Florida Statutes

Fla. Stat. § 163.3243 (2025)

Enforcement.

✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us JustiaFla. Statutes CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

163.3243 Enforcement.—Any party or aggrieved or adversely affected person as defined in s. 163.3215(2) may file an action for injunctive relief in the circuit court where the local government is located to enforce the terms of a development agreement or to challenge compliance of the agreement with ss. 163.3220-163.3243.

History.—s. 31, ch. 86-191; s. 27, ch. 2011-139.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2002–2023 · leading case: Leon Cnty. v. Gluesenkamp, 873 So. 2d 460 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Leon Cnty. v. Gluesenkamp, 873 So. 2d 460 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). · cites it 2× “NOTES [1] The County also argues that damages as a remedy for breach of contract are not permissible because section 163.3243, Florida Statutes (1997), which is part of the Florida Local Government Development Act, prescribes that an aggrieved or adversely affected person may…”

Combs v. City of Naples, 834 So. 2d 194 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002). · cites it 3× “Rather, count 1 is an action filed pursuant to section 163.3243 of the Development Agreement Act challenging a development agreement, not a development order.”

Citizens for Responsible Dev., Inc. & Herbert Simpson v. The City of Dania Beach, Florida, Broward Cnty., Florida, & Dania Ent. Ctr., LLC (Fla. 4th DCA 2022). · cites it 10× “3243, Florida Statutes, provides: Any party or aggrieved or adversely affected person as defined in s.”

Citizens for Responsible Dev., Inc. & Herbert Simpson v. The City of Dania Beach, Florida, Broward Cnty., Florida, & Dania Ent. Ctr., LLC (Fla. 4th DCA 2023). “The plaintiffs sought injunctive relief in two other counts, pursuant to section 163.3243. They requested the court declare the 2011 and 2014 approvals of the development agreements void because the City failed to comply with the public notice and hearing requirements of section…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.