percent effective July 1 of that year, unless the Legislature provides an alternative funding mechanism before that date.” Section 2, ch. 2001-235, amended s. 121.091(13)(b), relating to the Deferred Retirement Option Program, to add a provision relating to elected officers. The intended reference may be to s. 10, ch. 2001-235, which provides a one-time special cost-of-living increase for members of the Special Risk Class.

B. Section 9, ch. 2003-260, provides in pertinent part that “[i]t is the intent of the Legislature that the costs attributable to the modifications to the retirement laws by this act regarding the reemployment of instructional personnel shall be funded by an increase in payroll contribution rates beginning in fiscal year 2004-2005.”

Cases Citing F.S. 121.091

Fla. Stat. § 121.091 (2026) Copy Cite Official Site Syfertize CourtListener Amendments
69 resultsSort: Relevance · Newest · Treatment
Copy
·In Re the Florida Bar-Code of Jud. Conduct, 281 So. 2d 21 (Fla. 1973).
Cited 20 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1973 Fla. LEXIS 4972
...V, § 15, F.S.A. We therefore hold that Fla. Stat. §§ 123.09 and 123.20, F.S.A., are unconstitutional. Other retirees under Chapter 121 (Florida Retirement System) are allowed to receive retirement benefits while employed at other occupations. See Fla. Stat., § 121.091, F.S.A....
0 red0 yellow14 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (2017)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityIn Re: Amendments to the Code of Judicial Conduct - Canon 7 (2015)
phrase: "rule_authority"
AdoptedIn Re Code of Judicial Conduct (1994)
phrase: "adopted in"
Open case for full Syfertize analysis →
Copy
·Austin v. Austin, 350 So. 2d 102 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977).
Cited 21 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal
...Illinois Public Aid Commission, 2 Ill.2d 374, 118 N.E.2d 14 (1954); Brown v. Richardson, 395 F. Supp. 185 (D.C.W. Pa. 1975). By cross-assignment of error, DOR contends that the trial court erred in ruling that Carolina and her two children would share equally under decedent's designation of the three as beneficiaries. § 121.091(8), Florida Statutes (1975), provides in part: "Each member may ......
...m payment is involved, it would create a difficult if not impossible problem where a monthly annuity is to be paid. The options provided in the statute specifically provide for annuities to be paid based on the joint life expectancies of two people [§ 121.091(6)] but does not provide for paying annuities based on more than two lives....
0 red1 yellow11 green10 procedural
Distinguished(citing case) (1986)
phrase: "distinguishing"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2003)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2000)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Open case for full Syfertize analysis →
Copy
·Smith v. Brantley, 400 So. 2d 443 (Fla. 1981).
Cited 12 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida
...hed his office prior to the commencement of impeachment proceedings. The determination of the trial court with respect to the validity of Smith's impeachment conviction, however is affirmed. I As a preliminary matter, we note Smith's contention that section 121.091(5)(g), Florida Statutes (1977) (forfeiture of retirement benefits upon impeachment), is unconstitutional....
...unfavorable, and (3) that it was uncertain whether the final result of impeachment proceedings would be unfavorable to Smith. Smith does not challenge the trial court's dismissal order. Since the trial court did not pass on the constitutionality of section 121.091(5)(g) and dismissed all parties before him relevant to that issue, this issue is not properly before us for review....
1 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
Overruled(citing case) (1984)
phrase: "overruling"
Cited as authorityGreacen (2024)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityBuending (2024)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Open case for full Syfertize analysis →
Copy
·Florida Sheriffs Ass'n v. Dept. of Admin., 408 So. 2d 1033 (Fla. 1981).
Cited 9 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida
...Division Atty., Tallahassee, for Division of Retirement. *1034 OVERTON, Justice. This is an appeal by special risk law enforcement members of the Florida Retirement System created by chapter 121, Florida Statutes (1971), asserting the unconstitutionality of sections 121.091(1)(a) and .091(11), Florida Statutes (1979)....
...We set them forth chronologically: (1) On December 1, 1970, the legislature consolidated all existing retirement systems into a mandatory, contributory plan by the enactment of chapter 70-112, Laws of Florida (codified as chapter 121, Florida Statutes (1971)). Appellants are members of this system. (2) In accordance with section 121.091(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1973), appellants, as law enforcement officers, received a "special risk credit" as an extra benefit....
...tered into between the member and the state, and such rights shall be legally enforceable as valid contract rights and shall not be abridged in any way. (4) Effective October 1, 1974, the legislature enacted chapter 74-376, Laws of Florida, amending section 121.091(1)(a), to increase the special risk credit from two to three percent....
...l burden of making the plan actuarially sound. § 121.071, Fla. Stat. (1975). Employees, therefore, no longer were required to contribute. (6) Effective October 1, 1978, the legislature enacted chapter 78-308, section 6, Laws of Florida (codified as section 121.091(1)(a), .091(11), Florida Statutes (1979)), reducing prospectively the special risk credit from three to two percent....
...stration's motion for summary judgment, saying: "The court fails to find any vested contractual right in [appellants] which would have been impaired by the act of the state." We find this an inherent ruling on the constitutional validity of sections 121.091(1)(a), .091(11), Florida Statutes (1979), which vests jurisdiction in this Court pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(1), Florida Constitution (1972)....
0 red0 yellow9 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (2025)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2022)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityTaylor (2013)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Open case for full Syfertize analysis →
Copy
·Swanson v. Swanson, 869 So. 2d 735 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004).
Cited 9 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2004 WL 736050
...cost-of-living adjustment on the first day of each July, and it accrued tax deferred interest "at an effective annual rate of 6.5 percent compounded monthly, on the prior month's accumulated ending balance, up to the month of termination or death." § 121.091(13)(c), Fla....
0 red0 yellow7 green0 procedural
Cited as authoritySASNETT (2025)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2022)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityBAGGS (2016)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Open case for full Syfertize analysis →
Copy
·Busbee v. State, 685 So. 2d 914 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).
Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1996 WL 720475
...The Division ruled that appellant had forfeited his retirement benefits by virtue of his guilty plea to accepting a bribe in connection with his employment, under the authority of Article II, section 8, Florida Constitution, and sections 112.3173(3) and 121.091(5), Florida Statutes....
...t or theft from his employer, or bribery in connection with the employment, committed prior to retirement ... shall forfeit all rights and benefits under this chapter except the return of his accumulated contributions as of the date of termination." § 121.091(5)(f), Fla....
...Petersburg, 316 So.2d 554, 556 (Fla.1975) (affirming forfeiture of pension benefits because the forfeiture provisions were part of the law at the time Steigerwalt entered into his employment contract with the City and became a part of his contract). Because section 121.091(5)(f) was a part of the contract before Mr....
0 red0 yellow8 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (2024)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2018)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Followed(citing case) (2018)
phrase: "followed by"
Open case for full Syfertize analysis →
Copy
·Shields v. Smith, 404 So. 2d 1106 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).
Cited 8 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal
...SMITH, Jr., Chief Judge. Shields, the former executive director of the Department of Natural Resources, appeals a circuit court judgment that his conviction of federal crimes committed while he held State office requires forfeiture of his State retirement benefits. Section 121.091(5)(f), Florida Statutes (1979)....
...ral Resources, so that the defendant SHIELDS would suspend his independent and unbiased judgment on the merits when considering the recommendation of the purchase of certain lands ... pursuant to the State's Environmentally Endangered Lands program. Section 121.091(5)(f), Florida Statutes, forfeits the benefits otherwise payable to a member of the State retirement system who is "found guilty by verdict of a jury, or by the court trying the case without a jury," of specified crimes committed befo...
...blic servant represents as having been, either within the official discretion of the public servant, in violation of a public duty, or in performance of a public duty... . Forfeiture Based on Federal Conviction The recital of disqualifying crimes in Section 121.091(5)(f) contains no express reference to federal court convictions or to convictions in the courts of other states....
...imes adjudicated by the State courts of Florida. We do not agree. A federally adjudicated crime is cause for forfeiture if it otherwise satisfies the specifications of the statute. The disqualifying crimes pertinent to this case are, in the terms of Section 121.091(5)(f), "bribery in connection with the employment, or other felony specified in chapter 838." Shields was not convicted of any crime entitled "bribery," so we must decide whether he was convicted of a felony specified in chapter 838....
...Because the trial court correctly concluded that appellant had committed a felony violating Chapter 838 of the Florida statutes, the judgment declaring that Shields had forfeited his termination benefits is AFFIRMED. JOANOS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] Section 121.091(5)(f) provides: Any member who has been found guilty by a verdict of a jury, or by the court trying the case without a jury, of committing, aiding, or abetting any embezzlement or theft from his employer, bribery in connection with th...
0 red0 yellow5 green2 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (2018)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityHames (2008)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityCarpenter (2001)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Open case for full Syfertize analysis →
Copy
·Williams v. Christian, 335 So. 2d 358 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976).
Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal
...RAWLS, Acting Chief Judge. The central issue of this case is whether or not an adjudication of guilt under Section 838.06, Florida Statutes (1973), [1] constitutes a finding of guilt of the offense of "bribery in connection with the employment" as contemplated by Section 121.091(5)(f), Florida Statutes (1973)....
...urt held, inter alia: "... unauthorized compensation for performance or nonperformance of duty) and adjudication of guilt therefor, does not constitute a finding of guilt as to `... committing, aiding, or abetting ... bribery ...' as contemplated by Section 121.091(5)(f), Florida Statutes (1973), and, accordingly, does not serve to invoke the provision of the statute last cited requiring a forfeiture of all retirement rights and benefits granted plaintiff [Christian] under Chapter 121, Florida Statutes ....
...g receiving unlawful compensation, and that the remaining six counts, including the count involving bribery, would not be refiled. During the plea negotiations, both parties agreed and proceeded on the premise that the only plausible construction of Section 121.091(5)(f), Florida Statutes, would provide that the plea of nolo contendere to acceptance of unlawful compensation would not jeopardize Christian's retirement benefits....
...may be called on to perform. [6] Appellant relies primarily upon isolated extracts from our opinion in Smith v. State [7] to sustain his contention that Section 838.06, F.S. (1973), constitutes bribery as contemplated by the legislature in enacting Section 121.091(5)(f), F.S....
...know existing statutes [8] and case law construing them, provided one bribery statute and one separate and distinct statute proscribing acceptance of unlawful compensation. [9] *361 The legislature, in providing for forfeiture of pension benefits in Section 121.091(5)(f) in 1973, clearly intended that "bribery" would be applied in those cases where a "corrupt motive" and an "intent to influence an official act" were alleged and proved....
...remuneration for services performed in apprehending any criminal." Amended in 1974 (Ch. 74-383, Laws of Florida) specifically modifying the proscribed acts with the word "corruptly". Now Section 838.016, Florida Statutes (1975). [2] Florida Statute 121.091(5)(f) (1973) provides: "Any member who is found guilty in a court of competent jurisdiction of committing, aiding, or abetting any embezzlement or theft from his employer or bribery in connection the employment, committed prior to retirement,...
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (2024)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityChuck (2004)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityMulligan (2004)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Open case for full Syfertize analysis →
Copy
Florida Ass'n of Counties, Inc. v. DEPT. OF ADMIN., DIV. OF Ret., 580 So. 2d 641 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).
Cited 12 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1991 WL 43187
...ease in benefits on a sound actuarial basis. Art. X, § 14, Fla. Const. [2] Ch. 121, Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1988). [3] Ch. 88-238, § 1, Laws of Fla. (codified at § 121.071(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1988)). [4] Ch. 88-238, § 2, Laws of Fla. (codified at § 121.091(1)(a), Fla....
Copy
·Ganzel v. Ganzel, 770 So. 2d 304 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).
Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2000 WL 1671747
...The DROP is a voluntary retirement program, in which a Florida state employee can elect to work and earn a salary for up to five years past normal retirement age while the retirement benefits that would have been paid had the employee retired accrue in a fund and earn interest. See § 121.091(13), Fla....
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (2022)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityPullo (2006)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Open case for full Syfertize analysis →
Copy
·Russell v. Russell, 922 So. 2d 1097 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006).
Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2006 WL 708282
...cost-of-living adjustment on the first day of each July, and it accrued tax deferred interest "at an effective annual rate of 6.5 percent compounded monthly, on the prior month's accumulated ending balance, up to the month of termination or death." § 121.091(13)(c), Fla....
...We reverse the QDRO entered below and remand for entry of an order awarding the former Wife her share in the former husband's DROP benefits, along with any interest and cost of living adjustments which accrue thereon. Reversed and remanded. POLEN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] See § 121.091, Fla....
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (2022)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityKunsman (2013)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Open case for full Syfertize analysis →
Copy
·Amico v. Div. of Ret., Etc., 352 So. 2d 556 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977).
Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal
...Amico petitions for review of a Retirement Commission order terminating his disability retirement benefits. Amico was retired from his employment as a Metropolitan Dade County police officer in August 1972 on a determination that he was then "totally and permanently disabled." Section 121.091(4), Florida Statutes (1975)....
...We must determine who the retiree or the Division has the burden of proving the matter in issue in such a hearing before the Commission and whether substantial competent evidence supports the Commission's decision terminating Amico's benefits. Section 121.091(4) authorizes payment of monthly disability retirement benefits to members of the Florida Retirement System who are "totally and permanently disabled," i.e., "prevented, by reason of a medically determinable physical or mental impairment, from rendering useful and efficient service as an officer or employee." Section 121.091(4)(d), Florida Statutes (1975)....
...Amico's counsel, who did participate in the hearing, offered no evidence to overcome the Division's prima facie case. We find it unnecessary in this case to resolve the question of whether a retiree may continue to be totally and permanently disabled for purposes of Section 121.091(4) and yet be capable of earning, and in fact be earning, a partial livelihood in unique private employment for which he is not entirely disabled....
...It was not necessary that the Division adduce evidence Amico could have returned to line duty as a patrolman. See Tanzler et al. v. Wansley, 350 So.2d 113 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). This is not a proper case for our consideration of whether or in what circumstances disability retirement benefits may be refused under Section 121.091(4)(b) or terminated under Section 121.091(4)(d) on the ground that the employee, though disabled to perform his present or former duties and any other duties of a kind required by his particular employer, is nevertheless able to perform services of a kind required by another agency within the Florida Retirement System. It should be obvious that the proper time for the Division to seek such a judicial construction of Section 121.091(4) is when disability retirement is sought, not when the Division seeks to terminate benefits previously granted on the more liberal ground that the employee is disabled to perform his own particular duties....
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityAssily (2008)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Open case for full Syfertize analysis →
Copy
·Coral Imaging Servs. v. Geico Indem. Ins., 955 So. 2d 11 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006).
Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 16469, 2006 WL 2819614
...711(3); § 28.241(3),(4); § 29.004(10)(d); § 39.012; § 39.013(2); § 44.06(2); § 63.0423(5) and (6); § 90.604. Cf. e.g., Fla. Stat. § 627.4143(3)(b) (provision in same chapter utilizing permissive language "may or may not"); 11.70(5)(d)(same); § 121.091(7)(b)(same); § 154.09(4)(same); § 180.26(same); § 260.012(3)(same); § 475.611(1)(a)3 (same)....
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityGeico (2014)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2014)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Open case for full Syfertize analysis →
Copy
·Havener v. Div. of Ret., 461 So. 2d 231 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).
Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 61, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16288
...ing issue at final hearing was whether an injury or illness arising out of or in the actual performance of duty required by Havener's employment was the substantial producing cause or an aggravating cause of Havener's total and permanent disability. § 121.091(4)(a) and § 121.021(13), Florida Statutes (1983)....
...g. The Commission did not abuse its discretion by extending the time available to Havener in which to file his appeal. We reverse and remand with directions to award in-line-of-duty benefits retroactively to the date of the original award of regular section 121.091(4) benefits. SMITH and BARFIELD, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] The final order of the State Retirement Commission awarded regular disability retirement benefits pursuant to section 121.091(4), Florida Statutes (1983), but denied his claim for in-line-of-duty disability retirement benefits pursuant to section 121.021(13), Florida Statutes (1983)....
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityPender (1999)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityAndersen (1989)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Open case for full Syfertize analysis →
Copy
·State v. Gerren, 604 So. 2d 515 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).
Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1992 WL 153977
...hat the defendant would suspend his independent judgment when considering the recommendation of the purchase of certain lands. The issue before the court was whether those convictions required forfeiture of the defendant's state retirement benefits. Section 121.091(5)(f), Florida Statutes, forfeited benefits otherwise payable to a member of the state retirement system who is found guilty of specified crimes committed before retirement, including bribery in connection with the employment, or other felonies specified in chapter 838....
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityCastillo (2004)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (1994)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Open case for full Syfertize analysis →
Copy
·Pridgeon v. State Div. Of Ret., 662 So. 2d 1028 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995).
Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1995 WL 686041
...In its final order the Commission found that Pridgeon was injured in the line of duty and that competent medical and vocational evidence established that he was permanently and totally disabled. The Commission concluded that Pridgeon was entitled to receive regular disability benefits under section 121.091(4), but that the evidence was insufficient to establish Pridgeon's entitlement to in-line-of-duty disability retirement benefits under section 121.021(13)....
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityPender (1999)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Open case for full Syfertize analysis →
Copy
·Kennedy v. Wiggins, 368 So. 2d 454 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).
Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal
...tained an injury to her back at work in May, 1974. After several hospitalizations, she attempted to return to work in 1975 but, unable to continue, quit within months. She subsequently applied for in-line-of duty disability retirement benefits under Section 121.091(4). The Director denied her claim, finding her ineligible for any disability retirement benefits because she had not provided certification of total and permanent disability from two licensed state physicians as required in Section 121.091(4)(c)....
...ot employable in the Brevard County area. On this record, the commission found that Wiggins was not qualified for in-line-of duty disability retirement but had sufficiently proven total and permanent disability so as to entitle her to benefits under Section 121.091(4)(b). The Director appealed, again citing Section 121.091(4)(c) and claiming that the commission had no authority to award disability retirement benefits in the absence of disability certification by two licensed state physicians....
...trator in matters relating to disability retirement. In Section 121.23(2)(a), the commission was given broad authority in its delegated area, including the power to "order any action that it deems appropriate." Section 121.23(2)(a) was enacted after Section 121.091(4)(b), which had made the decisions of the administrator on these questions "final and binding." The commission argues persuasively that its statutory authority would be meaningless if it were limited to simply rubberstamping the admi...
...121.23(4). *456 Considering these standards, we conclude that the commission has not exceeded its statutory authority in granting regular disability benefits to Wiggins, and that its decision is based on substantial evidence. The apparent purpose of Section 121.091(4)(c) is to provide the administrator with guidelines in its decisions regarding benefits, and to furnish a ready means of obtaining benefits to claimants with obvious, certifiable "permanent and total disability." The harder cases, l...
...e of discretion. We have considered Wiggins' cross-appeal and find it to be without merit in view of the evidence linking her disability with the post-employment vascular disorder. AFFIRMED. McCORD, C.J., and MELVIN and BOOTH, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] Section 121.091(4)(b) and (c) provide: (b) Total and permanent disability....
0 red1 yellow0 green0 procedural
LimitedBrantley (1985)
phrase: "limited by"
Open case for full Syfertize analysis →
Copy
·Hoffman v. Dept. of Mgmt. Servs., 964 So. 2d 163 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007).
Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2007 WL 1772145
...The Division denied Appellant's petition for waiver because she did not allege that application of rule 60S-4.0035(3)(c) affected her differently than any other similarly situated person. In addition, Appellant did not cite any authority for the Division to waive section 121.091, Florida Statutes (2004), which provides, "Benefits may not be paid ....
...n's part when she chose not to avail herself of these materials. The Department rejected the ALJ's factual finding that a reasonable person could not determine what the Division meant in its correspondence to Appellant. The Department concluded that section 121.091, Florida Statutes, was not ambiguous and that the record supported the Division's conclusion that Appellant intended to defer her monthly benefit....
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (2015)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityWoodburn (2011)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Open case for full Syfertize analysis →
Copy
·Long v. Florida, 805 F.2d 1542 (11th Cir. 1986).
Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 42 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1058, 7 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2648, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 34989, 42 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 36, 709
payable to the remaining life. Fla.Stat.Ann. § 121.-091(6) (1982 & Supp.1986). Until August 1, 1983 the
0 red0 yellow8 green3 procedural
Cited as authorityMotley (2020)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2011)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2001)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Open case for full Syfertize analysis →
Copy
Crystal v. State, Dep't of Mgmt. Servs., Div. of Ret., 21 So. 3d 134 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009).
Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16541, 2009 WL 3645182
...nefit than regular class positions. § 121.021(29)(b), Fla. Stat. (2006). However, a member who becomes totally and permanently disabled in the line of duty can receive disability benefits regardless of the years of service or his or her risk class. § 121.091(4)(a)1.a., Fla....
...on of correctional officer required that the employment position be a special-risk position. Appellant is entitled to the presumption of in-line-of-duty disability under section 112.18(1) and, therefore, to disability retirement benefits pursuant to section 121.091(4)(a)1.a....
Copy
·Turlington v. Dep't of Admin., Div. of Ret., 462 So. 2d 65 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984).
Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 76, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16431
...Lewis, the Comptroller of the State of Florida, seeking both declaratory relief and an injunction against the payment of any funds from the State Retirement Fund by the appellees pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 83-76, Section 7, Laws of Florida (Section 121.091(9)(b)7, Florida Statutes (1983)), on the ground that the statute is unconstitutional, since it violates Article X, Section 14 of the Florida Constitution....
...reduction in retirement benefits by electing to retire earlier than his normal retirement date thereby receiving a reduced benefit while continuing to hold office. AFFIRMED. MILLS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur. . Chapter 83-76, Section 7, Laws of Florida (121.091(9)(b)7) Florida Statutes (1983), has since been repealed and modified by Chapter 84-11, Section 1, Laws of Florida, which now provides in part: Section 121.091(9)(b)7 Any person who is holding an elective public office which is covered by the Florida Retirement System and who is concurrently employed in nonelected covered employment may elect to retire while continuing employment in the elec...
...subsection; *67 however, no additional creditable service shall be earned for such continued employment. ****** Additionally Section 2 of the act provides: Any benefits actually paid pursuant to sub-paragraph 7. of paragraph (b) of subsection (9) of s. 121.091, Florida Statutes, as created by chapter 83-76, Laws of Florida, are hereby ratified and confirmed, however no future benefit payments shall be made pursuant to the provisions of said subparagraph, except as the same is amended by this act....
...No person who seeks to exercise the provisions of said subparagraph, as the same existed prior to the effective date of this act, shall be deemed to be retired under said provisions, unless such person is eligible to retire under the provisions of s. 121.091(9)(b)7., Florida Statutes, as amended by this act....
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (1991)
phrase: "rule_authority"
AffirmedLewis (1986)
phrase: "affirmed by"
Open case for full Syfertize analysis →
Copy
·Rarback v. Dep't of Admin., Div. of Ret., 540 So. 2d 198 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989).
Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 14 Fla. L. Weekly 736, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1414, 1989 WL 24037
...of Administration, Division of Retirement has, by the order on appeal, treated as a valid and enforceable designation of beneficiary upon Mr. Rarback’s death — became null and void when Paul Rarback died before receiving any retirement benefits. § 121.091(6)(e), Fla.Stat....
...d by the 1985 designation, so that he will be treated as having died without designating a beneficiary; as shown below, this means that Mr. Rarback’s wife will, in fact, become the beneficiary of his retirement benefits as he clearly intended. See § 121.091(8), Fla.Stat....
....1978). Third, Paul Rarback’s state employment terminated by reason of his death after ten years of creditable service, but prior to his actual retirement, and, accordingly, it rnust be assumed that he formally retired as of the date of his death. § 121.091(7)(b), Fla....
...Rarback failed to validly designate any beneficiary of his retirement account in the event of his death, the Division of Retirement was required to direct the payment of Mr. Rarback’s retirement benefits to his spouse, the petitioner Mae Rarback. § 121.091(8), Fla.Stat....
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityEaves (1997)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Open case for full Syfertize analysis →
Copy
·Hartley v. Dep't of Mgmt. Servs., Div. of Ret., 711 So. 2d 1380 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998).
Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 7432, 1998 WL 320125
efficient service as an officer or employee.” § 121.091(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (1995). Proof of disability
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityPender (1999)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Open case for full Syfertize analysis →
Copy
·Gaetaniello v. Gaetaniello (In re Gaetaniello), 496 B.R. 238 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2013).
Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida
...lations Orders, United States DepaRtment of Labor, http://www.dol.gov/ebsa/faqs/faq_qdro.html (last visited July 17, 2013) (emphasis added). Plaintiff conceded at trial, QDROs are not used exclusively for domestic support obligations. See Fla. Stat. § 121.091 (14)(b) & (e) (2012)....
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityCharles Dallas Hunsucker (2021)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Open case for full Syfertize analysis →
Copy
·Glisson v. State, Dep't of Mgmt. Servs., Div. of Ret., 621 So. 2d 543 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993).
Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 7366, 1993 WL 255597
the two “physicians’ reports” required by section 121.-091(4)(c), Florida Statutes (1989), as a condition
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityPender (1999)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Open case for full Syfertize analysis →
Copy
·Davis v. Dep't of Admin., Div. of Ret., 585 So. 2d 421 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991).
Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 8579, 1991 WL 167378
...Davis wished to spend more time with his family in Vero Beach and that there was a backlog of work at the Union County School Board. On November 1, 1984, Dr. Davis was again hired as an employee, finance director, of the Union County School Board. The nature of the employment relationship is critical because of former section 121.091(9)(b), Florida Statutes (1983), which dealt with entitlement to benefits of re *422 tirees who are reemployed by a member of the Florida Retirement System....
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (1995)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Open case for full Syfertize analysis →
Copy
·Young v. Dep't of Admin., Div. of Ret., 524 So. 2d 1071 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988).
Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 13 Fla. L. Weekly 978, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1621, 1988 WL 36084
...was dependent on his mother for support. Finding error in the administrative order, we reverse. At the time of her death on May 24, 1986, Nancy A. Young had been a member of the Florida Retirement System for more than 25 years. In 1974, pursuant to section 121.091(8), Florida Statutes, she executed a beneficiary designation, naming her husband, Fred 0....
...imers of any benefits to which they might be entitled from the retirement account of Nancy Young. On July 24, 1986, appellant requested the Division of Retirement to advise him of the amount of monthly benefits he was entitled to receive pursuant to section 121.091(7) from Nancy Young’s retirement account....
...Appellant alleged that he was financially dependent on Nancy Young and had been designated a contingent beneficiary by her. He alleged that it was an oversight that Nancy Young did not change the beneficiary designations after her divorce, and claimed that he was entitled as a dependent to the monthly benefits described in section 121.091(7), Florida *1073 Statutes....
...if the diselaimants had immediately predeceased Nancy Young. Appellant further alleged that as sole beneficiary, since he was financially dependent on Nancy Young, he would qualify as a joint annuitant and be entitled to monthly benefits pursuant to section 121.091(7), Florida Statutes (1985)....
...ncy Young, contrary to the explicit language of the statute. Appellant must be treated in law as the sole surviving contingent beneficiary designated by Nancy Young, and as such he is entitled as her dependent to receive monthly benefits pursuant to section 121.091(7)....
...ext designated beneficiary, *1077 notwithstanding the ability of the recipient beneficiary to qualify as a joint annuitant.” The paragraph further provides that, “if there is no other designated beneficiary, benefits shall be paid as provided in section 121.091(8), F.S., notwithstanding the ability of the recipient to qualify as a joint annuitant.” [Emphasis added.] The language relied on by the Division immediately follows these statements....
0 red0 yellow1 green1 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (1991)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Review denied(citing case) (1991)
phrase: "review denied"
Open case for full Syfertize analysis →
Copy
Steinhardt v. State, Dep't of Admin., Div. of Ret., 318 So. 2d 562 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975).
Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 15242
....” (Emphasis added) We shall discuss the contentions of the Division in turn. First, the Division suggests that the legislature has recognized two distinct classes of retirement system members, i. e., “members” and “terminated members,” and that F.S. § 121.091 (5) (e) (1974) refers to terminated members as those who are “no longer employed by an employer.” The Division argues that there is no provision of the law which allows a “terminated member” to transfer to FRS, and that since petit...
Copy
State, Dep't of Admin., Div. of Ret. v. Miranda, 513 So. 2d 170 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).
Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2135, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12155
apply for disability retirement benefits under Section 121.091(4), Florida Statutes. The relevant provisions
Copy
Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1977).
Published | Florida Attorney General Reports
Service after 10 years of creditable service. Section 121.091(5). If an employee terminates his employment
Copy
State, Dep't of Admin., Div. of Ret. v. Hissom, 476 So. 2d 244 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).
Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2156, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15941
...nd efficient service” in a “regularly established position” within the Florida Retirement System, and not merely that a retiree has the ability to engage in some form of employment outside the system. We agree with this inter *245 pretation of Section 121.091(4)(e) by the Commission in the context of a termination proceeding, finding it consistent with this court’s decisions in Oller v....
Copy
·Viele v. Div. of Ret., 642 So. 2d 1124 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994).
Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 9037, 1994 WL 502592
if his disability arose in the fine of duty. § 121.-091(4)(a), Fla.Stat. (1991). Accordingly, Viele was
0 red0 yellow0 green1 procedural
Review deniedPender (1999)
phrase: "review denied"
Open case for full Syfertize analysis →
Copy
Edwards v. State, Dep't of Admin., Div. of Ret., 445 So. 2d 1030 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983).
Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22558
as his designated beneficiary pursuant to Section 121.-091(8), Florida Statutes (1981). Two other adult
Copy
Brock v. Dep't of Mgmt. Servs., 98 So. 3d 771 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012).
Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 18097, 2012 WL 4897046
...The former employee nevertheless argues that Article II, Section 8(d) was intended to exempt from forfeiture those public employees who entered no contest pleas for which adjudication of guilt was withheld. The former employee reasons that the forfeiture statute in effect at the time of Section 8(d)’s passage, section 121.091(5)(f), Florida Statutes (1975), expressly imposed forfeiture upon public officers and employees who entered no contest pleas: Any [Florida retirement system] member who has been found guilty by a verdict of a jury, or by the court try...
...r felony specified in chapter 838 [relating to misuse of public office], shall forfeit all rights and benefits under [the Florida retirement system], except the return of his [or her] accumulated contributions as of his [or her] date of termination. § 121.091(5)(f), Fla. Stat. (1975) (emphasis added). We disagree with the former employee’s argument for two reasons. First, section 121.091(5)(f) remains in effect today, and we must give effect to that statute in combination with section 112.3173....
...pret Article II, Section 8(d) of the Florida Constitution pursuant to Williams . Given Section 8’s guarantee of the people’s “right to secure and sustain [the trust of public office] against abuse,” and given the legislature’s pre-existing section 121.091(5)(f) requiring forfeiture of benefits for a no contest plea, the legislature was within its authority when it defined “convicted” in section 112.3173 to include a no contest plea....
Copy
Castiglia v. Div. of Ret., State Dep't of Admin., 442 So. 2d 1007 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).
Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24361
NIMMONS, Judge. Castiglia appeals the Retirement Commission’s denial of “in line of duty” disability benefits under Sections 121.021(13) and 121.091(4)(d)l.a., Florida Statutes....
...He was entitled to a Retirement Commission hearing on the retirement date determination as well as the in line of duty decision. Nothing in chapters 120 and 121 suggests otherwise. With respect to Castiglia’s attack upon the constitutionality of Section 121.091(4), which concerns the setting of retirement dates, we do not reach that question since, as we have held, the Commission erroneously refused to hear Castiglia’s claim of error in the Division’s setting of his retirement date....
Copy
Eaves v. Div. of Ret., 704 So. 2d 140 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997).
Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 12969, 1997 WL 716105
...se names Mr. Eaves wrote down on the Division’s form can receive any Florida Retirement System benefit whatsoever on account of his death. This conclusion is clearly correct. “[SJubse-quent to the completion of 10 years of creditable service,” § 121.091(7)(b), Fla. Stat. (1993), the statute contemplates death benefits of two kinds: *142 § 121.091(7)(b), Fla....
...Because the administrative law judge found that neither the decedent’s sisters nor his mother was (in the least) financially dependent on Mr. Eaves at the time of his death, none of the persons named on the form qualifies ás a “joint annuitant” eligible to receive benefits under section 121.091(7)(b)l., Florida Statutes (1993). Because there are no “member’s personal contributions” to be returned, none of the three is entitled to receive benefits under section 121.091(7)(b)2., Florida Statutes (1993)....
...Designations may prove ineffective because a retirement system member fails to sign or file the requisite forms, because persons named as beneficiaries die before the member dies, or, as here, because persons named as beneficiaries do not qualify for benefits under section 121.091(7)(b), Florida Statutes (1993)....
...§§ 1001 et seq.; as amended, so that ERISA’s restrictions on preretirement survivor annuity benefits under defined benefit plans set out in 29 U.S.C. § 1055 (a)(2)(1994)(requiring payment to surviving spouse) do not apply here. 29 U.S.C. §§ 1002 (32), 1003(b)(l)(1994). Instead, section 121.091(8), Florida Statutes (1993), authorizes retirement system members to designate beneficiaries “who shall receive ......
...event of his death pursuant to the provisions in this chapter. If no beneficiary is named in the manner provided above, or if no beneficiary designated by the member survives him, the beneficiary shall be the spouse of the deceased, if living. *143 § 121.091, Fla....
...In the present case, too, the purported designation was nugatory. No genuine beneficiary was “named in the manner provided,” because none of the adult relatives Mr. Eaves listed on the form he filed “qualified ... to receive ... benefits.” Fla. Admin. Code R. 60S-6.001(9). Under section 121.091(7)(b), Florida Statutes (1993), the attempt to designate them as beneficiaries proved, if not a nullity, entirely ineffective....
...designation of beneficiarles],” Rarback v. Department of Admin., Div. of Retirement, 540 So.2d 198, 199 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), the appellant as surviving spouse is entitled to receive death benefits here as in Rarback , by virtue of language that has survived unchanged in pertinent part in section 121.091(8), Florida Statutes (1993), and since....
Copy
Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1979).
Published | Florida Attorney General Reports
Nevin G. Smith Secretary Department of Administration Tallahassee QUESTION: May persons already retired change the designation of their present joint annuitants, pursuant to s. 121.091 (6)(d), F. S., 1979, or does the new law apply only to persons retiring after October 1, 1979, the effective date of s. 3, Ch. 79-375, Laws of Florida? SUMMARY: Section 3 of Ch. 79-375, Laws of Florida, amending s. 121.091 (6)(d), F. S., to permit retired members of the Florida Retirement System to change their designated joint annuitants after benefits have commenced under option 3 or option 4 as set forth in s. 121.091 (6)(a), should be applied prospectively, and only those members who retire after October 1, 1979, the effective date of s. 3 of Ch. 79-375, should be allowed to change their designated `joint annuitant.' Section 3, Ch. 79-375, Laws of Florida, amended s. 121.091 (6)(d), F....
...ge his designation of a joint annuitant. The consent of a retired member's first designated joint annuitant to any such change shall not be required . (Emphasis supplied.) The effective date of s. 3, Ch. 79-375, Laws of Florida, was October 1, 1979. Section 121.091 (6)(d), F. S., as amended by s. 3, Ch. 79-375, provides that a member of the retirement system who elects the option in subparagraph 3. or subparagraph 4., set forth in s. 121.091 (6)(a), shall designate his spouse or other dependent to receive the benefits which continue to be payable upon the death of the member....
...Division of Retirement as the administrator of the retirement systems assigned or transferred to it by law and trustee of the trust funds transferred to the Florida Retirement System, it is the opinion of this office that s. 3, Ch. 79-375, amending s. 121.091 (6)(d), applies only to those members of the Florida Retirement System who retire after the effective date of the amendment, October 1, 1979....
...79-375, Laws of Florida. On the contrary, the statute is expressed in general terms and in present tense which the courts will ordinarily give a prospective effect. See State v. City of Miami, supra . Therefore, if such person designated as `joint annuitant' pursuant to s. 121.091 (6)(d), F....
...e time of the election and upon whose age the actuarial equivalent is determined acquires vested rights in the option which the retiree elected. Thus, under present Florida case law, the spouse or other dependent designated by the member pursuant to s. 121.091 (6)(d), F....
...I of the Alabama Constitution which prohibits any law that impairs the obligations of contracts. Florida has a similar constitutional provision contained in s. 10, Art. I, State Const. In conclusion, it is the opinion of this office that s. 3, Ch. 79-375, Laws of Florida, amending s. 121.091 (6)(d), F. S., to permit retired members of the Florida Retirement System to change their designated joint annuitants after benefits have commenced under the options in subparagraph 3 or subparagraph 4., as set forth in s. 121.091 (6)(a), should be applied prospectively, and only those members who retire after October 1, 1979, the effective date of s....
Copy
Larner v. State, Dep't of Mgmt. Servs., Div. of Ret., 34 So. 3d 179 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).
Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 6230, 2010 WL 1791912
...Thomas E. Wright, Assistant General Counsel, Department of Management Services, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. Mark Larner appeals a final order of the State of Florida Retirement Commission denying his claim for in line of duty disability benefits under section 121.091(4)(a)1.a., Florida Statutes (2004)....
Copy
Avis Brown v. State of Florida, Dep't of Mgmt. Servs., Div. of Ret. (Fla. 1st DCA 2024).
Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal
...Retirement System (FRS) account. Because Appellant fails to establish a statutory ground to set aside the final order, we must affirm. See § 120.68(8), Fla. Stat. (2023). The facts were undisputed. Appellant’s former husband retired on July 1, 1998. Under section 121.091(6)(a), Florida Statutes (1998), governing payout options for FRS pension plan retirees, the former husband chose option 2 and named Appellant as his beneficiary....
...Option 2 provides that a monthly retirement benefit will be paid to the retiree for life, but if the retiree dies during the first ten years after retirement, then the beneficiary receives “the same monthly amount payable for the balance of such 10-year period.” § 121.091(6)(a)2., Fla. Stat. As required by section 121.091(6)(a), Appellant was “notified of” and “acknowledge[d] such election” made by the former husband by signing at the appropriate line on her former husband’s FRS application for retirement. That application listed all four retirement options available to the former husband and the benefits, if any, Appellant would receive upon his death. See § 121.091(6)(a)1.–4., Fla....
...d’s FRS retirement benefit. Under the QDRO, the former husband was prohibited from removing Appellant as the beneficiary of his retirement account during Appellant’s lifetime. However, the QDRO did not and could not change benefits accrued under section 121.091(6)(a)2., including the ten-year window for a survivor benefit elected by the former husband....
...See § 121.011(3)(d), Fla. Stat. (stating that “the rights of members of the retirement system established by this chapter are declared to be of a contractual nature”). June 2008 was ten years from the former husband’s retirement date. At this point, section 121.091(6)(a)2....
...no longer provided for any survivor benefits upon the death of the former husband. The former husband died in 2017, more than nineteen years after his retirement date, and the retirement benefits payable to him expired upon his death. Thus, no retirement benefits were payable to Appellant under section 121.091(6)(a)2. The Department did not misinterpret section 121.091 or any administrative rule promulgated to carry out the statute....
Copy
Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 2003).
Published | Florida Attorney General Reports
conclusions of that agency regarding this issue. Section 121.091(13), Florida Statutes, establishes DROP, a
Copy
Moore v. State, 368 So. 2d 664 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979).
Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14381
...Subsequent tests revealed herniated discs in the cervical and lumbar areas. On several occasions after this beating, Moore’s legs collapsed on him as he walked. It was stipulated between the parties that after this incident Moore was “totally and permanently disabled” within the meaning of section 121.091(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1977). The only issue before the Commission was whether the 1976 student attack was the cause of the disability so as to entitle him to enhanced “in line of duty” disability retirement benefits under section 121.091(4)(d)l, Florida Statutes (1977)....
Copy
Bean v. State, Div. of Ret., 732 So. 2d 391 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999).
Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 7587, 1999 WL 141960
...We hold that an employee who had reached his or her normal retirement date prior to this statutory amendment and who had already indicated to the Division an intention to designate a former spouse as a joint annuitant under option 3 has a vested right to that designation. See § 121.091(6)(a)3, Fla....
...Apparently, there is no dispute that she was and is financially dependent. Until the amendment in 1995, the relevant definition of “joint annuitant” included a person who was financially dependent for at least one-half of his or her support from the retiring member at the time of that member’s retirement. See § 121.091(6)(d), Fla. Stat. (1993) (providing joint annuitant must be either spouse or “other dependant”); § 121.021(28)(c), Fla. Stat. (1993) (defining who may be considered an “other dependent” as that term is used in section 121.091(6)(d))....
...There is no question that George Bean was eligible to retire with a fully vested retirement when this amendment went into effect. The Division maintains that he needed to resign prior to the effective date of this amendment if he wished to fulfill his obligations to his former spouse. We disagree. Section 121.091(1) provides “upon attaining his or her normal retirement date, a member, upon application to the administrator, shall receive a monthly benefit which shall begin to accrue on the first day of the month of retirement....” Section 121.091(6)(a) requires a member to elect a retirement option “prior to the receipt of [the] first monthly retirement payment.” As we read these statutes, there was nothing to prevent Mr....
Copy
In re Inquiry Concerning a Judge, Kerr, 521 So. 2d 1092 (Fla. 1988).
Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 13 Fla. L. Weekly 192, 1988 Fla. LEXIS 343
...lity is job related. Judge Kerr’s counsel now argues that the JQC should have found the judge’s stroke to be job related 1 and, therefore, should *1093 have recommended that he be retired at forty-two percent of his average monthly compensation. § 121.091(4)(d)l, Fla.Stat....
...his judicial duties contributed to Judge Nelson’s heart attack and consequent disability and that Judge Nelson should receive forty-two percent of his average monthly compensation pursuant to subsection 121.-091(4)(d), Florida Statutes (1973). Subsection 121.091(4)(d) currently embodies the same provisions as in 1973. Subsection 121.091(4)(b), however, provides that total and permanent disability and retirement benefits therefor shall be determined by the director of the Division of Retirement pursuant to the statutes....
Copy
Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1975).
Published | Florida Attorney General Reports
Your question is answered in the affirmative. Section 121.091(5)(f), F.S. (1974 Supp.), of the Florida Retirement
Copy
Griffin v. State, 564 So. 2d 189 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990).
Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4623, 1990 WL 95535
...The Commission concluded that Griffin was totally and permanently disabled. It denied benefits, however, based on the determination that her disability resulted from injuries sustained after her employment with the Dade County School Board was terminated. See § 121.091(4)(f), Fla.Stat....
Copy
Shelkofsky v. Div. of Ret., 932 So. 2d 505 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006).
Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 10055, 2006 WL 1675084
...In doing so, the Commission explicitly did not decide whether the appellant suffered a permanent and total disability. The Commission further determined that the appellant was not vested because he had only eight years of creditable service at the time of the application. See § 121.091(4)(a)1.a., Fla....
...“A member shall be considered totally and permanently disabled if, in the opinion of the administrator, he or she is prevented, by reason of a medically determinable physical or mental impairment, from rendering useful and efficient service as an officer or employee.” § 121.091(4)(b), Fla....
Copy
Oller v. Div. of Ret., 415 So. 2d 801 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).
Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20282
...cer or employee” and thus not totally and permanently disabled, Section 121.-091(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1981). This finding is supported by competent substan *802 tial evidence. Amico v. Division of Retirement, 352 So.2d 556 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). Section 121.091(4)(b) does not provide total disability retirement for an officer or employee who is capable of performing useful and efficient service within the state system....
Copy
Carver v. State, Div. of Ret., 848 So. 2d 1203 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003).
Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 10129, 2003 WL 21510795
...but he opined that sheltered employment is not useful and efficient service. Carver applied for disability retirement benefits. Because Carver did not submit medical evidence that he was totally and permanently disabled as required by sec *1205 tion 121.091(4)(c), Florida Statutes, 1 the State Retirement Director denied his application for both regular and in-line-of-duty disability retirement benefits....
...nently disabled. Therefore the evidence does not rise to a sufficient level to overturn the state retirement director’s denial of the claim for total and permanent in line of duty benefits. In order to prevail before the State Retirement Director, section 121.091(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1997), requires the claimant to demonstrate with medical evidence that he is permanently totally disabled from rendering useful and efficient service as an employee....
...at 263: WHERE A CLAIMANT SEEKS TOTAL AND PERMANENT DISABILITY BENEFITS IN A PROCEEDING UNDER SECTION 121.23, FLORIDA STATUTES, WHAT MEDICAL EVIDENCE IS THE CLAIMANT REQUIRED TO PRESENT BEFORE THE STATE RETIREMENT COMMISSION? REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings. LEWIS and HAWKES, JJ., concur. . Section 121.091(4)(c), Florida Statutes (1997), requires an applicant to supply the Director with “the certification of the member's total and permanent disability by two licensed physicians of the state.” ....
Copy
Drew v. Div. of Ret., 640 So. 2d 1190 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).
Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7484, 1994 WL 391338
prerequisite for disability benefits under section 121.091(4)(b). Section 121.091(4)(a), Florida Statutes, provides
Copy
Town of Miami Lakes v. State of Florida, Dep't of Mgmt. Servs., Etc. (Fla. 3d DCA 2023).
Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal
...de. Members of FRS may elect to participate in a program known as the Deferred Retirement Option Program (“DROP”), which allows for the member to defer the receipt of their retirement benefits while continuously working for the FRS employer. §121.091(13)(a), Fla....
...A regularly established position “is an employment position which will be in existence beyond 6 consecutive calendar months. . . .” Fla. Admin. Code R. 60S-1.004(4)(b). A member of FRS who wishes to seek employment after retirement is subject to the limitations set forth in section 121.091. That statute provides that “a retiree may not be reemployed with an employer participating in the Florida Retirement System until such person has been retired for 6 2 calendar months.” § 121.091(9)(d)1., Fla....
...The reemployment limitations state that if the member is employed by an FRS employer within the first six (6) months of retirement, in violation of the prohibition, both the member and the FRS employer will be held jointly and severally liable for the retirement benefits that were paid to the member. §121.091 (9)(b)(1), Fla....
...Jenkins, and refund her the deductions withheld. The Department issued a Notice of Intended Agency Action letter against the Town on October 2, 2020, informing the Town that it was jointly and severally liable for the repayment of Ms. Jenkins’ retirement benefits in accordance with section 121.091(9)(c)3., Florida Statutes. The Town requested an administrative hearing before an ALJ at the Department of Administrative Hearings....
Copy
Shepard v. Dep't of Admin., Div. of Ret., 361 So. 2d 208 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978).
Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16386
...Shepard, whose employment by the Santa Rosa County sheriff was terminated in February 1977, petitions for review of an order of the Retirement Commission denying him disability retirement benefits. The question before the Commission, was whether Shepard was "totally and permanently disabled," Section 121.091(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1977), that is to say, whether he was then "prevented, by reason of a medically determinable physical or mental impairment, from rendering useful and efficient service as an officer or employee." Section 121.091(4)(b)....
Copy
In re Nelson, 288 So. 2d 218 (Fla. 1974).
Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1974 Fla. LEXIS 4513
which is permanent in nature. “2. Pursuant to Section 121.091(4) (d), Florida Statutes [F.S.A.], Judge Nelson
Copy
Hillman v. Div. of Ret., 446 So. 2d 158 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984).
Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11696
...es to a maximum of 1.68 percent); for a "special risk member,” the percentage is two percent for all creditable years of special risk service prior to October 1, 1974, three percent thereafter until October 1, 1978, and two percent thereafter. See Section 121.091, Florida Statutes (1981)....
Copy
O'Connell v. State, Dep't of Admin., Div. of Ret., 557 So. 2d 609 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).
Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 699, 1990 WL 8675
...Concluding that the beneficiaries were entitled to receive only O’Connell’s accumulated contributions, the Division issued a final order denying retirement benefits. O’Con-nell’s sons appeal. The Division erred in denying the benefits. Under the Florida Retirement System, section 121.091(1), Florida Statutes (1987), a member is entitled to obtain retirement benefits when he reaches his “normal retirement date.” The normal retirement date is the first day of any month following the date a member attains the applicable status enumerated in the statute....
...the act creating the retirement system); Grady v. Division of Retirement, 387 So.2d 419 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980) (no entitlement to pension benefits where appellants have neither retired nor satisfied the conditions of law for retirement benefits). Under section 121.091, O’Connell could have applied for, and received, retirement benefit payments as early as October 31, 1985....
...tation compels a particular action,” § 120.68, Fla.Stat. (1987), we reverse and remand for distribution of Option 2 benefits pursuant to O’Connell’s designation form. Reversed and remanded. . O’Connell selected Option 2 retirement benefits. Section 121.091(6)(a)2 provides as follows: (6) OPTIONAL FORMS OF RETIREMENT BENEFITS AND DISABILITY RETIREMENT BENEFITS.— (a) Prior to the receipt of his first monthly retirement payment, a member shall elect to receive the retirement benefits to...
Copy
Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1985).
Published | Florida Attorney General Reports
...Clifford M. Cail Chairman State Retirement Commission Room 530 Carlton Building Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Dear Mr. Cail: This is in response to your request for an opinion on substantially the following questions: 1. DOES THE TERM "REEXAMINATIONS" IN s 121.091 (4)(e) MEAN REEXAMINATIONS BY PHYSICIANS LICENSED IN THIS STATE? 2. MUST THE ADMINISTRATOR HAVE THE CERTIFICATION OF A LICENSED PHYSICIAN OF THE STATE THAT A MEMBER RECEIVING DISABILITY BENEFITS IS NO LONGER TOTALLY AND PERMANENTLY DISABLED IN ORDER TO MAKE THAT SAME FINDING UNDER s 121.091 (4)(e)1., F.S.? Your inquiry notes that s 121.23 , F.S., gives the State Retirement Commission authority to hold s 120.57 (1) hearings at the request of a member of the Florida Retirement System who wishes to challenge a decision of the administrator (Director of the Division of Retirement, see, s 121.021 [5], F.S. [1984 Supp.] that the member is no longer eligible to receive the disability retirement benefit provided by s 121.091 (4), F.S. (1984 Supp.). For this reason, the commission has asked for this office's interpretation of s 121.091 (4)(e), in regard to the questions set forth above....
...t the commission needs to know if this burden of proof must include the certification of a licensed physician of the state to the effect that the member who is receiving disability benefits is no longer totally and permanently disabled. QUESTION ONE Section 121.091 (4), F.S., provides for payment of "disability retirement benefits" to certain members of the Florida Retirement System. See, paragraph (4)(a) of s 121.091 , specifying eligibility for such benefits....
...and permanent disability by two licensed physicians of the state and such other evidence of disability as the administrator may require. (e.s.) See, Kennedy v. Wiggins, 368 So.2d 454 , 456 (1 D.C.A.Fla., 1979), stating that the apparent purpose of s 121.091 (4)(c) is to provide the administrator with guidelines for its decisions regarding benefits....
...If the administrator finds that a member who is receiving disability benefits is, at any time prior to his normal retirement date, no longer disabled, the administrator shall direct that the benefits be discontinued. (e.s.) You inquire whether the term "reexaminations" in s 121.091 (4)(e) means reexaminations by physicians licensed in this state. For the following reasons, it is my opinion that the term "reexaminations" in s 121.091 (4)(e), F.S., means an administrative review or inquiry into the issue of recovery from disability, which review may include a physician's examination. Section 121.091 does not define the term "reexamination" or otherwise specify what is included therein, nor is the term "examination" or "reexamination" used elsewhere in that statute. Cf., s 121.091 (4)(a)-(c), setting forth guidelines for the administrator for approving or granting disability benefits....
...70-112, Laws of Florida, does not provide any clear direction in determining the Legislature's intent. In the absence of any statutory direction or judicial precedents this office cannot limit the interpretation of the term "reexamination" to reexamination by a physician licensed in the State of Florida. Compare, s 121.091 (4)(c) stating that the proof of disability shall include the certification of the member's total and permanent disability by two licensed physicians of the state....
...1968) (an investigation, search, interrogatory). However, it does appear that a reexamination by a physician licensed in this state may be a part of or included as part of the administrator's review or reexamination of an individual's disability. See, s 121.091 (4)(b) stating that a member shall be considered to be totally and permanently disabled if he is prevented by reason of a medically determinable physical or mental impairment from rendering useful and efficient service as an employee or officer, and s 121.091 (4)(c), supra, requiring certification of disability by two licensed physicians of the state for the administrator's initial determination of disability....
...The foregoing provisions indicate the importance of a medical examination in determining disability or the recovery from disability. See, Amico v. Division of Retirement, Department of Administration, supra. Additionally, Rule 22B-4.07(8), F.A.C. (adopted pursuant to, inter alia, ss 121.091 [4] and 121.23 , F.S.), provides that the Division of Retirement "may conduct periodic reexaminations of members" granted disability status pursuant to Ch....
...QUESTION TWO Your second question asks whether the administrator must have the certification of a licensed physician of the state that a member receiving disability benefits is no longer totally and permanently disabled in order to make that same finding under s 121.091 (4)(e)1., F.S. (1984 Supp.). Section 121.091 (4)(e) does not impose such a requirement; nothing in that paragraph requires that the administrator base a finding of recovery from disability on a physician's certification....
...Accordingly, it is my opinion that the administrator is not required to obtain the certification of a licensed physician of the state that a member receiving disability benefits is no longer totally and permanently disabled in order to make that same finding under s 121.091 (4)(e)1., but that he may require such examinations....
...Section 121.23 , F.S., sets forth procedural guidelines for such proceedings before the commission, but nothing in that section prescribes the elements of the burden of proof or grants to the commission any power to dictate what such proof must include. Additionally, neither s 121.23 nor s 121.091 (4) empowers the commission to limit such proceedings to those cases where a medical certification has been obtained and presented. In summary, until legislatively or judicially determined otherwise, it is my opinion that (1) the term "reexaminations" in s 121.091 (4)(e), F.S., means a periodic administrative review conducted by the Division of Retirement into the issue of recovery from disability, which review may include a physician's examination; (2) the administrator (of the Florida Retirement System) is not required to obtain the certification of a licensed physician of the state that a member receiving disability benefits is no longer totally and permanently disabled in order to make that same finding under s 121.091 (4)(e)1....
Copy
Brantley v. Div. of Ret., 463 So. 2d 1222 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985).
Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 23 Educ. L. Rep. 447, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 401, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12337
SHIVERS, Judge. This is a case of entitlement to an ordinary disability retirement. Robert E. Brantley appeals from adverse decision of the Florida Retirement Commission, which ruled that he was not entitled to disability retirement pursuant to § 121.091(4)(f), Fla....
Copy
Vidal v. Div. of Ret., 410 So. 2d 1351 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).
Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19144
calculated in accordance with the provisions of Section 121.091. (e.s.) The appellant’s rights in the system
Copy
Johnson v. Dep't of Mgmt. Servs., 24 So. 3d 792 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009).
Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 20558, 2009 WL 5150070
...Johnson was entitled to in-line of duty disability benefits only if her injury or illness arose out of and in the actual performance of the duties required by her employment and was the substantial cause or aggravating cause of her total and permanent disability. See § 121.091(4)(a), Fla....
Copy
Seward v. Dep't of Admin., Div. of Ret., 366 So. 2d 82 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978).
Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 17010
...elects between April 15, 1971 and June 1, 1971, inclusive, to transfer to the Florida retirement system, he shall be transferred . . . and shall be subject to the provisions of the Florida retirement system . . . and at retirement have his benefits calculated in accordance with . . . s. 121.091.” Petitioner transferred his membership in SCOERS to membership in the Florida Retirement System (FRS), effective December 1, 1970....
...puted according to the totally disabled schedule, and petitioner was awarded 45% rather than 35% of his final compensation. On January 5, 1976, the Division of Retirement notified petitioner that he was to be reexamined pursuant to the provisions of § 121.091(4)(e)....
...examination, and (3) depending upon which section was found to apply, under what circumstances would petitioner be considered no longer disabled. The Division issued a declaratory statement that petitioner’s reexamination was controlled by FRS and § 121.091(4); that petitioner had the burden of proof at a reexamination hearing under § 120.57(1); and that “no longer disabled” in § 121.091(4)(e) meant the FRS member was no longer prevented from rendering useful and efficient service as an officer or employee because of a medically determinable physical or mental impairment....
Copy
Leonard v. Dep't of Admin., Div. of Ret., 352 So. 2d 1273 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977).
Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 17159
Retirement Commission must instead construe Section 121.-091(4)(b), defining total and permanent disability
Copy
Portee v. State Dep't of Admin., Div. of Ret., 603 So. 2d 621 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992).
Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8404, 1992 WL 183979
...Airee Portee appeals a final order establishing the amount of benefits he is entitled to receive. We reverse. The hearing officer found, and we agree, that the decedent, Violet Portee, died before her retirement benefits commenced within the meaning of paragraph 121.-091(6)(e), Florida Statutes (1989). Pursuant to subsection 121.091(8), Airee Portee became the beneficiary of the decedent. See also Rarback v. Department of Administration, Division of Retirement, 540 So.2d 198 (Fla.3d DCA 1989). We believe the better view is that paragraph 121.091(7)(b) must be read consistently with paragraph 121.091(6)(e), so as to require the administrator to select “the optional form of payment most favorable to [the beneficiary]_” Id....
Copy
Polk Cnty. Sch. Bd. v. Cobbett, 547 So. 2d 991 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989).
Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1846, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4485, 1989 WL 87551
..., TPD, and wage loss benefits for certain periods, and had agreed to pay certain medical costs incurred by the claimant. In discussing his reasons for including the retirement benefits in the AWW, the DC found that sections 121.021(13), and sections 121.091(4) and (5), Fla.Stat....
...Claimant’s impairment rating is 5% as found by the DC and that finding is supported by competent, substantial evidence. There is no evidence that the claimant is totally and permanently disabled. Except that Section 121.021(13) defines “disability in line of duty” as used in section 121.091(4), that section is of no consequence to this case. The remaining statute relied upon is section 121.091(5)....
...to the completion of ten years of creditable service.... ” In the event of such, the member is entitled to have his accumulated contributions returned to him. Since claimant made no contributions toward her retirement, this statute does not apply. Section 121.091(1) does aid in the determination of whether the claimant's retirement benefits have vested....
Copy
Hassler v. State Ret. Comm'n, 698 So. 2d 897 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997).
Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10115, 1997 WL 529726
THOMPSON, Judge. Mary Hassler appeals the order of the State Retirement Commission denying her disability retirement benefits. We reverse and remand for further proceedings. Hassler applied for early retirement benefits pursuant to section 121.091(4), Florida Statutes, which authorizes payment of early retirement benefits if a member of the state retirement system is “totally and permanently disabled.” Section 121.091(4)(b) defines total and permanent disability: (b) Total and permanent disability....
Copy
Strickland v. Dep't of Admin., Div. of Ret., 436 So. 2d 1033 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983).
Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20111
“in line of duty” disability benefits under Section 121.-091(4)(d)1.a., Florida Statutes. AFFIRMED. LARRY
Copy
Steadman v. Dep't of Mgmt. Servs., 901 So. 2d 915 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005).
Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2005 WL 924314
...ber is the legal guardian, provided that such parent, grandparent, or other person is financially dependent for no less than one-half of his or her support from the member at retirement or at time of the death of such member, whichever occurs first. Section 121.091(8) provides that if no beneficiary is named, the beneficiary shall be the spouse of the deceased, if living....
Copy
Mauldin v. State, Dep't of Admin., Div. of Ret., 468 So. 2d 332 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985).
Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 965, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13440
...This cause is before us on appeal from a final order of the State Retirement Commission (Commission) denying appellant’s application for disability retirement benefits. The issue presented is whether the Commission erred in ruling that appellant is not totally permanently disabled. Section 121.091(4)(b), Florida Statutes....
...survey but felt appellant could perform some jobs, such as fire control dispatcher, cashier, driver’s license examiner, inspector of mobile homes, or right-of-way agent, although he had not studied the job descriptions for each of these positions. Section 121.091(4)(b), Florida Statutes, defines total and permanent disability as follows: Total and permanent disability....
...contrary conclusion made by the Commission is not supported by competent, substantial evidence, that conclusion is reversed. In this regard, we note that the parties disagree as to whether the terminology “useful and efficient service” found in Section 121.091(4)(b), Florida Statutes, refers to useful and efficient service within the State Retirement System or outside of the system....
...thin the system that is intended. This construction is consistent with the language of the statute and accords with this court’s holding in Oller v. Division of Retirement, 415 So.2d 801 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), wherein it was stated that “[sjection 121.091(4)(b) does not provide total disability retirement for an officer or employee who is capable of performing useful and efficient service within the state system.” (emphasis added). 1 The evidence shows that the appellant is totally and permanently disabled as defined in Section 121.091(4)(b), inasmuch as the appellant’s permanent physical injury, with its attendant physical limitations, prevents him from rendering useful and efficient service as an officer or employee within the State system, and there is no compe...
Copy
James M. O'Meara v. State of Florida, Dep't of etc., 189 So. 3d 308 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016).
Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2016 WL 1458493, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 5675
...Wright, Department of Management Services, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. Former teacher James O’Meara challenges a final order of the State Retirement Commission denying his application for in-line-of-duty retirement disability benefits under § 121.091(4)(a), Florida Statutes....
Copy
Orange Cnty. Sch. Bd. v. Rachman, 87 So. 3d 48 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012).
Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 5641, 2012 WL 1231232
...The Orange County School Board (the “Board”) timely appeals a final judgment on the pleadings in favor of teachers Leona Rachman and Jonathan Schuman, plaintiffs below, arguing that the trial court erred in its interpretation and application of section 121.091(9)(b)l.a., Florida Statutes (2010)....
...owing his or her retirement on an annual contract. *49 The Board argues that this statute bars it from ever affording Appellees a longer professional service contract pursuant to section 1012.33(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2010). 1 Appellees argue that section 121.091(9)(b)l.a., only applies at the time of their initial rehire (following retirement), such that they can ultimately be awarded a professional services contract if they meet the requirements of section 121.091 (9)(b)l .a. We agree with the trial court’s well-reasoned analysis and conclude that section 121.091(9)(b)l.a....
...service contracts. Ch.2011-1, § 13, Laws of Fla. Appellees, however, assert rights that they contend vested prior to the effective date of section 1012.335, Florida Statutes (2011). The Board concedes in this case that but for its interpretation of section 121.091(9)(b)l.a., Appellees would have been eligible to be considered for professional service contracts.
Copy
Nickols v. Div. of Ret., 637 So. 2d 261 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994).
Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3372, 1994 WL 122342
...This view impermissibly limits the evidence which may be presented to and considered by the Commission. It has imposed upon appellant an incorrect standard of proof. We therefore reverse. An employee is entitled to total and permanent disability retirement benefits under section 121.091(4)(b), Florida Statutes, if he is prevented by reason of a medically determinable physical or mental impairment, from rendering useful and efficient service as an officer or employee. An employee seeking such benefits must first make application to the administrator of the State Retirement System. The administrator’s discretion to award benefits is strictly limited by section 121.091(4)(c), which provides: The administrator, before approving payment of any disability retirement benefit, shall require proof that the member is totally and permanently disabled as provided herein, which proof shall include the certifi...
...At the first level, the administrator is authorized to make an award of disability retirement benefits based on the written material submitted with the application for retirement without going to an evidentiary hearing, provided the proof requirements in section 121.091(4)(c) are met....
...to review and determine the disputed issues of fact concerning the extent to which the medically-determined impairments affect the ability to work. It is for this reason that section 121.-23(2)(a) does not contain the same language as that found in section 121.091(4)(c) about certificates of total and permanent disability from two physicians....

This Florida statute resource is curated by the lawyer who curates this resource, a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney (Florida Bar No. 39104). For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.

Cases Citing F.S. 121.091

·In Re the Florida Bar-Code of Jud. Conduct, 281 So. 2d 21 (Fla. 1973).

·Austin v. Austin, 350 So. 2d 102 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977).

·Smith v. Brantley, 400 So. 2d 443 (Fla. 1981).

·Florida Sheriffs Ass'n v. Dept. of Admin., 408 So. 2d 1033 (Fla. 1981).

·Swanson v. Swanson, 869 So. 2d 735 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004).

·Busbee v. State, 685 So. 2d 914 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).

·Shields v. Smith, 404 So. 2d 1106 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).

·Williams v. Christian, 335 So. 2d 358 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976).

Florida Ass'n of Counties, Inc. v. DEPT. OF ADMIN., DIV. OF Ret., 580 So. 2d 641 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).

·Ganzel v. Ganzel, 770 So. 2d 304 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

·Russell v. Russell, 922 So. 2d 1097 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006).

·Amico v. Div. of Ret., Etc., 352 So. 2d 556 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977).

·Coral Imaging Servs. v. Geico Indem. Ins., 955 So. 2d 11 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006).

·Havener v. Div. of Ret., 461 So. 2d 231 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

·State v. Gerren, 604 So. 2d 515 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).

·Pridgeon v. State Div. Of Ret., 662 So. 2d 1028 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995).

·Kennedy v. Wiggins, 368 So. 2d 454 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).

·Hoffman v. Dept. of Mgmt. Servs., 964 So. 2d 163 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007).

·Long v. Florida, 805 F.2d 1542 (11th Cir. 1986).

Crystal v. State, Dep't of Mgmt. Servs., Div. of Ret., 21 So. 3d 134 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009).

·Turlington v. Dep't of Admin., Div. of Ret., 462 So. 2d 65 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984).

·Rarback v. Dep't of Admin., Div. of Ret., 540 So. 2d 198 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989).

·Hartley v. Dep't of Mgmt. Servs., Div. of Ret., 711 So. 2d 1380 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998).

·Gaetaniello v. Gaetaniello (In re Gaetaniello), 496 B.R. 238 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2013).

·Glisson v. State, Dep't of Mgmt. Servs., Div. of Ret., 621 So. 2d 543 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993).

·Davis v. Dep't of Admin., Div. of Ret., 585 So. 2d 421 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991).

·Young v. Dep't of Admin., Div. of Ret., 524 So. 2d 1071 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988).

Steinhardt v. State, Dep't of Admin., Div. of Ret., 318 So. 2d 562 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975).

State, Dep't of Admin., Div. of Ret. v. Miranda, 513 So. 2d 170 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1977).

State, Dep't of Admin., Div. of Ret. v. Hissom, 476 So. 2d 244 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).

·Viele v. Div. of Ret., 642 So. 2d 1124 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994).

Edwards v. State, Dep't of Admin., Div. of Ret., 445 So. 2d 1030 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983).

Brock v. Dep't of Mgmt. Servs., 98 So. 3d 771 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012).

Castiglia v. Div. of Ret., State Dep't of Admin., 442 So. 2d 1007 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).

Eaves v. Div. of Ret., 704 So. 2d 140 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997).

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1979).

Larner v. State, Dep't of Mgmt. Servs., Div. of Ret., 34 So. 3d 179 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).

Avis Brown v. State of Florida, Dep't of Mgmt. Servs., Div. of Ret. (Fla. 1st DCA 2024).

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 2003).

Moore v. State, 368 So. 2d 664 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979).

Bean v. State, Div. of Ret., 732 So. 2d 391 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999).

In re Inquiry Concerning a Judge, Kerr, 521 So. 2d 1092 (Fla. 1988).

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1975).

Griffin v. State, 564 So. 2d 189 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990).

Shelkofsky v. Div. of Ret., 932 So. 2d 505 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006).

Oller v. Div. of Ret., 415 So. 2d 801 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).

Carver v. State, Div. of Ret., 848 So. 2d 1203 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003).

Drew v. Div. of Ret., 640 So. 2d 1190 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).

Town of Miami Lakes v. State of Florida, Dep't of Mgmt. Servs., Etc. (Fla. 3d DCA 2023).

Shepard v. Dep't of Admin., Div. of Ret., 361 So. 2d 208 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978).

In re Nelson, 288 So. 2d 218 (Fla. 1974).

Hillman v. Div. of Ret., 446 So. 2d 158 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984).

O'Connell v. State, Dep't of Admin., Div. of Ret., 557 So. 2d 609 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1985).

Brantley v. Div. of Ret., 463 So. 2d 1222 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985).

Vidal v. Div. of Ret., 410 So. 2d 1351 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).

Johnson v. Dep't of Mgmt. Servs., 24 So. 3d 792 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009).

Seward v. Dep't of Admin., Div. of Ret., 366 So. 2d 82 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978).

Leonard v. Dep't of Admin., Div. of Ret., 352 So. 2d 1273 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977).

Portee v. State Dep't of Admin., Div. of Ret., 603 So. 2d 621 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992).

Polk Cnty. Sch. Bd. v. Cobbett, 547 So. 2d 991 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989).

Hassler v. State Ret. Comm'n, 698 So. 2d 897 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997).

Strickland v. Dep't of Admin., Div. of Ret., 436 So. 2d 1033 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983).

Steadman v. Dep't of Mgmt. Servs., 901 So. 2d 915 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005).

Mauldin v. State, Dep't of Admin., Div. of Ret., 468 So. 2d 332 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985).

James M. O'Meara v. State of Florida, Dep't of etc., 189 So. 3d 308 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016).

Orange Cnty. Sch. Bd. v. Rachman, 87 So. 3d 48 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012).

Nickols v. Div. of Ret., 637 So. 2d 261 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994).