Home
Jacksonville Location Phone Call/Texting Policy How do Fees Work?
Criminal Defense DUI Defense Foreclosure Defense Copyright Workers Compensation Attorney Jacksonville Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statutes Georgia Code Jacksonville Accident Attorney Real Estate Attorney Jacksonville Florida Criminal Lawyer Jacksonville Notary Public
Menu
904-383-7448
Florida Statute 125.66 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 125.66 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 125.66

The 2022 Florida Statutes (including 2022 Special Session A and 2023 Special Session B)
Title XI
COUNTY ORGANIZATION AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS
Chapter 125
COUNTY GOVERNMENT
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 125.66
125.66 Ordinances; enactment procedure; emergency ordinances; rezoning or change of land use ordinances or resolutions.—
(1) In exercising the ordinance-making powers conferred by s. 1, Art. VIII of the State Constitution, counties shall adhere to the procedures prescribed herein.
(2)(a) The regular enactment procedure shall be as follows: The board of county commissioners at any regular or special meeting may enact or amend any ordinance, except as provided in subsection (4), if notice of intent to consider such ordinance is given at least 10 days before such meeting by publication as provided in chapter 50. A copy of such notice shall be kept available for public inspection during the regular business hours of the office of the clerk of the board of county commissioners. The notice of proposed enactment shall state the date, time, and place of the meeting; the title or titles of proposed ordinances; and the place or places within the county where such proposed ordinances may be inspected by the public. The notice shall also advise that interested parties may appear at the meeting and be heard with respect to the proposed ordinance.
(b) Certified copies of ordinances or amendments thereto enacted under this regular enactment procedure shall be filed with the Department of State by the clerk of the board of county commissioners within 10 days after enactment by said board and shall take effect upon filing with the Department of State. However, any ordinance may prescribe a later effective date. In lieu of delivery of the certified copies of the enacted ordinances or amendments by first-class mail, the clerk of the board of county commissioners shall transmit the enacted ordinances or amendments to the department by e-mail. The department shall confirm by e-mail the receipt and effective date of the ordinances or amendments with the clerk of the board of county commissioners.
(c) Whenever any ordinance has heretofore been enacted and a separate book of notices of intent was not kept by the clerk of the board of county commissioners, but a copy of the notice of intent was available for public inspection during the regular business hours of the clerk of the board of county commissioners, such ordinance is hereby validated.
(3) The emergency enactment procedure shall be as follows: The board of county commissioners at any regular or special meeting may enact or amend any ordinance with a waiver of the notice requirements of subsection (2) by a four-fifths vote of the membership of such board, declaring that an emergency exists and that the immediate enactment of said ordinance is necessary. However, no emergency ordinance or resolution shall be enacted which establishes or amends the actual zoning map designation of a parcel or parcels of land or changes the actual list of permitted, conditional, or prohibited uses within a zoning category. Emergency enactment procedures for land use plans adopted pursuant to part II of chapter 163 shall be pursuant to that part. Certified copies of ordinances or amendments thereto enacted under this emergency enactment procedure by a county shall be filed with the Department of State by the clerk of the board of county commissioners as soon after enactment by said board as is practicable. An emergency ordinance enacted under this procedure shall be transmitted by the clerk of the board of county commissioners by e-mail to the Department of State. It shall be deemed to be filed and shall take effect when a copy has been accepted and confirmed by the department by e-mail.
(4) Ordinances or resolutions, initiated by other than the county, that change the actual zoning map designation of a parcel or parcels of land shall be enacted pursuant to subsection (2). Ordinances or resolutions that change the actual list of permitted, conditional, or prohibited uses within a zoning category, or ordinances or resolutions initiated by the county that change the actual zoning map designation of a parcel or parcels of land shall be enacted pursuant to the following procedure:
(a) In cases in which the proposed ordinance or resolution changes the actual zoning map designation for a parcel or parcels of land involving less than 10 contiguous acres, the board of county commissioners, in addition to following the general notice requirements of subsection (2), shall direct its clerk to notify by mail each real property owner whose land the governmental agency will redesignate by enactment of the ordinance or resolution and whose address is known by reference to the latest ad valorem tax records. The notice shall state the substance of the proposed ordinance or resolution as it affects that property owner and shall set a time and place for one or more public hearings on such ordinance or resolution. Such notice shall be given at least 30 days prior to the date set for the public hearing, and a copy of such notice shall be kept available for public inspection during the regular business hours of the office of the clerk of the board of county commissioners. The board of county commissioners shall hold a public hearing on the proposed ordinance or resolution and may, upon the conclusion of the hearing, immediately adopt the ordinance or resolution.
(b) In cases in which the proposed ordinance or resolution changes the actual list of permitted, conditional, or prohibited uses within a zoning category, or changes the actual zoning map designation of a parcel or parcels of land involving 10 contiguous acres or more, the board of county commissioners shall provide for public notice and hearings as follows:
1. The board of county commissioners shall hold two advertised public hearings on the proposed ordinance or resolution. At least one hearing shall be held after 5 p.m. on a weekday, unless the board of county commissioners, by a majority plus one vote, elects to conduct that hearing at another time of day. The first public hearing shall be held at least 7 days after the day that the first advertisement is published. The second hearing shall be held at least 10 days after the first hearing and shall be advertised at least 5 days prior to the public hearing.
2. If published in the print edition of a newspaper, the required advertisements shall be no less than 2 columns wide by 10 inches long in a standard size or a tabloid size newspaper, and the headline in the advertisement shall be in a type no smaller than 18 point. The advertisement shall not be placed in that portion of the newspaper where legal notices and classified advertisements appear. The advertisement shall be placed in a newspaper in the county and of general interest and readership in the community pursuant to chapter 50. It is the legislative intent that, whenever possible, the advertisement shall appear in a newspaper that is published at least weekly unless the only newspaper in the community is published less than weekly. The advertisement shall be in substantially the following form:

NOTICE OF (TYPE OF) CHANGE

The   (name of local governmental unit)   proposes to adopt the following by ordinance or resolution:  (title of ordinance or resolution)  .

A public hearing on the ordinance or resolution will be held on   (date and time)   at   (meeting place)  .

Except for amendments which change the actual list of permitted, conditional, or prohibited uses within a zoning category, the advertisement shall contain a geographic location map which clearly indicates the area within the local government covered by the proposed ordinance or resolution. The map shall include major street names as a means of identification of the general area. If published in the print edition of the newspaper, the map must be part of any online notice made pursuant to s. 50.0211.

3. In lieu of publishing the advertisements set out in this paragraph, the board of county commissioners may mail a notice to each person owning real property within the area covered by the ordinance or resolution. Such notice shall clearly explain the proposed ordinance or resolution and shall notify the person of the time, place, and location of both public hearings on the proposed ordinance or resolution.
(5) Five years after the adoption of any ordinance or resolution adopted after the effective date of this act, no cause of action shall be commenced as to the validity of an ordinance or resolution based on the failure to strictly adhere to the provisions contained in this section. After 5 years, substantial compliance with the provisions contained in this section shall be a defense to an action to invalidate an ordinance or resolution for failure to comply with the provisions contained in this section. Without limitation, the common law doctrines of laches and waiver are valid defenses to any action challenging the validity of an ordinance or resolution based on failure to strictly adhere to the provisions contained in this section. Standing to initiate a challenge to the adoption of an ordinance or resolution based on a failure to strictly adhere to the provisions contained in this section shall be limited to a person who was entitled to actual or constructive notice at the time the ordinance or resolution was adopted. Nothing herein shall be construed to affect the standing requirements under part II of chapter 163.
(6) The notice procedures required by this section are established as minimum notice procedures.
History.—s. 1, ch. 69-32; ss. 10, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 1, ch. 70-422; s. 1, ch. 76-155; s. 1, ch. 77-331; s. 1, ch. 89-267; s. 1, ch. 90-152; s. 1, ch. 95-198; s. 2, ch. 95-310; s. 4, ch. 2012-212; s. 3, ch. 2013-192; s. 13, ch. 2021-17.

F.S. 125.66 on Google Scholar

F.S. 125.66 on Casetext

Amendments to 125.66


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 125.66
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 125.66.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

10 Cases from Casetext:Date Descending

U.S. Supreme Court11th Cir. - Ct. App.11th Cir. - MD FL11th Cir. - ND FL11th Cir. - SD FLFed. Reg.Secondary Sources - All

  1. Oakes v. Collier Cnty.

    Case No.: 2:20-cv-568-FtM-38NPM (M.D. Fla. Nov. 10, 2020)
    • Count 9: Violation of Florida Statute § 125.66
    PAGE 3

  2. Neptune Beach FL Realty, LLC v. City of Neptune Beach

    No. 1D19-2137 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Aug. 3, 2020)
    local self-government not inconsistent with general law, or with special law approved by vote of the electors." Art. VIII, § 1(f)-(g), Fla. Const. Article VIII, section 1(i) provides that "Each county ordinance shall be filed with the custodian of state records and shall become effective at such time thereafter as is provided by general law ." (Emphasis added). And in fact, every zoning decision made by local governments carries the imprimatur of state law: "In exercising the ordinance-making powers conferred by s.1, Art. VIII, of the state constitution, counties shall adhere to the procedures prescribed herein." § 125.66(1), Fla. Stat. (2019) (emphasis added). Any reader who simply searches the term "zoning" in the Florida Statutes in the Florida Legislature's excellent "Online Sunshine" website will receive 176 returns. See Online Sunshine, http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm (last visited May 28, 2020).
    PAGE 5

  3. Evans Rowing Club, LLC v. City of Jacksonville

    300 So. 3d 1249 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)   Cited 2 times
    Judge Wolf's concurrence correctly notes that the constitutional amendment adopted in the last election abolishing deference to administrative actions refers to "a state statute or rule[,]" but the concurring opinion incorrectly asserts that article V, section 21 of the Florida Constitution "has nothing to do with local government decision making, nor does it affect the scope of the second level review of local zoning decisions by the appellate courts of this state." Concurring opinion , page 2 . Quite the contrary, the organic law now prohibits deference to local zoning decisions because the constitution itself provides that all zoning decisions must be compliant with general law . "The board of county commissioners of a county not operating under a charter may enact, in a manner prescribed by general law, county ordinances not inconsistent with general or special law ... Counties operating under county charters shall have all powers of local self-government not inconsistent with general law, or with special law approved by vote of the electors." Art. VIII, § 1(f)-(g), Fla. Const. Article VIII, section 1 (i) provides that "Each county ordinance shall be filed with the custodian…

  4. Braden Woods Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. Mavard Trading, Ltd.

    277 So. 3d 664 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)   Cited 1 times
    The remainder of section 125.66(4) includes provisions for public hearings before the Board and the requirements for providing notice. Section 125.66(2)(a) also provides for a public hearing with notice when the Board amends any ordinance.
    PAGE 675

  5. Decker v. Citrus Cnty.

    Case No: 5:15-cv-24-Oc-30PRL (M.D. Fla. Nov. 10, 2015)   Cited 1 times
    Plaintiff seeks declaratory judgment that Citrus County Ordinance 2012-06, which contains the most current definition of gross floor area, is void because the County did not enact the ordinance in accordance with the procedures established by Florida Statute § 125.66(4)(b)(2), which provides the language that should be used in publishing notices of hearings regarding amendments to ordinances. (Doc. 1 at 29-31). Specifically, § 125.66(4)(b)(2) states that the title of the notice should read "NOTICE OF (TYPE OF) CHANGE." Here, the heading of the notice regarding the change to the ordinance defining gross floor area stated, "Notice of Intent to Consider an Ordinance Regulating Land Development in Citrus County to be Known as the Citrus County Land Development Code." (Doc. 1, Ex. T). According to Plaintiff, because this heading did not indicate that it reflected a change, it was not in substantial compliance with § 125.66(4)(b)(2). (Id. at 29).
    PAGE 14

  6. Neumont v. Florida

    610 F.3d 1249 (11th Cir. 2010)   Cited 4 times
    Plaintiffs contend that even if Defendant followed Florida law, Plaintiffs did not have "adequate notice and a meaningful opportunity to be heard as a matter of federal law." Plaintiffs raised no constitutional attack on the pertinent Florida statute, and so the constitutionality of Florida Statutes § 125.66 — setting out procedures under which a county is empowered to enact an ordinance — is not properly before us. By the way, this court has addressed the constitutionality of this statute before in a due process context and concluded it was not contrary to the Federal Constitution. First Assembly of God of Naples, Fla., Inc. v. Collier County, Fla., 20 F.3d 419, 421-22 (11th Cir. 1994).
    PAGE 1252

  7. Bay County v. Town of Cedar Grove

    992 So. 2d 164 (Fla. 2008)   Cited 5 times
    Read in light of the referenced statutory provisions, section 163.346 is clear and unambiguous. Section 163.346 specifies that the governing body of a municipality or county must give public notice and mail a timely notice to each relevant taxing authority before adopting resolutions pursuant to the Community Redevelopment Act. This public notice is subject to the standards set forth in section 166.041(3)(a) or 125.66( 2). Although sections 166.041(3)(a) and 125.66( 2) include additional procedures for enacting municipal and county ordinances respectively, they contain the identical public notice requirements. Both require (1) that at least ten days' notice be given; (2) that notice be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the pertinent county or municipality; (3) that a copy of the published notice be available for inspection by the public; (4) that the notice state the date, time, and place of the meeting; the title or titles of the proposed ordinance; and the place or places where the proposed ordinance may be inspected by the public; and (5) that the notice advise that interested parties may appear and be heard at the meeting. §§ 166.041(3)(a)…

  8. Neumont v. State

    967 So. 2d 822 (Fla. 2007)   Cited 2 times
    Article VIII, section 1 of the Florida Constitution authorizes counties to enact local ordinances: "The board of county commissioners of a county . . . may enact, in a manner prescribed by general law, county ordinances." Section 125.66, Florida Statutes (1995), establishes the procedures by which ordinances may be enacted: "In exercising the ordinance-making powers conferred by s. 1, Art. VIII of the State Constitution, counties shall adhere to the procedures prescribed herein." § 125.66( 1), Fla. Stat. (1995). Section 125.66 imposes detailed notice and hearing requirements depending on the type of ordinance proposed. Three subsections are particularly relevant here: (1) section 125.66( 2), governing the "regular enactment procedure" for ordinances that do not involve land use districts; (2) section 125.66( 4)(a), governing ordinances that change the zoning map designation for parcels of fewer than ten acres; and (3) section 125.66( 4)(b), governing ordinances that change the zoning map designation of parcels larger than ten acres, or which change the list of permitted, conditional, or prohibited uses within a zoning…

  9. Neumont v. Florida

    451 F.3d 1284 (11th Cir. 2006)   Cited 7 times
    Plaintiffs argue that the Ordinance should be void ab initio because Monroe amended the Ordinance during the enactment process in a manner that violated section 125.66. The district court concluded that Monroe did not violate section 125.66.
    PAGE 1286

  10. Neumont v. Monroe County, Florida

    CASE NO. 99-10054-CIV-PAINE/VITUNAC (S.D. Fla. May. 21, 2003)   Cited 1 times
    Defendant contends that it complied with Section 125.66 in enacting the Ordinance; Plaintiffs contend that defendant did not comply with Section 125.66. At the hearing, plaintiffs categorized their arguments as "Technical Requirements of 125.66 Regarding Advertised Notice" and "Notice and Hearing Violations." The court will address its analysis in such terminology, turning first to plaintiffs' contention that defendant violated the notice and hearing provisions of Section 125.66.

    Cases from cite.case.law:

    J. NEUMONT, F. J. v. STATE OF FLORIDA,, 610 F.3d 1249 (11th Cir. 2010)

    . . . Fourteenth Amendments, (4) the Ordinance is void because it was enacted in violation of Florida Statutes § 125.66 . . . certified this question to the Florida Supreme Court: Whether, for purposes of Florida Statutes section 125.66 . . . constitutional attack on the pertinent Florida statute, and so the constitutionality of Florida Statutes § 125.66 . . .

    BAY COUNTY, v. TOWN OF CEDAR GROVE, v., 992 So. 2d 164 (Fla. 2008)

    . . . Because section 163.346 incorporates only the public notice requirements of sections 166.041(3)(a) and 125.66 . . . Finally, section 125.66(2), which applies to counties, provides in relevant part: (a) ... . . . This public notice is subject to the standards set forth in section 166.041(3)(a) or 125.66(2). . . . Although sections 166.041(3)(a) and 125.66(2) include additional procedures for enacting municipal and . . . the notice advise that interested parties may appear and be heard at the meeting. §§ 166.041(3)(a); 125.66 . . .

    J. NEUMONT, v. STATE, 967 So. 2d 822 (Fla. 2007)

    . . . VIII of the State Constitution, counties shall adhere to the procedures prescribed herein.” § 125.66( . . . Section 125.66(2): the Regular Enactment Procedure Section 125.66(2) governs the enactment process for . . . Section 125.66(4)(b) contains several important provisions. . . . They derive this standard from the language of section 125.66(4)(b). . . . They are required only for regular ordinances, which are governed by section 125.66(2). . . .

    J. NEUMONT, F. J. v. FLORIDA,, 451 F.3d 1284 (11th Cir. 2006)

    . . . Among their claims, Plaintiffs contend that Monroe violated Florida Statutes section 125.66 when it made . . . Florida Statutes section 125.66 sets out the procedures under which a county is empowered to enact an . . . because Monroe amended the Ordinance during the enactment process in a manner that violated section 125.66 . . . The district court concluded that Monroe did not violate section 125.66. . . . Section 125.66(4)(b) states, in part: In cases in which the proposed ordinance or resolution changes . . .

    J. NEUMONT, v. MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA,, 280 F. Supp. 2d 1367 (S.D. Fla. 2003)

    . . . Section 125.66, Fla. . . . Stat. § 125.66(4)(b). . . . that defendant did not comply with Section 125.66. . . . Fla Stat. § 125.66(4)(b)(2). . . . Rather, defendant complied with all notice and hearing requirements of § 125.66. . . . .

    J. NEUMONT, v. MONROE COUNTY,, 242 F. Supp. 2d 1265 (S.D. Fla. 2002)

    . . . Judgment as to whether Ordinance is void ab initio because enacted in violation of Florida Statutes § 125.66 . . . Florida Statutes § 125.66 governs the procedures by which a county is empowered to enact ordinances. . . . Prior to enacting the Ordinance, and pursuant to the requirements of § 125.66, Defendant advertised and . . . Plaintiffs argue that Defendant did not comply with § 125.66 because it failed to properly notice public . . . Stat. §§ 125.66 and 125.68). . . .

    ORANGE COUNTY, v. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION,, 823 So. 2d 732 (Fla. 2002)

    . . . the public health, safety, and general welfare of the community under proceedings as provided in s. 125.66 . . .

    ALEXIS, INC. M L v. PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, 194 F. Supp. 2d 1336 (M.D. Fla. 2002)

    . . . Count VIII); and the ordinances were enacted improperly and in violation of Florida Statutes section 125.66 . . .

    FLEEMAN, v. CITY OF ST. AUGUSTINE BEACH,, 728 So. 2d 1178 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

    . . . 163.3184(15)(c) for such plan amendments if the local government complies with the provisions in s. 125.66 . . . notice by publication of a public hearing are required to all affected property owners under section 125.66 . . .

    UNIVERSITY BOOKS AND VIDEOS, INC. d b a v. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, DBJ ENTERPRISES, INC. d b a v. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, BOOK AND VIDEO CORP. v. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, MIAMI FACTOR, INC. v. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, PRIME TIME BOOK AND VIDEO, INC. v. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, PERRINE ADULT BOOK AND VIDEO, INC. v. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, SN CORP. v. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, BIRD ROAD BOOK AND VIDEO, v. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, HOME OF THE BRAVE LAND OF THE FREE v. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, XZ, INC. a v. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, MR. OLIVER, INC. a d b a v. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY,, 930 F. Supp. 1534 (S.D. Fla. 1996)

    . . . interior structure of a btdlding an ordinance that “affects the use of land” within the meaning of Section 125.66 . . .

    MARK DUNNING INDUSTRIES, INC. v. J. PERRY, H. B. J., 890 F. Supp. 1504 (M.D. Ala. 1995)

    . . . In accordance with Section 125.66(2), Florida Statutes, a certified copy of this ordinance shall be filed . . .

    A. McLEOD, v. ORANGE COUNTY,, 645 So. 2d 411 (Fla. 1994)

    . . . to procedures established in section 166.041, Florida Statutes (1991), and not pursuant to section 125.66 . . . Section 125.66(1) enumerates the procedures a county must follow when enacting an ordinance. . . . Section 125.66(1) specifically states that “in exei’cising the ordinance-making powers conferred by s . . . We find that the County properly enacted the ordinance pursuant to procedures established in section 125.66 . . .

    N. FEDERAL HIGHWAY, INC. d b a v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF BROWARD COUNTY, a B., 646 So. 2d 215 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

    . . . Section 125.66, Flori da Statutes (1993), does not provide clear guidance for county governments in determining . . . INTERIOR STRUCTURE OF A BUILDING AN ORDINANCE THAT “AFFECTS THE USE OF LAND” WITHIN THE MEANING OF SECTION 125.66 . . . argue that the ordinance was either a zoning law or a land-use ordinance within the meaning of section 125.66 . . . relatively minor changes in the interior of the building makes the ordinance a “land-use regulation.” § 125.66 . . . indicates that the conduct portions of the Broward County ordinance can stand even though the section 125.66 . . . governs the enactment of municipal zoning ordinances, not county ordinances which are governed by section 125.66 . . . Chapter 90-152 amends only section 125.66 which covers county ordinances. . In A.B.T. Corp. v. . . .

    FIRST ASSEMBLY OF GOD OF NAPLES, FLORIDA, INC. v. COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA,, 20 F.3d 419 (11th Cir. 1994)

    . . . . § 125.66 Fla.Stat.; § 125.68 Fla.Stat. . . . Section 125.66 Fla.Stat. provides in pertinent part: (1) In exercising the ordinance-making powers conferred . . .

    INTERNATIONAL EATERIES OF AMERICA, INC. v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, DMH, INC. v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, BORDO, INC. v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, N. FEDERAL HIGHWAY, INC. a d b a v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA,, 838 F. Supp. 580 (S.D. Fla. 1993)

    . . . Sections 125.66(6) and 163.3194(2) specify procedures that a county board of commissioners must observe . . . First, section 125.66(6) does not require that an ordinance qualify as a zoning ordinance in order to . . . Fla.Stat.Ann. § 125.66(6) (“Ordinances ... initiated by the board of county commissioners ... which do . . . They thus appear to “affect the use of land” within the meaning of section 125.66(6). . . . Defendants rely on then-arguments made in connection with section 125.66(6). . . .

    T. J. R. HOLDING CO. INC. a d b a v. ALACHUA COUNTY, a, 617 So. 2d 798 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

    . . . erred in ruling that Ordinance 91-5 did not affect the use of land within the meaning of subsection 125.66 . . . Florida Statutes (1991), did not create a de facto change in zoning within the meaning of subsection 125.66 . . . (5) or (6), and was properly enacted as a general ordinance in accordance with subsections 125.66(1) . . . Recognizing there is no reported case law construing this operative language in subsection 125.66(6), . . . There is nothing so mysterious about the phrase “affects the use of land” as used in subsection 125.66 . . .

    FIRST ASSEMBLY OF GOD OF NAPLES, FLORIDA, INC. v. COLLIER COUNTY,, 775 F. Supp. 383 (M.D. Fla. 1991)

    . . . remaining claims are that the zoning ordinances are void for failure to comply with Florida Statutes §§ 125.66 . . .

    REDNER v. STATE OF FLORIDA, 47 Fla. Supp. 2d 76 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1991)

    . . . this Court’s resolution is whether Ordinance 88-10 is a zoning ordinance within the meaning of section 125.66 . . . hearing held on February 16, 1988 did not conform to the form advertisement as required by section 125.66 . . . for the second public hearing again did not conform to the form advertisement as required by section 125.66 . . . (App 32) (emphasis supplied) In that under section 125.66 the only time two public hearings are mandated . . . Section 125.66(6), Fla. Stat. (1990). . . .

    WASTE AID SYSTEMS, INC. a v. CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA, a E. L., 613 F. Supp. 102 (M.D. Fla. 1985)

    . . . . § 125.66(2). . . . Section 125.66(2) does not in any way require that the Board make a determination as to the legitimacy . . . Section 125.66(2), Florida Statutes, states: The regular enactment procedure shall be as follows: The . . .

    NEFF v. BOWMER, 1 Fla. Supp. 2d 104 (Hillsborough Cty. Cir. Ct. 1981)

    . . . . — Contrary to the Board’s suggestion, §125.66, Fla. . . .

    M. SPEER v. OLSON, 367 So. 2d 207 (Fla. 1978)

    . . . project as defined in s. 125.011, either within or without the territorial boundaries of the county. 125.66 . . . enacted the ordinance on November 1,1977, pursuant to the emergency procedure contained in Section 125.66 . . .

    W. A. DAVIS v. G. GRONEMEYER, 251 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1971)

    . . . . §§ 125.66, .67 and .68, F.S.A. . . .

    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. NEW ENGLAND ELECTRIC SYSTEM, 390 U.S. 207 (U.S. 1968)

    . . . were as follows (1958 and 1959 figures): Sales — 51.8 and 60.4 mcf/customer; Revenues — $112.59 and $125.66 . . .

    T. DELBRIDGE, v. UNITED STATES, 262 F.2d 710 (D.C. Cir. 1958)

    . . . to you, members of the jury, would the newspapers have reported $1,175 if the actual theft was $1,-125.66 . . .