Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 136.03 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 136.03 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 136.03

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XI
COUNTY ORGANIZATION AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS
Chapter 136
COUNTY DEPOSITORIES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 136.03
136.03 County funds to be paid into depositories; triplicate receipts to be issued.Tax collectors and all other persons having, receiving, or collecting any money payable to the county funds not otherwise provided for, shall pay the same to the depositories qualified to receive the same. Each depository receiving any money, as provided in this chapter, shall make receipt for same in triplicate, one copy of which the depository will carefully preserve and keep, one copy to be given to the person from whom the money was received, and one copy to be given to the board for which the money was received.
History.s. 4, ch. 6932, 1915; RGS 1561; CGL 2406; s. 5, ch. 81-285.

F.S. 136.03 on Google Scholar

F.S. 136.03 on Casetext

Amendments to 136.03


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 136.03
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 136.03.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 136.03

Total Results: 16

Government Employees Insurance Company v. Glassco Inc.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2024-09-25T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: case. § 627.7289, Fla. Stat. (2024); ch. 2023-136, § 3, Laws of Florida.) Glassco’s own employees

Brock v. Board of County Commissioners

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2009-09-28T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 21 So. 3d 844, 2009 WL 3012705

Snippet: the funds in a qualified county depository. See § 136.03. The Clerk’s duty is to keep accounts of the funds

RS v. Department of Children and Families

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2007-05-23T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 956 So. 2d 1242

Snippet: child's best interests will be harmed. § 39.0136(3). The unavailability of evidence does not constitute

Alexander v. Tandem Staffing Solutions

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2004-07-07T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 881 So. 2d 607

Snippet: Oregon State Bar Legal Ethics Comm., Formal Op.1994-136 at 3. The plain language of our rule also supports

Mayes v. Moore

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2002-09-19T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 827 So. 2d 967

Snippet: quot; Fletcher v. Peck, 6 Cranch 87, 10 U.S. 87, 136, 3 L.Ed. 162 (1810). As mentioned above, the conditional

STATE, AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE v. Estabrook

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1998-05-13T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 711 So. 2d 161

Snippet: plan," id. at 1312 (quoting 42 C.F.R. § 433.136(3))—as the very purpose of UME payments is to reimburse…Medicaid-provided services, see 42 C.F.R. § 433.136(3); and (2) once it is determined that the entity …expenditures made in this case. See 42 C.F.R. § 433.136(3); § 409.901(19), Fla. Stat. (1991); see also 42

Burdick v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1991-07-25T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 584 So. 2d 1035

Snippet: the Florida Supreme Court. NOTES [1] Ch. 71-136, §§ 3, 5, Laws of Fla. [2] Since 1988, of course, a

Walter E. Heller & Co. Southeast v. Williams

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1984-04-02T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 450 So. 2d 521

Snippet: directing levy and seizure were added in 1975, Ch. 75-136, § 3, Laws of Fla., according to the statute, to "

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1979-12-30T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: loan associations continues to be governed by ss. 136.03-136.06(1), 215.85(5), and 665.321, F. S. See also

Coulter Electronics, Inc. v. Dept. of Revenue

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1978-12-28T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 365 So. 2d 806

Snippet: 1973 at page vii; 34 Fla.Jur., Statutes, § 3 at 136. [3] To like effect is Shuman v. State, 358 So.2d

Howell v. Cottage-Ette Mfg. Co.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1966-04-27T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 186 So. 2d 1, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3649

Snippet: . State, ex rel. Quigg, 156 Fla. 189, 23 So.2d 136. *3****** "The fact-finding arbiter is usually

Watson v. Centro Espanol De Tampa

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1947-04-29T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 30 So. 2d 288, 158 Fla. 796, 1947 Fla. LEXIS 638

Snippet: 817, Stuart Circle Hosp. Corp. v. Curry, 173 Va. 136,3 S.E.2d 153; O'Neil v. State, 115 Tenn. 427,

Orange County v. Robinson

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1933-07-13T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 149 So. 604, 111 Fla. 403

Snippet: amounts allowed as compensation, the sum of $20,136.03 during the period beginning on May 21, 1927, and

Orange County v. Robinson

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1933-07-13T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 111 Fla. 402, 149 So. 604, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 1997

Snippet: amounts allowed as compensation, the sum of $20,-136.03 during the period beginning on May 21, 1927, and

Pickett v. Russell

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1900-01-14T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 42 Fla. 116

Snippet: State ex rel. Smith v. Burbridge, 24 Fla. 112, text 136, 3 South. Rep. 869. VI. It is also contended, and

Osborne v. VanHorn

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1848-01-15T00:00:02-07:52:58

Citation: 2 Fla. 360

Snippet: produced of past expenses if any.”— Hoffman’s M. C., 136. 3 Br. Ch. R., 88. 1 Br. Ch. R., 179. In the case