Syfert Injury Law Firm

Brock v. Board of County Commissioners

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2009-09-28

Citation: 21 So. 3d 844, 2009 WL 3012705

Snippet: the funds in a qualified county depository. See § 136.03. The Clerk’s duty is to keep accounts of the funds

RS v. Department of Children and Families

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-05-23

Citation: 956 So. 2d 1242

Snippet: the child's best interests will be harmed. § 39.0136(3). The unavailability of evidence does not constitute

Mayes v. Moore

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-09-19

Citation: 827 So. 2d 967, 2002 WL 31084622

Snippet: departments." Fletcher v. Peck, 6 Cranch 87, 10 U.S. 87, 136, 3 L.Ed. 162 (1810). As mentioned above, the conditional

STATE, AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE v. Estabrook

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1998-05-13

Citation: 711 So. 2d 161, 1998 WL 236325

Snippet: state plan," id. at 1312 (quoting 42 C.F.R. § 433.136(3))—as the very purpose of UME payments is to reimburse

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1979-12-31

Snippet: loan associations continues to be governed by ss. 136.03-136.06(1), 215.85(5), and 665.321, F. S. See also

Coulter Electronics, Inc. v. Dept. of Revenue

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1978-12-29

Citation: 365 So. 2d 806, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 17150

Snippet: 1973 at page vii; 34 Fla.Jur., Statutes, § 3 at 136. [3] To like effect is Shuman v. State, 358 So.2d

Howell v. Cottage-Ette Mfg. Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1966-04-27

Citation: 186 So. 2d 1, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3649

Snippet: State, ex rel. Quigg, 156 Fla. 189, 23 So.2d 136. *3****** "The fact-finding arbiter is usually in a

Watson v. Centro Espanol De Tampa

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1947-04-29

Citation: 30 So. 2d 288, 158 Fla. 796, 1947 Fla. LEXIS 638

Snippet: 817, Stuart Circle Hosp. Corp. v. Curry, 173 Va. 136,3 S.E.2d 153; O'Neil v. State, 115 Tenn. 427, 90 S

Orange County v. Robinson

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1933-07-13

Citation: 111 Fla. 402, 149 So. 604, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 1997

Snippet: amounts allowed as compensation, the sum of $20,-136.03 during the period beginning on May 21, 1927, and

Orange County v. Robinson

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1933-07-13

Citation: 149 So. 604, 111 Fla. 403

Snippet: amounts allowed as compensation, the sum of $20,136.03 during the period beginning on May 21, 1927, and

Pickett v. Russell

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1900-01-15

Citation: 42 Fla. 116

Snippet: State ex rel. Smith v. Burbridge, 24 Fla. 112, text 136, 3 South. Rep. 869. VI. It is also contended, and

Osborne v. VanHorn

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1848-01-15

Citation: 2 Fla. 360

Snippet: produced of past expenses if any.”— Hoffman’s M. C., 136. 3 Br. Ch. R., 88. 1 Br. Ch. R., 179. In the case