Cases from cite.case.law:

IN RE TRADER JOE S TUNA LITIGATION, 289 F. Supp. 3d 1074 (C.D. Cal. 2017)

. . . . § 130.14(b). . . . of only violating the "federally mandated minimum standard of fill" set forth in title 21, sections 130.14 . . . labels had properly contained the statement 'Below Standard in Fill,' " as required by title 21, section 130.14 . . . that the cans were "Below Standard in Fill," which it did not. 21 C.F.R. § 161.190(c)(4) ; 21 C.F.R. § 130.14 . . .

COBINE, v. CITY OF EUREKA,, 250 F. Supp. 3d 423 (N.D. Cal. 2017)

. . . The ordinance, now codified at Eureka Municipal Code Section 130.14, provides that “ ‘no Person shall . . . The new ordinance, Eureka Municipal Code Section Í30Í4 (“Section 130.14”), entitled “Storage of Personal . . . Section 130.14 provides that “ ‘no Person shall Store Personal Property in Public Areas,’ and ‘All Stored . . . on public property and that they face a credible threat that Defendants will try to enforce Section 130.14 . . . the Court could. adjudicate an as-applied challenge to the immediate destruction provision of Section 130.14 . . .

NEMPHOS, C. G. N. a v. NESTLE WATERS NORTH AMERICA, INC. USA,, 775 F.3d 616 (4th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 130.14(a). . . .

HENDRICKS, v. STARKIST CO., 30 F. Supp. 3d 917 (N.D. Cal. 2014)

. . . ” in the regulation, “the label shall bear the general statement of substandard fill provided in §. 130.14 . . . Section 130.14(b), in turn, requires the “Below Standard in Fill” label statement to be a specified type . . . appears so conspicuously as to be easily seen under customary conditions of purchase.” 21 C.F.R. § 130.14 . . .

MOSS, v. VOYAGER INS. COS., 43 F. Supp. 2d 1298 (M.D. Ala. 1999)

. . . she make twenty-three monthly payments of $150.00 beginning on June 1, 1996 and a final payment of $130.14 . . .

JOHN D. COPANOS AND SONS, INC. v. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION E. M. D. Ph. D., 854 F.2d 510 (D.C. Cir. 1988)

. . . . § 130.14(b) (1971). . . .

EDISON PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY, INC. v. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION AND WELFARE, W., 513 F.2d 1063 (D.C. Cir. 1975)

. . . . § 130.14 specifies the contents of notice of hearing. . . . . . § 130.14(b) states that “[w]hen it clearly appears from the data in the application and from the reasons . . .

STERLING DRUG, INC. v. W. WEINBERGER, M., 384 F. Supp. 557 (S.D.N.Y. 1974)

. . . . § 130.14(b) (1973) provides, inter alia, that a request for a hearing must be accompanied by “a well-organized . . .

STERLING DRUG INC. v. W. WEINBERGER, M., 503 F.2d 675 (2d Cir. 1974)

. . . Under the FDA regulations, 21 C.F.R. 130.14(b), a hearing can be denied only if the petitioners fail . . . Petitioners duly submitted a written appearance requesting a hearing pursuant to 21 C.F.R. 130.14(b) . . . The regulation, 21 C.F.R. 130.14(a), spells out the due notice requirement as follows: “The notice to . . . In that case the Supreme Court held that 21 U.S.C. § 355(e) and 21 C.F.R. 130.14 set up a type of summary . . . ) and (e) and 21 C.F.R. 135.15 which parallel the provisions of 21 U.S.C. § 355(e) and- 21 C.F.R. § 130.14 . . .

COOPER LABORATORIES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER, FEDERAL FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION,, 501 F.2d 772 (D.C. Cir. 1974)

. . . . § 130.14(b) (April 1, 1973). . . . See also 21 C.F.R. § 130.14(b) (April 1, 1973). . . . . It is stated in 21 C.F.R. § 130.14(b) : When it clearly appears from the data in the application and . . .

HESS CLARK, DIVISION OF RHODIA, INC. v. FOOD DRUG ADMINISTRATION VINELAND LABORATORIES, INC. v. W. WEINBERGER,, 495 F.2d 975 (D.C. Cir. 1974)

. . . presentation could the Commissioner fairly impose upon the petitioner the heavy sanctions of 21 CFR § 130.14 . . . The Notice stated: . 21 C.F.R. § 130.14(a) (1973). . 37 Fed.Reg. 15,747 (August 4,1972). . . . . provision is in the final paragraph of § 360b (e)(1). . 38 Fed.Reg. 10,488 (April 27, 1973). . 21 C.F.R. § 130.14 . . . See note 25, supra, and accompanying text. . 21 C.F.R. § 130.14(b) (1973). . . .