Notes of Decisions
Miami Dolphins, Ltd. v. Metro. Dade Cnty., 394 So. 2d 981 (Fla. 1981).
· cites it 24× “These are consolidated appeals from a final declaratory judgment of the Circuit *983 Court of Dade County specifically passing upon the constitutionality of section 125.0104, Florida Statutes (1977), and a decision of the Third District Court of Appeal.”
Alachua Cnty. v. Expedia, Inc., 110 So. 3d 941 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013).
· cites it 38× “In this case before us, we address the Tourist Development Tax, codifed in section 125.0104, Florida Statutes, and levied pursuant to Florida’s Local Option Tourist Development Act of 1977.”
State v. Osceola Cnty., 752 So. 2d 530 (Fla. 1999).
· cites it 27× “MATERIAL FACTS In 1997, Osceola County by ordinance declared the levy of a one percent tax pursuant to the Local Option Tourist Development Act, section 125.0104, Florida Statutes (1997).”
Alachua Cnty. v. Expedia, Inc., 175 So. 3d 730 (Fla. 2015).
· cites it 24× “§ 125.0104, Fla. Stat. (2014). In certifying the present question of great public importance, the First District asks this Court for guidance on whether the TDT applies to total monetary amounts online travel companies (hereinafter “OTCs”) charge their customers for securing…”
Cnty. of Monroe v. Priceline.Com, Inc., 265 F.R.D. 659 (S.D. Fla. 2010).
· cites it 7× “In the instant Motion, the County seeks certification of a class of [a]ll counties within the State of Florida that: 1) have enacted a tourist development tax under authority of F.S.A. § 125.0104; and 2) have not received the tax due on the amount received by the Defendants as…”
Rowe v. Pinellas Sports Auth., 461 So. 2d 72 (Fla. 1984).
· cites it 7× “In 1977 the Florida legislature enacted what is now section 125.0104, Florida Statutes (1983), the "Local Option Tourist Development Act.”
Metro. Dade Cnty. v. Shiver, 365 So. 2d 210 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).
· cites it 6× “The Board of County Commissioners of Dade County, Florida enacted an ordinance subject to voter approval imposing a certain tourist development tax pursuant to Section 125.0104, Florida Statutes (1977) throughout Dade County, Florida except within the municipal limits of Miami…”
Alachua Cnty. v. Adams, 702 So. 2d 1253 (Fla. 1997).
· cites it 6× “§ 125.0104, Fla. Stat. (1983)(emphasis added).”
Lozier v. Collier Cnty., 682 So. 2d 551 (Fla. 1996).
· cites it 10× “[3] Section 125.0104, Florida Statutes (1995), governs the levying and use of tourist development taxes.”
Rowe v. St. Johns Cnty., 668 So. 2d 196 (Fla. 1996).
· cites it 4× “012, Florida Statutes (1995) (relating to certain authorized charter county projects), and chapter 159, Florida Statutes (1995) (the "Revenue Bond Act of 1953"), preclude the County from issuing bonds under chapter 125 because these other statutes contain alternate methods to…”
— 125.0104(10)(a) — 1 case
— 125.0104(2) — 1 case
Miami Dolphins, Ltd. v. Metro. Dade Cnty., 394 So. 2d 981 (Fla. 1981).
“These are consolidated appeals from a final declaratory judgment of the Circuit *983 Court of Dade County specifically passing upon the constitutionality of section 125.0104, Florida Statutes (1977), and a decision of the Third District Court of Appeal.”
— 125.0104(2)(a) — 1 case
— 125.0104(3) — 3 cases
State v. Osceola Cnty., 752 So. 2d 530 (Fla. 1999).
“MATERIAL FACTS In 1997, Osceola County by ordinance declared the levy of a one percent tax pursuant to the Local Option Tourist Development Act, section 125.0104, Florida Statutes (1997).”
— 125.0104(3)(a) — 7 cases
Alachua Cnty. v. Expedia, Inc., 110 So. 3d 941 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013).
“In this case before us, we address the Tourist Development Tax, codifed in section 125.0104, Florida Statutes, and levied pursuant to Florida’s Local Option Tourist Development Act of 1977.”
Alachua Cnty. v. Expedia, Inc., 175 So. 3d 730 (Fla. 2015).
“§ 125.0104, Fla. Stat. (2014). In certifying the present question of great public importance, the First District asks this Court for guidance on whether the TDT applies to total monetary amounts online travel companies (hereinafter “OTCs”) charge their customers for securing…”
Miami Dolphins, Ltd. v. Metro. Dade Cnty., 394 So. 2d 981 (Fla. 1981).
“These are consolidated appeals from a final declaratory judgment of the Circuit *983 Court of Dade County specifically passing upon the constitutionality of section 125.0104, Florida Statutes (1977), and a decision of the Third District Court of Appeal.”
— 125.0104(3)(a)(1) — 1 case
— 125.0104(3)(a)(l) — 1 case
Cnty. of Monroe v. Priceline.Com, Inc., 265 F.R.D. 659 (S.D. Fla. 2010).
“In the instant Motion, the County seeks certification of a class of [a]ll counties within the State of Florida that: 1) have enacted a tourist development tax under authority of F.S.A. § 125.0104; and 2) have not received the tax due on the amount received by the Defendants as…”
— 125.0104(3)(b) — 1 case
— 125.0104(3)(c) — 3 cases
Alachua Cnty. v. Expedia, Inc., 110 So. 3d 941 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013).
“In this case before us, we address the Tourist Development Tax, codifed in section 125.0104, Florida Statutes, and levied pursuant to Florida’s Local Option Tourist Development Act of 1977.”
Alachua Cnty. v. Expedia, Inc., 175 So. 3d 730 (Fla. 2015).
“§ 125.0104, Fla. Stat. (2014). In certifying the present question of great public importance, the First District asks this Court for guidance on whether the TDT applies to total monetary amounts online travel companies (hereinafter “OTCs”) charge their customers for securing…”
State v. Osceola Cnty., 752 So. 2d 530 (Fla. 1999).
“MATERIAL FACTS In 1997, Osceola County by ordinance declared the levy of a one percent tax pursuant to the Local Option Tourist Development Act, section 125.0104, Florida Statutes (1997).”
— 125.0104(3)(e) — 1 case
Alachua Cnty. v. Expedia, Inc., 110 So. 3d 941 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013).
“In this case before us, we address the Tourist Development Tax, codifed in section 125.0104, Florida Statutes, and levied pursuant to Florida’s Local Option Tourist Development Act of 1977.”
— 125.0104(3)(f) — 4 cases
Alachua Cnty. v. Expedia, Inc., 110 So. 3d 941 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013).
“In this case before us, we address the Tourist Development Tax, codifed in section 125.0104, Florida Statutes, and levied pursuant to Florida’s Local Option Tourist Development Act of 1977.”
Miami Dolphins, Ltd. v. Metro. Dade Cnty., 394 So. 2d 981 (Fla. 1981).
“These are consolidated appeals from a final declaratory judgment of the Circuit *983 Court of Dade County specifically passing upon the constitutionality of section 125.0104, Florida Statutes (1977), and a decision of the Third District Court of Appeal.”
Alachua Cnty. v. Expedia, Inc., 175 So. 3d 730 (Fla. 2015).
“§ 125.0104, Fla. Stat. (2014). In certifying the present question of great public importance, the First District asks this Court for guidance on whether the TDT applies to total monetary amounts online travel companies (hereinafter “OTCs”) charge their customers for securing…”
— 125.0104(3)(g) — 2 cases
Alachua Cnty. v. Expedia, Inc., 110 So. 3d 941 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013).
“In this case before us, we address the Tourist Development Tax, codifed in section 125.0104, Florida Statutes, and levied pursuant to Florida’s Local Option Tourist Development Act of 1977.”
— 125.0104(3)(i) — 1 case
Cnty. of Monroe v. Priceline.Com, Inc., 265 F.R.D. 659 (S.D. Fla. 2010).
“In the instant Motion, the County seeks certification of a class of [a]ll counties within the State of Florida that: 1) have enacted a tourist development tax under authority of F.S.A. § 125.0104; and 2) have not received the tax due on the amount received by the Defendants as…”
— 125.0104(3)(n) — 1 case
State v. Osceola Cnty., 752 So. 2d 530 (Fla. 1999).
“MATERIAL FACTS In 1997, Osceola County by ordinance declared the levy of a one percent tax pursuant to the Local Option Tourist Development Act, section 125.0104, Florida Statutes (1997).”
— 125.0104(4) — 1 case
— 125.0104(4)(a) — 2 cases
Rowe v. Pinellas Sports Auth., 461 So. 2d 72 (Fla. 1984).
“In 1977 the Florida legislature enacted what is now section 125.0104, Florida Statutes (1983), the "Local Option Tourist Development Act.”
— 125.0104(4)(c) — 2 cases
Miami Dolphins, Ltd. v. Metro. Dade Cnty., 394 So. 2d 981 (Fla. 1981).
“These are consolidated appeals from a final declaratory judgment of the Circuit *983 Court of Dade County specifically passing upon the constitutionality of section 125.0104, Florida Statutes (1977), and a decision of the Third District Court of Appeal.”
— 125.0104(4)(d) — 1 case
Rowe v. Pinellas Sports Auth., 461 So. 2d 72 (Fla. 1984).
“In 1977 the Florida legislature enacted what is now section 125.0104, Florida Statutes (1983), the "Local Option Tourist Development Act.”
— 125.0104(4)(e) — 1 case
— 125.0104(5) — 5 cases
Alachua Cnty. v. Expedia, Inc., 175 So. 3d 730 (Fla. 2015).
“§ 125.0104, Fla. Stat. (2014). In certifying the present question of great public importance, the First District asks this Court for guidance on whether the TDT applies to total monetary amounts online travel companies (hereinafter “OTCs”) charge their customers for securing…”
Rowe v. Pinellas Sports Auth., 461 So. 2d 72 (Fla. 1984).
“In 1977 the Florida legislature enacted what is now section 125.0104, Florida Statutes (1983), the "Local Option Tourist Development Act.”
State v. Osceola Cnty., 752 So. 2d 530 (Fla. 1999).
“MATERIAL FACTS In 1997, Osceola County by ordinance declared the levy of a one percent tax pursuant to the Local Option Tourist Development Act, section 125.0104, Florida Statutes (1997).”
— 125.0104(5)(a) — 3 cases
Miami Dolphins, Ltd. v. Metro. Dade Cnty., 394 So. 2d 981 (Fla. 1981).
“These are consolidated appeals from a final declaratory judgment of the Circuit *983 Court of Dade County specifically passing upon the constitutionality of section 125.0104, Florida Statutes (1977), and a decision of the Third District Court of Appeal.”
State v. Osceola Cnty., 752 So. 2d 530 (Fla. 1999).
“MATERIAL FACTS In 1997, Osceola County by ordinance declared the levy of a one percent tax pursuant to the Local Option Tourist Development Act, section 125.0104, Florida Statutes (1997).”
Lozier v. Collier Cnty., 682 So. 2d 551 (Fla. 1996).
“[3] Section 125.0104, Florida Statutes (1995), governs the levying and use of tourist development taxes.”
— 125.0104(5)(c) — 2 cases
Lozier v. Collier Cnty., 682 So. 2d 551 (Fla. 1996).
“[3] Section 125.0104, Florida Statutes (1995), governs the levying and use of tourist development taxes.”
Rowe v. St. Johns Cnty., 668 So. 2d 196 (Fla. 1996).
“012, Florida Statutes (1995) (relating to certain authorized charter county projects), and chapter 159, Florida Statutes (1995) (the "Revenue Bond Act of 1953"), preclude the County from issuing bonds under chapter 125 because these other statutes contain alternate methods to…”
— 125.0104(5)(d) — 1 case
State v. Osceola Cnty., 752 So. 2d 530 (Fla. 1999).
“MATERIAL FACTS In 1997, Osceola County by ordinance declared the levy of a one percent tax pursuant to the Local Option Tourist Development Act, section 125.0104, Florida Statutes (1997).”
— 125.0104(6)(b) — 3 cases
Miami Dolphins, Ltd. v. Metro. Dade Cnty., 394 So. 2d 981 (Fla. 1981).
“These are consolidated appeals from a final declaratory judgment of the Circuit *983 Court of Dade County specifically passing upon the constitutionality of section 125.0104, Florida Statutes (1977), and a decision of the Third District Court of Appeal.”
Metro. Dade Cnty. v. Shiver, 365 So. 2d 210 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).
“The Board of County Commissioners of Dade County, Florida enacted an ordinance subject to voter approval imposing a certain tourist development tax pursuant to Section 125.0104, Florida Statutes (1977) throughout Dade County, Florida except within the municipal limits of Miami…”
— 125.0104(8)(a) — 1 case
Alachua Cnty. v. Expedia, Inc., 110 So. 3d 941 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013).
“In this case before us, we address the Tourist Development Tax, codifed in section 125.0104, Florida Statutes, and levied pursuant to Florida’s Local Option Tourist Development Act of 1977.”
— 125.0104(f) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.