Cases from cite.case.law:

CAN, a Ay l a Ay l a Ay l a a v. GOODRICH PUMP ENGINE CONTROL SYSTEMS, INC., 711 F. Supp. 2d 241 (D. Conn. 2010)

. . . Compare 18 Moore's Federal Practice § 132.05[6][a]-[b] (Supp.2010) (stating that issue preclusion may . . .

UNITED DISASTER RESPONSE, LLC, v. OMNI PINNACLE, LLC, v. St., 511 F.3d 476 (5th Cir. 2007)

. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 132.05[8](a) (3d ed.1999), we do not have jurisdiction to address . . .

RAMIREZ ZAYAS, v. PUERTO RICO,, 400 F. Supp. 2d 410 (D.P.R. 2005)

. . . .; James WM Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice vol. 18, § 132.05[7], 184 (3d ed., Lexis-Nexis 2005). . . .

CUDMORE, v. HOWELL, II, C. III,, 232 B.R. 335 (E.D.N.C. 1999)

. . . (quoting 18 Moore’s Federal Practice § 132.05(1)). . . .

F. KOSHOREK, v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, 318 F.2d 364 (3d Cir. 1963)

. . . See 2 Gray, supra, at § 132.05, p. 1365. . . . .