Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 132.32 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 132.32 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 132.32

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XI
COUNTY ORGANIZATION AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS
Chapter 132
GENERAL REFUNDING LAW
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 132.32
132.32 Replacement of bonds.In case any coupon bonds and the coupons thereunto appertaining, or any registered bonds, shall become mutilated or be destroyed, a new bond shall be prepared at the expense of the applicant, and be executed and delivered, of like tenor, amount, date and series in exchange and substitution for the mutilated or destroyed bond or coupons. In case of destruction the applicant for a substituted bond shall furnish to the unit satisfactory evidence of its destruction and shall also give such security and indemnity as may be required for it.
History.s. 34, ch. 15772, 1931; CGL 1936 Supp. 2383(33).

F.S. 132.32 on Google Scholar

F.S. 132.32 on Casetext

Amendments to 132.32


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 132.32
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 132.32.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

ST. LUKE S METHODIST HOSPITAL, v. G. THOMPSON,, 182 F. Supp. 2d 765 (N.D. Iowa 2001)

. . . Luke’s had an average length of stay of 20 days compared to a national average of 132.32, Medicare utilization . . . Luke’s had an average length of stay of 20 days compared to a national average of 132.32, Medicare utilization . . .

In PHILLIPS, t a CREDITWAY OF AMERICA, v. M. PHILLIPS,, 55 B.R. 663 (Bankr. W.D. Va. 1985)

. . . which was also a security agreement, provided for total payment of $3,175.68, with monthly payments of $132.32 . . .

WALDEN, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND COMPANY,, 654 F.2d 443 (5th Cir. 1981)

. . . See 4A Moore’s Federal Practice 132.32[2]. . . .

WILLIAM F. OVERLY AND LYLE L. JONES, RECEIVERS OF W. F. OVERLY SONS, A CORPORATION, v. THE UNITED STATES, 87 Ct. Cl. 231 (Ct. Cl. 1938)

. . . April 5, 1934, the plaintiffs submitted to the contracting officer a claim for extra compensation of $132.32 . . . the contract that no discussion is necessary and the plaintiffs are entitled to recover the sum of $132.32 . . .